vikipeediya:chaupaal/puraalekh 36

ek savaal

shreemaan ji, gair-bhaarati bhaashaayon se lekh ka anuvaad karte samay jin shabd ka hindi me kabhi pahile prayog na kiya giya ho, unakein liye aap shabd khud banaate ho ya kise bhaasha vighyaani ki salaah lete ho ? --Vigyani (vaarta) 04:29, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

ham koi bhi shabd khud naheen banaate. kai baar kuchh sambhaavit shabd kaam mein lete hain aur charcha ke anusaar use theek kar diya jaata hai. saamaanyat: vaigyaanik tatha takaneeki shabdaavali aayog, raajabhaasha vibhaag, bhaarateeya rijrv bank aur isi tarah ki sambandhit sansthaanon dvaara pehle se diye gaye shabd kaam mein liye jaate hain. kisi shabd ke adhik prachalan mein hone ki sthiti mein prachalit shabd ko variyta di jaati hai.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 05:08, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
vigyaani ji, ek aisi vishay hi ki dilchasp vaarta aap yahaaain dekh sakte hain. --mujmmil (vaarta) 12:42, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
dhanyaavaad mujmmil ji, vah vaarta vikeepeedeeaa ki adrooni pranaali ko lekar he. mere chinta dusare shabdon ko lekar the jo asal me maaine rakhate hain. hamaari punjabi viki par cheeni bhaasha ke shabd Taiping ke lipyantaran ko lekar vaarta chal rahi thi. yeh shabd punjabi me pehle jiaada isatemaal naheen hua. aur aisa bahut shabadon ke maamalon mai hota rahata hai, lipyantaran ya anubaad ko lekar. to main isaliai jaanana chaahata tha ki aise maamalon mein dusare vikeepeedeeaa kaya karte hai. --Vigyani (vaarta) 13:43, 30 July 2014 (UTC
vigyaani ji, aise mein mere vichaar se do maanak rakhe ja sakte hain:
  1. yadi koi aadhoonik shabdakosh ho jise nirvivaad roop se shikshaavid maanate hon, to krupaya pehle use dekhein aur samasya ka samaadhaan dhooaindein.
  2. chaupal par sadasyon se bhi rai li ja sakti hai. kaafi samay tak ham vikipeediya ko "jnyaaanakosh" kehte aae the. baad mein humne charcha ki aur ab ham "jnyaaanakosh" kah rahe hain.--mujmmil (vaarta) 14:17, 30 July 2014 (UTC)


saaaincha:sadasyanaam pratibandh

angreji vikipeediya ke Template:Usernameblock saaainche ke anuroop hamako bhi saaaincha:sadasyanaam pratibandh nirmaan karne ki aavashyakta hai jiske antaragat ek sadasyanaam ek "vaastavik duniya" samooh ya sangathan, aakraamak ya vightanakaari, gumaraah karne vaalaaathva prachaar ka roop lene wala naheen hona chaahiye . mujhe lagta hai ki yeh sadasya khaata is shreni mein shaayad aata hai jaisa ki sadasyaprushth ko dekhne se pata chalta hai. --mujmmil (vaarta) 18:20, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

@Hindustanilanguage: iske liye vikipeediya par ek prashaasak ka hona anivaarya hai aur hamaari vikipeediya par koi prashaasak naheen hai. abhi hamaari charchaayein bhi is tarah ki chal rahi hain ki hamaare kisi bhi sadasya ko prashaasak adhikaar naheen mil sakte.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 06:40, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
hai so admin kounse gul khilare jo aur naye hona hai....Sperm whale fluke.jpg; whale vaarta 06:53, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

sandarbh

namaskaar doston! krupaya mujhe bataaen ki kisi prushth par sandarbh soochi jodne ke baad vahaaain kevalreflistyatippani soochikaise darshaai jaati hai. is kaaran maine jo sandarbh soochi jodi hai unamein khaamiyaan rah jaati hai.

03:31, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

shri susheel mishr ko sampaadan karne se turant vanchit kiya jaae

sabhi prashaasakon ke dhyaanaakarshan ke liye anurodh hai ki main jo bhi likhta hooain uske poora hone se kaheen pehle shri susheel mishr manamaane dhang se chippiyaaain chipka chipka kar avaanchhit hastakshep karte aa rahe hain ! vah ek besabr sampaadak hain jinhein viki hit mein pad se hata kar unke adhikaar tatkaal seemit kar diye jaane praarthit hain| vah sabhyata ki seemaaen laangh gaye hain| mere prushth par unki tippani nitaant asabhya tippani hai| turant kaaryavaai ka anurodh! Hemant Shesh 08:28, 3 August 2014 (UTC) punashch : yeh kaaragujaari shreemaan susheel mishr ne mere nirmaanaadheen lekh Bhaarat mein angreji raaj par bhi naveenatam kuchamaad ke roop mein ki |Hemant Shesh 08:37, 3 August 2014 (UTC)


aadaraneeya hemant shesh ji se main ittefaak rakhata hooain aur unase sahamat hooain. suneel ji aap bura mat maaniye, mujhe bhi lagta hai aapko thoda apne attitude aur apne vyavahaar mein namrata, dhairyata laane ki aavashyakta hain. --Jeeteshvaishya (vaarta) 09:47, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

I had no option but to retaliate

COPY PASTED FOR READY REFERENCE (From his Page) 36 dheeraj rakhein[srot sampaadit karein] susheelaji lekh poora bhi na hua aur aap anaahoot prakat bhaye! bhaai...chippi lagaane ka shauk kaheen aur poora karein- abhi lekh nirmaanaadheen hai!!Hemant Shesh 12:15 pm, aaj (UTC+5.5)

@Hemant Shesh: shock nahi majboori hai......you call your self as educated person.....shame on you.....where was work in progress tag? Where are the references for the matter posted until now?......you should be ashamed of yourself to be called as educated.......Sperm whale fluke.jpg; whale vaarta 12:24 pm, aaj (UTC+5.5)


mujhe ab vhel-kilr naam se ek khaata kholana hoga taaki uchhrankal vhelon ko thikaane lagaaya jaaya !Hemant Shesh 11:58, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

@Hemant Shesh aur Jeeteshvaishya: hahaha you are making me laugh at your childishness.......first of all how would i know that you are working kya uss time par waha apne koi bhi kaam jari ka tag lagaya tha? Second hemant ji Where are the references for the matter posted until then?(time when tag was added)? Third jeetesh vaishya you said.....if i get time then i will add references....ok bro fine....so why dont you add the matter for which you are searching references after you found references.....why dump it now?? Why should we wait ki jeetesh bhai ko time kab mile aur woh woh kan aakar references dale??
  • hemant ji you might have been collector or what ever in your life in past but here you are now simple person.....so behave like 1 and use proper language to communicate.....you words chippi lagaane ka shauk kaheen aur poora karein made me angry...you should be grateful ki maine zada kuch nahi kaha.....
  • jeetesh main samay milte hi sandarbh aid kar doonga and jra rukega, itna kya ghaai hain.....attitude aap ko change karne ke zarurat hai
the day you start following basic rules......that day i wont trouble you.....i messg admins for the mistakes they are doing and you are just newbies......learn from your mistakes and avoid making it a habit.......Sperm whale fluke.jpg; whale vaarta 13:01, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
jeetesh ji ka "attitude" mujhe zyaada asabhya laga, "jra rukega, itna kya ghaai hain" ye kya hain? ise sabhya kehte hain?--peeyoosh mauryavaarta 13:37, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
@Jeeteshvaishya: jeetesh ji earlier thrice i took your mistakes as newbie error and let it go by making you to understand it......
  • firstly you started posting personal details of a women from her facebook page here on wikipedia......which is not only against wikipedia rules.......but you can also be booked for it by law also......this was a serious offence.....even muzalim ji did that when i warned him of results he deleted it.....
  • second you used two different account here on same wikipedia------i ignored it by explain you the result
  • thirdly with out references you dumped material, when asked to provide a reference you gave a blog-------again i explained you and let it go
next time i might not be in a mood to explain or in a mood to let it go.......so be prepared to follow wikipedia policy correctly.......you are doing a good job here......please continue it and avoid getting into a mess...........may the force be with you......Sperm whale fluke.jpg; whale vaarta 13:58, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Mr. https://hi.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%A4%B8%E0%A4%A6%E0%A4%B8%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%AF:Sushilmishra

I am requesting you again to be cool and quite now. pl MIND Your language>Hemant Shesh 14:12, 3 August 2014 (UTC) apne adhikaar ka durupayog karne ke liye [1] se adhikaar chheene jaaen!Hemant Shesh 14:32, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

@Hemant Shesh: i did not said any thing until now for which i have to mind my language......you dragged it over here and now you want me to be cool.....when i once asked you to please read conflict of interest policy you hushed me saying you read it and you continued to edit your self made multiple biography pages until 1 of it was deleted.......now i will present to you some side effects which were mentioned........Sperm whale fluke.jpg; whale vaarta 14:37, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
@Hemant Shesh: arey admin saab....collector saab ka order aya hai adhikar chinlo......hahaha.....par kounsa adhikar?? Hahaha.......Sperm whale fluke.jpg; whale vaarta 14:39, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
@Hemant Shesh: pure duniya mai kisi ke do do biographies nahi hai wikipedia pe par aap ke the.....kitne mahan aadmi hai aap.......zarur aap ko bharat ratna mila hoga.....nahi nahi hero of russia....nahi nahi Congressional Gold Medal......nahi nahi shayad knighthood.......arey nahi ab samja nobel prize......uff kitne maha aadmi hai humarey beech......aapki mahanta aur awards humse na miss ho isliye aap ne apne upar he page banaya....woh bhi do do......Sperm whale fluke.jpg; whale vaarta 14:51, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

kya hindi mein anuvaad karte samay tatsam shabdon ka hi prayog karein ya anya prachalit shabdon ka bhi

mera prashn yeh hai ki kya hindi mein prushthon ka anuvaad karte samay tatsam shabdon ko adhik vareeyata di jaani chaahiye ya urdoo aur anya prachalit shabdon ko prayog bhi kiya ja sakta hai | kuchh tatsam shabd atyant klisht ( kathin ) hote hain jisse paathak ko samajhne mein kathinaai aa sakti hai | — is ahastaaksharit sandesh ke lekhak hain -chakrapaani (vaartayogadaan)

chakrapaani ji, kuchh shabd jaise ki loh path gaamini ya yeh shabdaavali ke sthaan par aam prachalit bhaasha hi achhi hai. --mujmmil (vaarta) 07:54, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
chakrapaani ji, urdoo bhi bhaarateeya bhaasha hai kintu khud vah shabdon ke liye arabi aur faarasi ke daaman pakadna pasand karti hai. saral prachalit shabdon ka prayog karna chaahiye. tatsam shabdon ke bina bahut jagah kaam hi naheen chalega. aur jahaaain tak 'prachalit' ka prashn hai, aajkal 'pita' aur 'ravivaar' ke bajaay 'father' aur 'sande' adhik prachalit hai. to kya is kaaran aap anuvaad mein 'father' aur 'sande' prayog kareinge? ---- anunaad Singhvaarta 08:46, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
@chakrapaani: ji, prachalit bhaasha mein bhi prachalit likhit aur prachalit bolachaal ki bhaashaaeain alag hain. nishchit roop se likhte samay aap ravivaar likhoge aur sambhav hai ki bolne mein Sunday aasaan lage. haaain, yadi aap kisi naatak ke paatron aur unki baatcheet likhoge tab shaayad aap likhne mein bhi Sunday hi likhoge.--mujmmil (vaarta) 11:40, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
chakrapaani ji! agar tatsam aur tadbhav donon tarah ke shabd prachalan mein hain to likhte samay tatsam ka prayog jyaada uchit hai. lekin yadi tatsam (ya tadbhav shabd bhi) bikul kam prachalan mein hai ya vaisa hai jaisa mujmmil ji ne oopar sujhaaya, to usase bachana hi theek hai. aap urdoo ke bahuprachalit shabdon ka bhi prayog kar sakte hain. aapka prashn do prachalit shabdon mein 'vareeyata' dene ke sambandh mein hai, to jahaaain tak mujhe lagta hai, tatsam jyaada upayukt hai. aur urdoo (arabi-faarasi-Turkey) se aaye shabdon ke bhi tadbhav roop hain, tatsam k matlab keval sanskrut ke hi shuddh shabd naheen.--satyam mishr (vaarta) 12:24, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
@satyam mishr: ji ek aur baat kehna chaahooainga. aap "vasool" aur "vasoolana" shabd leejiye. yeh arabi shabd "vusool" se hain. par "vasoolana" (kriya) urdoo mein aprachalit hai. arthaat humne ek naya shabd apni bhaasha mein banaaya hai. aur yahi hamaare liye gaurav ki baat hai ki ham videshi sanskruti ko apnaate to hain parantu apni chhaap bhi banaae rakhate hain. --mujmmil (vaarta) 12:47, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

avadhi lekh

avadhi lekh par jo chitr lagaaya hai us chitr ka lekh se koi sambandh naheen hai, is chitr ko hata diya jaana chaahiye--daa0 jagadeesh vyomvaarta 15:51, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

poorn hua.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 17:09, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

itihaas ka vilopan aur apraasangik charcha

meri yeh shikaayat vikipeediya:punareekshak pad hetu nivedan mein shri peeyoosh maurya ko punareekshak banaane ke prastaav par hui charcha se hai. is sambandh mein meri do shikaayatein hain-

