vikipeediya:nirvaachit soochi ummeedavaar

nirvaachit soochi
nirvaachit soochi aavashyakataaeain (vaarta) • nirvaachit soochi ummeedavaar (vaarta) • mukhaprushth mein nirvaachit soochi (vaarta)

nirvaachit soochi ummeedavaar

निर्वाचित सूची उम्मीदवार का सिम्बल

yeh taalika hindi vikipeediya mein nirvaachit soochi banane ke liye naamaankit ummeedavaaron ki taalika hai. soochi ko naamaankit karne ke liye soochi ke vaarta prushth par {{nirvaachit soochi ummeedavaar}} laga kar prushth sahej dein. saheje hue prushth par aapko "naamaankan aarambh karein" par klik karna hai. jo prushth khul kar aae usamein {{subst:naya nirvaachit soochi prastaav|soochi ka naam jise aap naamaankit kar rahe hain|~~~~|aapki tippaniyaaain}} jod dein. naamaankan prushth ke nirmaan ke pashchaat {{vikipeediya:nirvaachit soochi ummeedavaar/naamaankit lekh ka naam}} ko is prushth ke "naamaankan" anubhaag mein sabse oopar jod dein.

nirvaachit banane ke pehle soochi ko nirvaachit soochi aavashyakataaon ko poora karna hoga. aap naamit soochi ke ke aage (soochi ke sudhaar se sambandhit) apne vichaar ya tippaniyaaain bhi daal sakte hain. apne mat ki shuruaat karein *'''samarthan''' ya *'''virodh''' ke saath karein.

puraalekh 1

naamaankan

raani mukharji ki filmein

(prastaavak: ☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 17:20, 24 June 2014 (UTC))

angreji mein nirvaachit soochi ka anuvaad prushth.

tippaniyaaain

  1. " unhonne apne pita Ram mukharji nirdeshit baangla film biyr fool (1992) mein sahaayak abhinetri ke roop mein filmi duniya mein padaarpan kiya.", mujhe sahi naheen lag raha hai. shaayad isko aise kiya ja sakta hai-"unhonne apne pita Ram mukharji dvaara nirdeshit baangla film biyr fool (1992) se sahaayak abhinetri ke roop mein filmi duniya mein padaarpan kiya."
  2. "unki pratham agrani abhinay bhoomika" agrani ki jagah pramukh zyaada sahi rahega.
  3. "usi varsh baad mein raani mukharji roomaani naatak film", mukharji ke baad ne yahaaain joda jaana chaahiye.
  4. "banti aur babali mein ek chor mahila ka abhinay bhi kiya." yahaaain mahila chor karna sahi lagega.
  5. saath hi mujhe lagta hai thode hindi sandarbh hona bhi jaroori hain. abhi lekh mein ek bhi naheen, dhoodhne mein zyaada pareshaani naheen hogi.--peeyoosh mauryavaarta 09:27, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
pehle chaar binduon mein ullikheet sudhaar kar diye gaye hain. kuchh hindi sandarbh jod diye gaye hain aur kuchh dheere-dheere jod diye jaayeinge.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 08:05, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
nimn ek nirvaachit soochi naamaankan charcha ka puraalekh hai. krupaya ismein badlaav na karein. anuvarti tipniyaaain lekh ke vaarta prushth ya vikipeediya vaarta:nirvaachit soochi ummeedavaar par karein. is prushth par ab koi bhi naya sampaadan naheen hona chaahiye.

yeh soochi 21:08, somvaar July 11, 2016 (UTC) ko sanjeev Kumar dvaara padonnat ki gayi.

suneel Gavaskar ke antararaashtreeya cricket shatakon ki soochi

upakaran
(prastaavak: ☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 10:12, 20 April 2014 (UTC))

yeh angreji vikipeediya par nirvaachit soochi ka anuvaad hai at: mujhe lagta hai kuchh maatraatmak trutiyon ke alaava anya koi samasya naheen aayegi.

