vikipeediya:nirvaachit lekh ummeedavaar

nimnalikhit nirvaachit lekh naamaankan ka puraalekh hai. krupaya ismein badlaav na karein. agar aap ko is naamaankan sambandhit koi tippani karni hai to apni tipnni lekh ke vaarta prushth ya vikipeediya vaarta:nirvaachit lekh ummeedavaar par chhodein. ab is anubhaag mein kisi bhi prakaar ka koi sampaadan naheen hona chaahiye.

yeh lekh 12:10, somvaar June 20, 2016 (UTC) ko sanjeev Kumar dvaara padonnat kiya gaya.

noor inaayat Khan

(prastaavak: --maala chaube^vaarta 06:44, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

aaj antararaashtreeya mahila diwas hai. vishv ke vibhinn kshetron mein mahilaaon ke prati sammaan, prashansa aur pyaar prakat karte hue is din ko mahilaaon ke aarthik, raajaneetik aur saamaajik upalabdhiyon ke upalakshya mein utsav ke taur par manaaya jaata hai. noor inaayat Khan dviteeya vishv yuddh ke dauraan bhaarateeya mool ki mitr deshon ki jaasoos thi, jinke balidaan aur saahas ki gaatha Britain aur France mein khoob gaai jaati hain. isliye aaj ke din ko vishesh din maanate huye is prushth ko nirvaachit lekh hetu naamaankit kiya ja raha hai. is prushth ki banaavat, rachanaatmakata aur vishyavastu sandarbh sahit va bharpoor hai.--maala chaube^vaarta 06:45, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

lekh ki bhoomika bahut chhoti hai. krupaya ise lekh ke anusaar paryaapt aakaar dein.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 10:55, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

dhanyavaad sanjeev ji, lekh ki bhoomika aur uske anubhaagon mein paryaapt vistaar diya gaya hai. aur koi sujhaav ho to bataaen.

--maala chaube^vaarta 13:10, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

samarthan main maala ji ke prastaav ka samarthan karta hooain. --04:37, 9 March 2014 (UTC)mujmmil (vaarta)

sujhaav: yadi ismein yeh chitr bhi de diya jaaye to sone pe suhaaga! dau॰'kraant'ema॰aaela॰aavarma (vaarta) 08:51, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Krantmlverma ji, aapke sujhaav ke aalok mein lekh ke saath uparokt chitr jod diye gaye hain.

--maala chaube^vaarta 08:48, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

samarthan ab yeh lekh nirvaachit karne yogya ho gaya hai.--prateek maalaveeya^vaarta 11:59, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

tippani

1. bhoomika lekh ka saar hoti hai, usamein sandarbh dene ke sthaan par vahaaain likhe huye vaakya ka aage vistaar se varnan aata hai. us varnan mein uske sandarbh jode jaate hain.
2. praarambhik jeevan naamak anubhaag mein likha hai ki vo teepoo sultaan ki prapautri theen jabki iske aage diye gaye sandarbh ke anusaar vo teepoo sultaan ki vanshaj thi. chooainki prapautri ka arth putr ke putr ki putri hota hai jabki us angreji mein likhe vaakya ke anusaar yeh siddh naheen hota hai. chooainki prapotri shabd pitru paksh se sambaddh rakhata hai balki great-great-great-graandamadar ka sambandh pitru athva maatru paksh mein antar naheen karta at: krupaya uchit sandarbh dein.
3. lekh ke adhiktar anubhaag keval unhein mahaan mahila siddh karne ke prayaas mein likhe gaye hain jinka drushtikon nishpaksh karne ki aavashyakta hai. udaaharanaarth "du:khad ant" naamak anubhaag mein ek vaakya likha hai - "itni bahaadur mahila ka ant itna dukhadaai kyon hua." kya yeh vyaakaran evam lekh ki gunavata aankane ke aadhaar par theek hai?
4. krupaya sandarbhon mein sudhaar karein aur aavashyakta padne par {{cite book}}, {{cite web}} aadi saaainchon ka prayog karein.

krupaya uparokt sudhaar karne ka prayaas karein iske baad lekh mein aur sujhaav diye jaayeinge.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 16:10, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

sanjeev ji, aapke sujhaav ke aalok mein lekh mein samuchit sudhaar kar diye gaye hain. koi aur sujhaav ho to bataaen.

--maala chaube^vaarta 08:48, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

krupaya lekh ke vaarta prushth par meri tippaniyaaain dekhein.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 08:35, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

mujhe lagta hai lekh mein paryaapt sudhaar ho chuke hain at: ab ise nirvaachit kar dena chaahiye. kuchh dinon (lagbhag ek saptaah) ke liye anya sadasyon ke vichaar bhi dekh lete hain anyatha agale ravivaar (27 April) tak koi tippani naheen aati hai to lekh ko nirvaachit kar diya jaayega.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 07:06, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

aapka bahut-bahut dhanyavaad sanjeev ji,--maala chaube^vaarta 11:43, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

is lekh ko mainne aaj dekha, achha lekh hai parantu abhi is lekh mein anek trutiyaaain dikh rahi hain, kuchh ko yahaaain ingit kar raha hooain..... aap theek samajhein to main is lekh ki vartaneegat trutiyon ko theek kar dooain......

apne chaaro bhaai-bahanon mein sabse badi thi. [ thi ke sthaan par " theen " karein] unhein veena bajaane ka unhein shauk joonoon ki had tak tha. [ vaakya mein unhein atirikt hai, ise hataayein] ve teepoo sultaan ki vanshaj theen. - [do baar yeh vaakya aaya hai] .... aur piyaano ki dhun par sangeet ka prasaar karne lagi. ... [ "prasaar karne lageen " par vichaar karein..]--daa0 jagadeesh vyom^vaarta 15:23, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

