vikipeediya:chaupaal/puraalekh 5

lipyantaran

d likhne ke liye DaK prayog karein--sumit sinhavaarta 11:28, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

lipyaantikran kaafi rochak shabd hai. kya iska anvaya bata sakte hain? kya yeh tamil ka hindeekaran hai? ya shabdakosh dot com ka mahaajnyaaan? --poornima varman 15:02, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
is shabd ki vishvasaneeyata aur sahi arth jaanana aavashyak hai --raajeevamaas 15:24, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
sahi shabd lipyaantaran hai, na ki lipyaantikran --Tarun 15:41, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
lipi+antaran=lipyaantaran sahamat --raajeevamaas 15:39, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
yeh sahi hai ki web par sarvajnya aur bhoomiyo jaisi saaitein lipyaantaran shabd ka prayog kar rahi hain. par lipyantaran ya lipyantaran likhna sahi rahega. kuchh sandarbh sanlagn hain. [1] [2] aasha hai sahayogi iska laabh uthaaeainge aur sujhaav ko anyatha na lete hue sahayog banaae rakheinge. --poornima varman 18:49, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

lipi + antaran = lipyantaran ( dhyaan dein, lipyaantaran naheen) anya udaaharan :(i + a = ya) prati + arpan = pratyarpan vi + arth = vyarth

kintu, (i + aa = ya) iti + aadi = ityaadi ati + aachaar = atyaachaar

anunaad Singh 03:44, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

lipyantaran sahi shabd hai, father bulke se asahamati ka savaal hi naheen :)--debaasheesh 11:56, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

sandarbh

  1. bulke, kaamil (1984). aaingareji hindi kosh. raamanagar, nai Delhi: S chand end company. pa॰ 756.
  2. baahari, Dr.haradev (1999). angreji-hindi paaribhaashik-shabdakosh. Kashmiri gate, nai Delhi: raajapaal end sons. pa॰ 625.

vikshanari nae badlaav

priya hindi vikipeediyns, hindi vikshanari ke prabandhak pad ke liye mere naamaankan evam chayan karne ke liye dhanyavaad. apeksha hai aane vaale masamaya me mai aap sabki apekshaaonko pure karne me sahaayya kar sakta hoon.

hindi vikshanari me mere dvaara pratham mahatvapoorn badlaav hindi vikipeediya ki upayojit dhvanyaatmak devanaagari likhneki suvidha (pareekshan praavastha) ka prayog karna hai . is badlaav ke prati aapka samarthan evam virodh chaupaal par likhe .

dhanyavaad

Mahitgar 19:18, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

koi virodhi mat na aanese vikshanareeme upar prastaavit nirdesh kiya hooaa badlaav amal kiya gaya hai . yeh badal hindi vikipeediya ki aaj ke sanskaran par aadhaareet hai. hindi vikipeediya ki upayojit dhvanyaatmak devanaagari likhneki suvidha ka laabh abhi aap hindi vishnari me bhi utha sakte hai.

Mahitgar 17:40, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Wikimedia Indian chapter

As you might be aware, we are planning to start an India chapter of the Wikimedia Foundation. Please see Wikimedia India for details. We're currently working on the draft of bylaws. If you are interested, please join the discussion on meta, and subscribe to the wikimediaindia-l mailing list. Utcursch 17:38, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Is there any update on this? Is there any active hindi wikipedian involved in Wikimedia Indian Chapter?--mitul 20:30, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
I realy do not get why Indian local language wikipedians are missing from on going discussions.Mahitgar 11:17, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Aamir khusaro?

Aamir khusaro: kya sahi naam ameer khusaro naheen hai? kam se kam ham school mein to yahi padhte aaye. sadasyagan spasht karne mein madad karein taaki aavashyak ho to naam sahi kiya ja sake.--debaasheesh 11:56, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

sahi hai .

 amit

ameer khusaro sahi naam hai daa0 jagadeesh vyom

filmon ke sheershak

filmon ke vishay mein banaae jaane vaale prushthon ke sheershak ke vishay mein sujhaav hai- ki unke naam ke saath film ka varsh na joda jaaya. varsh juda hone se filmon ko sarch karna sambhav naheen hai. agar kisi film ke vishay mein khojana ho to usaka varsh jaanana zaroori hai aur saamaanya roop se log yeh naheen yaad rakhate ki yeh film kis varsh mein bani hai. agar kisi naam ki do filmein hain to unke liye ek prushth banaakar do link alag alag varsh ke dena theek rahega. varsh ka nirdhaaran karne ke liye us par varsh ke anusaar shreni laga dena paryaapt hoga. yeh sujhaav mere man mein saahityakaaron ke prushth banaate samay aaya. udaaharan ke liye kamaleshvar dvaara likhi gayi pramukh filmon ke naam jab maine un filmon se jodne chaahe jinki katha ya patakatha unhonne likhi hai to ve mujhe un filmon ke prushth naheen mile. anya sadasyon ke vichaar aamantrit hain --poornima varman 05:52, 19 December 2007 (UTC)


main poornima ke vichaaron se poornaroopen sahamat hooain . kisi anbhigya ke liye dhooaindhane mein pareshaani ke alaava yeh kai filmon ke prushthon ka naam bhi anaayaas hi lamba tatha bhonda bana deta hai . jaise ki jab pyaar kisi se hota hai ka naam jab pyaar kisi se hota hai (1961 film) rakhane ki koi aavashyakta naheen hai . --amit prabhaakar 13:43, 19 December 2007 (UTC)


I agree with you guys, but how can we maintain consistency without providing YEAR in the title. Why can't we just create article with "FILM TITLE" redirecting to "FILE TIME (FILM YEAR)" page. It's not that bad. If you search for the page, you will always get to the right page. If page jab pyaar kisi se hota hai has a redirection to jab pyaar kisi se hota hai (1961 film), It should work in the search. I don't know but this would be an issue anyway as Bollywood keep producing movies and they are bound to be duplicate in future also.----maneesh vashishth 14:20, 19 December 2007 (UTC)


vikipeediya:vikipeediya par kya chal raha hai

sakriya viki-prayogakartaaon se anurodh hai ki apne kaaryau ke baare me vikipeediya:vikipeediya par kya chal raha hai par ek-do panktiyaaain likh diya kare. isse yeh jaanane me suvidha hogi ki hindi vikipeediya par naya kya ho raha hai? aapko apne kaam me sahaayata milegi, aisi ummeed bhi hai.--mitul 20:39, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

maine ise ek saaainche ke roop me parivrtit kar diya hai. isse sadasya isko apne vaarta ya sadasya prushth par laga sakte hai. udaaharan: mere vaarta prushth ko dekhe. --mitul 01:05, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

nav varsh shubhakaamanaaain

aap sabhi hindi lekhako ko paashchaatya nav varsh - 2008 shubh ho !!!--raajeevamaas 07:30, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

nirvaachit lekh ummeedavaar

krupaya dekhe aur tippani de: vikipeediya:nirvaachit lekh ummeedavaar. --mitul 19:07, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

"rakshaabandhan nirvaachit lekh ghoshit hua. aap apne anya lekho ko ummeedavaar banaae. paryatan bhoogol lekh ummeedavaar ban sakta hai. --mitul 05:16, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

is it logical?

Dear hindi wikipedians,

During each of my visit to hindi wikipedia and hindi wiktionary I always found it defficult to understand the help "yoonikod devaganaagari sahaayataake liye prushth" is given in devanagari script.While 98% of Indian website users generaly do not know about Undicode UTF 8 needs to be selected to view devanagari and other indian scripts , how do we expect a new visitor to read "yoonikod devaganaagari sahaayataake liye prushth" in devanagari.I feel devanagari sentence there is defeating the purpose itself .