sujhaav
  • doosare pairaagraaf ki pehli pankti mein saamane shabd ko viruddh kiya jaaya.
  • teesare pairaagraaf ki pehli pankti mein koshtak mein likha odeeaai shabd anaavashyak hai.
  • test cricket shatak anubhaag mein doosare shatak mein likha maidaan ka naam keningsatan oval hai na ki keinsingtan oval.
  • isi anubhaag mein satrahavein va atthaarahavein shatak mein kalakata ko Calcutta kiya jaaya tabhi sahi prushth judega.
  • test cricket shatak va ekadivseeya shatak anubhaag mein likha suneel Gavaskar dvaara banaaye gaye shatakon ki soochi tatha suneel Gavaskar dvaara banaaye gaye ekadivseeya shatakon ki soochi heding anaavashyak hai.
  • H/A/N kya? sambhav ho to ise hindi mein likhe.--prateek maalaveeyavaarta 11:32, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
prateek ji, sarvapratham to main aapko dhanyavaad dena chaahuainga ki aapne turant prabhaav se apne sujhaav prastut kiye. aapke antim sujhaav ke alaava anya badlaav kar diye gaye hain. iske atirikt antim sujhaav mein likhe H/A/N se taatparya ghareloo/baahari (saamane waali team ka ghareloo)/tatasth sthaanon se hai. arthaat vo desh jismein match khela gaya. yadi aapko theek lage to inke sthaan par gh/ba/t likh dooain.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 15:18, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
sanjeev ji gh/ba/t ka hi istemaal hona chaahiye. iske saath {{Tooltip}} saaainche ka prayog kare jisse pata chal sake ki gh ka arth gharelu, ba ka arth baahar tatha t ka arth tatasth hai. iske alaava ekadivseeya shatak ki soochi sahi kare.--prateek maalaveeyavaarta 07:20, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
prateek ji: kaarya poorn hua. kuchh anya sujhaav hon to jaroor bataayein.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 11:12, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

samarthan mere dvaara bataae gaye sujhaav apna liye gaye. at: mera is lekh ko nirvaachit soochi hetu samarthan hai. yadi koi aur sujhaav ho to anya sadasya avashya de.--prateek maalaveeyavaarta 05:27, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

bill William kaumpatan ki tippaniyaaain
  • gadya
  1. poore lekh mein ek prakaar ke ank istemaal karein.
  2. "ek poorv cricket khilaadi hain", yeh 'ek' ka istemaal angreji ke aartikl ke kaaran hindi mein aaya hai. hindi mein aartikl ki aavashyakta naheen.
  3. "bhaarateeya cricket team ka pratinidhitv aur kaptaani", bhaarateeya cricket team ka pratinidhitv kahaaain par? agar aap 'poorv antararaashtreeya cricket khilaadi' likhte hain to usase yeh abhipraaya ban sakta hai ki inhonne antararaashtreeya star par Bhaarat ka pratinidhitv kiya tha.
  4. "banaaye.[2])" ko 'banaaye).[2]' karein
  5. "pahachaane jaane vaale[3][4] Gavaskar ne 125 test maichon mein 10,122 run banaaye.[3]" ek hi sandarbh ko vaakya mein do jagah istemaal karne ki aavashyakta naheen. sandarbh aamtaur par vaakya ke ant mein ya kisi alpaviraam ke baad lagaae jaate hain, uske beech mein naheen.
  6. test cricket ko vikilink karein
  7. 'sachin Tendulkar' ke pehle sandarbh ko vikilink karein aur kisi jagah naheen.
  8. 'bhaarateeya cricket ke varsh ke cricket khilaadi', aisa kuchh bhi astitv mein na tha aur na hai. Indian cricket ek kitaab thi jo 'cricketer of the iyar' taaital/sammaan deti thi.
  9. 'visdan khilaadi' bhi kuchh naheen hai, sammaan ka naam 'visdan cricketer of the iyar' hai. anuvaad koshthak mein likha ja sakta hai.
  10. visdan ko vijdan kriketars almanaak se vikilink bhi karein.
  11. "vaale pratham khilaadi bane.[15][14][16]" mein sandarbh ka kram theek karein.
  12. 'baarah' ko 12 likhein. das se neeche ki sankhyaaon ko shabdon mein das va uske baad ki sankhya ko ank avastha mein likha jaata hai. iska ek apavaad vaakya mein anko ki nirantarata hai.
  13. "February 2012 mein antararaashtreeya cricket parishad (ICC) ne ICC cricket hall of fame ke liye chuna", kise chuna?
  14. 'vestaindeej' likhein ya 'vest indeej' ek samaan karein.
  15. "ek divseeya antarraashtreeya mein 1974 mein hedingle mein inglaind", itne saare 'mein' ke kaaran vaakya atpata lag raha hai. ise sudhaar kar 'ne 1974 mein apna ek divseeya antarraashtreeya padaarpan ingalaind ke viruddh hedingle stadium mein kiya'.
  16. vaakya ka "shatak nyoojeelaind ke viruddh - cricket vishv cup, 1987 ke dauraan" bhaag bigda hua hai.
  17. "unke jeevan ke antim se pehle vaale match mein aaya." aisa prateet ho raha hai jaise is match ke pashchaat Gavaskar ka nidhan ho gaya tha.