@Dr.jagdish:ji, aapke sujhaav ke anusaar vartaneegat trutiyon ko theek kar diya gaya hai. yadi aapko koi aur trutiyaaain dikh rahi ho to aap svatantr hain is lekh ki vartaneegat trutiyon ko theek karne ke liye. avashya sudhaar karein aur ek shreshth va nirvaachit lekh banaane ki disha mein sahayog karein. dhanyavaad.--maala chaube^vaarta 05:06, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

bill William kaumpatan ki tippaniyaaain

• bhoomika
  1. urdoo mein naam likhne ka kaaran?
  2. Endash ka istemaal karein.
  3. "bhaarateeya mool ki guptachar thi", ye bhaarateeya mool ki kis raashtra ki naagrik theen? spasht karein.
  4. 'dviteeya vishv yuddh' ko vikilink karein.
  5. "jisne" ki jagah 'jinhonne' istemaal karein.
  6. "ve France mein kaam karti theen", France mein kis prakaar ka "kaam" karti theen?
  7. France ko do baar vikilink na karein.
  8. "poochh-taachh karne vaalon ne unase koi raaj naheen ugalava paaya", ye poochh-taachh karne vaale kaun the? fraanseesi sarkaar, sena ya koi aur?
  9. "unke balidaan aur saahas ki gaatha Britain aur France mein khoob gaai jaati hai", is vaakya ko tatasth banaaeain. is vaakya se yeh prateet hota hai ki inki prasiddhi jon of aark ki tarah hai.
  10. "Britain aur France", yahaaain abhipraaya Britain dweep se hai ya yoonaaited Kingdom se?
  11. "kisi Asiaee athva bhaarateeya mahila", bhaarateeya mahilaaeain bhi Asiaee hain isliye 'bhaarateeya mahila' anaavashyak hai.
  12. "sarvochch sammaan" naheen 'sarvochch naagrik sammaan'
  13. "George cross" naheen 'George kraus'
  14. 'Britain' ko pun: vikilink na karein.
  15. kisi bhi shabd ya vishay ko vikilink uske sabse pehle sandarbh mein kiya jaata hai. udaaharan ke liye 'dviteeya vishv yuddh' ko oopar hi vikilink karna chaahiye tha na ki doosare anuchhed mein.
  16. ek shabd ya vishay ko baar-baar vikilink naheen kiya jaata, akeli bhoomika mein hi 'France' ko paaainch-paaainch baar vikilink kiya gaya hai. balki jo samaanya bodh ke shabd hain unhein to vikilink kiya hi naheen jaata kyonki isse paathak ka dhyaan anya mahatvapoorn vaakyon ya shabdon se bhang hota hai. udaaharan ke liye shaayad hi koi hindi bhaashi hoga jise 'Bhaarat' ya 'mahila' ka arth na pata ho.
  17. 'naaji' koi shabd naheen hai. sahi shabd 'naaji' hai va ise bhi 'naaji Germany' se link karein.
  18. "unke France pahunchane par unke sabhi saathiyon ko naaji Germany ki khufiya police gestaapo ne giraftaar kar liya tha.", kya is girftaari mein Khan bhi shaamil theen?
  19. "ve France va Britain ke beech akeli kadi theen", kis prakaar ki kadi?
  20. 'jeeni-meri-renneeer' galat uchaaran hai, yeh 'jeen-mari reniya' sahi vartani hogi va Europeeya naamo mein haayafn keval do shabdon ke beech aata hai na ki ek ke baad ek.
  21. bhoomika mein sandarbh ka istemaal na karein.

kuchh samay se main niji jeevan mein vyast hooain isliye viki ki gatividhiyon mein theek se bhaag naheen raha hooain. yahaaain der se tippaniyaaain chhodne ke liye kshama chaahata hooain parantu vartamaan avastha mein lekh nirvaachit banane se bahut door hai. main anubhaag anusaar tippaniyaaain chhodta jaaooainga. main thoda hairaan is baat se bhi hooain ki sanjeev ji ke aalaava kisi aur sadasya ne spasht dikh raheen trutiyon par dhyaan kaise naheen diya? nirvaachit lekh ummeedavaar samarthan ke aadhaar par naheen apitu tippaniyon ki gambheerta aur unke anusaar hue sudhaaron ke aadhaar par padonnat kiye jaate hain.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 11:13, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

@Bill william compton:ji, sarvapratham aapka aabhaar ki der se hi sahi aapki nazar is lekh ki kamiyon par gayi. aapke sujhaav ke aalok mein samuchit sanshodhan karte huye bhoomika se sandarbh hata diye gaye hai. main bhi maanati hooain ki vartamaan avastha mein lekh nirvaachit banane se bahut door hai. ab choonki aapki nazar pad gayi hai, isliye mujhe ummeed hai, ki ab yeh lekh nishchit roop se nirvaachit banane ki maanak prakriyaaon ke sannikt aa jaaega. aapka pun: aabhaar aur shubhakaamanaayein bhi ki aap sheegra apne niji jeevan ki vyastata se baahar nikal kar poorv ki tarah ham sabka maargadarshan kareinge.--maala chaube^vaarta 08:18, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