  • (1) shri susheel mishr ne pehle is prastaav ka virodh kiya tha. apne virodh ko mitaakar unhone ab samarthan kiya hai. pehle virodh aur ek saptaah baad samarthan - yeh vaidh hai ya naheen yeh to prabandhan jaanein. mera savaal yeh hai ki kya susheel mishr ko apne puraane 'krutya' ko mitaane ki anumati hai? isse bhraamak/galat soochana naheen ja rahi hai?
  • (2) shri mujammil ne vahaaain 'tippani' ke antargat hui charcha mein se kuchh ansh chhipaakar use 'aprasaangik tippaniyaaain' mein daal diya tha. apraasangik tippaniyon ko chhipaana/mitaana/rokana achhi baat hai. main iski prashansa karta hooain. kintu shri mujammil ne swayam apni tippaniyon ko vahaaain kyon chhod diya hai? mera sanket unki is tippani @hindusthaan vaasi: aap niraash mat hoiye. yahaaain aap pad paana chaahein to diplomesi ke maadhyam se prabandhak pad paane ka prayaas keejiye kyonki hamaare kalchar ke anusaar aap gauravamaya pad praapt kar chuke hote hain.... aadi, se hai. yahaaain kisi mitr ko unki yeh tippani praasangik lag rahi hai?---- anunaad Singhvaarta 04:00, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
susheel maurya who is he? When was he nominated for being reviewer??.....hahaha.....Sperm whale fluke.jpg; whale vaarta 04:23, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
susheel maurya naheen, peeyoosh maurya. maine use theek kar diya hai.
zafar itna dar gaye humare naam se ki bas parchai ko bhi hum samaj kar bhagne lage.....Sperm whale fluke.jpg; whale vaarta 04:58, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
anunaad ji kaafi saamayik aur uchit baate karte hain aur aise mein unki kuchh shikaayaton par main kehna chaahooainga:
  • (1) susheel mishr ji hi ki tarah aniruddh ji bhi maala ji ka prabandhak pad ke liye virodh kar rahe the. uske uchit kaaran bhi vo bata chuke the. par maala ji ne shabdon ke aise baan chalaae ki bechaare ghaayal hue aur samarthan kar baithe. kya kisi chunaav pranaali mein matadaata ke vote ko aisa prabhaavit karna uchit hai? peeyoosh ji ne kisi ko prabhaavit karne ka prayaas naheen kiya tha, susheel ji swayam apni rai badal chuke the. at: naitikta ke aadhaar par maala ji prabandhak par naheen rahana chaahiye.
  • (2) "'@hindusthaan vaasi: aap niraash mat hoiye." ki tippani yadi aap poori yahaaain likhte to achha hota ki shaayad ab us tippani ke saar par charcha hoti. khair, mainne "'@hindusthaan vaasi: aap niraash mat hoiye." ke ek vaakya ko chhodkar baaki sab 'aprasaangik tippaniyaaain' mein daal diya hai. aasha hai ki isse aapko bura na laga hoga haalaanki meri vyaktigat rai ab bhi vahi hai.
  • (3) yadi koi aur seva chaahiye to avashya kahein. --mujmmil (vaarta) 04:59, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
mujammil ji, itna spasht roop se likhne ke baad bhi aap naheen samajhne ka bahaana kar rahe hain. shri susheel mishr ke apna mat badalne par mujhe koi aapatti hi naheen hai. vah to neeti ka mudda hai. vah neetisangat hai ya naheen, vah prabandhak aadi dekh sakte hain. meri aapatti susheel mishr ke dvaara apni puraani likhi hui baat ko poora mitaakar nayi jagah par bilkul nai baat likhne se hai. yadi puraani baat ko kaatkar ya kisi aur roop mein apni puraani jagah par rakha jaata to baad mein aaye hue kisi ko seedhe pata chal jaata ki unhone pehle virodh kiya tha aur baad mein samarthan.
ab aapki doosari baat par. mujammil ji, aapne maana ki aapne apraasangik baat likhi thi aur us apraasangik tippani ko vahaaain se hata di kintu vahaaain bhi 'apraasangik tippaniyaan' ka ek link hona chaahiye tha. pata naheeain aapne kya sochakar link naheen diya. mujhe baar-baar 'par upadesh kushal bahutere' ki yaad aati hai. jahaaain tak aapki tippani ke saar par charcha ka prashn hai, jab yeh likha gaya tha tab to aap 'kabhi haaain kabhi na' waali maanasik sthiti mein the. ab yahaaain us par charcha karna kitna praasangik hoga? aapke sujhaaye raaste se adhik achha to yeh hoga ki use ek alag sheershak ke antargat uthaaiye aur charcha aarambh keejiye.---- anunaad Singhvaarta 05:44, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
apraasangik tippaniyon ki kadi yadi mujmmil ji de dete to achha tha. iske alaava susheel ji ko apna mat badalne ka poorn adhikaar hai lekin aisi avastha mein apne poorv mat <s>aur sambandhit tippani ko kaatkar</s> likhna chaahiye tha kyonki mahatva mat ka naheen balki sahamati ka hai.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 06:26, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
yadi kisi sadasya ko dhaaras baaaindhane ke liye main apne poorv anubhav ko likhta hooain, to ise main vyaktigat roop se apraasangik naheen maanata. ise apraasangik tippaniyon ke anubhaag mein jodna keval vivaad aur arthaheen charcha se bachane liye kiya jaane wala kadam hai. --mujmmil (vaarta) 07:15, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
@Hindustanilanguage aur sanjeev Kumar: it is my vote i can change it hundred times before the polling closed......more over my reason for opposition is still there for all to see......1st line in section tippani states my reservations for this poll.....i even sent a message to admin sanjeev in this regard with a list.....for which he showed his usual lameness.........as far as this guy is concerned he is just pissed off because some 1 who is rules follower will be a reviewer, some 1 who is not lame will be reviewer......he is just frustrated..........and muzamil ji please check this click, this is an example of influencing the voter......and all can see who is influencing the voters......such people cant stand on high moral ground and lecture others about moral.......Sperm whale fluke.jpg; whale vaarta 12:13, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
@Sushilmishra: susheel ji mujhe yeh charcha 'til ko taad banaane' waali lag rahi hain, jitna hangaama mere naamaankan par ho raha hain vo hindi vikipeediya ke itihaas mein kabhi naheen hua hoga. mujmmil waali baat to aisi hain ki aap kisi ke kehne par safaai kar do par vo kahe ki aapne ponchha bhi kyon naheen lagaaya? shreemaan anunaad ji ko itni chinta kyon hain "apraasangik baat" doosaron ko dikhaane ki, kya "shreemaan ji" kisi ko dikhaane ke liye tippani likhte hain? apne likhne ki yogyata par naaj hain, lagta hain. khair jaisa mujhe upadesh diya tha to khud kyon naheen link laga diya "apraasangik baat" ka naamaankan prushth par. ek muhaavara- "apni chit-apni pat"!! vaise is charcha ne "24 ghante se zyaada barbaad kar diye" hain kai logo ke!--peeyoosh mauryavaarta 13:19, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
@hindusthaan vaasi: kisi vivaad ke samay hone vaale naamaankanon ke samay aisi charchaayein aur vivaad hote rahe hain. mujhe is baat ka du:kh hai ki aapke naamaankan par hua vivaad kuchh aisa prateet ho raha hai jaise us vivaad ko badhaane vaale kaarakon mein main bhi ek hooain. at: chalo is charcha ko chhodo aur siddhaarth ji ke nirnaya ki pratiksha karte hain.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 14:08, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
@hindusthaan vaasi: you reminded me of a very funny thing this user always complain about other users saying they waste their time and also other's time but as you can see who is wasting whose time.....like i said before he is pissed off because you are winning the vote.......this guy have a unique problem of having grudge on every 1 who speaks against him and his rule breaking antics.....just click on this link click here you will see how he influence the voters........such people cant stand on high moral ground and lecture others about moral.......Sperm whale fluke.jpg; whale vaarta 14:02, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
@Sushilmishra: I have quoted a very valid case where Mala chaubey influenced Aniruddha to change his opinion directly on the particular Request for rights page. Aniruddha first gave a negative and then later changed his mind after the candidates lucid arguments. Anunad Singh is in no mood to comment on it. Similarly he observes a complete silence on his statement completely negating the contribution of a fellow user by throwing up absurdities.
Here is something worth considering for you:
  1. Mala ji expressed her inability to continue as admin on this very page- has the account been relieved of the responsibility?
  2. Hunnjazal posted a message on his talk page asking to be relieved from adminship as he is engrossed with other activities - has the account been relieved of the responsibility? --mujmmil (vaarta) 04:20, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
@Hindustanilanguage: guy is worth our attention mate.....he is not only a rule breaker but also an abuser.....and if you see this click here then you will find he is a vote influencer and black mailer......he doesnt worth our attention.....and about being relived of their adminship honhar sanjeev said what is the use......i felt like questioning him whats his use over here.....but let go guy is still a padwan....Sperm whale fluke.jpg; whale vaarta 06:14, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

jaaainch ka vishay

shreemati maala chaube ne Dr. govind chandr paandeya jiski saari saamagri in panktiyon ke lekhak ki thi, hata diya aur mere saare sanpaadan aur yogadaan ke aankade aadi bhi gaayab ho gaye| poorv mein is panne par meri kaaryavaahi ka itihaas bhi gaayab hai| jis praacheen aalekh govind chandr paandeya ki jagah mere vaale lekh ko samaayojit kiya gaya hai usamein mera koi itihaas ya yogadaan darj naheen balki ye poora hi pej shri dhavalagiri ki kalam se likha jaan padta hai| yeh baat hajam naheen hui | is maamale ko prashaasakon ka vruhattar samooh dekhe aur krupaya jaanche ki Dr. govind chandr paandeya hatna chaahiye tha ya govind chandr paandeya ????Hemant Shesh 06:38, 5 August 2014 (UTC)


dubaara aartanaad

gambhir jaaainch ka vishay[srot sampaadit karein]

shreemati maala chaube ne kinheen vhel ke galat tathya bayaan karne par Dr. govind chandr paandeya jiski saari saamagri in panktiyon ke lekhak ki thi, ekaaek bina meri aapattiyon ka niraakaran kiye, hata diya aur mere saare sanpaadan aur yogadaan ke aankade aadi bhi gaayab ho gaye| poorv mein is panne par meri saari kaaryavaahi / yogadaan ka itihaas bhi gaayab hai| jis praacheen obsolete aalekh govind chandr paandeya ki jagah mere baad vaale lekh ko 'samaayojit' kiya gaya hai usamein mera koi itihaas ya yogadaan darj naheen balki ye poora hi pej shri dhavalagiri ya kisi anya sadasya ki kalam se aarambh kiya jaana/ likha jaan padta hai| yeh baat hajam naheen hui | is maamale ko prashaasakon-prabandhakon ka vruhattar samooh dekhe aur krupaya is prakaran ko samayavaar jaanche ki mere baad ke aalekh Dr. govind chandr paandeya hatna chaahiye tha ya puraani soochana vaale govind chandr paandeya ko ?? kya puraane lekh ko vilopit kiye jaane mein vaidhaanik sankat tha ? Hemant Shesh 12:33 pm, aaj (UTC+5.5)

hemant ji,

jab koi prushth pehle se hindi vikipeediya par maujood ho to, pun: usi vishay par usi naam se prushth hindi vikipeediya par nahi banaaya ja sakta. yeh pratilipi lekh ki shreni mein aata hai aur ise sheegra mitaaya ja sakta hai. aapko pehle se sthit lekh mein hi aavashyak sudhaar karna chaahiye tha, jo na karke aapne 16 July 2014 ko usi naam se naya prushth bana liya. sheeh naamaankan ke baad hi is prushth ko sanjnyaaan mein lekar mitaaya gaya hai. at: aapko jo bhi sudhaar karna ho puraane lekh mein hi karein. ek vishay par do lekh nahi rakha ja sakta.--maala chaubevaarta 07:18, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

yadi kaheen mudraadhikaar ullanghan naheen hua hai to itihaas vilay kar dena chaahiye.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 07:27, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
mudraadhikaar ullanghan se sambandhit charcha ko nahi mitaaya gaya hai, is vaarta prushth par charcha chal rahi hai, yadi nirnaya hua to itihaas vilay kiya ja sakta hai. anya sadasyon ki bhi rai le li jaaye to shreyaskar hoga.--maala chaubevaarta 07:35, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

praachi mishra

mere dvaara banaaai gaye pej brahm Baba mandir raajesultaanapur ko hataane waali shreni me daala gaya hai ye saraasar anyaaya hai kyoki ye sah prachaar nahi hai krupaya soch kar hataane ke liye daale— is ahastaaksharit sandesh ke lekhak praachi mishra hai, (vaartayogadaan) 15:25, 5 August 2014 (UTC).

praachi mishra ji, krupaya lekh mein kuchh vishvasaneeya tathya jodein. tathyon ke abhaav mein yeh lekh prachaar hi prateet ho raha hai.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 15:33, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

alvida doston

@Bharat Suta: did manoj khurana gave you any kind of religious preaching/sermon/call?? So on bases are you criticizing other's believe.......every 1 have their point of view......thing which is fake to you is life for others and similarly you atheistism is evil for others.....you are a atheist that is your personal thing but you cant deny any 1 their believe.......vridh ashram, anat alay why you need those?? People like you may be are too much obsesive about their personal things that they are forgeting their culture and want to start a trend of vridh ashram and anat alay......i question you kiss samaj mai log apne ghar se mata pita ko nikal rahe hai? Aur kyu? Aur iss ka dharam se kya lena dena hai?......swati ji jo baat mujhe bolrahi hai jiyo aur jeene do uski zarurat aapko hai....kyu aap ne bina kisi waja khurana saab ke believe dharam ko criticize kiya hai......if you want to say you are atheist then please go and write on your usr page but criticizing other believe is wrong......aap nastik hai yeh aap ki choice hai.....dusro par nahi apni baat thopye aur nahi unke believe ko bura boliye.......Sperm whale fluke.jpg; whale vaarta 06:51, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
@sanjeev Kumar: dont close this......she cant insult any 1's believe......she has to delete her words and promise us that she will not criticize any religion/caste/sect/race/gender......she is an atheist that is her personal thing.....she needs to learn how to separate her personal and public life it will be good for her in future career......Sperm whale fluke.jpg; whale vaarta 06:51, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Fault aur Rift valley ka anuvaad

is saptaah ke sudhaar hetu lekh keeniya ka sanpaadan karne ke kram mein anya lekon aur kadiyon hetu hindi viki par padhte hue mujhe kuchh lekh mile jaise daraar (bhoovijnyaaan), ya mahaan daraar ghaati aur poorv afreeki daraar ityaadi. uparokt mein daraar shabd ka prayog Rift (valley) keliye tatha Fault ke liye kiya gaya hai. hindi mein Fault(-ing) ke liye "bhransh" aur "bhranshan" tatha Rift (valley) ke liye "bhransh ghaati" ka prayog hota hai. aise mein kya uparokt lekhon ko "bhransh ghaati" aur "bhransh" vaale naamon par sthaanaantarit kiya ja sakta hai? sadasyagan krupaya apni rai dein!--satyam mishr (vaarta) 16:51, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