At Marathi wikipedia this help sentense is very much in roman/english script for the benefit of first time visitor who would not know even how to see devenagari script on internet.

Mahitgar 15:25, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

its an image. No setup is needed to view the message. By putting message in devanagari, intention is to encourage first time visitors to find out more about it. --mitul 15:58, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for it being an image,With due respect to you, frankly still I am not satisfied.Considering my self who knows Hindi but reached with Encoding western european (that what will happen with first time visitor) I could read the sentence "yoonikod devaganaagari sahaayataake liye prushth" but my impression is the same page is supposed to provide me help is looking garbled, frankly as a first time user I have no chance to get an Idea that there is any link given and that link with that link I need to proceed to another page.

I feel we still need to think in point of view of first time visitor. Just open any page other than in UTF 8 and think is it realy giving me any help.

Secondly present system does not think of interwiki wiki visitors and of those who are Non resident people of Indian origin born and brought up outside India,not learned hindi but still want to understand and are visiting first time to hindi wikipedia; they will not be able to make any sense of "yoonikod devaganaagari sahaayataake liye prushth".

Thanks and regards

Mahitgar 15:24, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Your points are well taken. I have replaced the image to show both hindi and english. --mitul 16:45, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks and It is very nice of you .
Regards Mahitgar 16:13, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

shreni

ka upayog kaise kare , ye kaise bataaoo ke mera gyaan star kya hai ? sabhi sadasyon ke parichay prasth pe is ka varnan milta hai ki unke bhaasa gyaan ka star kya hai kintu mere prasth pe esa kuchh bhi nahi hai iska hal kya hai ? --abhimanyu 07:38, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

aapke sadasya prushth par uttar de diya gaya hai--sumit sinhavaarta 09:04, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

up shreni ka nirmaan kese karoo masalan vishv ke yuddh me vishv ke senaanaayak naamak upshreni bana dena chaahata hnoo taaki senya itihaas par likh sakoo--abhimanyu 01:31, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

vikipeediya logo

varishth prabandhakon ka dhyaan is or aakarshit karavaana chaahati hooain ki vikipeediya logo mein hindi mein likhe gaye vi ki vartani galat hai. yaani yeh vi na hokar pehle va likha hai aur chhoti i ki maatra is prakaar lagi hai ki vah va par naheen balki usaki daahini taraf baahar ki or nikli hui hai. iski ek sahi pratikruti sanjaya beingaani ne bheji hai jisko hindi vikipeediya par upload kar rahi hooain krupaya isko sahi sthaan par pahuaincha dein.--poornima varman 20:39, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

sahamat--raajeevamaas 04:46, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
is baare me yahaaain charcha hai (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Ambuj.Saxena/Wikipedia-logo#It_fits_the_theme_of_the_logo) aur New York times me bhi likha gaya hai - (

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/25/technology/25wikipedia.html?_r=4&adxnnl=1&oref=slogin&ref=technology&adxnnlx=1182852725-SfZGbED6N/RZUssUqA3gNQ&oref=slogin)

--mitul 21:12, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

nirvaachit tasveer

mukhaprushth par nirvaachit tasveer ka saaaincha khaali ka raha hai nivedan hai ki shighr lagaaain .--raajeevamaas 13:24, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

badhaai

sabhi sadasyon aur prabandhakon ko jinke sahayog se hindi viki ke lekhon ka aaainkada 16,000 tak pahuaincha.--poornima varman 18:42, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

vikipeediya:gyaan pahelee‎

mere paas agale kuchh dinon mein thoda khaali samay hoga,to main jnyaaanapaheli ke jariye apna yogadaan dobaara shuru karna chaahooainga. isse nae vishyon par prakaash dalega aur vikipeediya par aap sabhi ka samay thoda ruchikr bana rahega. gyaan paheli ke prushth par naya prashn daal diya hai, dekhein. -- daadheekesh 05:21, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

translate

i want to ask somebody to translate this introduction to hindi:

Want to know about Malay? The Malay language is of Austronesian stock, spoken mainly in the Malay Archipelago of Southeast Asia namely the countries of Indonesia, Malaysia, Brunei, Singapore, Southern Thailand, the Southern Philippines and even as far as Christmas Island in Australia. The language achieved the status of lingua franca in the region during the height of the Malaccan Sultanate in the 15th and 16th century. As of late the importance of Malay as a language is being noted worldwide.

Izzudin 14:46, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

this is not the trabnlation mera bhaarateeya samvidhaan aapki sahaayata chaahata hai, vaise mera aalekh theek chal raha hai ,kintu mai chaahata hooain ki us ko theek tareeke se rakha jaaye haal me 1 sajjan ne us ki uddeshika khand ko behtar dhaing se upavibhaajit kiya hai yaani 6.2,6.3 6.4 ke uvibhaajan diye hai kintu mai yeh kaam nahi karna jaanta krupya anya khandau ko bhi is dhang se upavibhaajit kar de --abhimanyu 02:10, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Vkvora2001 bhaaratvaasiyo se maafi maage

vipidiya ke ek sadsya lekh me Vkvora2001ji ne likha hai ki is mandeer ke naash ya satyaanaash ke leeye muhammad gajanavi ko afaghaaneestaan se aamantreet karta hun. mai maang karaat huki vikipidiya samast bharatvaasiyo se Vkvora2001ji ke krt ke liye maafi maage . yeh unaki vyaktigat sochh ho sakti hai kintu unhone ise yaha par saarvajnik kar deshdrohita ka saboot apne ap de diya hai,Vkvora2001 ko tatkaal pratibndhit kiya jaana chhaahiye -- Dr. Jain 09:26, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

anya sadsya gan dhyaan de

mera likha baar-baar mitaaya ja saha hai . mai bata doo ki mai ek kaalej shikshak hoo aur mera adhikaar hai ki apni baato ko yaha rajhoo . par loktantr ka naajaayaj faayadaa utha kar viki par Vkvora2001 jaise log deshdrohi baate likh rahe hai . anya sadryo se aasha hai ki tatkaat karvaahi kare -- ravi chhnad jain