maala ji, nirvaachit lekh jaanch ke samay agar koi sadasya tippani karta hai to vah lekhak se ummeed rakhata hai ki lekhak usaki har ek tippani ka uttar de. udaaharan ke liye is prushth ko dekhein ki kis prakaar naamaankanakarta ne tippani karne vaale sadasyon ko uttar diye hain. aisa karne se yeh faayda rahata hai ki tippani karne vaale sadasya ko baar-baar ek-ek tippani ke liye prushth ki jaanch naheen karni padti. saath hi naamaankanakarta apne badlaav ka saaraansh bhi de deta hai jisse uske dvaara ki gayi kaarravaai ke baare mein pata chal jaata hai. ek aur baat jodna chaahooainga ki har tippani ka arth yeh naheen hai ki use ekdam se maan liya jaae, agar aapko lagta hai ki ki gayi tippani vaajib naheen hai to apna mat spasht karein. jaise maine bas yeh poochha tha ki vishay ka naam urdoo mein kyon likha gaya hai, mujhe abatak naheen pata chala ki naam kyon likha gaya tha aur use kyon hata liya gaya; main hataane ke liye naheen kah raha tha.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 14:03, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

aisa prateet hota hai ki is lekh mein angreji vikipeediya ke lekh en:Noor Inayat Khan se anuvaad kiya gaya hai, parantu iske itihaas mein ya iske vaarta prushth par kaheen iska shreya naheen joda gaya hai. is sambandh mein vi:anya vikimeediya pariyojanaaon se saamagri lena dekhein, aur upayukt roop se {{anoodit prushth}} ka prayog karein. iske atirikt aisa prateet hota hai ki vishay ka ek uddharan (quotation, not citation) mahila sahakarmi, vaayu sena bhaag mein anoodit kiya gaya hai. yadi yeh anuvaad vikipeediya par hi kiya gaya hai (arthaat anuvaad apne-aap mein kisi baahari srot se naheen hai), to us uddharan ke srot mein mool uddharan quote ke taur par jodna chaahiye (cite saaainche mein quote praachal).--siddhaarth ghai (vaarta) 15:41, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

@Siddhartha Ghai:ji, mujhe is baat ki khushi hai, ki der se hi sahi kintu bill ji ke baad aapki bhi pratikriyaaeain mili. pehli baat to yeh ki is lekh ko na to angreji vikipeediya ke lekh en:Noor Inayat Khan se aayaatit kiya gaya hai aur na anoodit hi. haaain kuchh anubhaag jaise mahila sahakarmi, vaayu sena aur vishesh abhiyaan ke kaaryakaari ef seksan agent ke roop mein jaasoosi aadi mein kaheen-kaheen katipya mahatvapoorn jaanakaariyaaain avashya li gayi hai. mahila sahakarmi, vaayu sena bhaag mein aapke dvaara jis quote ki baat ki gayi hai vah unheen mahatvapoorn jaankaariyon mein se ek hai. jahaan tak ise cite saaainche mein quote praachal jodne ka prashn hai, to main jod deti hooain.--maala chaube^vaarta 05:46, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

lekh dekh kar to mujhe aisa prateet hota hai ki jaankaari lete samay vaakya-dar-vaakya anuvaad kiya gaya hai, jo ki close paraphrasing mein aata hai aur isliye {{anoodit prushth}} (athva shreya pradaan karne ke kisi anya tareeke) ka prayog aavashyak ho jaata hai. main bill se anurodh karooainga ki ve bhi ek baar prushth ko is najriye se jaaainch lein, khaas kar un bhaagon ko jinmein aapka kehna hai ki jaankaari angreji vikipeediya se li gayi hai.--siddhaarth ghai (vaarta) 11:18, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

maala ji, lekh ki bhoomika se hi yeh pata chal raha hai ki angreji viki se kaafi ansh liya gaya hai. {{anoodit prushth}} lagaane se kaupeeraait samasya naheen hogi. anoodit prushthon ki badi sankhya hone ke kaaran main bhi maanata hooain ki har aise prushth par saanche ka istemaal mushkil hai parantu nirvaachit saamagri hamaara utkrusht kaarya hota hai, hamein iske nirmaan mein utkrusht prakriya hi apanaani chaahiye.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 14:03, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

maala ji, is lekh mein abhi kuchh parishram karne ki aavashyakta prateet ho rahi hai.... kuchh vaakya vyaakaranik drushti se sudhaar maaaingate hain.... jaise-

" mool ki british guptachar thi " "thi" kriya ek vachan mein hai.... " pehli mahila wireless oparetar theen. " yahaaain "theen " kriya aadaraarth bahuvachan hai..... --daa0 jagadeesh vyom^vaarta 14:46, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

@Bill william compton, Siddhartha Ghai, aur Dr.jagdish:ji, sabse pehle bill ji aur siddhaarth ji se duharaana chaahoongi ki aaingreji vikipeediya se katipya jaanakaariyaaain lene ke kram mein sambhav hai ki kuchh panktiyaaain anoodit dikhaai de rahi ho, kintu poora lekh anoodit kehna meri samajh se pare hai. fir bhi yadi aapko kaupeeraait samasya utpann ho rahi ho to {{anoodit prushth}} ankit karne mein mujhe koi samasya naheen hai. haaain vil ji se ek baat aur kehna chaahoongi, ki noor ka urdoo mein naam likhne ka keval ek hi kaaran tha, ki vah naam arabi jubaan mein hai aur unki maatrubhaasha bhi urdoo hi hai. kintu mujhe laga ki aapko us naam ko urdoo mein rakhane par aapatti hai. aap yadi santusht ho to main pun: jod dooaingi. ab daa0 jagadeesh vyom ji se main mukhaatib ho rahi hooain. aapne jab mujhse poorv mein hi poochh liya tha, ki "aap theek samajhein to main is lekh ki vartaneegat trutiyon ko theek kar dooain......" aur mainne apni sahamati bhi de di thi to fir "thi" aur "theen" ki baat karne ka kya abhipraaya hai? ap jahaan bhi uchit samajhein sudhaar kar sakte hain. aap sabhi ka bahut-bahut aabhaar mahatvapoorn sujhaav ke liye.--maala chaube^vaarta 05:13, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