@satyam mishr: hmm thoughts are good young padwan but who uses such terms "bhransh", "bhranshan" or "bhransh ghaati", this may be correct no doubt but who uses them in common language?? but yes on other hand this name mahaan daraar ghaati is wrong the name of this is The Great Rift Valley irrespective of language this can be compared to New York or England as you cant translate New york as naya york or England as engles ki zamin.......on a personal note satyam i remember you saying you dislike unnecessary hindification of words by hindi walas........Sperm whale fluke.jpg; whale vaarta 17:08, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
i cant understand what the creator of page mahaan daraar ghaati was thinking it seems he was interested in translating everything into hindi......this is similar to translating River Brahmaputra in english as river brahma's son.....ridiculous....Sperm whale fluke.jpg; whale vaarta 17:13, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
@satyam mishr: ji, maanak shabdon par sthaanaantarit karne ke liye charcha ki aavashyakta naheen honi chaahiye. iske alaava aap is vishay (bhoogol) ke visheshagya aur hindi bhaasha ke achhe jnyaaata bhi lagte hain. at: yeh maan sakte hain ki daraar ghaati aadi naam us lekh ke nirmaata sadasya ke maanak shabd na jaanane ke kaaran hua hoga. saath hi main aapka dhyaan is tathya ki or bhi kheenchna chaahata hooain ki aaj ki tithi mein vaigyaanik tatha takaneeki shabdaavali aayog ne apne site par 'rift valley' ke sangat 'rift-ghaati' shabd diya hai. haaain 'faalt' ke liye 'bhransh' diya gaya hai.---- anunaad Singhvaarta 13:47, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
@anunaad Singh aur Sushilmishra: aap donon logon ke sujhaav aur shabdakosh dekhne ke baad mujhe lagta hai ki Rift ke liye rift aur Rift Valley ke liye "rift ghaati" ka prayog hi adhik uchit hoga. vaise bhi, hindi mein "bhransh ghaati" ka istemaal pehle bhi mujhe thoda samasya wala lagta raha hai kyonki bhranshan (faulting) ki prakriya ke parinaamasvaroop do prakaar ki ghaatiyaaain banti hain - Rift Valley aur Ramp valley. aise mein keval Rift Valley ko bhransh ghaati kehna bhi thoda kanfyoojanaatmak hi hai. aur susheel ji! aapne kaha ki common language mein ye shabd naheen istemaal hote, to iska kaaran hai, saamaanya aadmi ke liye to ghaati shabd hi paryaapt hai use kya matlab ki yeh bhransh dvaara bani ya kisi aur prakriya se. lekin ek bhoogolavetta ya bhoovijnyaaani ke liye ghaatiyon ka vargeekaran karna bhi jaroori ho jaata hai aur ve log hi is tarah ki shabdaavali ka prayog karte hain. doosari baat, baaki anya bhaashaaoain mein vikipeediyaaon par bhi Great Rift Valley ko anuvaad karke hi istemaal kiya gaya hai jaise Valléae du grand rift (French), Gran Valle del Rift (speni) ya Großaer Afrikanischer Grabenbruch (jarman); aur jarman mein to rift ko bhi jarman shabd Graben likha hai. aise mein hamalog ise "mahaan rift ghaati" kah sakte hain.
punashch -- chooainki kisi aur ne rai naheen di at: anaapatti ki avastha mein main kal daraar (bhoovijnyaaan) ko "rift", ya mahaan daraar ghaati ko "mahaan rift ghaati" aur poorv afreeki daraar ko "poorv afreeki rift" par sthaanaantarit kar dooainga, sangat aur sambhaavit naamon ke liye punarnirdesh vaale panne banaate hue. aap donon ko bahut bahut dhanyavaad!--satyam mishr (vaarta) 18:37, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
@satyam mishr: answer me how will you create page of this 1---Las Palmas de Gran Canaria---this is a name of city in spain it means---The Great Palms of Canary---will you translate it as---kainari ke mahaan taad---i am keen to know you views satyam----------Sperm whale fluke.jpg; whale vaarta 18:45, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
agar anya bhaashaonmein bhi iska anoodit naam chalta ho to, naheen to "las paamaas" se kaam chala looainga. vaise hamaare vartamaan sandarbh mein Großaer Afrikanischer Grabenbruch (jarman) jisne likha hai vo kya galat hai aapki najar mein? aap kya naam sujha rahe hain great rift valley?--satyam mishr (vaarta) 19:12, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
@satyam mishr: i dont understand german well so i cant say exactly what is written.......but i suggest it should be great rift ghaati, because it is the name of mountain range irrespective of language.............once i came across a page on canadian city calgary on hindi wikipedia were i found name of Canadian Rockies mountain range as Canada ki chattaanon you can check yourself by seeing this page kailagari........more over this will be like naming page about new york as naya yaurk.............Sperm whale fluke.jpg; whale vaarta 19:26, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
theek hai fir! great rift ghaati kar dooainga! aur uparokt udaaharan mein unhein "kainediyn raukeej" ya "Canadai rauki parvat" hi kaha jaana chaahiye aap theek kar sakte hain , kisi ne Google anuvaad dvaara lekh banaaya hoga isliye aisa hoga.--satyam mishr (vaarta) 19:34, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
@satyam mishr: you are free to do it my friend.........may the force be with you.....Sperm whale fluke.jpg; whale vaarta 19:36, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

open challenge/khuli chunauti

@Manojkhurana: kya hua khurana saab apka dost kyu aagaya aap ko bachane......itna kya dar gaye toh jo admin ka sahara lena pada.....
@sanjeev Kumar: vyatigat charcha kise kahte yeh aap ko seekhna chahiye....alvida doston....yeh jo section hai aur jis tara ke messgs usmai the usko bolte hai vyatigat charcha......Sperm whale fluke.jpg; whale vaarta 06:47, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
@Manojkhurana:kya hua khurana saab chupne ki jaga dhund rahe ho kya??......Sperm whale fluke.jpg; whale vaarta 06:57, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
@Manojkhurana: arey khurana saab kitni madad karey aapke dost aapko bachane ki aur aap hai ki bas bhag gaye.......Sperm whale fluke.jpg; whale vaarta 07:37, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

7 August 2014

☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 12:23, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

main spasht hooain


vikipeediya mudraadhikaar neeti

namaste doston, aaj vikipeediya par chitron se sambandhit mudraadhikaar niymaavali ke baare mein ek samaachaar padha. mujhe kaafi achha laga aur yahi niymaavali kaumans par mujhe ek vyakti ne samajhaai thi. shaayad aap padhoge to aapko bhi achhi lagegi. yahaaain dekhein.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 14:35, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

haaain sanjeev ji, mainne is baare mein padha tha. kaafi dilchasp maamala hain, kahi vikipeediya ko jurmaana na bhugatna pade.--peeyoosh mauryavaarta 16:10, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
vॆse vikipeediya paisa laayega kaha se sab to free hi hai.Amt000 (vaarta) 16:17, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
it is free that is why we are destroying it......right sanjeev......you are not getting paid so you are not interested..........Sperm whale fluke.jpg; whale vaarta 16:36, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
@Amt000 aur hindusthaan vaasi: paise ki chinta hamein naheen karni kyonki yeh viki-kaumans ka maamala hai. hamein to ghar baithe hi anoodit niymaavali mil gayi aur is tarah ke samaachaaron se hindi vikipeediya ka bhi laabh hi hai kyonki kam se kam log vikipeediya se to judeinge.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 16:49, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
and will never ask them follow any rules laid by wikipedia foundation......as admins are not being paid to inform users about rules.......how great......Sperm whale fluke.jpg; whale vaarta 16:56, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
@sanjeev Kumar: achha hain jude to, vaise hame ginti ke log naheen chaahiye balki viki niymavaali ke anuroop yogadaan dene vaale sadasya chaahiye. bina sandarbh di baat to unhein kisi blog par hi mil jaaegi, jab logo ko sandarbh yukt, paryaapt aur nishpaksh jaankaari milegi to avashya kai log aaeainge. varana chaahe angreji na aati ho, jaaeainge to angreji waali par!--peeyoosh mauryavaarta 16:58, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
@hindusthaan vaasi: what are you saying? are in your senses?? have you lost your mind? how can you ask a user to add references?? how can you even dare to think that we will ask users to add references?? and neutral and non point of view thing you are doing a crime........you know there are admins here who will not only warn you but can also abuse you if you do such things......thank god they are not active now but ever since they became admin they are not concern about wikipedia as they are not being paid to do this work.........oh no what did i do just now i warned you about it oh no i may be abused for doing that...........Sperm whale fluke.jpg; whale vaarta 17:04, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
peeyoosh ji, jab logon ki sankhya adhik hogi tabhi niymaavali mein drudhta aayegi. abhi niymaavali ko katheen karke ham akele hi rah jaayeinge. aap dekhoge to gyaat hoga ki hamaari niymaavali sanskrut/Bhojpuri/maraathi jaisi bhaarateeya bhaashaaon ki vikipeediyaaon se kadi hai. telugu aur tamil vikipeediya mein kuchh varshon pehle tak hamaari vikipeediya se adhik prushth the iske baavajood hamaare paas aaj adhik aujaar hain aur adhik achhi aur spasht niymaavali hai.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 17:12, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
this people cant manage 10 people and enforce rules, so imagine their lameness when 100s if not 1000s will be here..........sanjeev will be the 1st to run away just like other honhar admins ran away........they just want this admin thing in front of their name.......as for work they are not interested as they are not paid to do it............sahi hai na sanjeev saab aapko paise thodi na milre jo aap kaam karoge.......Sperm whale fluke.jpg; whale vaarta 17:23, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

maranee se pehle jaroor dekhein

--Amt000 (vaarta) 01:17, 8 August 2014 (UTC)


ye badatameej susheel mishr aakhir hai kaun???

@hindusthaan vaasi: ::@sanjeev Kumar: ::@Manojkhurana: ::@Hindustanilanguage:

I am very much unhappy to say that just an ordinary Hindi Wiki user, Mr. Sushil Mishra, a nuisance-monger mediocre of first watermark, (who is also operating unscrupulously through his other account with the name Whale), is crossing all limits of decency and linguistic-decorum. While writing irresponsible and highly derogatory comments about Mr. Sanjiv Kumar and also the undersigned, Mr. Mishra has not only been persistently passing unwanted useless personal remarks on my previous official capacity of DM, but also using a language that is almost abusive, rude, discourteous and insulting.

I had therefore, once requested the bureaucrats of the Wiki to ban such a non sense by immediately debarring Mr. Mishra from further unsolicited indecent interventions and take back his powers to edit other's writings, but I am sorry again to note, no concrete / firm action has been taken as yet against this monstrous 'culprit'. This situation is highly unfortunate, pitiable and depressing when even our potent officials are looking helpless to initiate some stern action against a most unwanted user like Mr. Sushil Mishra, who has not been given a single warning to be more sensible and sober, but on the contrary, his abusive, extraneous remarks instead of being ignored or rebuked sternly, are being constantly entertained and replied to, as if he is the Master and others are his obedient pupils!

The list of his malpractice goes further when we find that he is always engaged in baseless arguments with everyone, even in the subjects he is just alien, he appears without any reason sticking his advisory notes- however irrelevant they may be. Mr. Mishra hardly visits the pages to verify if the desired action has been taken by the concerned contributor at a later stage or not.

I wonder, who has, and after what scrutiny, on what merits, Mr. Mishra allowed to operate as Self-Patrolled/ Auto-Confirmed user! And what are the compulsions when he is being tolerated despite his shameful deeds.

This comment of mine is based on the solid postulates, gathered after studying all cynical comments irresponsibly jotted down against Mr. Sanjiv Kumar, Mr. Manoj Khurana, the undersigned and many others from time to time. Many a times, as you all pretty well know, Mr. Whale, the third rate guy, has stooped down to the lowest civic level by passing belittling remarks on his own user page/other's user pages and Chaupal in the garb of 'getting observed the Wiki rules'.

Every self-motivated user in Hindi Wiki is singularly working for the cause of adding valuable information to its pages, but such unauthorized interventions make it impossible to continue many of us further. Persons like me have reached an unbearable limit of self-control or composure, as no person with self esteem would ever tolerate the gibberish created by persons like Mr. Mishra, who seems to be an illiterate, uneducated, indecent, impolite, and above all an improper intruder on the present Hindi Wiki scenario. I, therefore do not feel inclined to continue with my contribution to Hindi Wiki anymore, just because of the prejudiced/ biased attitude and filthy comments being passed uninterruptedly by Mr. Sushil Mishra alias Whale.

While saying temporary goodbye to all my friends here, I also feel my duty to warn the office bearers of Hindi Wiki that if such sadist persons like Mr. S. Mishra, are allowed to unscrupulously hyperactive in obstructing genuine writers and selfless contributors, more and more people will abstain themselves from visiting Hindi Wiki or write for it, which is primarily a useful academic mission and absolutely not an arena of exhibiting one's sluggish-'Sanskars' through most rubbish comments like the ones penned by Mr. Sushil mishra for no useful outcome than undermining, devastating and vitiating a pious cause .