mere vichhaar se in Vkvora2001 ko tatkaal prabhaav se pratibndhit kar dena chaahiye, varta - vivaad ke dauraan inhone mere jain hone par hi tippni kar di thi. inke kehne mein jain kaum deshbhakt nahi hoti ? mai inse adhik umr ka hooonga padha-likha bhi inse jyaadada hoooga, lekin ye mujhe hi kehte hai ki pada karo . ab mera yaha likhne ka man nahi karta . are itihaas mein kisne kya kiya uske liye uske liye ab hame doshi tharaaya jaaega ? aaj mai 59 saal kka hoon . lekin aaj tak maine esa nahi dekha ki khule aam vebsaait par jain sampdaaya par AC teekhi teeppni ho. ab mai rou ya atmhatya kar loo -- Dr. Jain 04:05, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
is vikipeediya par kya-kya ho raha hai use mai nahi rok sakta, lekin maine is baat ki likhit shikaayat, jain sampradaaya se ki hai ki "aaj hame bhootakaal mein hue kaamo par taane diye ja rahe hai ham jaino ki deshbhakti par shak kiya ja raha hai vikipeediya par, yaha ke prabandhak bhi chup hai ese aarop lagaane vaalo ke baare mein" --Dr. Jain 15:45, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
professor evam doktar saahab ham aapki bhaavanaaoko samajhte hai aur ayogya bhaasha evam vyavahaaraki ninda karte hai| aapki vinanti ke uparaant shaayad kisi hadatak koi prabandhak uchit kaaryavaahi kare magar krupaakar kuchh baatoko maddenajar rakhe ki praaya: vikipeediya vichaaro ka mukt sthal hai kisi vyakteeke vichaar ayogya ho to unhe aap ya to ucheet sandarbh ya aadhaar ki apeksha kar sakte hai. koi vyakti yadi koochh galat bayaan baaji kare to usase ulajhaneme ya gaur karaneme samay na ganvaae , vikipeediyaapar aksar aisa dekha gaya hai ki aksar aise log kuchh maheeno ke saathi hote hai jo chale jaate hai. apna man Constructive cheejome lagaae rakhe. aapko yeh bhi pata hoga ki prabandhak log yanha vikipeediya par aapaheemese koi swayam sevak hai aur vikipeediya par ho rahi galat harakatoke liye jimmevaar nahi hote.
dhanyavaad aur apnepan ka praarthi
Mahitgar 12:33, 9 March 2008 (UTC) maraathi bhaasha vikipeediya se

tithiyon ke liye sankhya padvati

mitron,

yeh prashn pehle bhi poochha ja chuka hai par main yeh prashn fir se uthaana chaahata hooain. 15 January sahi prayog hai ya 15 January. mere vichaar se hamako ek tarah ki sankhya padvati prayog karni chaahiye evam doosare padvati ke lekhon ko pehli padvati ke lekhon par REDIRECT kar dena chaahiye.

aap logon ka is baare mein kya khyaal hai?

--sadasya:maneesh vashishth

Your question is nothing but the Devanagari-Roman dilemma. I think it has been decided that we will use the Devanagari numerals. Maquahuitl 22:27, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

holi

holi lekh nirvaachit lekh ummeedavaar hai. krupaya apne sahayog se ise is prakaar sudhaarane mein sahaayata karein ki yeh nirvaachit ki shreni tak pahuainche.--poornima varman 09:14, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

holi lekh anek sujhaavon aur sanshodhanon ke baad ab poori tarah taiyaar hai. kya ise nirvaachit ghoshit kar diya jaae? sadasyon se anurodh hai ki apna samarthan, virodh evam sujhaav neeche likhein.

samarthan

  1. samarthan ke saath holi mubaarak --raajeevamaas 17:19, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

virodh

sujhaav raajeevamaas tatha amit prabhaakar ke samarthan tatha kisi ka virodh ya sujhaav na aane se samjha jaata hai ki yeh lekh ab nirvaachit ke yogya hain. ise nirvaachit lekh banaaya gaya.--poornima varman 04:34, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

gaharaai

hindi vikipeediya par lekhon ki sankhya to kaafi tej gati se badh rahi hai, lagta hai is pariyojana ke sadasyon ke utsaah ke bal par sheegra hi ham 20,000 lekhon ki sankhya paar kar leinge. lekin angreji vikipeediya ke mukhaprushth par pahuainchane ke liye hamein gaharaai (depth) par bhi dhyaan dena hoga. vikipeediya ke niyamon ke anusaar jin bhaashaaon ke vikipeediya gaharaai 5 ko paar kar gaye hon, aur lekh 20,000 se jyaada hon, unhein hi bhaashaaon ki soochi mein daala jaata hai. hindi vikipeediya ki gaharaai is samay 4 hai. is gaharaai naamak sankhya ko badhaane ke liye kuchh upaaya kiye ja sakte hain, jinse lekhon ke star mein bhi sudhaar hoga-

  1. lekhon mein antaraviki kadiyaaain daalein. agar aap lekh mein sirf ek angreji ke lekh ki kadi bhi daal dete hain, to antaraviki baut baaki bhaashaaon ki kadiyaaain khud jod deingi. ye baut fir samay-samay par nai kadiyaaain khud jodti raheingi. lekh jitne jyaada sanpaadit honge, utani hi gaharaai bhi badhegi.
  2. lekhon ke atirikt anya panne banaaeain. chitr, shreniyaaain, templet ityaadi ke prushth bhi gaharaai ko badhaate hain.
  3. aadhaar ya stab lekhon par kaam karein. lekhon kitne bade hain iska bhi gaharaai par fark padta hai.

sabse jaroori- sanpaadan karne mein sankoch na karein. kaheen koi galati dikhe to use turant sudhaar dein. aapko kisi vishay vishesh ki jaankaari hai to us par likhein. vikipeediya par jitna jyaada miljul kar kaam hoga, gaharaai to badhegi hi, yahaaain par upalabdh saamagri ki upayogita bhi badhegi. -- daadheekesh 00:12, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

aavashyak tathyon se avagat karaane ke liye daadheekesh ka dhanyavaad . hame ab uparokt jaankaari ke aadhaar par aur adhik sakriyta aur yojana se lekhan karna chaahiye --raajeevamaas 17:43, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

sadasya :Vkvora2001 par pratibandhanaka prastaav

vikipeediya par khoodake charcha panneparaki jaankaari bhi vikipeediya samoodaayaki maanyata beena hataana ayogya hai . yeh prateet hota hai ki sadasya doktar jain evam itar sadasya gan evam prabandhakoki ichhaaoka anaadar karte hooe sadasya sadasya :Vkvora2001 ne khoodake charchaapannoparase likhi hooi baate aaj feerase mitaayi hai [1],[2] sadasya :Vkvora2001 evam aaipi adres (yadeevo sthaayi aaipi adres hoto) par teen maheenotak pratibandhanaka samarthan karte hooe yeh prastaav rakhata hoon. Mahitgar 13:01, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