taalika par tippaniyaaain baad mein karooainga.<>< bill William kaumpatanvaarta 15:45, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

@Bill william compton: aapki tippaniyon ke saath vaastav mein aapne soochi mein sudhaar ki disha mein bahut achha yogadaan diya hai. iske liye bahut-bahut dhanyavaad. uparokt parivartan poorn kar diye gaye hain yadi abhi bhi kuchh truti dikhaai deti hai to mujhe bataayein athva use theek karne ka prayaas karein.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 18:12, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
  • soochi
  1. soochi theek se saurt naheen ho rahi. dinaank ke anusaar saurt karne par kram yeh ban raha hai: 1 April 1971, 1 December 1978, 10 November 1976, aadi, jo bilkul galat hai.
  2. "gh/ba/t" ki jagah 'sthaan' ya koi aur spasht shabd ka istemaal karein. angreji mein cricket ke sandarbh mein 'H/A/N' bahut pehle se istemaal hote aa rahe hain isliye unhein samajhne mein koi dikkat naheen parantu hindi mein gh/ba/t kuchh betuka sa prateet ho raha hai. kunji mein bataaya ja sakta hai ki 'sthaan' (ya koi bhi upayukt shabd) se kya abhipraaya hai.
  3. kunji mein "paari" ka arth kya hai? kisi cricket ki kam samajh rakhane vaale ke liye 'paari' wala soochi ka column samajhna mushkil hai. not dvaara 'paari' ki paribhaasha likhein. aise hi "main of the match" ko not se samajhaaeain.
  4. 'test' vaale column mein 1/3, 6/6, aadi, ka kya arth hai? ise kunji ya not dvaara spasht karein.
  5. 'sthaan' column ka upayukt naam 'aayojan sthal' rahega.
  6. jin vishyon par lekh naheen hain ya to un sab ko kadi na dein ya fir sab ko hi dein. keningsatan oval ya borda ko kadi na dena aur national stadium va Vidarbh cricket association ground ko kadi dena kuchh pakshapaat prateet hota hai. main aisa naheen kah raha hooain ki kuchh pakshapaat hua hai parantu aisa lag raha hai.
  7. soochi dekhne mein bhi aakarshak honi chaahiye isliye jahaaain sambhav ho rango ka istemaal karein. yahaaain naabaad, kaptaani va main of the match ko haailaait karne ke liye halke rango ka istemaal kiya ja sakta hai. udaaharan ke liye 2010 Asiaee khel padak taalika dekhein.
  8. "khel parinaam rahit raha athva anirneet parinaam" ka agar koi prakaran naheen hai to ise kunji se hataaeain.
  9. 'naagapoor' ko 'Nagpur' karein.
  10. tippanee6 mein Bihar ke chetan gaaainv ko kyon vikilink kiya gaya hai?
  • bhoomika
  1. "cricketer of the iyar" ko donon mein se kaheen bhi itelik na karein. ye sammaan hain aur sammaan ko itelik akshar se naheen likhte.<>< bill William kaumpatanvaarta 07:15, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
sudhaar
  1. soochi dinaankavaar shreneebaddh theek hui.
  2. "gh/ba/t" ki jagah ghareloo/baahar shabd kaam mein liya hai jisse spasht bhi hota hai aur chooainki inmein se koi bhi match tatasth sthaan par naheen hai at: usaki aavashyakta bhi naheen hai.
  3. paari ko vikilink kar diya hai aur 'main of the match' ko bhi vikilink kiya hai jispar jaldi hi prushth ka nirmaan bhi kar dunga.
  4. 'test' vaale column mein k/kh likhne ka arth us shrunkhala mein (khilaadi dvaara khele gaye match)/(shrunkhala mein kul match sankhya) se hai. (meri samajh ke anusaar, abhi mujhe sahi arth gyaat naheen hua hai. chooainki prushth angreji vikipeediya se anoodit hai at: yeh gyaat karke iska matlab bhi spasht karuainga.
  5. 'sthaan' column ka naam badalkar 'aayojan sthal' kar diya gaya hai.
  6. jin vishyon par lekh naheen hain unapar jaldi hi lekhon ka nirmaan kar dunga aur sabamein ekaroopata bhi le aaya hooain.
  7. soochi ko rangeen karne mein ek samasya aa rahi hai. jaise khilaadi ek match mein naabaad bhi raha ho aur kaptaan bhi ho evam main of the match bhi mila ho to us pankti mein kaunasa rang aayega. aapka ye sujhaav milne ke baad yeh kaarya bhi poorn kar diya jaayega.
  8. "khel parinaam rahit raha athva anirneet parinaam" ki kuainji lagaane mein galati se bhool ho gayi thi jise ab theek kar diya hai.
  9. 'naagapoor' ko 'Nagpur' kar diya hai.
  10. tippanee6 mein Bihar ke chetan gaaainv ka link bhi galati se lag gaya tha jise ab theek kar diya gaya hai.
  11. bhoomika mein "cricketer of the iyar" ka tirchhaapan hata diya gaya hai lekin saamaanyat: vikipeediya par niyamon ke anusaar anya bhaasha ke shabdon ko tirchhe aksharon ki likhne ki parampara ke kaaran ise mainne teerachha kar diya tha.