It is high time when instead of giving such a 'kusnskaree' vagabond a long rope, you all must keep him at an arm's distance from now, in the best interest of all sagacious readers and authentic contributors.Hemant Shesh 17:08, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

@Hemant Shesh: collector saab ka order aagaya.....hahahaha.............this person is having grudge just because i am asking him to follow the rules.......being a person of holding a responsible post he should be an example of responsible person here too but instead he is behaving childishly breaking all rules biggest of example is him creating multiple pages about himself and then shamelessly trying to protect it.......later he broke rule for naming of page and again shamelessly tried to protect it even after multiple user explaining him the rules he had shameslessly cried here about that incident........he later again behaving childishly came up with number of pages asking admin why this pages are not deleted because they too violate naming policy of wikipedia.......mr hemant as soon as this pages come in our view we nominate them and delete them......we are not like you to shamelessly defend those illegal actions............even how your hate mongerness towards me is so much that your whole attention is towards me.......this shows your hate towards me and the grudge towards me.......better grow up mr hemant you dont worth a pinch of salt so dont try to poke a finger in lions eye.........stay away it will be good for you............the amount of energy you spent to provoke me here if you spend half of those in following rules then it will help hindi wikipedia........Sperm whale fluke.jpg; whale vaarta 17:53, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
@Hemant Shesh: more over former collector saab instead of talking sanskar better you should read the rules of wikipedia and then start working here cause as long as you break rules then me if not some 1 else will remind you of your patheticness.........so talk less work more.......and create proper pages that worth the salt...........Sperm whale fluke.jpg; whale vaarta 17:59, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
@Sushilmishra: I didn't follow some of the comments shared between you and others. But the language you use for Sanjeev Kumar "Tandoor", "lame duck", etc. Other usages such as padawan, etc, even if you use for relatively harmless extended meanings (novice / apprentice, etc) may sound quite offensive to others. I suggest some basic civil way of communication is observed, even when you believe somebody has erred. Otherwise, it is highly discouraging for others and this might reduce the number of editors on our Wiki. Please, give a thought to my words. There also one more prob - we've paucity of time and whatever time is available is needlessly involved in these types of discussions. --mujmmil (vaarta) 18:54, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
@Hindustanilanguage: muzamil saab sanjeev knows very well i call him tandoor.......secondly there is nothing wrong in calling a novice as padwan atleast it is much better term than novice.........and about civil way i think i was very much civil with this civil officer before he started to grow a grudge on me and started to talk about sanskar with me it was on until and unless he came on chuppal with his section I had no option but to retaliate the vile which he spole against me was clear indication the grudge he is having against me and this little messg which he again posted here is second example........funny thing is this 1 came when i was not at all concern about him and was not at all messaging him.......he just wanted to provoke me to get a response so that he can again cry foul......it is simple......this guy just cant follow a single rule here on wikipedia and creating multiple pages on himself and creating pages with incorrect name.....when some 1 warns him this is against rule he talks about sanskar......he himself is throwing himself in line of fire..........retire adami hai aachi post pe tha kabhi kyu apni izzat ka faluda banwara........Sperm whale fluke.jpg; whale vaarta 19:12, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
While I agree that Sushil Mishra has not been respectful enough, rather insulting with many of the members, the reason we are unable to decide on any action is that he talks about wiki quality. He knows very well that here people are lenient enough and surely he has been testing our patience. "kyu apni izzat ka faluda banwara" is clearly an unparliamentary langugae. I admit I'm unable to decide what should be done here as I'm in favour of maintaining quality but strictly against the way he's trying to do. I suggest either the community should unanimously decide something e.g. either simply boycott him, not replying to any of his comment (this option I prefer, atleast we keep getting his football contributions this way), or to decide on blocking him or refer this issue to meta stewards. This is for sure that due to Mr. Mishra too much time is being consumed on discussions. This must end now. Reforming himself & to use parliamentary language is also an option available with Mr. Mishra. --manoj khuraana 06:18, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
@Manojkhurana: khurana saab the day you follow the policy correctly then that day you wont have to see me messaging.....it is as simple as......person who need to wary about me are persons who dont follow the rules......so relax sit back see the indian parliamentary language that i will post now......because this is 3rd time he is dragging me on chuppal just for pointing out his mistakes.....this besharam guy is unable to digest the fact that he is wrong.......yaad rakhi khurana saab mai bhi ek section shuru kar sakta hu ki yeh anpad hemant shesh hai koun jo rules follow nahi kara.......jitne mere se uljhoge mujhe utna he motivation milega.......last year ka example yaad hoga aap ko akele 5 ko jawab dera tha mai......aap log ke liye ek he advice hai bas rules follow karo toh mere se bache rahoge.......Sperm whale fluke.jpg; whale vaarta 06:26, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
@sanjeev Kumar, Manojkhurana, aur Hindustanilanguage: stick rules and policies if not this wikipedia will turn into this click here........remember if you follow rules correctly you dont have to see my message on your talk page.....Sperm whale fluke.jpg; whale vaarta 06:38, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
susheel ji, aisi kaunasi niymaavali hai jo aapko masheeni anuvaad yahaaain lagaane ki anumati deti hai? aap kin niyamon ki baat kar rahe ho? hindi vikipeediya par jo niymaavali hai usaka aap khule aam makhaul uda rahe ho. aapka kehna hai ki aapne prushthon mein chippiyaaain niymaavali ke anusaar lagaai, aapne apne dvaara nirmit prushthon mein chippiyaaain kyon naheen lagaai? aap kah rahe ho ki anya sadasya achha yogadaan naheen de rahe aur aap hi ek maatr sadasya ho jo niymaavali ka anusaran kar rahe ho. kya niymaavali aapke anusaar bani hui hai? aap hamesha angreji vikipeediya ki niymaavali ke udaaharan prastut karte ho lekin kya aapne vahaaain niymaavali padhi hai? yadi haaain to aap usaka anusaran kyon naheen karte? aapka pratyek kaarya angreji vikipeediya ki niymaavali ke viruddh hai aur yadi aap samajhte ho ki aap sahi ho to vo sabhi shabd jo aapne hindi vikipeediya par kaam mein liye hain jyon ke tyon angreji vikipeediya par likhkar dikhaavo! aapko turant pratibndhit kar diya jaayega! angreji vikipeediya par aap kisi sadasya ko khule aam tandoor/aanti/kiddo aadi shabd likhkar dikhaavo. uske baad aapko parinaam vahaaain main dikhaauainga. aap chaaho to main vo sab galatiyaaain vahaaain karke dikha sakta hooain jo yahaaain karta hooain aur tay hai ki vahaaain mujhe iski koi chetaavani bhi naheen dega.
yahaaain uttar dene se poorv apni maatru vikipeediya par ye karm karke dikhaana anyatha yahaaain logon ko pareshaan mat karo.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 06:46, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
@sanjeev Kumar: ab aye aap mudde ke baat pe yeh harkat kab se shuru kara aap ko pata hai......maine aap kha diya tha ki mai yeh karne wala hu aur jab tak karunga tab tak aap rule follow nahi karege.......aage wale ne mujhe gali di jo steward ne confirm ki ke kisne di toh phir kyu rules waha follow nahi hue.......maine ussi din sonch liye ki ab aap ko tules sikhana hai.......aur rahi baat mere rules ki toh mai har rule ki limit hu.......yeh aapko bhi pata hai......aur rahi baat mere pages ki tog mere pages mai khud kaise audit karu.....maine aap se kaha tha ki unko audit karo.....par kya bola apne ki nahi mere pass time nahi toh theek hai mere pass time hai mai aapke karta hu.........maine zaada kuch nahi bas yehi bola tha ki steward ki baat mano aur rule impose karo......kiya apne abhi tak......nahi na.....toh ab jheelo.......mera mission ab bas aap ko rules yaad dilana hai aur kuch nahi.......Sperm whale fluke.jpg; whale vaarta 07:07, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
aapne pehli baat to mere kisi bhi prashn ka uttar naheen diya. doosari baat mainne kaunase niyam naheen maane. steevards ke anusaar koi bhi khaata kathaputali khaata naheen paaya gaya aur unke anusaar ek sadasya par shak kiya ja sakta hai ki usane gaali di lekin vo jaaainch mein spasht naheen ho paaya at: use pratibndhit naheen kiya ja sakta. iske atirikt aapne khule aam gaaliyaaain di fir bhi aapko mainne meri taraf se maaf kiya tha. aap dekh lo koi bhi aapke paksh mein un gaaliyon ko lekar khada hai kya? steevards ne kaheen naheen likha ki koi kathaputali khaata paaya gaya hai. mujhe jo angreji aati hai uske anusaar mainne sahi samjha. masheeni anuvaad karke main us angreji ko naheen samajh sakta. aap angreji vikipeediya par kisi sadasya ko gaaliyaaain dekar dekho aur fir parinaam bhi dekho.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 07:16, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
@sanjeev Kumar: steward ne kya kaha aache se malum mujhe.....usne seede seede ek user ka naam liye aur bola ki he is responsible.....toh ismai aapko kuch aur bolne ki zarurat he nahi......aur aap ke kis sawal ka jawan maine nahi diya yeh bolo......Sperm whale fluke.jpg; whale vaarta 07:23, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
aapne kisi bhi savaal ka uttar naheen diya. steevards ka uttar "Due to the use of highly dynamic IP addresses it is not possible to confirm they are linked to a registered account. However, other technical evidence confirms XYZ is the source of the abuse." jiska hindi anuvaad meri samajh ke anusaar yeh hai: "atyadhik gatisheel aai॰apee॰ pate kaam mein lene ke kaaran iska satyaapan karna mushkil hai ki yeh kisi panjeekrut khaate se juda hua hai. haalaanki, anya takaneeki pramaan pushti karte hain ki XYZ hi gaaliyon ka srot hai."
iske baad unase mainne aur anunaad ji ne baat spasht karne ka aagrah kiya to unhonne bina kisi kaaran hi kah diya ki main iski pushti kar sakta hooain lekin pushti karne mein vo saksham naheen ho paaye. ab kis aadhaar par XYZ khaate ko pratibndhit kiya ja sakta hai. yeh jaankaari mainne imel par pushti karni chaahi lekin unhonne vahaaain bhi iski pushti naheen ki. mainne poorn jaankaari praapt karne ka bharsak prayaas kiya lekin parinaam yahi raha ki pushti naheen ho paayi.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 07:35, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
dhyaan rahe yahaaain anya pramaan mere dvaara diye gaye tathya the aur yadi mere tathyon se hi parinaam nikaalna hota to main meta viki par kyon jaata? sabhi parinaam yahaaain hi nikaal leta.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 07:37, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
@sanjeev Kumar: mate no matter what you say truth is in front of you and your acting like a fool...in which case you left me no option to behave in this.......you keep on violating rules and i will keep on reminding you.....if you talk crap them remember i can too talk crap......so crawl back under the stone fro which yoh came from.....if you wish to laugh and have fun in mean time refer to this.....click here......search for any page and get ready to laugh.....more that is the advance level of our hindi wikipedia as hindi wikipedia too is going in that direction........Sperm whale fluke.jpg; whale vaarta 07:48, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
hindi vikipeediya us disha mein naheen ja rahi. haaain mujhe lagta hai ki aap chaahate ho ki hindi vikipeediya bhi us disha mein chali jaaye lekin aapki vo har koshish naakaam rahegi jo nek naheen hai.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 07:52, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
@sanjeev Kumar: hahaha yeh sahi hai.....admin aap, reviewer aapka dost, editor aap ke state wala.....rules todte aap log.....par blame mujhe par......jao sanjeev babu jao.....khud samal nahi pare hindi wikipedia ko par blame kare ho dusro par......zari si bhi sharam abhi hai toh chod do admin giri.....Sperm whale fluke.jpg; whale vaarta 08:09, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
susheel ji fir se ukasaave waali bhaasha prayog kar rahe hain. mera nishchaya ho chala hai ki unhein pratibandhit karna hi hindi viki ke hit mein hoga. baaki sabki jo ichha ho. bahut ho chuka hai ab ye kissa samaapt hona chaahiye. --manoj khuraana 08:19, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
@Manojkhurana: arey khurana saab yeh chat shuru karne ka aim he yehi tha na ki mujhe ban karo......1 saal kosish mai the.....final collector ke order ka he wait karey the aap.....khud ka faisala lene ke liye dimag nahi shayad......itna bas hai ya aur kuch bolu......Sperm whale fluke.jpg; whale vaarta 08:32, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
susheel ji, mainne edamingiri hi to naheen ki. ek prabandhak hone ke naate mujhe aapko uchit samay par pratibndhit kar dena chaahiye tha lekin mere vyaktigat vichaaron ne aapko pratibndhit karne se rok diya anyatha aaj sabhi sadasyon ko aapke kaaran pareshaani kyon jhelni padti.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 08:34, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
susheel ji, aapko kai baar samajhaane ki koshish karne ke baad main is nateeje par pahuaincha hooain. aapke vichaaron se main aaj bhi sahamat hooain, lekin aapke taur tareekon se kadaapi naheen. aapke taur tareekon se sabhi sadasya dukhi hain aur ek naheen kai log vikipeediya chhodne ki kagaar par hain. aap akele banaam baaki sabhi mein yadi ek vikalp chunana hai to main baaki sab sadasyon ko chunata hooain. kvaaliti hona na hona sahan kiya ja sakta hai, badtameeji sahan naheen ki ja sakti. aapko sudhaar ke bahut mauke diye gaye hain. kya aap jaante hain ki jab aapko apne atirikt baaki sabhi paagal lagne lagein to iska ek hi matlab hota hai ? lekin shaayad aap naheen samjheinge.--manoj khuraana 08:58, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
@sanjeev Kumar: mujhe na pahele iss baat ki koi fikar thi na aaj hai aur na kal hogi......puri chat start karne ka jo cowardly intention tha mai usse pura support kara hu......rule breaker kabhi nahi ban karna par jo rule breaker mistake point karta hai usse point karna......kyu ki rule breaker ko yeh baat hazam nahi hori ki koi uske khilaf awaz utara hai.....ha bhai itne saalo mai kursi ki garmi aayi hogi na dimag mai.....Sperm whale fluke.jpg; whale vaarta 09:00, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
@Manojkhurana:lo ab khurana saab bhi faisla lene lage hai haha......dukhi karte hai toh phir galti karte he kyu.....na karo galti aur na ho dukhi simple......aur bhai saab jo log bolte hai ki mai wikipedia chod dunga wohi sab se bade besharam hote hai.....bas srif bolne ke hote woh karne ke nahi......hindi bhasa mai inke liye ek word hai jo "g" se shuru hota hai......aur kisko chuna hai chuno mujhe kya already yeh crap hai isko aur crap karo......mai toh bas maaze lera hu aap ke mammu paneke......Sperm whale fluke.jpg; whale vaarta 09:08, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
@Manojkhurana: yaad rakhna khurana saab jab tak hu rules yaad dilata rahunga.....mere se bachna hai toh bas rules follow karo aur bache raho mere se......and remember specially baldiya wale ko.....what does round comes round......baldiya wale ke har edit ab nazar mai hoge mere.....toh be careful.......Sperm whale fluke.jpg; whale vaarta 09:13, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
  1. "kyu apni izzat ka faluda banwara"
  2. .this besharam guy
  3. your acting like a fool
  4. so crawl back under the stone fro which yoh came from
  5. khud ka faisala lene ke liye dimag nahi shayad......itna bas hai ya aur kuch bolu.
  6. kursi ki garmi aayi hogi na dimag mai
  7. wohi sab se bade besharam hote hai.
  8. .hindi bhasa mai inke liye ek word hai jo "g" se shuru hota hai.
  9. mai toh bas maaze lera hu aap ke mammu paneke..