sahamati ke saath Vkvora2001 ko teen mahine ke liye hindi viki par pratibndhit kiya gaya --raajeevamaas 15:26, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
mere vichaar me yeh nirnaya thodi jaldabaaji me liya gaya hai. is baat me do rai nahi ki vkvora2001 ke dvaara panno par se jaankaari hataana galat tha. lekin angreji vikipeediya par saamaanyataya sadasyo ko bure vyavahaar ke liye pehle chetaavani di jaati hai aur vahi vyavahaar dobaara dekhne ko mile to hi pratibndhit kiya jaata hai. [3] jaha tak mera khyaal hai is sadasya ko kisi prabandhak ne is baare me chetaavani nahi di, seedha pratibndhit kar diya gaya hai. chaahe is sadasya ke khyaal baaki sadasyo se mel nahi khaate, hame sabse pehle yahi maan kar chalana chahiye ki ye sampaadan niymo ko anadekha karne ke liye nahi balki niymo ki jaankaari na hone ke kaaran kiye gaye. (Assume good faith) is tarah ke sampaadan yeh sadasya bahot samay se kar raha hai, aur mera maanana hai ki aupachaarik chetaavani na milne par inhone maan liya hoga ki aisa karna galat nahi hai. isliye mera sujhaav hoga ki pratibndhit karne ke bajaay sadasya ko chetaavani di jaaye. mera vichaar hai ki antim prasang ki tarah hi ye sadasya galati sudhaar lege. -- daadheekesh 22:40, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
yeh sahi hai ki yadi koi sadsya hindi viki ke anuroop vyavhaar nahi karta to sarvpratham use chetaavani di jaati hai . daadheekesh aapse anurodh hai ki in pratibndhit sadsya ke vaarta par jaae aur dekhe ki inko pehle chetaavani mili hai ya nahi (mai bata doo ki inhe pehle bhi chetaavani mil chuki hai) . aap inki vaarta par jaae aur dekhe .--raajeevamaas 05:14, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
mainne is sadasya ke vaarta panne ke itihaas par jaakar kaafi peechhe tak dekha hai. aapne inhein jo chetaavani di thi vo keval ek prakaar ki bhaasha ke upayog ko lekar thi - "voharaaji, yadi bhavishya me aapne is prakaar ke shabdo ka prayog hindi jnyaaanakosh mein kaheen kiya to aapko pratibndhit kar diya jaaaiga." iske atirikt anya sadasyon ne inko kaha hai ki ye vaartaaeain na mitaaeain, lekin kisi prabandhak ne abhi tak lekh ya vaartaaeain mitaane ke liye inko chetaavani naheen di hai. aur dekha jaae to inhonne aapki chetaavani ka paalan karte hue aapattijanak baatein mita di hain, aur is tarah ki aur baatein likhna band kar diya hai. -- daadheekesh 11:04, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
mujh se pehle jain ji iska uttar de chuke hai . --raajeevamaas 13:13, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
shaayad ye daadheekesh chaahate hai ki agar koi galati kare to use alag-alag galati ke liye alag alag chetaavani deni hoti hain . mai bata doon ki ek sabhya,sanvedansheel, susanskrut aur sachche lekhak ke liye ek hi chetaavani bahut hoti hain . ab ek aur kamaal ki baat jo daadheekesh ko pata honi chaahiye jab aapke hi ek prabandhak ne inhe chetaavani di to in vohara mahaashaya ne us prabandhak ke hi vaarta pej par seedhi-sidhi dhamaki de daali . (daadheekesh vaha bhi jaakar dekho) . ab bhi agar daadheekesh aap yeh maanate hai ki esa nhi hona chaahiye tha to mujhe aapse kuchh javaab chaahiye -
  1. kya kisi ko chetaavani dena bhi kam nahi hota kya chetaavani praapt vyakti ka yeh kartavya nahi banta ki vo sanyam me rahkar apne lekhan ko sudhaare ya ulta hi chor kotvaal ko daatega .
  2. pehle usane desh ke khilaaf tippnani ki fir mere jain hone par ki jaino ne hi------- jaakar mere pej par dekho daadheekesh .
  3. bina apne naam se laagin kare I pi number se apne pej par apne liye likha mita raha hai, aap soch sakte hai ki aisa vayakti aisa jaanboojh kar kar raha hai . inhe sab kaayade pata hai viki ke lekin jab tak aap jaise log inke saath hai inhe bhi himmt aa jaati hai ki ab deshdrohi baate karne mein ya ek vishesh kom ko gaddaar kehne me unhe koi rok nahi sakta, iske jimmedaar aap hai .
  4. in maahaashaya ka yogadaan dekhe lagta hai saari bevakoofi (maaf karna inke shuroo kiye lekh dekho) yaha daal di ho kahi yaha ye sab seekh sakte the lekin inhe jo sikhaane aaya inhone use ki ulta kar diya .

ab shaayad bahut ho chuka hai mai abhi naya hi hoo ye aapki aur aapke puraane sathiyon ki baat hai kintu aap ab apna dimaak badal de kyoki lekh ki shakti aap shaayad nahi jaante daadheekesh . vohara ka likha ek ek shabd aaj tak viki ke puraane avatarano mein samaahit hai jis gairjimmedaaraana tareeke se unhone yaha likha hai us aadhaar par ham lekhako ke saath saath vikipeediya ko bhi iski bharpaai karni padegi --Dr. Jain 11:51, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
daadheekesh ke vaarta pej par aur adhik sundarta se samjha diya gaya hai, aasha hai ab ve yahaaain maafi maagane hi aaenge .--Dr. Jain 15:54, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