krupaya anya tippaniyaaain bhi likhein. kyonki main is soochi ko sarvashreshth soochiyon mein se ek karna chaahata hooain aur mere dvaara nirmit anya soochiyaaain is soochi ko aadarsh maankar banaai jaayeingi at: achhi soochi nirmaan ke liye iska aadarsh hona atyaavashyak hai.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 17:37, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

sanjeev ji, main apni taraf se yahi prayatn karta hooain ki jab bhi tippani karoon tab achhi tarah se karoon, jisse lekh ko sudhaarane mein madad mile. yahi kaaran hai main hamesha aur jaldi tippani naheen kar paata kyonki prakriya kaafi samay leti hai. is soochi mein mujhe ab koi samasya naheen dikhti jo ise nirvaachit banane se roke. agar ek saath do-do prateek ek hi pankti mein istemaal hue hain to unke liye kunji mein alag pankti bana dein va uchit rang ka istemaal kar lein, udaaharan ke liye # = team ki kaptaani ki va match mein naabaad rahe. rango se ek bada faayda yeh rahata hai ki paathak turant soochi dekh kar bata sakta hai ki kitne maicho mein Gavaskar naabaad rahe, kitne mein kaptaani ki, aadi.<>< bill William kaumpatanvaarta 14:05, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
bill ji, mainne kuchh aur rang bharne ka prayaas kiya hai. samay mile to krupaya jaaainch kar lein.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 20:33, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
oopar ki charcha ek puraalekh ke taur par parirkshit ki gayi hai. ismein koi badlaav na karein. ismein ab koi sanpaadan naheen hona chaahiye.
nimn ek nirvaachit soochi naamaankan charcha ka puraalekh hai. krupaya ismein badlaav na karein. anuvarti tipniyaaain lekh ke vaarta prushth ya vikipeediya vaarta:nirvaachit soochi ummeedavaar par karein. is prushth par ab koi bhi naya sampaadan naheen hona chaahiye.

yeh soochi 21:08, somvaar July 11, 2016 (UTC) ko sanjeev Kumar dvaara padonnat ki gayi.

bhaarateeya janta party ke mukhyamantriyon ki soochi

(prastaavak: prateek maalaveeyavaarta 03:43, 29 October 2013 (UTC))

isse poorv mainne ise nirvaachit lekh ke liye naamaankit kiya tha parantu sanjeev ji ke sujhaav par main is lekh ko nirvaachit soochi ummeedavaar ke taur par naamaankit karta hooain. sujhaav ke liye sabhi sadasya aamantrit hain.