aur kehne ko kuchh bacha hai?--manoj khuraana 09:21, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

@Manojkhurana: aur add kar sakte the khair mujhe ab farak nahi padta i quit lets see how to manage this crap......adieus.....Sperm whale fluke.jpg; whale vaarta 18:39, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

soorajadaas

--jeetesh (vaarta) 19:11, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

viki se avakaash

sadasyon ke saath jis tarah ki apamaanajanak bhaasha ka prayog kiya ja raha hai aur karmath sadasyon ko viki par kaarya karne se apratyaksh roop se kaarya na karne dene ke liye vivsh kiya ja raha hai..... viki prabandhak tatkaal nirnaya lein..... jab tak kuchh nirnaya naheen hota hai tab tak viki se avakaash le raha hooain..... --daa0 jagadeesh vyomvaarta 10:36, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
mainne ek lekh shuroo kiya tha aur aasha kar raha tha ki kisi tarah ravivaar ko usako poora kar dooain. par main dekhkar hairaan hooain ki yahaaain aate hi vivaadon aur bahason ka hissa banana padta hai. isliye main bhi ek saptaah ke liye hindi vikipeediya se door rahane ka nirnaya le chuka hooain. --mujmmil (vaarta) 14:43, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

nirnaya leejiye, nirnaya leejiye

sanjeev Kumar ji aur anya prabandhakagan, shri susheel mishr ke baare mein kuchh din poorv maine jo prastaav diya tha, use fir se yaad keejiye. uske baad bhi log shikaayat karte rahe aur aap shri susheel ko samjha-samajhaakar thak gaye. ab aage charcha se kya milega? jab tak hndi viki par vyavastha naheen rahegi aur charchaaeain sammaanajanak bhaasha mein naheen hongi, log yahaaain aane se kataraayeinge aur jo hain ve dheere-dheere sarak leinge. ---- anunaad Singhvaarta 11:22, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

samasyaao ka samaadhaan kare

@sanjeev Kumar: hindi vikipeediya ke prabandhak mahodayon se anurodh hai ki, in dinon hindi viki par jo samasyaae utpann ho rahi hain, sadasyon par vyaktigat hamle ho rahe hain, logo ka niymaavali ki aad mein jo ghor niraadar, aur prataadit kiya ja raha hain, tamaam sadasyon ki shikaayate aa rahi hain, krupaya us par dhyaan de, aur is baabat krupaya sheegra samasyaao ka samaadhaan kare, aadaraneeya edamin ji.— is ahastaaksharit sandesh ke lekhak Jeeteshvaishya hai, (vaartayogadaan) 16:22, 9 August 2014 (UTC).

@sanjeev Kumar, Jeeteshvaishya, Hindustanilanguage, Dr.jagdish, aur anunaad Singh:
need cry mate i know you are good drama queens non of will leave you guy will be back again contributing crap and making this wiki crap.........but any how i have decided to quit.......enjoy you crap.......but before i go....
  • jeetesh i never said any to you that can qualify as personal attack but this is second time you initiated such thing against me.......i know why you have grudge on it is because i asked you not to use 2 ids....
  • anunad he is pathetic no doubt......you are unable to digest the fact that you are not following wikipedia rules.....i have seen many old cases were you did similar things with other users when they said you violate the rules......
  • jagdish i never had a chance to message you but you want to link up your leave with me......to remind you there is a page about yourself on wikipedia which you yourself created.....and many more such policy violation which you did......
  • muzamil ji as long as i was fight on your behalf i was a good guy but as soon as i critisied you i am a bad guy.....may be you have some work and you cant be available....but you want to link that up with me.......
enjoy destroying this wikipedia.....may the force be with you.....i quit.....Sperm whale fluke.jpg; whale vaarta 18:52, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

@Sushilmishra:, Mr. Mishra, You're talking nonsense. What grudge, grudge, grudge? All the people having only grudge on you, And here all the people have gonna mad and they are not following rules and you are the only right person, who is very genuine to the rules of Wikipedia. Wah, Very Good, Hats off man.

First you learn the talking sense to elders. Dr. Jagdish Ji, is not your son, to whom you're so roughly calling jagdish.

And why I have any grudges on you. About my two IDs, for that I already have given a valid reason and others were satisfied with my answer. Okay. I warn you please next time do not target me on this matter.

Here, I don't have any grudges for any single person. I accept opinions of you for improving the quality of Wikipedia, but the way you are, the way you talk, the way you deal with other Wikipedians, For that I extremely oppose you. Okay Mr. Mishra.--jeetesh (vaarta) 19:58, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

@Jeeteshvaishya: if he is an elder ask him to behave like 1......no need for him to air his views about me......i have posted a warning for all on my talk page any further flare up will be responded accordingly.....stay away and need not reply and you will be happy......Sperm whale fluke.jpg Darth Whale vaarta 20:06, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

This user is on self imposed ban from 10 August 2014 and will not answer any questions/queries....
Warning: any 1 posting any message about this user will be declared scum....
this user reserve the right to retaliate
this user is now offical on dark side of force-hence user is now-"DARTH WHALE"-

final and offical warning.......Sperm whale fluke.jpg Darth Whale vaarta 20:11, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

krupaya jaldi kaaryavaahi karein

prabandhakagan aur sadasya shri susheel mishr ke uparokt vaarta ko padhein. ve gaali dekar abhi bhaagane aur fir gaali dene ke liye lautakar aane ki soochana de rahe hain. teesari fail bachcha bhi unke is vyavahaar ko achhi tarah samajh sakta hai. ---- anunaad Singhvaarta 07:59, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

@anunaad Singh: i am not coward like you......warning has clearly stated that any provocation/message will be retaliated in harshest way possible.....i think you wish to be abused......think you aint even 2nd class pass that is why you are unable to understand the message.....stop being a queer.....chin up like man.....but i think you cant as you are a queer......
@sanjeev Kumar aur Manojkhurana: remind your coward brigade to stay away and stop provocations......if not i will be responding in harshest way.......more over coward brigade can go on and change rugby union into rugby sangh, create pages about themselfs, add not only dr. but shri, shriman, pandit, acharya to all pages and yes can create multiple new pages instead of editing old pages claiming they have latest info and ask for deletion of old 1.....Sperm whale fluke.jpg Darth Whale vaarta 08:43, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

matapradarshan ki vinanti (rikvest for kaumeint)

namaste,

maine Special:Log/newusers (naye sadasyon ki soochi) yanha naye sadasyonke naya akaaoont banaaneki prakreeya ka abhyaas karne ki kosheesh ki. svachaalit roop se banaaya gaya tha ye kaitegari bhaarateeya bhaashaai vikipeediyaaoainme atyaadhik hone ki sambhaavana najar I. aisa hone ka kaaran ye log angreji vikipeediyaapar apna khaata khulavaate hai aur baadame bhaarateeya vikipeediya par aate hai chunki Bhaarat me sarch injeen par dhundhane itna angreji bahuto ko aata hai aur hamaare kampyutaroke kibord angreji me hote hai. yadi computer pranaaleese lekar Google jaise shodh sanpurnataya bhaarati bhaashaanome hote to ye log sidhehi bhaarati bhaashi vikipeediyaapar punhuchate. magar aise to nahi hai to feer jabaki vyakti angreji vikipeediyaapar apna sadasyakhaata khulava raha hai tab use Special:UserLogin/signup is faurmame naahi usaki mukhya bhaasha puchhi jaati hai naahi use yunivharsal laingvej salektar dvaara bhaarateeya bhaashaataayapeeng upalabdhata ke baare me Special:UserLogin/signup is skreenapar koi praapt hoti hai.

http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/List_of_Wikipedias is soocheese kuchh bhaasha vikipeediyaaoke Special:Log/newusers (naye sadasyon ki soochi) abhyaas se aise lagta hai svachaalit roop se banaaya gaya tha pratishat jeen vikipeediya ka kam ho ya jab log apni apni bhaashaame sadasya naam darj karte ho aise vikipeediyaaki pragati ki sthiti achhi honeki sambhaavana dikhaai deti hai. aap maine niche diye aakadopar najar daal sakte hai. yadi sabhi bhaaratabhaashi vikipeediynsaka samarthan praapt ho sake to ham Special:UserLogin/signup par bhaaratase koi vyakti khaata khulavaata hai to use bhaarateebhaashaaki taayapeeng suvidha us screen par sidhese upalabdh hone ki maang karna aasaan hoga. iske alaava naye sadasya ki maatrubhaasha usi skreenase darjakar use apni bhaashaaki vikipeediyaame jaane ka sidha avsar usi screen se praapt hone ki maang kar sakte hai.

bhaaratabhaashi vikipeediyns maangaka samarthan karne ke liye tayaar ho to mai yeh baat metaapar rakhana chaahata hun .

mathala majakoor Name of language wikipedia Aprox percentage of Accounts created automatically per 250 new users
i.e. most likely opening account at en wiki first
language script sheershak
1 Swedish 40 % Roman/ latin udaaharan
2 Hindi 80% Devnagri udaaharan
3 Marathi 70% Devnagri udaaharan
4 Dutch 28 % Roman/latin udaaharan
5 German 25% udaaharan udaaharan
6 Russian 20% udaaharan udaaharan
7 French 30% udaaharan udaaharan
8 Italian 30% udaaharan udaaharan
9 Vietnamese 20% Roman/latin udaaharan
10 Japanese 30% udaaharan udaaharan
11 Chinese 6% udaaharan udaaharan
12 Persian 40% udaaharan udaaharan
13 Tamil 75% udaaharan udaaharan
14 Urdu 80% udaaharan udaaharan
15 Malyalam 80% udaaharan udaaharan
16 Bengali 60% udaaharan udaaharan


aap sabko shubh kaamanaaen.

aapki baat se poornat: sahamat hooain. taalika (tebul) se spasht hai ki aap jis suvidha ko maangane ka prastaav karne ja rahe hain usase bhaarateeya bhaashaaon ko laabh hoga. aapko meri shubhakaamanaaeain aur vaichaarik samarthan hai.---- anunaad Singhvaarta 12:53, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
yeh sandesh poori tarah se meri samajh mein naheen aaya. iska kaaran ya to sandesh hindi mein naheen hai athva kuchh aise vishay par hai jo meri samajh se door hai. fir bhi main ise sakaaraatmak roop se lete huye kisi tarah ka virodh naheen kar raha.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 11:28, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

hindi vikipeedeeyaatak simeet vichaar kare to iska saral matlab hindi vikipeediyaake 80 pratishat nae sadasyagan sadasya khaata hindi vikipeediyaapar nahi balki angreji vikipeediyaapar khulavaate hai, aur baadame hindi vikipeediyaapar aate hai. khaata khulavaane ke liye Special:UserLogin/signup panneka prayog hota hai| is khaata khulavaate samay bhaasha sulabhata ki aur vibheenn suvidhaae dena mumakeen ho sakta hai . yadi koi vyakti bhopaalase hai to use hindi aur koi chennaise hai to ase tameel ke opshan atomaticaly upalabdh karaana. apni apni bhaashaame kaise taaip kare iska vhideeo dikhaana aur apni bhaashaaka naam nirdeshan karaneki suvidha usi faurmame hona. ho sake to vanheese apni chaahataki bhaashaake vikipeediyaapar jaane ka paryaaya upalabdh karaana aadi paryaayopar vichaar hone ki sambhaavana ho sakti hai.

yadi khaata khulavaate vakt se hi apni bhaasha prayukt karne ki suvidha praapt ho to nae sadasyako apni bhaashaame aur vikipeediyaame likhne ka aatmavishvaas praapt hoga. aur bhaarateeya bhaashaayi vikipeediyaaonke vikaas me vruddhi hogi aisi aasha hai. magar metaapar koi baat manavaana itanaabhi to aasaan nahi hai. yadi aap yanha virodh ke paksh me tark dhundhaneki kosheesh karte hai to meta aur angreji vikipeediyaapar virodh karanevaale asankhya raheinge. ia hisaabase mera prayaas/vichaar kamase kam bhaarateeya vikipeediyaame kuchh sahamati banti hai saath milta hai to apna paksh metaapar rakhana hai.

aapko shubh kaamanaaen.