kshama keejiyega lekin ek website par likhi baaton par itna bada bavaal uthaane vaalon par mujhe hansi hi aati hai. intaranet par likhi har ool-jalool baat par agar aap apna paara garam karne lage, to jaldi hi blood-praishar ki beemaari ka saamana karna padega. mainne pehle aapki baat ko anadekha karne ki sochi (choonki ek to yeh masala seedhe aapse sarokaar naheen rakhata, yeh vikipeediya neeti ka prashn hai, aur doosare mere paas itna samay ya dhairya naheen ki aapki bhaavukata bhari baaton mein se tathya aur tark dhoondh kar unka javaab dooain.) lekin pichhle kuchh dinon mein aapne bhaavukata ke saath saath samajhadaari ka bhi pramaan diya hai, isliye ek baar apni baat aapko samajhaane ki koshish kar raha hooain.
aapka yeh maanana galat hai ki mujhe pichhle kuchh dinon ho rahi gatividhiyon ki khabar naheen. itni halachal hindi vikipeediya par pehli baar hui hai, mainne ek-ek vaarta achhe se padhi hai. lekin abatak jo ho raha tha, usaka mujhse koi sarokaar naheen tha aur prabandhakon ne jo kaaryavaahi ki vo mere vichaar mein sahi thi, isliye mainne kuchh naheen kaha. doosari baat mera na to aapse koi vair hai, aur na hi vkvora2001 se koi mitrata, aur na hi yeh netaagiri karne ka koi prayaas hai; neeti ka prashn hai, kal ko mujhse ya kisi anya sadasya se anajaane mein koi galati hui to sahi raah kya hai, main sirf yeh jaanane ki koshish kar raha hooain. yeh bhi ho sakta hai ki hindi vikipeediya ke sadasya angreji vikipeediya ki neetiyon ki bajaay alag neetiyaaain nirdhaarit karein, agar aisa hota hai, to vah mujhe maanya hoga.
ab aapke tarkon ka javaab - jeehaaain, main chaahata hooain ki har alag galati ke liye alag se chetaavani di jaae. vikipeediya website bahut jatil hai aur iske alag-alag visheshataaon ki jaankaari to mujhe bhi naheen (3 saal sanpaadan karne ke baad bhi), fir vikipeediya samaaj ke niyam bhi kuchh kam naheen. aise mein galatiyaaain hona svaabhaavik hai. (agar aap chaahein to main aapki 3-4 galatiyaaain abhi gina sakta hooain, lekin baat yahaaain aapki galatiyon ki naheen ho rahi.) mera fir kehna hai ki is sadasya ko pehli baar vaarta ya lekh mitaane par chetaavani milti to ye yeh galati dobaara naheen karte. is sadasya ne bahut si aisi baatein ki hain jo mere vichaar mein bhi nissandeh galat thi, aur jinse sabhi sadasya inse naaraaj hain, lekin main chaahooainga ki prabandhak yahaaain spasht karein ki inmein se kin galatiyon ke chalte inhein pratibandhit kiya gaya hai. main yeh bhi fir kahooainga ki lekh mitaane ke liye jabatak is sadasya ko spasht roop se chetaavani naheen mili, ham yeh seedha naheen maan sakte ki inhein is neeti ki jaankaari thi. rahi baat yogadaan ki gunavatta ki, to vikipeediya par moorkhata-poorn lekhon ka bhi jamkar svaagat kiya jaata hai. inhonne jo kumaarapaal par lekh shuru kiya vah ab anya sadasyon ke sahayog se angreji vikipeediya ke lekh se kai guna achha ban gaya hai.
jainaji, aapko apni baat do jagah likhne ka kasht karne ki jaroorat naheen, yeh prushth meri dhyaanasoochi mein hai, aap yahaaain likheinge to mujhe soochana mil jaaegi. sirf ek baat aur kahooainga. bhaavukata ki bajaay tarkon aur tathyon tak aap apni baat seemit rakheinge to mujhe samajhne mein aasaani hogi. aapke, anya sadasyon aur prabandhakon ke vichaar jaanane ko utsuk hooain. -- daadheekesh 23:47, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
to bhaiya itna samjhaane ke baad bhi aapko til ka taad banaane ka shauk hai to vahi sahi . aapne kaha hi ki mai chaupaal par hi aapka uttar doon . theek hai . pehli baat aapki ye baat galat hai jo aapne kaha tha ki aapke vohara ko chetaavani ke milne ke baad bhi unke lekh aaj bhi maujood hai (mere vaarta par aur Bhaarat ke samvidhaan par) sahi hai ki nahi ------ bataaie (tark aur tathya bhi hai yeh bhaavukata nahi ). doosra kumaarapaal ki baat yeh lekh raajivmaas ji dwaar dhyaan me laane ke baad poornima varman ne theek kiya fir aakhir mein raajivmaas ne use shreneebadd kiya . ab har lekh ko to ye dono theek to nahi kar sakte . daadheekesh aapne teen saal kaam kiya hai . yaani ki aap mere varishth hai . badiya hai tabhi aap apne samvaad par likhne ke bajaae chaupaal ka samvaad ke roop me prayog kar rahe hai . ab aap meri galati ki baat karte hai theek hai kare, agar mai koi galati karta hun viki par to bhaiiya mere yeh aap logo ka hi farj hai ki mujhe bataae aur yeh mera man hai ki use dil se maanoo na ki aap par hi chad jaaoo . aap mujhse varishth hai (bhaii 3 saal sanpaadan kiya hai aapne), isliye aapko toda ghamand ho gaya hai ki aap ki hi baat sab maane yha tak ki aap anya sadsrayo ki bhi nahi maan rahe hai vohara ke liye isame shaayad aapakaa koai svarth hoga khair . aur aakhri baat vohara ko itni deshdrohi baate karne me keval teen mahine ka pratibndh mila hai aajeevan nahi . aap ko us par bhi aapatti hai . to aapki marji hai jo chaahe soche . vohara ka teen maheene ka pratibndhan sahi hai . bevakoofi aur deshdrohi baate karne vaalo ki kahi bhi koi jagah nahi hai , aapke man mai hai to yeh aapki maanasikta hai aap bhi videshi aakramankaatari ko yaha hame lootne ke liye bula le . Bhaarat ke samvidhaan ki buraiiya kare . jaino ko deshdrohi bataaen . mandiro ko kalank bataaen . maaf kijiye aap jaise log koi kaam shuroo nahi karte agar koi shuroo kar de to usame galatiya nikaalne me aap jaise log sabse aage rahate hai (bhaii 3 saal sanpaadan kiya hai aapne). holi ke prusht par aap ye hi kar rahe hai . ek baar bata doo kaam shuroo karna aur use kriyaanvit karte rahana mushkil hai usame galatiya nikaalna aasaan (bhaii 3 saal sanpaadan kiya hai aapne) jo aap ka kaam hai . ek baar aur 3 saal sanpaadan nahi keval time paas kiya hai aapne yahaan . ab hindi viki keval ek time paas ki jagah nahi hai ab yaha shramdaan diya jaat hai sahi aur pramaanit jaankaari di jaati hai . aur haan jo deshdrohi baate karta hai uske hit ki baat karna bhi deshdrohita hai . aur ab aap bhi usi shreni mai hain . likhne ko abhi bhi mere paas bahut shabd hai lekin chaupaal prachaar ya faaltoo sanvaado ke liye nahi bana . yeh mai jaanta hoo aur mujhe teen mahine bhi nahi hue is gyaan mandir mai --Dr. Jain 06:46, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
kshama keejiyega daadheekesh mujhe ya mujh jaise hindi svanyasevako ke liye hindi vikipidiya keval ek website nahi hai, jaisa aap maanate hai, mai aapki baat se asahamat hooain . baaki baat shri voharaaji ko pratinbdhit karne ki vah sahi tha . aap bhool jaae ki yeh keval ek website nahi hain . aaj hajaaro hindi bhaashi ab hindi vikipeedeeya ko dekhte hai isame se gyaan ke moti chunate hai . prabandhak hone ke naate yeh mera farj banta hai ki un tak baato ko rokoo jo vivaadit hai . aapki jain ji ko likhi baat ki "intaranet par likhi har ool-jalool baat par agar aap apna paara garam karne lage, to jaldi hi blood-praishar ki beemaari ka saamana karna padega." par mujhe aapki tarah hansi bhi nahi aati . mujhse itni bade samvaad nahi kiye jaate . itne me to ham sakaaraatmak hokar aur adhik lekho par kriyaatmak kaarya kar sakte hai . aage aap mujhse adhik samajhdaar hai . dhanyavaad --raajeevamaas 08:42, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
mera shaayad in daadeekesh ki najaro me koi mahatva na ho lekin raajivmaas ji aap maane ya na maane in jaise logo ki najaro mein gyaan, desh, tark,bhaasha aur siddaanto ka koi mahatva nahi hai . jab maine in daadeekesh ko vohara ki kartooto ke liye sabut diye to isne (daadeekesh ne) baat hi ghuma di . ab chopaal par hi laakar in jaiso ki javaabdehi tay karni chaahiye aapko --Dr. Jain 10:31, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
is vaarta se mera dhairya chuk chuka hai. yeh bilkul sahi hai ki mai yaha taaimapaas karne aata hoo, isaliye mujhe apne ya kisi aur ke gun-dosho ki charcha karne ki koi ichha nahi hai. mujhe apne yogadaano par garv hai, yeh kisi ko ghamand lagta hai to lage. raajeevaji, aap hindi vikipeediya ko gambheerata se lete hai yeh bahut achhi baat hai, isi kaaran aap prabandhak hai aur mai nahi. lekin sanad rahe ki aapne abhi tak sadasya vkvora2001 ko pratibndhit karne ke thos kaaran prastut nahi kiye hai. -- daadheekesh 19:16, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
chetaavani ke baad bhi apni vivaadit baato ko lekhon se nahi hataana vaarta:Jain aur vaarta:bhaarateeya samvidhaan(somanaath mandeer ko samast maanavajaat ka kalank smaarak hai .