prateek ji, naamaankan prakriya aisi naheen hai. svabhaavik hai jab yeh kaheen likha bhi naheen hua to aapko pata bhi kaise hota isliye main naamaankan theek kar deta hooain.<>< bill William kaumpatanvaarta 05:53, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
mukhya yogadaanakarta ke taur par prateek ji ka dhanyavaad karta hooain ki unhonne is soochi ko nirvaachit karne yogya samjha. main is nirvaachan ke prati apni sahamati jataata hooain. vaibhav jain vaarta imel 11:31, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Seems to be very much India specific and may be a little of partisan thoughts also. Why not Congress' Chief Ministers? I am saying so, because we already have BJP in "Kya aap jaante hain" section, We have had discussion on BJP's PM Candidate for updation in News section. While I respect any member's political orientations, I think it has been a little too much of BJP here. So, at this moment I am not in favour of this list. I'd like to go for a neutral list like list of all CMs of India presently etc. --☍ manoj khuraana ( sadasyaprushth) 13:21, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
manoj ji, main bhi aapke Congressi vichaaradhaara ka hone ka sammaan karta hooain lekin keval aap Congressi hone ke kaaran virodh kar rahe hai to iska main virodh karta hooain. kam se kam vikipeediya par is prakaar se raajanitik bayaanbaaji naheen honi chaahiye. agar aap chaahe to bhaarateeya raashtreeya Congress ke mukhyamantriyon ki soochi naam se naya lekh shuroo kar sakte hai aur use bhi nirvaachit soochi ke liye naamaankit kar sakte hain. main aapko bataana chaahata hooain ki yahaaain par bhaajapa ke liye kuchh bhi jyaada naheen ho raha hai.--prateek maalaveeyavaarta 14:07, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
prateek ji, manoj ji Congressi naheen hain. vo vishay ko theek se samajh naheen paaye.
manoj ji, nirvaachit soochi ke liye abhi tak mukhaprushth par koi sthaan naheen hai. ab aap yeh bataao ki yadi koi lekh "kya aap jaante hain?" mein aa gaya to use sudhaarakar nirvaachit lekh banaana uchit naheen hoga. "mukhaprushth samaachaar" aur "kya aap jaante hain?" mein aapki kahi baat laagoo hoti hai. iske alaava soochi mein likhe vaakya pakshapaat vaale naheen hone chaahiye. yadi ham is tarah kehne lage ki bhaajapa ke hi kyon Congress ki soochi kyon naheen! to kal mujhe bhi koi kahega ki aapne Ranbeer Kapoor ki film ko hi kyon chuna? Salman Khan athva Aamir Khan ki film ko kyon naheen jabki unhonne to barfi! se adhik paisa kamaaya hai! at: aapka is kaaran se virodh karna ki Congress ki soochi kyon naheen, mujhe sahi naheen laga fir bhi ye faisala aapka hai aur aap jaisa chaahein le sakte hain. ham aapko sujhaav de sakte hain, prereet kar sakte hain.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 14:27, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
Prateek ji, I opposed only because I'm also a BJP supporter (atleast for the coming elections) and in order to maintain neutrality, we need to question our own selves first otherwise unknowingly we may end up taking sides and in my opinion Wiki should not look like taking sides, and that too at the time of elections. That was the only reason. (This also answers Sanjeev Ji's questions, Salman Khan Vs. Amir Khan issue may be rightly compared with Congress Vs. BJP, but in my view, its the election timing which may change the context.) Please note that I also suggested neutral lists like list of all CMs of India. I am also in favour of the list of all MPs of India that we just completed a few days back. ( I don't know, I may be wrong like on the name of neutrality, someone has demanded all lotus ponds to be covered and in return the other party is planning to demand covering all hands ! But still these are my thoughts. Wiki "IS" in a position to change minds and we should avoid such topics near elections.) As far as, Sanjeev Ji's point of new system for Nirvachit Suchi is concerned . I'm all in for any developmental work. Regards--☍ manoj khuraana ( sadasyaprushth) 06:14, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