@Mala chaubey: maala ji, aapko ye kyon lag raha hai ki {{anoodit prushth}} ka prayog karne ka arth hai ki poore prushth ko anoodit kaha ja raha hai? yeh saaaincha to keval mool lekhakon ko shreya pradaan karne ke liye hai. aur saaainche ki bhaasha bhi kaheen bhi ye naheen kehti ki poora lekh anoodit hai, balki sirf ye ki usamein anuvaad kar ke saamagri jodi gayi hai. udaaharan ke taur par aap vaarta:indira Gandhi dekhein. aur jahaaain tak mera vichaar hai, haaain, is prushth ke vaarta prushth par is saaainche ko lagaana mool lekhakon ko shreya pradaan karne ke liye aavashyak hai. aap bhaagon ki jaankaari dene ke liye saaainche ke praachalon ka prayog kar sakti hain (haaain shaayad anek bhaagon ke naam jodne ke liye anek baar prayog karna pade).--siddhaarth ghai (vaarta) 09:02, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

@Siddhartha Ghai:ji, aapke vichaaron ka sammaan karte huye mere dvaara vaarta:noor inaayat Khan mein {{anoodit prushth}} ka saaaincha jod diya gaya hai.--maala chaube^vaarta 09:23, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

@Siddhartha Ghai, Bill william compton, sanjeev Kumar, aur Shubhamkanodia:ji, uparyukt badlaav kiye ja chuke hain. sambhav ho to lekh ko nirvaachit karein ya aur sudhaar bataayein.--maala chaube^vaarta 13:16, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

@Mala chaubey: siddhaarth ji apni tippaniyaaain likhkar abhi chhuti par chale gaye hain. agale do-teen din mein (jab bhi paryaapt samay mila) unki sameeksha main kar dunga. iske atirikt bill ji bhi abhi kaafi vyast hain at: unki ek-do saptaah prateeksha karna achha rahega. yadi unki tippani agale 10 din tak naheen aati hai to yeh prushth nirvaachit ho jaayega. lekin dhyaan rahe unki tippani atyaavashyak hai.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 16:33, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

'praarambhik jeevan' par tippaniyaaain

1. poora naam 'noor-un-nisa inaayat Khan' likhein. bhoomika mein bold bhi poore naam ko karein.
2. "1 January, 1914" tithi ka koi praaroop naheen hai.
3. Moscow ko Moscow, roos, likhein. kisi bhi shahar (praant/raajya) ke pehle sandarbh ko desh ke saath likha jaata hai.
4. jaisa main oopar bhi bata chuka hooain ki samaanya bodh ke shabd vikilink naheen kiye jaate isliye Bhaarat ko kadi na dein.
5. pun: us bindu par jor de raha hooain ki 'Bhaarat' jaise shabdon ko vikilink na karein.
6. "poora parivaar pashchimi deshon mein hi rahane laga", kya parivaar pashchim ke vibhnn desho mein alag-alag ho kar rahane laga tha ya kisi ek desh mein? agar keval ek ya do desh hain to unhein spasht karein. pashchim mein kai desh aate hain jo bhramit karta hai.
7. 'sangeet' ko vikilink karne ka auchitya?
8. "vaheen sangeet ki ruchi noor ke bheetar bhi jaagi aur ve bachchon ke liye jaatak kathaaon par aadhaarit kahaaniyaaain likhne lageen", sangeet mein roochi jaagane aur bachcho ke liye kahaani likhne mein kya sambandh hai? is vaakya se yeh prateet ho raha hai ki sangeet ki roochi ke kaaran ve kathaaeain bhi likhne lageen.
9. "unka parivaar Moscow, roos se London aa gaya tha", 'Moscow' aur 'London' ko vikilink na dein. roos ke baad coma aaega.
10. "nauting hil" kya hai? school? sthaan? ya kuchh aur?
11. "1920 mein ve France chali gain, jahaaain ve peris", 'France' aur 'peris' ko vikilink na dein.
12. "yeh ghar unhein soofi aandolan ke ek anuyaai ke dvaara upahaar mein mila tha", kise ghar upahaar mein diya gaya tha? inhein ya inke parivaar ko?
13. bauddhon ko bauddh dharm se vikilink dein.
14. "(aaiesabeeen 978-0892813230)", lekh ke beech mein aaiesabeeen na dein.
15. "London se prakaashit", London ko vikilink na dein. aisa hi aage "France aur Germany" aur "Britain" ke saath karein.
16. "samudri maarg se Britain ke faalamaauth, kaurnavaal laut aayeen.", vaakya se prateet hota hai ki ye pehle isi sthaan ki nivaasi theen aur yuddh praarambh hone ke pashchaat vaapas vahaaain laut gain. kya aisa kuchh hai?

@Mala chaubey: krupaya mere dvaara oopar bataae gaye udaaharan ki tarah tippaniyon ke uttar dein.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 12:51, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

@Bill william compton:ji, sabse pehle aapka aabhaar trutiyon par gaur karne ke liye. aapki tippaniyon ka kramavaar uttar:

1. sahi kar diya gaya hai, krupaya avlokan kar lein.
2. yahaaain praaroop ka abhipraaya mujhe samajh mein naheen aaya?
3. sahi kar diya gaya hai, krupaya avlokan kar lein.
4. sahi kar diya gaya hai, krupaya avlokan kar lein.
5. sahi kar diya gaya hai, krupaya avlokan kar lein.
6. desh ka naam ankit karaate huye vaakya sahi kar diya gaya hai, krupaya avlokan kar lein.
7. sahi kar diya gaya hai, krupaya avlokan kar lein.
8. (vaheen saahitya aur sangeet mein ruchi noor ke bheetar jaagi aur ve sangeet ke abhyaas ke saath-saath bachchon ke liye jaatak kathaaon par aadhaarit kahaaniyaaain likhne lageen. vaheen unhein veena bajaane ka shauk junoon ki had tak pahuncha.) sahi kar diya gaya hai, krupaya avlokan kar lein.
9. sahi kar diya gaya hai, krupaya avlokan kar lein.
10. nauting hil" school hai----sahi kar diya gaya hai, krupaya avlokan kar lein.
11. sahi kar diya gaya hai, krupaya avlokan kar lein.
12. inke parivaar ko upahaar mein mila tha. sahi kar diya gaya hai, krupaya avlokan kar lein.
13. sahi kar diya gaya hai, krupaya avlokan kar lein.
14. aaiesabeeen ko sandarbh mein de diya gaya hai, krupaya avlokan kar lein.
15. sahi kar diya gaya hai, krupaya avlokan kar lein.
16. haaain, ve pehle isi sthaan ki nivaasi theen aur yuddh praarambh hone ke pashchaat vaheen vaapas vahaaain laut gain.--maala chaube^vaarta 06:31, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

samarthan - :@Mala chaubey:ji, aapke is lekh ko nirvaachit karne hetu mera samarthan hai, meri tipnni mein der isliye hui ki tipnni karne se pehle main niyam ko bhaleebhaanti jaan lena chaahati thi. Naziah rizvi (vaarta) 14:01, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

• main samajh naheen pa raha ki mere baar-baar kehne ke pashchaat bhi lekh mein vikilink ka itna galat istemaal kyon hai? main is lekh ko teesari baar padh raha hooain parantu har baar vikilink ke sahi upayog ki tippani karni pad rahi hai. nirvaachit lekh ummeedavaar ki prakiya mein tippaneekarta prastaavak ko keval sanket dete hain ki kis prakaar ki kami sampoorn lekh se door honi chaahiye parantu yahaaain aisa kuchh ho hi naheen raha. main virodh naheen karna chaahata parantu agar aise hi baar-baar mujhe vikilink ka sahi istemaal samajhaana pada to vivsh ho kar mujhe virodh karna padega. aur main doosare sadasyon ke samarthan se aashcharyachakit hooain. lekh ko abhi bhi itna kaupi-edit karna hai ki ise angreji viki par gud aartikl bhi na banaate. maala ji krupaya mujhe kshama karein agar meri baat thodi katu lagi ho to parantu aap jaisi lekhika ko to ishaara hi kaafi hona chaahiye.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 15:36, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

@Bill william compton:, "main doosare sadasyon ke samarthan se aashcharyachakit hooain." aapke is kathan se main ittefaak naheen rakhati, kyonki aapki soch se doosaron ki soch mel khaae mumakeen naheen hai. aisi bhaasha ke prayog se aapko bachana chaahiye.Naziah rizvi (vaarta) 17:03, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

naajiya ji, yahaaain sadasyon ki soch mahatva naheen rakhati. yahaaain hamein sarvashreshth lekh chunane hote hain aur achha sadasyon ke vichaaron se naheen balki kuchh niyamon par khara utarane vaale ko kaha jaata hai. at: ham yahaaain niymaavali ke anusaar ki gayi tippani se sahamati athva asahamati jataayein, iska koi auchitya naheen hai.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 17:16, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

@Bill william compton, sanjeev Kumar, aur Naziah rizvi:,

bill ji ki baat thodi katu avashya hai, kintu vo kehte hain na ki kadvi davaaiyaaain svasthya ke liye laabhadaayak hoti hai. to ise kadvi dabaaiyon ke roop mein grahan kiya jaaye. sanjeev ji ne sahi kaha ki ham yahaaain niymaavali ke anusaar ki gayi tippani se sahamati athva asahamati jataayein. naajiya ji kshama keejiyega aap abhi nai hain dheere-dheere aap vikineetiyon se avagat ho jaaengi. sabse mera anurodh hai ki bhaasha ki maryaada banaae rakha jaaye. bill ji ki tippani ke baad sanjeev ji ke dvaara lekh mein kaupi-edit kiya gaya hai. main bhi dekhti hooain aur bhi kuchh kamiyaaain shesh rah gayi ho to door karne ka prayaas karti hooain. bill ji se anurodh hai ki uske baad bhi kaheen chhoti-moti trutiyaaain shesh rah jaaye to use ve swayam sudhaar devein ya fir sanket dein to main sudhaar dooaingi.--maala chaube^vaarta 05:35, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

• lambe samay tak koi tippani naheen hona aur lekh mein aavashyak sudhaar poorn hone ke baad lekh ko nirvaachit kiya ja raha hai. lekh mein abhi bhi kuchh sthaanon par nukta aksharon se sambandhit trutiyaaain hain lekin aadhunik hindi mein unka prachalan adhik naheen hai aur lagbhag aavashyak sthaanon par unhein poorn kiya ja chuka hai.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 08:44, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

oopar ki charcha ek puraalekh ke taur par parirkshit ki gayi hai. ismein koi badlaav na karein. ismein ab koi sanpaadan naheen hona chaahiye.

nimnalikhit nirvaachit lekh naamaankan ka puraalekh hai. krupaya ismein badlaav na karein. agar aap ko is naamaankan sambandhit koi tippani karni hai to apni tipnni lekh ke vaarta prushth ya vikipeediya vaarta:nirvaachit lekh ummeedavaar par chhodein. ab is anubhaag mein kisi bhi prakaar ka koi sampaadan naheen hona chaahiye.