Mahitgar (vaarta) 12:55, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

mujhe samajh mein aa gaya, par mujhe to Special:UserLogin/signup hindi mein hi dikh raha hain. par mera aapke prastaav ke saath samarthan hain. (par pata naheen isse koi fark padega ya naheen)--peeyoosh mauryavaarta 13:11, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
aksharaantaran = lipyantaran athva inaskript paryaaya, hindeemebhi aisi vhideeo hai magar shaayad hindi vhideeo clip thoda adhik samay leti hai. yadi aap hindi vikipeediyaapar khulne vaale nae sadasya khaate bhi dekhte hai bahutaansh roman lipi ka prayog karte hai.meri apeksha aisi clip Special:UserLogin/signup skreenapar upalabdh ho aur is paristhiti me kuchh sakaaraatmak parivartan ho.

aap angreji vikipeediyaapar Special:UserLogin/signup dekheinge to aapko angreji me dikhaai dega. yadi hindi vikipeediyaake 80 pratishat log angreji vikipeediyaapar khaata kholkar yanha aate hai to, kya sahi vakt sahi suvidha dena, sahi nahi hoga ? aap isi chij ke aur bhi paksh hai 1) aap jis bhaashaako adhik dekhte hai us bhaashaame adhik sochate hai aur jis bhaashaame sochate hai us bhaashaame abhivyakt hone ki sambhaavana adhik hoti hai 2) angreji vikipeediyaapar abheebhi aap bhaarateeya bhaashaame taaip to kar paate hai, magar ek to use visheshat:se kaaryaanvit karna hota hai, naye vyakti ko kanhaase bhaasha kaaryaanvit karni hai yeh jaanane ka koi sahaj upaaya angreji vikipeediyaapar upalabdh hone ka savaalahi nahi uthata 3) yunivharsal laingvej salektar suvidhaako samajhne me abheebhi naye logonko dikkat bhaarateeya bhaashi vikipeediyaame bhi hoti hai is vishyapar maine maraathi vikipeediyaake maadhyamase visheshat:se abhyaas kar aankade ikaththa kiye hai ULS kibord ka chhota chinh aate jaate rahata hai vah bahutahi alpaavadhi me aate jaate rahata hai aur vah chinh naye logoke palle nahi padata. is 1 August se jab maine niche di hui vhidio clip sidhe saait notees pe daali to gaye pandhara din me upayog hajaar guna badha hai yeh aankade darshaate hai. ham vhideeo hamesha ke liye to saait noteesapar nahi laga paaenge. hamesha ke liye log janhaase entry lete hai vahi pe maargadarshan upalabdh karna adhik sayukteek aur samay bachaanevaala hoga. ek baar koi angreji vikipeediyaapar roman lipeeme khaata khol kar hindi vikipeediyaapar puhunchega usame ka bahot saare log sirf vaachakahi bane raheinge hindi suvidha kaise aur kanhaase praapt karni hai sirf do chaar pratishat log hi jaakar dhoondhakar apna aap sikhte hai. baaki logonko hindi suvidha praapt sahajata se hogi isame vishvaas hone tak vah log nikal bhi jaate hai. yadi aap khaata khulavaate vaktahi vishvaas dilaate hai to upayogakarta ko aatmavishvaas milne ki adhik sambhaavana hogi. aisa mera vichaar hai.

jahaaain tak mujhe samajh mein aa raha hain, aap kisi yoonivrsal laingvej salektar ke baare mein baat kar rahe hain jo hamein angreji keebaurd se bhaarateeya bhaashaaon mein likhne deta hain? jo angreji vikipeediya par par naheen hain. jisse kai bhaarateeya apni bhaasha ki vikipeediya par naheen aate kyonki vo computer par use likhna hi naheen jaante? aur jab tak unako pata chale vo pehle hi khisak lete hain ya angreji vikipeediya par hi yogadaan dene ki koshish karte hain. agar unhein vahi unki maatrubhaasha mein saadhan mile to unka apni bhaasha mein yogadaan dene ke zyaada avsar hain? vaise bahut se logon ko apni maatrubhaasha likhne mein sharm aati hain jisse (yoonivrsal laingvej salektar) ye door ho sakti hain? par agar aap aisa prastaav rakhogein to angreji vikipeediya ko nuksaan naheen hoga? aur doosaron deshon ke log bhi ye suveedha ki maaaing naheen kareinge?--peeyoosh mauryavaarta 16:16, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
@sanjeev Kumar aur hindusthaan vaasi: ji! jitna mujhe samajh aaya, saamaanyataya koi naya vyakti jab pehli baar vikipeediya par khaata banaata hai tab khaata banaate vakt vah jis bhaasha ki vikipeediya par hota hai vahi usaki "Home wiki" ban jaati hai aur us viki par vyakti ka khaata "praathamik khaata" ban jaata hai. udaaharan ke taur par mera (satyam mishr) khaata praathamik roop se Bhojpuri viki par hai aur meri "hom vikipeediya", Bhojpuri vikipeediya hai. iske baad main apne khaate se login karke jis bhi anya bhaasha ki vikipeediya par jaata hooain vahaaain svat: isi naam se khaata ban jaata hai (jaise mera hindi khaata).
aise mein Mahitgar ji do baatein prastaavit kar rahe hain - 1. jab koi vyakti pehli baar khaata banaaye tabhi usase usaki bhaasha poochhi jaaya (ya IP ki lokeshan se svat: sujhaai jaaya) aur is prakaar uske dvaara chuni bhaasha ki vikipeediya par usaka praathamik khaata bane; 2. uske hom viki aur praathamik khaate ki bhaasha ke aadhaar par use us bhaasha ke input upakaran usaki hom viki par svat: upalabdh karaaye jaanya (jo abhi tak khud dhooaindhane padte hain, kyonki jyaadaatar log pehli baar khaata banaate samay angreji viki par rahate hue khaata banaate hain).
agar aisa ho jaaya to mujhe bhi lagta hai isse bhaarateeya bhaashaaoain mein sadasyon ki sankhya mein vruddhi hogi kyonki tab navaagantukon ko apni bhaasha ki viki par jaane aur vahaaain yogadaan karne ke liye input upakaran chunane ke liye bhatakna naheen padega. agar main yeh prastaav sahi samajh raha hooain to yeh samarthan yogya hai.--satyam mishr (vaarta) 20:07, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
Mahitgar aur satyam ji, charcha ko spasht karne ke liye aap donon ko dhanyavaad. aapse main sahamat hooain.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 05:24, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
dhanyavaad satyam ji samajhaane ke liye, mujhe isse koi aapatti naheen hain aur meri taraf se poorn samarthan hain par agar aap aisa prastaav rakheinge to angreji vikipeediya ko nuksaan naheen hoga? vo maan jaaeainge aisa karne ko? aur doosaron deshon ke log bhi ye suveedha ki maaaing naheen kareinge? agar mere yeh prashn bachakaane hain to rahane deejiye.--peeyoosh mauryavaarta 08:25, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
peeyoosh ji, ismein kisi ka nuksaan naheen hoga.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 08:57, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

aap sabheeke is charcha sahabhaag aur samarthan ke liye dhanyavaad. is charcha ko anuvaadeet kar itar bhaarateeya bhaashi vikise samarthan jutaakar metaapar vishay rankhunga. shaayad anuvaad aur dusari Bhaarat bhaashi vikipeediynase sanparkake liye kuchh samay lage magar prayaas to avashya karna hai.

punashch dhanyavaad evam shubhakaamanaane.

Mahitgar (vaarta) 06:07, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

@Mahitgar: jab aap meta viki par yeh faisala le jaavo tab hamein bhi soochit kar dena jisse charcha mein ham bhi apni taraf se sahayog ka prayaas kar sakein.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 06:21, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Help for translate

Hello and sorry for writing in English. Can anyone help me translate a small article (2 paragraphs) from English to your language and create the article in your wiki? Please, fell free to answer in my talk page in your wiki anytime. Thanks! Xaris333 (vaarta) 23:30, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Bhaarat mein vikimeediya kaarya ke bhavishya par paraamarsh

doston, isi varsh sambhavat: October mein Bhaarat mein vikimeediya kaarya ke bhavishya par paraamarsh hoga jismein vibhinn bhaasha samudaayon ke pratinidhi bhaag leinge. ismein har bhaasha samudaaya ko pratinithitv diya jaayaga. adhik jaankaari yahaaain dekhi ja sakti hai: bhaarateeya samudaaya paraamarsh 2014 . --mujmmil (vaarta) 13:53, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

tools mein badlaav

main chaahata hooain ki angreji vikipeediya ki bhaaainti hindi vikipeediya par bhi kisi bhi prushth ke badlaav itihaas ke aaainkade mein X!'s Tools ka upayog ho. yeh tool naya bhi hai tatha prushth itihaas ke baare mein vistaar se jaankaari bhi deta hai. udaaharan ke liye 2014 raashtramandal khel ka prushth ka itihaas tatha 2014 Commonwealth Games ka itihaas dekhein. krupaya sabhi sadasya iske baare mein rai dein.--prateek maalaveeya 04:37, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

prateek ji, main aapka taatparya naheen samajh paaya. aapke dvaara bataaye gaye prushth ke aaainkade bhi to X! Tools par dekhe ja sakte hain. jaise yahaaain dekhein.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 07:19, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
@sanjeev Kumar: yeh ham dekh sakte hain par is tool ko itihaas prushth par 'badlaav itihaas ke aaainkade' link ke saath jodna chaahiye jaisa ki angreji vikipeediya par hai. mera yeh kehna hai. ummeed hai aapko ab baat samajh aa gayi hogi.--prateek maalaveeya 12:26, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

vedaantasaar

is pustak pe kuchh-prati din likhna chaahata hooain — is ahastaaksharit sandesh ke lekhak ved prakaash paathak hai, (vaartayogadaan) 06:29, 20 August 2014‎ (UTC).

kraaist vishvavidyaalaya ke chhaatron dvaara hindi vikisrot par kaarya, CIS-A2K pariyojana

namaskaar

main rahamaanuddeen shekh hooain. mai CIS-A2K mein program aafeesar hooain aur telugu bhaasha sambandhit pariyojanaaon par kaam kar raha hooain, main telugu vikeepeediya aur telugu vikeesors par sisaap hooain aur pichhle 10 varshon se vikipeediya sambandhit kaaryakramon mein bhaag le raha hooain. haal hi mein mujammil ke seeaies-e2ke chhodane ke baad, hindi kaaryakram mein bhi maine bhaag lena shuroo kiya hai. seeaies-e2ke dvaara kraaist vishvavidyaalaya me aayojit ki ja rahi "snaatak kaksha ke bhaasha adhyayan mein vikipeediya" kaaryakram ke antargat snaatak(graajuyet) chhaatron ko vikipeediya mein shikshan diye jaane vaale kaaryakram me bhi mai bhaag le raha hooain. aap sab ko yaad hoga ki pichhli baar November 2013 se January 2014 tak isi kraaist vishvavidyaalaya mein chhaatron dvaara vikipeediya par lekh likhne ka kaaryakram CIS-A2K mulaajim mujammil ke paryavekshan mein aayojit kiya gaya tha, us kaaryakram me hindi vikipeediya samooh ke sadasyo ki sahaayata ke liye bahut bahut dhanyavaad. kaaryakram ke samaapan samaaroh ke samay humne is yojana ke baare mein hindi vibhaag ke shikshak evam chhaatron se pratikriya li. sabhi ne is kaaryakram ko saraaha, aur is kaaryakram ko kraaist vishvavisyaalaya me hamesha aayojit karne ka anurodh kiya. iske alaava hame yeh bhi sujhaav mili ki pariyojana ke dauraan chhaatron ko tankan me kuchh kathinaaiyaaain hui, vikipeediya ki jaankaari, yuktiya, chhoti-moti baatein chhaatron ko kam samay mein jaanane ka avakaash nahi mil paaya, agar yeh kaaryakram aur dheemi gati se kiya gaya to chhaatron ko adhik se adhik laabh hoga aisa bataaya gaya. chhaatron evam shikshakon ki pratikriya ke anusaar pariyojana ko sudhaara gaya hai. sudhaare gaye pariyojana ke anusaar graajuyet chhaatr apne pehle saal ke pehle semestar mein ek panna vikisrot par likheinge, doosare semestar mein vikisrot par aur adhik panne jodeinge. isse unako hindi tankan me seekh milegi aur meediyaaviki plaatafaam(jis par vikipeediya chalta hai) ki samajh milegi. aur ve vikipeediya me lekh jodane ki kshamata paaenge. is seekh se ve teesare semestar mein hindi vikipeediya par apne prayogaprushth par shikshak ki dekharekh mein mahattvapoorn evam aavashyak vishyapar lekh likhna shuroo kareinge aur chauthe semestar mein apne vishyasanbandhi (jaise ekanaamiks chhaatr ekanaamiks mein) ek lekh ko sambandhit shikshak ki dekh-rekh mein vikipeediya par sahejeinge. is vishyamein hindi vikipeediya samooh ke sabhi sadasyon se mai vinti karta hooain ki sabhi is kaaryakram ke chalte aane vaale naye sadasyon ko sampoorn sahaayata dein, evam unke kaarya ko saraahana dekar unako poorn roop se viki sadasya ke roop mein ubhaarein. is poori pariyojana ke vishyamein metaaviki par ek praajekt pej jald hi shuroo kiya jaayega, jiski jaankaari main yahaaain dooainga. har ek hindi vikipeediyn ki sahaayata is yojana ke liye aur hindi vikipeediya ke badhottari ke liye bahumoolya hogi. dilchaspi rakhane vaale sadasya jo aanlain mein sahaayata dena chaaheinge, meta prushth par apna naam jikr kar sakte hai.

dhanyavaad.--rahamaanuddeen shekh (vaarta) 10:23, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

rahamaanuddeen shekh ji, namaste. kya November 2013 se January 2014 tak kraaist vishvavidyaalaya mein chhaatron dvaara hindi vikipeediya par diye gaye yogadaan ka moolyaankan kiya gaya tha? yadi aapko is yogadaan ke liye -10 se +10 ke beech ank (maarks) dene hon to aap kitne ank deinge?---- anunaad Singhvaarta 03:12, 21 August 2014 (UTC)


kya aap sanskrut achhi tarah se jaante ho to kontek kijiye .

muje sanskrut jaanana hai muje sanskrut nahin aata hai krupaya mujhe gyaan pradaan kare

aapko sahi maargadarshan sanskrut Google samooh par mil sakta hai.
mel ka pata yeh hai : samskrita@googlegroups.com.
---- anunaad Singhvaarta 08:54, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

kuchh vikipeediya susamaachaar

---- anunaad Singhvaarta 08:54, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
vikipeediya ke naam se saamaanyat: log angreji vikipeediya hi samajhte hain aur mujhe aashcharya hota hai jab kuchh log kehte hain, "kya vikipeediya hindi mein bhi hai?"
samaachaar achha hai aur chooainki Bihar ke log hindi ka achha gyaan rakhate hain at: yadi unhein hindi vikipeediya se joda jaayega to bahut hi laabhakaari hoga.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 12:39, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Letter petitioning WMF to reverse recent decisions

The Wikimedia Foundation recently created a new feature, "superprotect" status. The purpose is to prevent pages from being edited by elected administrators -- but permitting WMF staff to edit them. It has been put to use in only one case: to protect the deployment of the Media Viewer software on German Wikipedia, in defiance of a clear decision of that community to disable the feature by default, unless users decide to enable it.