manoj ji, yeh ek udaaseen soochi hai. ismein Congress ki kaheen buraai naheen ki gayi aur bhaajapa ko bahut achha naheen kaha gaya. iske alaava chunaavon se viki ka koi lena dena naheen hai. humne kaheen bhi prachaar naheen kiya. yahaaain vo bindu mahatva rakhate hain jo bill ji ne neeche likhe hain. un binduon se pradarshit kiya ja sakta hai soochi mein di gayi jaankaari vartamaan mein theek naheen hai. ab aap ye bataao ki yadi koi kshetriya dal hame kahe ki aapne bhaajapa aur Congress ke prushth banaakar unka prachaar kiya hai lekin aapne hamaare chhote dalon ke saath bhedabhaav kiya hai to kya yeh pakshapaat kahalaayega? chooainki hamaare paas jaankaari hoti hai uske anusaar hi prushth banaate hain. prateek ji ko bhaajapa ke mukhyamantriyon ka pata hoga (paryaapt saamagri hogi) at: unhonne yeh soochi bana di. yadi kisi ke paas anya dalon se sambandhit aisi jaankaari hogi to soochi bana sakte hain. aap nishchint rahein, yahaaain na hi to koi chunaav prachaar ho raha hai aur na hi iska chunaavon par koi asar padne wala hai. mujhe jahaaain tak lagta hai viki ke sakriya sadasyon mein se adhiktar to apne mataadhikaar ka prayog bhi naheen kareinge.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 06:24, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
tippaniyaaain
  • "bhaarateeya janta party (bhaajapa) bhaarateeya ganaraajya ki raajanaitik pranaali ke do pramukh dalon mein se ek hai", kis prakaar se pramukh? sadasya sankhya, sansad sadasyon ki sadasyata ya vidhaayakon ki sankhya?
  • "29 bhaajapa neta mukhyamantri ke pad par baithe hain", kya Bhaarat ki tees vidhaanasabhaaon (28 raajya + do kendra shaasit raajya) mein se 29 par bhaajapa bahumat mein hai?
  • "mukhyamantri ke pad par baithe hain", bhaasha sudhaarein.
  • "seaton ki bahusankhyata", seat kya?
  • "agar uske paas vidhaanasabha ka vishvaas hai", bhaasha sudhaarein.
  • "Rajasthan ke bhairon Singh shekhaavat bhaajapa ke pehle mukhyamantri the", shekhaavat kab mukhmantri the yeh bhi vaakya mein bataaeain.
  • "kuchh bhaajapa neta janta party (japa) ke sadasya...", ye "kuchh neta" kaun se hain?
  • WorldStatesmen.org vishvasaneeya srot naheen hai kyonki usaki saamagri kraaudasorsing dvaara jutaai gayi hai.
  • "[teep 1]", teep kya?
  • chitr ki kalar koding sudhaarein. spasht roop se prathak rangon ka istemaal karein.
  • chitr ke kaipshan mein srot dein.
  • "aaङagl mein"?
  • "teep" anubhaag "vishisht" ke oopar hona chaahiye.
  • "bhaarateeya janta party ke mukhyamantri" aur fir se "bhaajapa ke mukhyamantri" anaavashyak hai.<>< bill William kaumpatanvaarta 15:19, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
bill ji, aap ke dvaara bataaye gaye sudhaar kar diye gaye hai. teep ka arth angreji bhaasha ke Note shabd ke samaan hai. chitr ki kalar koding kis prakaar se sudhaarani hai krupaya bataaye. tippani 7 ka vivran teep 2, 3, 4 tatha 5 mein diya hai. WorldStatesmen.org ke baare mein mujhe naheen pata hai kyoki is prushth ke mukhya yogadaanakarta vaibhav ji hai. at: main unase kahooainga ki iska javaab de.--prateek maalaveeyavaarta 04:50, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
prateek ji, Note ke samatulya shabd teep to mainne pehli baar dekha hai. kuchh anuvaad upakaranon mein bhi yeh dekha ja sakta hai lekin maanak hindi mein ise "tippani" athva "drushtavya" (sanjnyaa roop) likhte hain. kriya (sanskrut mein dhaatu) ke roop mein iska tulya shabd "dhyaan dena" hai. ☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 08:43, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
teep ke sthaan par tippani shabd kar diya gaya hai.--prateek maalaveeyavaarta 11:00, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
tippani 2