) aur (pehle kaarano ke saath laga huva hai alag nahi )apne vivaadit kathano par prabandhak ki taraf se chetavani milne ke baad bajaae usaka paalan karne ke ya prabandhak se sakaaraatmak vaarta karne ke use dhamaki ke roop mein prachaarit kar hindi viki par sadbhaavana ka maahol bigaadana . saath hi sanvaado se lekh mitaana (pratibndhit lekhak hindi hi nahi gujaraati aur angreji viki par kaam karta hai at: ye nahi maana ja sakta ki use is tathya ki jaankaari nahi thi, kam se kam vah teen baar to esa nahi karta) . --raajeevamaas 05:41, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

kya koi bina log in kare nae sadsyo ka svaagat kar sakta hai

agar aisa hai to bataae aur agar esa nahi hai to os I pi adres par tatkaal karvaahi kare--Dr. Jain 11:56, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
shaayad aisi chijo par kisi ka dhyaan nahi jaata, kyon daadheekesh saahab . ab kise chetaavani de ???? I pi adres to hamesha badalta hai --Dr. Jain 13:36, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

udaaharan

  1. (antar) (itihaas) . . na sadasya vaarta:Bhu pain‎; 12:07 . . (+22) . . 59.183.174.26 (Talk) (naya prushth: {svaagat})
  2. (antar) (itihaas) . . na sadasya vaarta:Devendra gupta‎; 16:00 . . (+22) . . 59.184.176.63 (Talk) (naya prushth: {svaagat})
  3. (antar) (itihaas) . . na sadasya vaarta:Parolu Esperanto‎; 15:58 . . (+22) . . 59.184.176.63 (Talk) (naya prushth: {svaagat})
aapne seedha mujhse savaal poochha hai isliye bata raha hoo. meri jaankaari me vikipeediya par aisa koi niyam nahi hai. naye sadasyo ka svaagat karna bahot achhi baat hai chaahe ise sadasya laag in karke kare ya bina laagin kiye. -- daadheekesh 19:03, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
daadheekesh agar kisi nae sadsya ko kuchh puchhana hai ya jaankaari leni hai jo yaha ke vaataavaran ke baare mai nahi jaanta poori tarah se anbhigya hai to kya vah svaagat dene vaale anaam I pi adres se sahaayata maangega . vaise daadheekesh meri yeh niji rai hai ki agar aisa niyam nahi hai to banaana chaahiye aur agar nahi hai bhi to aap nirnaya akele nahi le sakte . aap ko chaahiye tha ki is vishya par yadi aapko jaankaari nahi hai to aapko bhi is vishay par prabandhako se baat karni chaahiye thi . kyoki aap jaise jnyaaanvaan (?) ke samarthan se yaha aisi gativishiya kaafi bad gaii hai -- Dr. Jain 06:27, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
nae sadsya ka svaagat sadaiv laag-in kar kisi pehle se sadsya dvaara hi karna chaahiye . yeh naitik, daarshanik aur vyaavaaharik roop mein sahi hoga . agar aisa koi niyam nahi hai to hindi viki par yeh niyam banaana chaahiye --raajeevamaas 11:36, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

shikaayat

mujhe dukh hota hai ki aisi baat koi chhdm (chhup kar kaise karta hai bina laag-in kare aur bina hstaakshar chhode) . mere vaarta par ajeeb sandesh chhod raha hai khair mere anumaan se yeh vi ke vohara ho sakta hai ya daadeekesh . mere paas javaab hai aur bahut jordaar lekin pehle savaal poochhane vaale apne ko saamane laaen --Dr. Jain 08:10, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

mota paath

yaha tak ki niche likhe samvaad par mera galat hstaakshar daala gaya hai, yeh mera likha samvaad nahi hai .
na chaitadvidm: kataranno gareeyo yadva jayem yadi va no jayeshu:. yaanev hatva na jijeevishaam stedavasthita: pramukhe dhaartaraashtra:.
ham yeh bhi naheen jaante ki hamaare liye yudd karna aur na karna - in dononmansein kaun - sa shreshth hai, athva yeh bhi naheen jaante ki unhein ham jeeteinge ya hamako ve jeeteinge . aur jinko maarkar ham jeena bhi naheen chaahate, ve hi hamaare aatmeeya dhrutaraashtrake putr hamaare mukaabalemein khade hai .

--Dr. Jain 08:21, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

chaupaal se ek paal

krupaya chaupaal ka sheera deinkhe . yeh chaupaal ek paal ban raha hai . dhanayavaad .

Edit Wars Vs Constructive editing

Right now there is good opportunity for those, who like edit wars, at an english wikipedia article en: Religious violence in India
By the way I began and is working on a constructive article en:Religious harmony in India to give justice to positive side of Indian Life , wish and request all to join me in bringing up this english article .Thanks and Regards Mahitgar 17:22, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

dharm

dharmaka matlab maanyata hoti hai . raamaayan, mahaabhaarat, geeta, vardhamaan, buddh, pruthveeraaj chauhaan, mahaaraana prataap,Akbar, aurangajeb se lekar sheevaaji tak seerf maanyata hi maalum hai. tathya ya itihaas to hamein videshi angrejone bataaya hai . itna hi naheen anjata ki gufaae hamein maalum naheen thi . sheevaaji ki janm taareekh ke leeye kya bada veevaad aaj bhi mahaaraashtramein chaalu hai . sarkaar ek mana rahi hai or sheevasena vaale dusrari . kya vitanbana hai ? likhne se sabhi dhongeeyonka pardaafaas jarur hoga . dhanyavaad !

sabhi prabandhak dhyaan dein

  • krupaya is chaupaal ke puraane avataran barobar dekhein . yeh Rajiv maas or ravi jain dono ek hi hai .
  • at: Rajiv maas or ravi jain ke saamane ucheet kaaryavaahi ki jaaya .
  • 59.184.191.121 16:41, 17 March 2008 (UTC)


sadasya vaarta:124.124.36.4

  • (cur) (last) 06:23, 14 March 2008 59.184.143.16 (Talk) (22,231 bytes) (→asach) (poorvavat karein)
  • (cur) (last) 06:22, 14 March 2008 59.184.143.16 (Talk) (22,231 bytes) (poorvavat karein)
  • (cur) (last) 06:04, 14 March 2008 Jain (Talk | yogadaan) (21,991 bytes) (→akaaravaahee) (poorvavat karein)
  • (cur) (last) 06:03, 14 March 2008 124.124.36.4 (Talk) (22,017 bytes) (→akaaravaahee) (poorvavat karein)
  • (cur) (last) 05:46, 14 March 2008 59.184.143.16 (Talk) (21,719 bytes) (poorvavat karein)
  • (cur) (last) 05:38, 14 March 2008 Jain (Talk | yogadaan) (20,833 bytes) (→asach) (poorvavat karein)


sadasya jain par jaayein . . or upar likhe gaye baar baar dekhein . aapko maalum padega kisne fer faar kiya hai ? Rajiv maas ne bahot kosheesh ki isko mitaane ki . ab va shakya naheen hai . prabandhakon se vinantti ki jaati hai aap baar baar uparokt ferafaar ko dekhein. 59.184.150.1 04:14, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

sabhi prabandhak dhyaan dein

  • sadasya jain par jaayein
  • sadasya jain ke samvaad par jaayein
  • sadasya jain ke puraane avataran dekhein
  • laast 05:38 March 14, 2008 jain tak le jaayein or jain par kaleek karein
  • barobar dekhkar agala antar par kleek karein
  • 5:46 ko kaam hua. neeche sahi dekhein . maahitgharane sahi kiya hai .
  • barobar dekhkar agala antar par kleek karein
  • 06:03 ko kaam hua . 124.124 ne kaam kiya . neeche sahi bhi usaki hai .
  • barobar dekhkar agala antar par kleek karein

06:04 ko kaam hua . barobar dekhein . upar bhi dekhan. jain ne kaam kiya hai. neeche sahi 124.124 se badalkar jain kar the gayi hai . samay bhi badal diya gaya hai. 06:03 se 06:04 kar diya gaya hai . pura pol yahaan khulata hai .