If you oppose these actions, please add your name to this letter. If you know non-Wikimedians who support our vision for the free sharing of knowledge, and would like to add their names to the list, please ask them to sign an identical version of the letter on change.org.

-- JurgenNL (talk) 17:35, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Process ideas for software development

''My apologies for writing in English.''

Hello,

I am notifying you that a brainstorming session has been started on Meta to help the Wikimedia Foundation increase and better affect community participation in software development across all wiki projects. Basically, how can you be more involved in helping to create features on Wikimedia projects? We are inviting all interested users to voice their ideas on how communities can be more involved and informed in the product development process at the Wikimedia Foundation. It would be very appreciated if you could translate this message to help inform your local communities as well.

I and the rest of my team welcome you to participate. We hope to see you on Meta.

Kind regards, -- Rdicerb (WMF) talk 22:15, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

--This message was sent using MassMessage. Was there an error? Report it!

maithili bhaashaake vikipeediyaake sambandhamein

namaskaar mitro ! yadi aapalogo mein kisiko maithili bhaashaaka gyaan hain aur maithili bhaashaake vikipeediyaame yogadaan karna chaahate hain to aap yahaaain jaakar maithili bhaashaakein vikipeediyaamein yogadaan dekar ise test project (inkubetar)se baahar nikaalneme sahayog kar sakte hain . ye maithili bhaashaake vikipeediya bahut samay se test project mein hain kyonki vahaaain yogadaanakartaao ki kami hain . yadi aap mitr maithili bhaashaakein vikipeediyaame yogadaan dekar use vahaaainse baahar nikaalna chaahate hain to apna yogadaan dijiyega . koi truti najar aae to mujhe sampark kar sakte hai aur meri vaarta prushthame likh sakte hai . Star प्रमुख.pngbiplab aanand (mujhse vaarta karein) 06:41, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

@biplab aanand: ji, aapne bahut achha kiya jo hindi vikipeediya chaupaal par maithili vikipeediya ke liye appeal ki. iske atirikt aap adhik jaagrukta aur samudaaya mein unhi ki bhaasha ke vikipeediya hone ki soochana dene ke liye maithili sabha aur maithili foram ka prayog kar sakte hain. --mujmmil (vaarta) 06:58, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

avadhi vikipeediya

@biplab aanand, sanjeev Kumar, aur Hindustanilanguage:
jis prakaar se maithali aur Bhojpuri vikipeediya hain, kya vaise hi avadhi vikipeediya bhi hain kya? agar yadi naheen hai to avadhi bhaasha mein vikipeediya ko astitv mein kaise laaya ja sakta hain?--jeetesh (vaarta) 07:58, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

@Jeeteshvaishya: ji, avadhi vikipeediya ko aap yahaaain dekh sakte hain - abhi maithili vikipeediya ki tarah yeh inkyoobetar mein hai. iske koi khaas yogadaanakarta naheen hai. vartamaan sthiti aap yahaaain dekh sakte hain. anuraag paandeya ji aur girmitiya ji ke atirikt kisi ne yogadaan naheen kiya. ise poori tarah astitv mein laane ke baare ek steevard ki baat aapko yaad rakhana hoga: "There should be a number of regular contributors (3-5 maybe) over the period of several months. " --mujmmil (vaarta) 18:08, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

@Hindustanilanguage aur mujmmil: ji , shukriya aapka ki aapne ye jaankaari di, vaise main apni aur se poori koshish karooainga ki avadhi vikipeediya jald hi astitv mein aaye. yadi aapko avadhi aati hai to krupaya aap bhi yogadaan kare.--jeetesh (vaarta) 11:34, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

jeetesh ji, durbhaagya se mujhe avadhi naheen aati. mere vichaar se aap facebook par vishesh roop se is prakaar ke prushthon par apne mitron ko jama karke koi yojana bana sakte hain. --mujmmil (vaarta) 14:28, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
@Hindustanilanguage aur mujmmil: ji , koi baat naheen ji, main koshish karooainga bhaai, shukriya.--jeetesh (vaarta) 15:49, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

gotr

ek jaati mein gotr kitne hote hai ? kya up jaati ke bhi alag-alag gotr hote hai ? jaise ---aheer kis gotr se hai ? — is ahastaaksharit sandesh ke lekhak hain -Ramesh Yadav Arciya Azamgarh (vaartayogadaan)

punyaarkavanaspatitntram

vikipeediya ke aayojak-prabandhak-sudhaarak sabhi bandhuon ko Kamlesh punyaark ka saprem naman. abhi teen-chaar dinon pehle yahaaain aaya,sadasyata grahan kiya,niyamon aur takaneeki vyavastha ko seekhane samajhne ka prayaas karte hue(navasikhuve ki tarah) apni ek maulik rachana punyaarkavanaspatitntram ko post kiya.pratham graase pakshika paat: ko charitaarth karte hue,turat mujhe soochana mili- dhokha(hataane ki neeti va4).mainne iska javaav bhi sheegra diya,kintu kaaran kuchh samajh naheen aata, dhokha- mainne kise kaise diya ? ye masheeni vyavastha badi suvidhaajanak hai,to badi ghaatak bhi- kshanabhar mein machine ne bata diya- dhokha,aur lebal lag gaya- dhokha ka. pata naheen mera yeh samvaad bhi sahi jagah pahuainch raha hai ya ismein bhi kisi tarah ka dhokha hi hai- dhokha ki paribhaasha aur maan dand ko samajhe bina lagta hai kuchh aage naheen kar sakta.abhi to seekh-samajh hi raha tha.ek-do aur post daale hue hain parichay aur prayogaprushth par.unhein hataane bhi mujhe naheen aata.krupaya sambhav ho to hata dein.aur lage ki yeh dhokhevaaj aadmi veekipeediya ke yogya naheen hai- to meri sadasyata bhi samaapt kar di jaaya. vyaktigat mel se aap shaayad javaab dete naheen,aur mere is anunaya ka javaab main kahaaain kaise dekh paauainga mujhe pata naheen.vaise do-chaar din baad fir ekabaar jhaank loonga apne panne par. dhanyavaad.--Kamlesh Punyark (vaarta) 03:08, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

@Kamlesh Punyark:aapke us lekh mein tantro-vantro ki baat thi isliye use dhokha ki shreni se hataane hetu naamaankit kiya gaya tha. par use hataaya gaya hain "maulik rachana" hone ke kaaran. ye rahi neeti is par. apni is rachana ko kisi akhbaar ya patrika mein chhapavaaie, vikipeediya maulik rachana daalne ka sthaan naheen hain.--peeyoosh mauryavaarta 04:15, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
@Kamlesh Punyark: yadi aap in veediyoj ko dekhein to hindi vikipeediya par kin baaton ka yogadaan kiya ja sakta hai aur kaise kiya ja sakta hai khud hi samajh mein aa jaaega. --mujmmil (vaarta) 04:29, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Kamlesh ji, apni mool rachanaaon ko vikipeediya par naheen daala jaata. iske liye aapko niymaavali padhni padegi.
peeyoosh ji, mool shodh ko hataane hetu charcha ke liye naamaankit karte hain na ki saaf-dhokha ki shreni mein. krupaya bhavishya mein iska dhyaan rakhein.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 08:06, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Copy of Deleted Articles ?

Hello, Can and Do admins on Hindi Wikipedia provide copies of deleted articles ? --Vigyani (vaarta) 09:24, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Dear @Vigyani:, I am sure admins can help you out if you are a bit more specific:
  1. Are you referring to any specific list of deleted articles by topic / user?
  2. Are talking about articles deleted during a particular period, say July 2014?
  3. Any article you are currently in need or working on Punjabi Wikipedia? --mujmmil (vaarta) 10:00, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
Dear @Hindustanilanguage:, Thanks. Specifically, I need this deleted copy of article raveendr prabhaat, for some investigations.--Vigyani (vaarta) 10:07, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
@sanjeev Kumar: ji, aapse nivedan hai ki vigyaani ji dvaara poochhe gaye lekh ke hataae gaye hisse ko (code aur sampaadan itihaas-sahit) mere prayogaprushth par daal deejiye ya mujhe yeh poora lekh (code aur sampaadan itihaas-sahit) imel kar deejiye. main vigyaani ji ko yeh sandesh imel kar dooainga. --mujmmil (vaarta) 10:17, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
@Vigyani: You can find the whole list of deleted articles on vishesh:laug/delete and material of the deleted article Ravindra Prabhat has been kept at my sandbox. After a limited period, I will delete it. So, please let me know when you will copy it.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 17:26, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
@sanjeev Kumar: I think Vigyani wants the article which was deleted by Aniruddha on "08:14, 22 fravari 2014" to do some analysis. --mujmmil (vaarta) 17:54, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
@sanjeev Kumar: Thanks. I have saved a copy in my sandbox.--Vigyani (vaarta) 02:01, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

hindi vikipeediya aur hindi viki travel

mainne hindi vikipeediya aur hindi viki travel ke kuchh lekhon mein badi had tak samaanata dekhi hai jaise ki raajesultaanapur aur raajesultaanapur. kya viki travel par upalabdh saamagri ko hindi vikipeediya mein shaamil kiya ja sakta hai kyonki donon jaalasthalon ka license ek jaisa hai? --mujmmil (vaarta) 13:51, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

yeh prushth vikipeediya se viki trevel par kaupi kiya gaya hai. mudraadhikaar niymaavali ke anusaar unhein apne itihaas mein iska shreya vikipeediya ko dena chaahiye tha lekin unhonne aisa naheen kiya.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 17:19, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
@sanjeev Kumar: aapne ek baat ko gaur naheen kiya - hindi vikipeediya par lekh ka nirmaan "Prashantpking" ne kiya jabki hindi viki travel par yeh kaarya "prashaant paandeya" ne kiya. yaani sambhat: ek hi vyakti. is par aap kya kaheinge? shaayad yogadaanakarta ek hone ke kaaran shreya dena aavashyak naheen samjha ho? --mujmmil (vaarta) 19:19, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
haaain, yeh dhyaan mainne naheen diya tha.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 12:09, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

hindi vikisrotapar upalabdh 'ardhakathaanak' granthake sahi hone ki pushti karne me sahaayyata chaaheee

hindi kavi banaaraseedaas kharagasen jain , inki i.s. 1641 me likhi ardhakathaanak naamak jivni/aatmachareetr hindi vikisrot bandhooprakalp me upalabdh hai. hindi vikisrot bandhooprakalp me upalabdh ardhakathaanak naamak jivni/aatmachareetr ka lekhan us granthake mool rupase milta hai ya nahi iski pushti kar. kanhi kami/galati hai to uske sudhaar me sahaayyata chaaheee. 'ardhakathaanak' aiteehaaseek dastaevaj ka mahatva rakhata hai aur usame koi galati rah jaana ucheet nahi hoga. khaas baat yeh ki maraathi vikisrot me 'ardhakathaanak' granth ka anuvaad/bhaashaantar karne ki pariyojana chal rahi hai. granthake mool rupase milne ki pushti honese maraathi aur itar bhaashaayi anuvaad ko yogya maanyata praapt honeme suvidha hogi.

is silseeleme aapki sahaayata ke liye dhanyavaad, evam shubhakaamanaaen.

Mahitgar (vaarta) 04:42, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

hindi vartani ka maanakeekaran

is aalekh mein nimnalikhit naveenatam soochana jode jaane ki aavashyakta hai.

hindi vartani ka naveenatam maanakeekaran August-2012 mein bhaarateeya maanak bureau (www.bis.org.in/) dvaara jaari kiya gaya hai. iski sauftakaupi nimn kadi (http://www.standardsbis.in/Gemini/search/BasicSearch.action) par IS 16500~Devanagari Script and Hindi Spellings ke naam se online khareedne ke liye upalabdh karaai gayi hai. bhaarateeya janta ke liye iska moolya Ru.180 maatr rakha gaya hai. — is ahastaaksharit sandesh ke lekhak hain -Hariraama1 (vaartayogadaan)

E-mel ka aavishkaar bhaaratavanshi

http://khabar.ndtv.com/news/world/as-email-turns-32-indian-american-reaffirms-his-claim-as-the-teen-creator-656512 imel ko kisne banaaya? bahut kanfujan hai.