lekh mein kisi bhi mukhyamantri ke kaaryakaal ka sandarbh naheen diya gaya hai. chooainki mujhe yaad hai ki Rajasthan ki poorv mukhyamantri vasundhara raaje ne 8 December 2003 ko shapath grahan ki thi aur uske baad 11 (12) December 2008 ko ashok gahalot ne. at: kaaryakaal mere hisaab se keval 5 varsh, 3 din hua balki vahaaain par 5 varsh 15 din likha hai. yahaaain ya to main aapki ganana samajhne mein saksham naheen hooain athva aapne sankhya galat likhi hai. at: uchit hoga ki aise sthaanon par sandarbh diye jaayein.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 09:10, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

saaainche mein likhi dinaank galat thi, use sahi kar diya gaya hai. ab yeh 5 varsh, 3 din ho gaya hai.--prateek maalaveeyavaarta 11:00, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
manoj ji aur bill ji, krupaya apni baaki tippaniyaaain dein. mujhe lagta hai vartamaan sthiti ko adyatan karne ke baad soochi ko nirvaachit kiya ja sakta hai.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 22:13, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
tippaniyaaain
  1. lekh ko naveenatam badlaavon ke anusaar adyatan karein
  2. "pad sambhaala" mein se "kaarya avadhi" ko hata kar naya column bana dein
  3. sandarbh sambandhit prashn abhi bhi bana hua hai

krupaya jaldi lekh ka adyatan karein, is naamaankan ko bahut samay beet chuka hai.<>< bill William kaumpatanvaarta 12:34, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

lekh mein aavashyak va sujhaaye gaye sujhaavon ke anusaar parivartan ho chuka hai. ab jald hi iska nirnaya liya jaaya.--prateek maalaveeyavaarta 09:36, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

  • samarthan – sandarbh sambandhit samasya abhi bhi bani hui hai, parantu abhi main use najaraandaaj kar raha hooain. sanjeev ji se anurodh karooainga ki naamaankan ka nishkarsh nikaal dein.<>< bill William kaumpatanvaarta 12:29, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
chooainki vartamaan mein koi virodh naheen hai at: soochi nirvaachit honi chaahiye lekin mainne pehle yeh kaarya kabhi kiya naheen hai at: bill ji, aapse anurodh hai ki mujhe vo disha nirdesh bataayein jisse main sabhi kaarya sampann kar sakuain.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 16:28, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
oopar ki charcha ek puraalekh ke taur par parirkshit ki gayi hai. ismein koi badlaav na karein. ismein ab koi sanpaadan naheen hona chaahiye.

indiyaana raajya prateekon ki soochi

(prastaavak: <>< Bill william comptonTalk 04:00, 27 April 2012 (UTC))

main is soochi ko nirvaachit banaane ke liye naamit karta hooain. mere vichaar mein vikipeediya pe nirvaachit vishyavastuon ki sankhya mein vruddhi hoti rahani chaahiye aur agar ham achhi maatra mein nirvaachit soochiyaaain bana paate hain to shaayad jald hi mukhaprushth par bhi inke liye jagah ban paaegi. mere vichaar mein is prayojan ke liye kam se kam das nirvaachit soochiyaaain to honi hi chaahiye. isi uddeshya ke saath yeh mera doosra naamaankan hai. agar is naamit lekh mein aapko neeli kadiyon ki kami lage to chinta na karein, is naamaankan prakriya ke saath-saath mein kuchh nae lekh bhi banaata rahooainga. dhanyavaad ki aap yahaaain is naamaankan ka hissa banane aae.<>< Bill william comptonTalk 05:28, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