  • us log ko barobar dekhein
  • vaapas sab reepeet karein .
  • Rajiv maas ne kya kosheesh ki hai vah dekhein


kuchh deri se aaya lekin in aai0pee0 adres (patibndhit kuthaagrast rogi) ki khabar leta hooain . mene suna hai ki yadi jhootha chillaakar bole (yahaaain chor machaae shor) aur usaka koi virodh na kare to jhooth bhi sach ho jaata hai . ab is maanasik rogi ko jo shaayad mere pichhe paagal ho gaya hai . mai bata doo ki mere vaarta ke baabat mujhse seedha savaal poochha jaae aur saamane aakar poochh le to achha hai . mere paas jaavaab hai is bevakoof, deshdrohi,aur maanaseek rogi ke har savaal ka . kyoki mai chaahata hu ki hindi viki par sadbhaavana ka maahol rahe --Dr. Jain 05:45, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

barobar dekhein

  • yeh Rajiv maas or ravi jain dono ek hi hai . barobar jo upar likha hai vaisa karein . pura pol khulata hai .
  • ab iski intaraneshanal tatha anya samaachaaron maadhyam ko jaankaari di jaayegi . dhanyavaad
  • 59.183.178.208 10:36, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

vinantti

lagta hai ab Rajiv maas veekeepeedeeya par aayega naheen. Rajiv maas or purneema varman ne meelakar veekeepeedeeyaako bahot nukashaan keeya hai . kam se kam sabhaasadoki maafi maangane aana chaaheeye. 59.184.170.88 04:23, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

svaagat

sadasya dhavalabhaai, aapne ek do jagah sadasya ke vaarta ya tok pej par uparokt sandesh mein Rajiv maas naamake prabandhak ne purneema varman naamaki prabandhak ke sahaaya se tatha Rajiv maas ka dami ekaaunt ravi jain ke naamase kaala krutya kar ke heendi veekeepeedeeya ka bahot bada nukashaan keeya hai. ab heendi veekeepeedeeya ke sabhi prabandhak maathe par haath raakhakar ro rahe hai. neechi ek link di gayi hai. krupaya use kleek karein . Rajiv maas naamake prabandhak ka sab bhanda foot gaya hai . leenk dabaane se pehle uparokt mesej ko barobar ek do baar jarur padh lein taaki aap svam samaj jaayeinge purneema varman ne 124.124 ko kyon hataaya. bakaaya aap svam samaj jaayeinge .
http://hi.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%E0%A4%B8%E0%A4%A6%E0%A4%B8%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%AF_%E0%A4%B5%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%B0%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%A4%E0%A4%BE:Jain&diff=next&oldid=172723
59.184.134.16 14:09, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

mera paksh

haalaaki aapne mujh se nahi puchha hai lekin mai bataana chaahata hooain kyoki pratibndhit vkvora2001 ko na to likhne ki tameej hai aur naahi tark dene ki . mere vaarta par mmere hi hadtaakshar ke peechhe shri raajeevmaas, aur mere liye galat auraur bina kaaran maanhaahijnak baate kar raha hai yaha tak ki purnima barman ji aur anya sadryo ko bhi khuli chunauti de raha hai . aur vo bhi vibinn I pi adres se . yeh kunthit rogi angreji vikipeediya par bhi pratibndhit hai . pikshle kuchh dino se aapattijanak baate yaha paagalo ki tarah llikh raha hai jab maine maraathi par bhi yahi tareeka dekha to pakka ho gaya ki yeh vkvora2001 hi hai is dusht ki lekhan shaili bhi mel khaati hai . kaaran- mai hi hindi viki par iske deshdrohi samvaad ko saamane laaya tha . aur maine hi ise jaino ko seedhe seedhe deshdrohi bolne par aapatti ki thi . are mera vaarta pej maine hi hstaaksharit kiya aur usaka aarop lagaata hai shri prabandhak raajivmaas par , yeh unase chidta hai kiyoki unhone hi ise baar baar apne lekhi ko sudhaarane ko kaha (ye to aap bhi aap hi maraathi viki par ise kehte hain aur angreji vikipeediya par bhi isko akl nahi I) aur prastaav par sahamti ke saath thos kaaran dekar ise pratibndhit kiya tha . pichhle dino jo huva mujhe iska khed hai lekin mai ab hindi viki par bahut adhik prasiddh ho chuka hoon. --Dr. Jain 14:23, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

svaagat

Rajiv maas ya ravi jain dono ek hi hai vah neeche leekhi leenk se maalum pad jaata hai.
http://hi.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%E0%A4%B8%E0%A4%A6%E0%A4%B8%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%AF_%E0%A4%B5%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%B0%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%A4%E0%A4%BE:Jain&diff=next&oldid=172723
59.184.134.16 14:27, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
sevaamein Rajiv maas, pyaarase rahe hindi bhaashaaki vruddheeke liye lagan se kaam kare

svaagat

krupaya bhagavadgeeta ka pathan paathan karein .
http://hi.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%A4%B5%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%B0%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%A4%E0%A4%BE:%E0%A4%B6%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%B0%E0%A5%80%E0%A4%AE%E0%A4%A6%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%AD%E0%A4%97%E0%A4%B5%E0%A4%A6%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%97%E0%A5%80%E0%A4%A4%E0%A4%BE
uparaki leenk ka chaar shrlok ka mukh paath karein . bhavadeeya 59.184.134.16 16:01, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

mera paksh


deshdrohi, kunthaagrast, pratibndhit aur maanasik rogi vkvora2001 ko karaara javaab, ab huva ye dusht poora kaala

haalaaki aapne mujh se nahi puchha hai lekin mai bataana chaahata hooain kyoki pratibndhit vkvora2001 ko na to likhne ki tameej hai aur naahi tark dene ki . mere vaarta par mmere hi hadtaakshar ke peechhe shri raajeevmaas, aur mere liye galat auraur bina kaaran maanhaahijnak baate kar raha hai yaha tak ki purnima barman ji aur anya sadryo ko bhi khuli chunauti de raha hai . aur vo bhi vibinn I pi adres se . yeh kunthit rogi angreji vikipeediya par bhi pratibndhit hai . pikshle kuchh dino se aapattijanak baate yaha paagalo ki tarah llikh raha hai jab maine maraathi par bhi yahi tareeka dekha to pakka ho gaya ki yeh vkvora2001 hi hai is dusht ki lekhan shaili bhi mel khaati hai . kaaran- mai hi hindi viki par iske deshdrohi samvaad ko saamane laaya tha . aur maine hi ise jaino ko seedhe seedhe deshdrohi bolne par aapatti ki thi . are mera vaarta pej maine hi hstaaksharit kiya aur usaka aarop lagaata hai shri prabandhak raajivmaas par , yeh unase chidta hai kiyoki unhone hi ise baar baar apne lekhi ko sudhaarane ko kaha (ye to aap bhi aap hi maraathi viki par ise kehte hain aur angreji vikipeediya par bhi isko akl nahi I) aur prastaav par sahamti ke saath thos kaaran dekar ise pratibndhit kiya tha . pichhle dino jo huva mujhe iska khed hai lekin mai ab hindi viki par bahut adhik prasiddh ho chuka hoon. --Dr. Jain 16:38, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

aabhaar evam dhanyavaad

bechaare Rajiv maas or ravi jain ek hi hai . krupaya link ko barobar dekhein. 124-124 Rajiv maas ka aaipi hai . galati naheen kukarm mein andha ho gaya or log in karna bhul gaya . feer sudhaar ne gaya . Rajiv maas or ravi jain ek hi hai . pura bhanda fat gaya hai . sabhi prabandhakako veenantti ki jaati hai bhagavadgeeta ke tok pej par sanskrut or heendi shrlok hai usaka pathan paathan kar Rajiv maas or purneema varman ko saatvan dein . 59.184.134.16 16:49, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