yeh lekh 12:10, somvaar June 20, 2016 (UTC) ko sanjeev Kumar dvaara padonnat kiya gaya.

naalaapat baalamani amma

(prastaavak: ----maala chaube^vaarta 13:27, 6 May 2014 (UTC))

• naamaankan hetu tippani: yeh lekh Bhaarat ki kshetreeya bhaasha malayalam ki kaalajayi lekhika jinhein "grand madar of malayalam litrechar" kaha jaata hai, par hai. iski sabse badi visheshata yeh hai, ki itne sundar tareeke se na to malayalam viki par aur na aaingreji viki par yeh lekh bana hai. is lekh ko vikipeediya:is saptaah ka sudhaar hetu lekh pariyojana ke antargat 23 April 2014 se 3 May 2014 tak sadasyon dvaara sudhaar kiya gaya hai aur iski sthiti gunavatta ke anuroop hui hai. sadasyon ki sahamati se is lekh ko nirvaachit lekh parakh hetu prastut kiya gaya hai. nirvaachit hone ke pashchaat hindi viki par yeh Bhaarat ke kisi kshetreeya bhaasha ke kaalajayi saahityakaar par pehla nirvaachit lekh ya shreshth lekh hoga.

samarthan --mujmmil (vaarta) 08:19, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

is lekh mein mainne kai jagah vartani evam vaakyon mein sudhaar kar diye hain. "nirvaachit hone ke pashchaat hindi viki par yeh kisi bhaarateeya bhaasha ke kaalajayi saahityakaar par pehla nirvaachit lekh ya shreshth lekh hoga." yeh kehna uchit naheen hoga kyonki mahaadevi varma jaisi bhaarateeya bhaasha ki kaalajayi saahityakaar par viki par lekh pehle se hi nirvaachit lekh ke roop mein upalabdh hai.--daa0 jagadeesh vyom^vaarta 15:51, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

samarthan anya sadasya bhi sabhi pahaluon par ise parakh lein. ░a▒a▓► shubham kanodiya ^vaarta 17:42, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

@Dr.jagdish:ji, aap theek se padhein- oopar likha hai, ki "yeh lekh Bhaarat ki kshetreeya bhaasha malayalam ki kaalajayi lekhika jinhein "grand madar of malayalam litrechar" kaha jaata hai, par hai." bhaarateeya bhaasha se taatparya kshetreeya bhaashaaon se hai jo ki bhaarateeya samvidhaan ki aathaveen anusoochi mein darj hai. mahaadevi varma raashtrabhaasha hindi ki kaalajayi saahityakaar theen, na ki kshetreeya bhaashaaon ki.--maala chaube^vaarta 06:38, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

maala ji theek se padhkar hi likha tha anyatha yeh galati rah hi jaati, ab dhanyavaad sanshodhan karne ke liye-

"nirvaachit hone ke pashchaat hindi viki par yeh kisi bhaarateeya bhaasha ke kaalajayi saahityakaar par pehla nirvaachit lekh ya shreshth lekh hoga." (yeh pehle likha tha)

"nirvaachit hone ke pashchaat hindi viki par yeh Bhaarat ke kisi kshetreeya bhaasha ke kaalajayi saahityakaar par pehla nirvaachit lekh ya shreshth lekh hoga." (yeh ab likha hai)--daa0 jagadeesh vyom^vaarta 03:39, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

@Mala chaubey: hindi raashtrabhaasha naheen balki Bhaarat ki ek raajabhaasha hai. Bhaarat mein kendriya star par do raajabhaasha hain jinmein se ek hindi hai. iske atirikt pratyek raajya ki apni raajabhaasha hai.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 07:02, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

@sanjeev Kumar:ji, behtar hoga in vivaadit baaton ko yahaaain na uthaaya jaae. ispar ek lambi bahas ho sakti hai. main raajabhaasha ya raashtrabhaasha ke pachade mein naheen padna chaahati, kyonki main hindi ko keval bhaarateeya bhaasha kehkar apamaan naheen karna chaahati kyonki yeh bhaasha kai roopon mein Bhaarat ke baahar ki bhi bhaasha hai. hindi vaishvik bhaasha hai keval bhaarateeya naheen. yadi sambhav ho to keval lekh par apni pratikriya vyakt karein. vishay se baahar nikalkar baat karne se lakshya, kaaryakram aur gatividhiyaan teenon prabhaavit hoti hain.--maala chaube^vaarta 07:12, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

mera uddeshya bahas karna naheen hai. aapne raashtrabhaasha likha tha jise theek karna mera uddeshya tha.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 07:30, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

main meri tippaniyon ki pratham soochi prushth ke vaarta panne par likh chuka hooain.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 05:53, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

tippani: mujhe iske bhoomika bhaag mein kuchh khaami najar aayi use sudhaar diya hai. baaki lekh theek hai sandarbh bhi mujhe uchit lage. nirvaachit lekh parakh ki anya kasautiyon ke liye prabandhak gan swayam saksham hain. baharahaal, mera samarthan hai. dau॰'kraant'ema॰aaela॰aavarma (vaarta) 04:14, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

samarthan - :@Mala chaubey:ji, aapke is lekh ko nirvaachit karne hetu mera samarthan hai, meri tipnni mein der isliye hui ki tipnni karne se pehle main niyam ko bhaleebhaanti jaan lena chaahati thi aur parakh ke baad main is nishkarsh par pahunchi hooain ki yeh lekh vaakai shreshth lekh banane ke yogya hai. aapki mehnat ko salaam. Naziah rizvi (vaarta) 13:59, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