tippani:
  • bhoomika mein likha hai aur upayukta , kya yeh upayuktata hona chaahiye tha, ya kuchh aur? (meri jaankaari mein upayukta koi shabd naheen hai, yadyapi main galat bhi ho sakta hooain).
theek kar diya.
  • bhoomika mein mere hisaab se koi bhi vyaakaran/vartani ki galatiyaaain naheen hain (keval ek thi jo theek kar di).
  • raajachinh bhaag mein paaainch agale paaainch raajyon ka kuchh arth samajh naheen aata. krupaya paath mein spasht karein.
kar diya.
  • upanaam ka vivran spasht naheen hai (kuchh samajh naheen aata ki ek agyaat mool ke shabd se jaana jaata hai ka kya taatparya hai; ise vahaaain spasht karne ki aavashyakta hai)
spasht kar diya.
  • ristaart ka anuvaad punaraaranbh theek naheen hai. behtar anuvaad dhooaindhein. saath hi indiyaanaapolis 500 kya hai yeh bhi spasht karein (koi race?) saath hi, ristaart ya reestaart (indiyaana mein iska uchchaaran kya hai)?
reestaart hi hai, traansaletar ne 'E' ko 'i' kar diya tha aur maine dhyaan naheen diya. iska abhipraaya punaraaranbh karne se hi hai, asal mein yeh paryatakon ko lubhaane ke liye indiyaana 500 ko indiyaana raajya ke paryatan se jodne ki koshish hai (jo kuchh kaamayaab naheen hoti, kyonki race ke alaava yahaaain koi jyaada khaas hai hi naheen), mera matlab yahi hai ki race to "punaraaranbh" hi hoti hai (sahi?).
aarambh-to begin, punaraaranbh-begin again, race punaraaranbh ho sakti hai. engines are "turned on again", but the sense I find in punaraaranbh is that of "begin the engines again" (which I find to mean "construct your engines again"). Maybe its just me. If noone else objects to this usage, its fine (since I'm not sure if the usage is incorrect/correct).--siddhaarth ghai (vaarta) 10:25, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
  • tippani column ka naam shaayad srot ya sandarbh hona chaahiye
poorn kiya
  • chhuttiyon ke chitron mein, raaifl, pai ke chitr mein alt text jodein. sabhi alt text hindi mein dein.
poorn kiya
kuchh alt text abhi bhi angreji mein hain: dekhein altviewer aur hindi mein karein--siddhaarth ghai (vaarta) 10:33, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
poorn kiya
maanachitr aur far far away ke poster mein abhi bhi baaki hain. mujhe inke liye upayukt alt text samajh naheen aa raha, krupaya koi upayukt hindi alt text lagaaeain.--siddhaarth ghai (vaarta) 10:16, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
kar diya<>< Bill william comptonTalk 04:22, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
sujhaav:naare aur kavita ki hastalikhit kaupi ke chitr yadi kaumans par upalabdh hon to jodein.--siddhaarth ghai (vaarta) 13:33, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
kavita ki kaupi abhi bhi kaupeeraait ke andar hai, aur na to vikisors pe aur na hi kaumans par uplabdh hai. naara to teen shabdon ka vaakyaansh hai, iski hastalikhit kaupi kya hogi, aur yeh to vaise bhi indiyaana toorijm dipaartameint ne [kuchh hi varsh pehle] banaaya hai.<>< Bill william comptonTalk 14:50, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
Yes check.svg samarthan--Mayur (talk•Email) 19:33, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
Yes check.svg samarthan: yeh ek achhi soochi hai aur nirvaachit soochi banaane ke liye ab upayukt hai.--siddhaarth ghai (vaarta) 14:41, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
aap donon ka dhanyavaad ki aap ne apna keemati samay nikaal ke yahaaain apna mat prastut kiya. vishesh dhanyavaad siddhaarth ko jinhonne apni tippaneeyon se is soochi ko sudhaarane mein ek aham bhoomika nibhaai. jaisa ki aap donon hi jaante hai ki shaayad koi aur sadasya yahaaain tippani naheen karne wala aur naamaakann ko aaj poora ek maah hon gaya hai aisi sthiti mein aap mein se krupaya koi lekh mein nirvaachit soochi ka saaaincha va is naamaankan ko band karne jaise kaarya kar dein. iske pashchaat mein kisi anya lekh ko nirvaachit banaane ka kaarya shuroo karta hooain, ekabaar fir, dhanyavaad.
Symbol oppose vote.svg virodh yeh kai tareekon se galat hai .nirvaachit soochi ka ummeedavaar hone ke liye lekh ka darshaneeya hona zaroori hai. led bhaag lekh ka saaraansh maana jaata hai,jinmein sandarbhon ki koi aavashyakta naheen honi chaahiye. lekin vivaadaaspad baaton ke satyaapan ke liye ham sandarbhon ko upayog mein la sakatein hain. poore lekh ko table form mein usase bhi sudhaarein .dhanyavaad ...!!! sinemaaskop ϟ sandesh 10:56, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
aap galat kah rahein hain. yeh nirvaachit lekh naheen soochi hai aur nirvaachit soochi mein hamesha sandarbh gadya bhaag mein hi lagaaeain jaate hain, udaaharan: 2002 Asian Games medal table, Counties of Croatia, List of accolades received by My Week with Marilyn, aadi. table form mein sudhaar? kis prakaar ka sudhaar?<>< bill William kaumpatanvaarta 12:40, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg samarthan lekh theek hai. maafi chaahata hooain,nirvaachit soochi se anbhigya tha. maargadarshan hetu dhanyavaad. -sinemaaskop ϟ sandesh 09:17, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
YesY poorn hua ise nirvaachit soochiyon mein shaamil kar diya gaya hai.--siddhaarth ghai (vaarta) 08:00, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Follow Us:
  • Get daily news by email:

  • Delivered by FeedBurner