ek hapte ke liye doorlaksh kare

sarv sadasyose aavaahan hai ki poorv sadasya vheeke vora ki anaamik gateevidheeyoko ek hapte keliye najar andaaj kare | is dauraan unase prayookt sabhi aayapi adreso ko yanha likhe . yadi vo ek hapte me apni gateevidheeyose baaj na aae to meta par iski vaarta dekar suyogya karavaaiki vinanti ki jaaegi. isi avsar par ham sadasya jain ko bhi hidaayat dete hai ki vo kisi vivaad me na padate hooe khoodabhi thode samayakeliye maun vrat ka paalan kare.
Mahitgar 16:56, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
theek hain (ye hi ilaaj hai is vkvora2001 ka) --Dr. Jain 17:00, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
  1. 59.183.189.175
  2. 59.183.142.87
  3. 59.183.178.208
  4. 59.184.185.156
  5. 59.184.159.38
  6. 59.184.130.231
  7. 59.184.134.16
  8. 59.184.170.88
  9. 59.184.147.162
  10. 59.183.148.134
  11. 59.183.157.244
  12. 59.183.142.87
  13. 59.183.136.33
  14. 59.184.143.16

aabhaar evam dhanyavaad

krupaya leenk barobar dekhein . use aage peechhe karein. ravi jain or Rajiv maas dono ek hi hai . maaheetaghaar ab to kuchh samay ya ghante ka prashran hai . pure sansaar ko maalum padega heendi veekeepeedeeya ke prabandhakone kya keeya ? bechaari purneema varmanaki daya aati hai . usane 124-124 ka log meeta deeya . anyatha Rajiv maas ya usaka dami ravi jain ka bhanda kabaka foot gaya tha . krupaya bhagavadgeeta ka tatha tok pej ka jarur pathan paathan kare.59.184.134.16 17:07, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

aabhaar evam dhanyavaad

koi matlab naheen hai . ab to maafi, kshama ki bhi jarurat naheen hai . maaheetagharaki madhyasthi bhi jarurat naheen hai . bhagavadgeeta lekh ke tok pej par chaar-paanch shrlok hai or usaka heendi sahi ya galat arth ya matlab keeseene leekha hai . ravi jain, Rajiv maas or maaheetaghar se vinanti hai jarur pathan paathan kare . aage purneema varman se pehle bechaari shabd ka ghalati se vaparaash ho gaya hai . maahitghar aapko vinantti hai vah shabd neekaal dein. purneema varman ko maalum bhi naheen padata hai idhar - udhar kya ho raha hai. karm keeye ja ke mutaabeek likhti hai . raveevaar ko Mumbai ki Wilson kaalej mein feelosofi ke profesaron ko keeseene karm or karm fal ka jo bhaashan or keesi ???? ne usaka matlab kaha hai samaj leejeeye bhen ke bachche jaisa hota hai . ab karm tatha usaka fal kya hota hai vah samaj gaye honge . 59.184.134.16 17:29, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

chetaavani

uparokt I.P. Address ko chetaavani di jaati hai ki hindi jnyaaanakosh par kutark ev vyakti vishesh par galat ev apamaanajanak teeppni na kare aur jnyaaanakosh ki lokataantreek sthiti ka galat prayog na kare . yadi bhavishya mein bhi in I.P. Address ka yahi ravaiya jaari raha to inke virudh sakht karyvaahi ki jaaegi .--raajeevamaas 05:34, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

aabhaar evam dhanyavaad

koi matlab naheen hai . ab to maafi, kshama ki bhi jarurat naheen hai . maaheetagharaki madhyasthi bhi jarurat naheen hai . bhagavadgeeta lekh ke tok pej par chaar-paanch shrlok hai or usaka heendi sahi ya galat arth ya matlab keeseene leekha hai . ravi jain, Rajiv maas, purneema varman or maaheetaghar se vinanti hai jarur pathan paathan kare .
purneema varman ko maalum bhi naheen padata hai idhar - udhar kya ho raha hai. karm keeye ja ke mutaabeek likhti hai . raveevaar ko Mumbai ki Wilson kaalej mein feelosofi ke profesaron ko keeseene karm or karm fal ka jo bhaashan or keesi ???? ne usaka matlab kaha hai samaj leejeeye bhen ke bachche jaisa hota hai . ab karm tatha usaka fal kya hota hai vah samaj gaye honge .
59.184.156.91 05:48, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Spam

Kaun hai yaar ye sabke talk page par bakwaas kar raha hai. Maquahuitl 09:07, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

prabandhak Rajiv maas, unka dami akaaunt ravi jain tatha prabandhak purneema varman

yeh patra pratham jahaan taaip hua hai vah leenk neeche di gayi hai .

http://hi.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%A4%B8%E0%A4%A6%E0%A4%B8%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%AF_%E0%A4%B5%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%B0%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%A4%E0%A4%BE:Vkvora2001


heendi veekeepeedeeya ke prabandhak Rajiv maas ne angreji, heendi, maraathi or gujaraati veekeepeedeeya ke upar ravi jain naamaka dami akaaunt banaakar bahot bada kukarm keeya hai . prabandhak Rajiv maas ke is kukarm mein anya prabandhak purneema varman ne teka deeya hai .

prabandhak Rajiv maasaka pura bhanda khul gaya hai .

chaupaal mein pura bhanda tatha tathya deeya gaya hai .

Rajiv maas aur purneema varman ke saamane kaaryavaahi ki jaaya .

is kukarm ki jaankaari sabhi bhaashaaonke prabandhako, trasteeon tatha ijeepatamein ikaththe hone vaaleko pepar banaakar di jaaya .

jeesake leeye ek chhoteesi sameeti banaayi jaaya .

yeh patra heendi veekeepeedeeya chaupaal , Rajiv maas, purneema varman, dami akaaunt ravi jain, angreji, heendi, maraathi, gujaraati veekeepeedeeya ke prabandhako tatha anya jaane maane logon ko bheja gaya hai .

tathyake leeye neeche leenk di gayi hai . jeesamein 124.124 Rajiv maas ka aaipi hai . baayein haath baaju peechhale antar mein spasht deekhaai deta hai . daayein haath par agale antar ko baraabar dekhein . upar naam ravi jain ka hai . Rajiv maas samay badal raha hai . aaipi bhi badal raha hai .

tathyake leeye neeche ki leenk kaleek karein .


http://hi.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%E0%A4%B8%E0%A4%A6%E0%A4%B8%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%AF_%E0%A4%B5%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%B0%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%A4%E0%A4%BE:Jain&diff=next&oldid=172723


Complaint forwarded

Complaint is lodged on Talk Page of Jimbo Wales and Talk Page of Administrators for missuse of Administrator Tools by Rajiv Mass, Purnima Varman, Manish Vashistha and Dummy Account of Administrator Rajiv Mass. I signed as vkvora

Miss Use on Hindi Wikipedia

Category:Wikipedians in India http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Noticeboard_for_India-related_topics

All most all and at least three confirmed have grossly missused their Administratators Tools on Hindi Wikipedia. Their Names are Rajiv Mass, Purnima Varman and Manish Vashishtha. Not only that Administratator Rajiv Mass has opened dummy account in name of Ravi Jain and miss used to harass other members of Hindi, Gujarati, Marathi, English wikipedia. I have complained in poor English to English Wikipedia Administratators and one has advised me to write here. Those who know Hindi very well should visit Hindi wikipedia to solve the problem and this fact should be brought to all Administratators of world. I signed as vkvora.