tippani -

• sammaan/ puraskaar anubhaag ke ant mein poornaviraam anaavashyak hai.
• kaavya vivechana anubhaag ki pratham pankti mein isaprakaar ke madhya space dein.
• isi anubhaag mein aapne ke॰ sachchidaanandan va vee॰ ema॰ girja ke tippaniyon ko mote aksharon mein likha hai tatha saahitya aur bhaarateeya ekta E pustak va dau॰ haradvaari laal sharma ki kaavyalochan mein saundarya drushti pustak ko mote aksharon mein naheen likha hai. kya iska koi vishesh kaaran hai?
• saahitya, saahityakaar, bhaarateeya mahila saahityakaar yeh ek hi prakaar ki shreniyaaain hain. mera sujhaav hai ki keval bhaarateeya mahila saahityakaar shreni hi rakhe. krupaya en:WP:OC dekhein.
• isi prakaar malayalam aur malayalam saahityakaar ek hi prakaar ki shreniyaaain hain. mera sujhaav hai ki keval malayalam saahityakaar shreni hi rakhe.--prateek maalaveeya^•✉•✎ 12:35, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

@Prateekmalviya20:ji,

• mujhe naheen lagta ki sammaan/ puraskaar anubhaag ke ant mein poornaviraam anaavashyak hai, yadi aapko yeh anaavashyak prateet ho raha ho to hata dein, meri sahamati hai.
• kisprakaar ke ke madhya space dein? main samajhi naheen.
• iska koi vishesh kaaran naheen hai, aisa keval prushth ki sundarata ke liye kiya gaya hai.
• anaavashyak shreniyaaain hata di gain hain. dhanyavaad.--maala chaube^vaarta 11:31, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

"malayalam saahitya ki daadi" kaha jaata hai." yeh vaakya do baar aa gaya hai--daa0 jagadeesh vyom^vaarta 13:37, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

@Dr.jagdish:ji, bhoomika mein diye jaane ke baad sambandhit anubhaag mein sandarbh sahit diya jaana meri rai mein galat naheen hai. yadi aapko yeh galat lag raha ho to kuchh vishay visheshagyon se bhi rai le lein.--maala chaube^vaarta 11:55, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

samarthan kisi bhi achhe lekh mein ek hi vaakya ka do baar prayog ashuddh maana jaata hai, yadi ek hi vaakya ka do baar prayog karna hi pade to vaakya ki bhaasha mein thoda parivartan kar sakte hain --daa0 jagadeesh vyom^vaarta 14:43, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

@jagadeesh ji: aapne theek kaha. ek hi lekh mein ek vaakya ko baar-baar naheen likha jaana chaahiye.

@maala ji: jab ham ek vaakya bhoomika mein likhte hain to vah lekh mein prayukt saamagri ka saar hota hai at: lekh mein samaan pankti aana uchit naheen hai. jaisa jagadeesh ji ne kaha pankti ka svaroop badla ja sakta hai.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 15:06, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

maala ji bhi apni jagah sahi hain ki sambandhit anubhaag mein sandarbh sahit diya jaana galat naheen hai, kintu mere vichaar se donon vaakyon mein aanshik bhinnata to honi heeain chaahiye. is disha mein main bhi jagadeesh ji aur sanjeev ji ki baaton se sahamat hooain.Naziah rizvi (vaarta) 02:47, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

@Dr.jagdish, Naziah rizvi, aur sanjeev Kumar:ji, aap sabhi ke sujhaav ke aalok mein mere dvaara ukt lekh ke kaavya srujan anubhaag mein aavashyak sanshodhan kar diya gaya hai. aap teenon ka bahut-bahut dhanyavaad.--maala chaube^vaarta 06:24, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

@Mala chaubey: mera arth isaprakaar ko is prakaar karne se tha, jo ki mainne kar diya. iske alaava poornaviraam bhi hata diya. parantu abhi bhi do anaavashyak shreniyaaain saahitya aur saahityakaar judi hai. ise hataate hi mera samarthan hai.--prateek maalaveeya^•✉•✎ 15:59, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

@Prateekmalviya20: aapke sujhaav ke anusaar shreniyaaain saahitya aur saahityakaar hata di gayi hai. dhanyavaad.--maala chaube^vaarta 05:47, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

samarthan maala ji ne mere tippaniyon ke anusaar lekh mein sudhaar kar diya at: mera is lekh ko nirvaachit banaane ko samarthan hai.--prateek maalaveeya^•✉•✎ 09:36, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

meri jaaainch lagbhag samaapt ho gayi hai at: ab lekh ko nirvaachit karne mein mujhe koi aapatti naheen hai.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 20:18, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

• virodh lekh apne vartamaan svaroop mein nirvaachit banane se bahut door hai. main kuchh praarambhik tippaniyaaain kar raha hooain.

1. sampoorn lekh se atyaadhik maatra mein istemaal kiye gaye vikilink, udaaharan: janm ya mrutyu ka arth kis hindeebhaashi ko naheen pata? malayalam kitni baar link ki jaaegi?
2. janm aur mrutyu ka sthaan jab tak bhoomika mein (janm va mrutyu tithi ke saath) likhne ki jaroorat naheen jab tak janmasthaan ya mrutyusthaan vishay ke jeevan mein vishesharoop se aham ho.
3. tithiyon ke beech ienadaish ka istemaal karein.
4. "malayalam bhaasha ki ek bhaarateeya kavayitri", 'ek' angreji ke aartikls ki vajah se hindi mein aaya hai jo bilkul bhi aavashyak naheen.
5. bhoomika keval inki kavitaaon ke baare mein bataati hai, jabki pratham vaakya ke anusaar ye lekhika bhi theen. inke lekhan ka varnan karein.
6. jnyaaanasandook mein prabhaavakarta ka jikr hai jabki lekh mein kaheen bhi naheen.
7. alajaaimar rog jaise shabdon ko vikilink karein.
8. jnyaaanasandook mein mrutyu ka kaaran dein.
9. "unhein malayalam kavita ki sheersh kavayitri maana gaya hai", kisne inhein "sheersh kavayitri" maana hai. krupaya veejl shabdon ke upayog se bachein.
10. agar inhein sachch mein "sheersh kavayitri" maana gaya hai to 'kaavya srujan' anubhaag mein inki rachanaao ke baare mein itni kam jaanakari kyon hai?
11. keval kavitaao ka jikr hai, to ye lekhika kaise bani?

<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 16:03, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

@Bill william compton:ji, aapki kuchh praarambhik tippaniyon ka uttar-

1. atyaadhik maatra mein istemaal kiye gaye vikilink hata diye gaye hai, krupaya avlokan kar lein.
2. janm aur mrutyu ka sthaan bhoomika se hata diya gaya hai, krupaya avlokan kar lein.
3. tithiyon ke beech ienadaish ka istemaal kar diya gaya hai, krupaya avlokan kar lein.
4. ek shabd hata diya gaya hai, krupaya avlokan kar lein.
5. bhoomika mein majhuveent katha (kulhaadi ki kahaani) ki charcha hai aur unhone kuchh baal kahaaniyaaain bhi likhi hain.
6. lekh ke jeevani anubhaag ko theek se padhein "ena॰ Narayan Menon ki likhi pustakon ka un par gahra prabhaav pada aur unhein kavayitri banane mein bharpoor madad ki. ve apne kaavya jeevan mein kavi ena॰ Narayan Menon aur vee॰ Narayan Menon se atyadhik prabhaavit rahi hain."
7. alajaaimar rog ko vikilink kar diya gaya hai, krupaya avlokan kar lein.
8. jnyaaanasandook mein mrutyu ka kaaran de diya gaya hai.
9. "unhein malayalam kavita ki sheersh kavayitri maana gaya hai." vaakya hata diya gaya hai.
10. uparokt panktiyaaain hataane ke baad is prashn ka koi matlab naheen.
11. sandarbh sankhya 3 ka avlokan karein, unhein "A prolific writer" kaha gaya hai.

aapki aage ki tippaniyon ki prateeksha hai. dhanyavaad.--maala chaube^vaarta 06:24, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

• chooainki pichhli tippani ke baad lekh mein bahut bade parivartan ho chuke hain (yahaaain dekhein) at: iski sameeksha pun: shoonya se karna behtar hoga.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 13:18, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

• lambe samay tak koi tippani naheen hona aur lekh mein aavashyak sudhaar poorn hone ke baad lekh ko nirvaachit kiya ja raha hai. fir bhi yadi kisi ko kisi tarah ki samasya ho to lekh ke vaarta prushth par aage ki charcha ki ja sakti hai.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 17:03, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

oopar ki charcha ek puraalekh ke taur par parirkshit ki gayi hai. ismein koi badlaav na karein. ismein ab koi sanpaadan naheen hona chaahiye.

nimnalikhit nirvaachit lekh naamaankan ka puraalekh hai. krupaya ismein badlaav na karein. agar aap ko is naamaankan sambandhit koi tippani karni hai to apni tipnni lekh ke vaarta prushth ya vikipeediya vaarta:nirvaachit lekh ummeedavaar par chhodein. ab is anubhaag mein kisi bhi prakaar ka koi sampaadan naheen hona chaahiye.

yeh lekh 12:10, somvaar June 20, 2016 (UTC) ko sanjeev Kumar dvaara padonnat kiya gaya.

1 − 2 + 3 − 4 + · · ·

(prastaavak: ☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 20:14, 25 May 2014 (UTC))

angreji mein nirvaachit prushth ka hindi anuvaad. shaayad ganit vishay mein pratham lekh hoga jo hindi vikipeediya par nirvaachit ho sakta hai.

• yadi koi virodh naheen hua to is lekh ko isi saptaah main nirvaachit ghoshit kar raha hooain. kaaran: koi virodh naheen aur lekh mein aavashyak sudhaar kar chuka hooain tatha yeh nirvaachit lekh ka anuvaad hai.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 16:56, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

• mujhe koi aapatti naheen hai. aap iski sameeksha kar le, kaheen koi chhoti-moti glatiyaaain rah gayi ho. main bhi madad karta par ganit mein nausikhiya hooain! :D --peeyoosh^vaarta 12:25, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

• sanjeev ji, kya hua? agar samarthan chaahiye to ye raha- samarthan.--peeyoosh (vaarta)^yogadaan 16:27, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

ganit mein haath tang hain, par vartani aur bhaasha vaale kuchh sujhaav vaarta panne par chhode hain! ise bevajh adi lagaana mat maaniyega!--satyam mishr (vaarta) 18:26, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

satyam ji, ise adi lagaana naheen kehte. balki mujhe to kaafi khushi ho rahi hai ki kam se kam aapne to koi tippani ki. isse pehle surendr ji se aagrah karne par unhonne kuchh sujhaav diye the. jaldi hi ye sudhaar kar diye jaayeinge.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 19:51, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

peeyoosh ji, main samarthan ki prateeksha naheen kar pa raha lekin lekh mein sabhi laal-kadiyaaain abhi laal hi hain. main naheen chaahata ki mukhaprushth par aate samay lekh mein itni adhik maatra mein laal-kadiyaaain hon. at: mainne yeh hi chaaha ki ise mukhaprushth par laane se poorv adhiktar laal-kadiyon ko theek karooain.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 19:59, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

oopar ki charcha ek puraalekh ke taur par parirkshit ki gayi hai. ismein koi badlaav na karein. ismein ab koi sanpaadan naheen hona chaahiye.