--Amt000 (vaarta) 14:47, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

@Amt000: ismein kisi tarah ka bhram naheen hai. aapke dvaara di gayi NDTV India ki kadi ke anusaar vee॰ae॰ shiva ayyadurai ne imel ki khoj ki. yeh tathya bilkul sahi hai lekin hamaare hindi vikipeediya prushth p-patra mein iski jaankaari naheen di gayi hai. aap chaahate ho to uparokt sandarbh ke saath yeh jaankaari jod sakte ho. iske alaava aapne vebamel ki kadi bhi di hai jo kisi sadasya dvaara angreji vikipeediya se kiya gaya masheeni anuvaad hai. vebamel vaastav mein ek imel client hai arthaat iske maadhyam se ham imel bhej sakte hain is tarah ke anek anuprayog (eppaleekeshan) baajaar mein upalabdh hain. outlook bhi ek isi tarah ka client hai arthaat vebamel imel naheen balki kuchh sadasyon ko imel seva upalabdh karavaane ka ek maadhyam hai.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 17:53, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
@sanjeev Kumar: pehla imel 1972 [4] mein bheja gaya aur program aaviskaar hua 1978 mein [5] Amt000 (vaarta) 12:47, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
aapne theek kaha ki pehla imel 1972 mein bheja gaya. aap ise aur bhi adhik dhyaan se dekhoge to paavoge ki pehla imel 1969 mein bheja gaya tha lekin vo ek machine se doosari machine (donon kanpyutar pehle se nirdhaarit hain) mein bheja gaya tha. us samay imel naam aur domen naam ke madhya @ ka prayog bhi aarambh ho gaya tha lekin "imel" ka kaupeeraait peteint vee॰ae॰ shiva ayyadurai ko mila. unhein yeh adhikaar 30 August 1982 ko, unke dvaara 1978 mein taiyaar kiye gaye program ke liye mila. yeh adhikaar milne ka arth hai ki aap hi uske asli hakdaar hain. iske alaava aap yadi koi naya kaarya karte hain aur iske kaupeeraait adhikaar kisi anya vyakti ko apne kisi laabh (dhan athva anya kisi bhi tarah ke laabh mein) vikraya kar dete hain to yeh sambhav hai ki usaka kreta aapko iska shreya na de. arthaat usaka khojakartta us vyakti ko maana jaata hai jisko aapne apni khoj ka kaupeeraait becha hai. mera kehne ka arth hai ki khoj ka shreya usako milta hai jiske paas sabhi mudraadhikaar (kaupeeraait) hon.
aapke dvaara di gayi kadiyon ke atirikt anya samaachaar patron mein bhi isi tarah ka samaachaar likha hai jaise: rediyo roos, patrika samaachaar samooh aadi.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 16:53, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

alikhit mahatvapoorn lekh pata karne ki ek vidhi

jab vikipeediya ki shuruaat hui thi tab 'mahatvapoorn lekh jo sabhi vikipeediya mein hone chaahiye' naam se milne waali soochi bahut upayogi hui thi. hindi viki ki vartamaan sthiti mein mujhe ab doosare tarah ki jaankaari adhik upayogi lag rahi hai, jo is prakaar hai-

maan leejiye kisi tareeke se ya kisi aujaar ke sahaare ham jaan sakein ki viki par kauna-kaun se lekh hain jo 30 se adhik bhaashaaon mein hain kintu hindi mein naheen hain. yadi yeh pata chal jaaya to ham seedhe un lekhon ko hindi mein banaane mein lag sakte hain. koi na koi baat hogi ki vah lekh anya pacheeson bhaashaaon mein hai, isaliye us par hindi mein lekh hona adhik jaroori hai.---- anunaad Singhvaarta 05:40, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
aisa tool hona chaahiye---Amt000 (vaarta) 09:53, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
vaakai aise aujaar ki aavashyakta hai, is prastaav ko samarthan.--satyam mishr (vaarta) 11:02, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
This tool lists articles in one language and missing in other. There might be better tools on WMFlabs.--Skr15081997 (vaarta) 17:08, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
@anunaad Singh, Amt000, aur satyam mishr: ji is aujaar se jise vikidaata tarminetar ka naam diya gaya hai, anya bhaasha mein prachalit lekh jaan sakte hain. khed hai ki yeh aujaar hindi ka is samay samarthan naheen karta, isliye misaal ke liye faaraasi ko chuna gaya hai. --mujmmil (vaarta) 17:51, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
mujmmil ji! aapne ek badhiyaaain upakaran sujhaaya hai. bas ise hindi vikipeediya par kaise istemaal kiya jaaya yeh mudda bhi sulajha dein to yeh kaafi upayogi saabit hoga.--satyam mishr (vaarta) 18:05, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
@satyam mishr: ji, mere anurodh par nemo ji ne yahaaain par hindi ko sammilit karne ki appeal ki hai. jab aisa ho jaaega to hamako badi aasaani ho jaaegi. --mujmmil (vaarta) 18:40, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

sadasya:Skr15081997/vomesh chandr

I have created a rough draft of en:Womesh Chunder Bonnerjee in my userspace. I have used Google translate, so the article needs tidying up. Can someone do it and move it to the complete title "Womesh Chunder Bannerjee". I think this would be an appropriate article for "kya aap jaante hain" section of our main page.--Skr15081997 (vaarta) 13:31, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Firstly we have already an article for this person- Umesh chandr Bannerjee. And secondly your draft need not to be tidying up, it needs to be completely rewritten.--peeyoosh mauryavaarta 14:36, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
@Skr15081997: Thanks for your suggestion. One user Anunad Singh has created this page.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 16:18, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Grants to improve your project

Apologies for English. Please help translate this message.

Greetings! The Individual Engagement Grants program is accepting proposals for funding new experiments from September 1st to 30th. Your idea could improve Wikimedia projects with a new tool or gadget, a better process to support community-building on your wiki, research on an important issue, or something else we haven't thought of yet. Whether you need $200 or $30,000 USD, Individual Engagement Grants can cover your own project development time in addition to hiring others to help you.

abhiklitr ke sambandh mein

sabhi mitron se ek vinmr gujaarish hai - krupaya lekh abhiklitr ko ek baar padh kar bataayein yeh hindi mein hi hai ya kisi aur bhaasha mein.

kuchh udahaaran de raha hooain jinhein bina is lekh mein padhe samajhne ki koshish karein:

  • suvaahya sanganak
  • kendreeya prakraman ekak
  • yaadruchhik abhigm smruti
  • namyika

aur, aur bhi kai hain.

krupaya apni spasht rai jaahir karein.--satyam mishr (vaarta) 18:23, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

yeh lekh ek misaal hain ki hindi aur anya bhaarateeya bhaashaaeain angreji ke saamane kyon past hain. aise nae shabd gadhna un bhaashaaon ke liye theek hain jahaaain koi doosari takaneeki bhaasha istemaal na hoti ho jaise Turkey, par yahaaain Bhaarat mein jahaaain har koi angreji se udhaar liya shabd "computer" aur "laipatop" istemaal karta hain vahaaain aise kathin shabd gadhe jaate hain ki logon ka apni bhaasha se man bhang ho jaae. dekho na faarasi se liye gaye anginat shabd badal diye gaye par logon ki ye fitrat hoti hain ki vo fashion mein chal rahe shabd hi istemaal karte hain. ab dekho "shukriya" ki jagah "dhanyavaad" naheen "theinkyoo you" le raha hain. par kuchh log ab bhi bhaasha ko likhit bhaasha samajhte hain par asal bhaasha to bolachaal waali hi hoteen hain. main ye naheen kehta ki ham hinglish istemaal karein par aise shabdon ka istemaal haasyaaspad hain.--peeyoosh mauryavaarta 18:58, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
satyam mishr ji, shabdaavali aur spashtata - donon drushtiyon se yeh lekh kaafi seema tak santulit hai. sudhaar ki gunjaaish to har jagah rahati hai. is lekh mein shabdaavali aayog dvaara sujhaayi gayi shabdaavali prayog ki gayi hai aur jahaaain pehli baar ye shabd prayog kiye gaye hain vahaaain sangat angreji shabd bhi diye gaye hain. ---- anunaad Singhvaarta 04:12, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Hindustan (paribhaasha)

☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 09:03, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

naya prastaav

mainne angreji vikipeediya par yeh soochi dekhi. is soochi mein yogadaan dene vaale sheersh 5000 prayoktaaon ki raink di gayi hai tatha yeh rojaana baaait dvaara update bhi ki jaati hai. yeh mujhe upayogi soochi lagti hai. main chaahata hooain ki yeh soochi apni hindi vikipeediya par bhi ho. ham jyaada naheen to sheersh 1000 prayoktaaon ki bhi soochi bana sakte hain. main baaait ke baare mein adhik naheen janta. main chaahata hooain ki sabhi sadasya is baare apni rai vyakt karein.--prateek maalaveeya 11:43, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Symbol support vote.svg samarthan vaise kuchh saankhyiki to yahaaain mil jaati hai. par aisi list yaheen hindi vikipeediya par bhi ho to adhik achha.--satyam mishr (vaarta) 13:09, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
tippani

prateek ji, vahaaain par BernsteinBot dvaara yeh kaarya kiya jaata hai. kya aap aisi baut hindi vikipeediya par banaane ko taiyaar ho? iske alaava NeechalBOT bhi kuchh aaainkade ekatr karne ka kaarya kiya ja raha hai jinki soochi yahaaain dekhi ja sakti hai.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 19:56, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

sanjeev ji, yadi mujhe baaait ke kaaryakalaap ka pata hota to main avilamb baaait khaata bana deta. mere saath samasya yahi hai ki mujhe baaait ke baare mein adhik pata naheen hai. shaayad baaait khaata prograaming laingvej ke maadhyam se chalta hai, aur prograaming laingvej ke baare mein main thodi hi jaankaari hai.--prateek maalaveeya 02:23, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
fir ham yeh kaarya kaise kar paayeinge?☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 11:39, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
@Prateekmalviya20, satyam mishr, aur sanjeev Kumar: ji, shaayad aap logon ko is kadi se madad mil jaae. vaise mujhe lagta hai ki poori jaankaari screen par athva us jaankaari ko seeesavi faail ke roop mein daaunalod karke usase milaakar dekhne se zyaada laabh hoga. --mujmmil (vaarta) 08:49, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
@sanjeev Kumar aur Hindustanilanguage: mujmmil ji aapka shukriya! krupaya aap log mera baaait khaata banaane mein madad karein tatha yeh kaise kaarya karta hai iske baare mein bhi bataaye.--prateek maalaveeya 08:58, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
prateek ji, baut khaata banaane ke liye aap vikipeediya:baut/anumodan hetu anurodh par anurodh kar sakte ho. iski alp jaankaari vikipeediya:baut par milegi. seedhe shabdon mein kahooain to baut ka laabh yeh hai ki iske dvaara kiye gaye parivartan haal mein hue parivartan mein naheen dikhaai dete. iske liye aap pehle koi paayathan/parl/peeechapi athva anya kisi prograaman bhaasha mein apna code likhein aur usako apne vartamaan khaate se chalaakar dekhein. yadi aap yeh kaarya safalataapoorvak karne mein saksham rahate hain to aap baut khaata chalaane mein bhi saksham rah honge. kuchh baut code saarvajanik roop se upalabdh hain (yahaaain dekhein) lekin adhiktar log apne code ko saarvajanik naheen karte. aap chaaho to sambandhit baut sanchaalak se usaka code le sakte ho aur alp sudhaaron ke saath hamaare yahaaain laagoo karke dekh sakte ho. yadi aap prograaman bhaasha ke baare mein adhik jaankaari naheen rakhate ho to otovikibraaujar kaam mein lekar dekh sakte ho, yeh ardhasvachaalit kaarya karta hai. iske alaava paayathan bhaasha mein paaivikibaut aapke liye sahaayak ho sakta hai. parl aur anya bhaashaaon ke code ko sikhne ka prayaas kar raha hooain abhi mujhe unka adhik gyaan naheen hai.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 09:31, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
dhanyavaad sanjeev ji, main in kaaryon ka karne ka prayaas karooainga.--prateek maalaveeya 05:45, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

saaaincha sudhaar

namaste viki doston, mere vaarta prushth par biplab aanand ji ne {{jnyaaanasandook desh}} ek truti sujhaai. chooainki vah saaaincha bahut puraana hai aur usamein mainne kuchh sudhaar ke prayaas pehle bhi kiye hain. ab usaki trutiyon se nijaat paane ke liye mainne us saaainche ke prayogaprushth par kuchh pareekshan kiye hain jinki vartamaan saaainche se tulana iske parikshan prushth par dekhi ja sakti hai. chooainki {{jnyaaanasandook desh}} saaaincha 222 prushthon (athva adhik) par prayukt hai at: mere dvaara kiye gaye prayogasaaainche ko mool saaainche par sthaanaantarit karne se pehle main sabhi logon se salaah lena chaahata hooain. yadi sabhi is kaarya ke liye apni sahamati dete hain to bhavishya mein is saaainche mein aane waali trutiyon mein sudhaar karna mere liye saral hoga.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 19:43, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

sanjeev ji, mujhe saaaincho ke baare mein zyaada jaankaari naheen hain par mujhe aapke parikshan aur mukhya saaainche mein kuchh kamiyaaain lag rahi hain jaise "kshetrafal" aur "sarkaar" mukhya saaainche mein hain par aapke parikshan mein naheen. inko hataane ka koi kaaran mujhe nazar naheen aata, baaki sab theek hain.--peeyoosh mauryavaarta 12:03, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
sanjeev ji mujhe parikshan prushth mein raashtreeya geet (national_song) praachal nazar naheen aa raha.--prateek maalaveeya 10:58, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
@hindusthaan vaasi aur Prateekmalviya20: aapke sujhaavon ke liye dhanyavaad. kshetrafal praachal ke liye pooraane saaainche mein praachal area, area_rank, area_magnitude aur areami² hain lekin naye saaainche mein inke sthaan par praachalon ke naam kramash: area_km2, area_rank, area_magnitude aur area_sq_mi hain. aapke sujhaavon ke anusaar mujhe do vikalp dikhaai dete hain. ya to naye saaainche ke anusaar sabhi lekhon mein in praachalon ko naye praachalon se badal diya jaayega. yeh kaarya mere baut khaate se aasaani se kar paaooainga aisa mera vishvaas hai (kyonki is tarah ka parikshan mainne abhi kiya naheen hai) athva naye saaainche mein bhi in praachalon ke naam puraane roop mein paribhaashit kar dooain. iske atirikt ek anya vikalp bhi hai jiske anusaar donon paribhaashaayein ek saath de dooain lekin kuchh jagah aisi sthiti mein saaainche mein virodhaabhaash ki sthiti ban jaayegi. at: yeh achha rahega yadi aap is sambandh mein apne vichaar mujhe bataayein.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 14:17, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
sanjeev ji! jahaaain tak mujhe samajh mein aaya, nae praachalon ke naam angreji ke vartamaan sangat saaainche vaale hain. main to yahi kahooainga ki nae naam hi rakhiye aur lekhon mein inhein baut khaate ka istemaal karke badal diya jaae! nae aur puraane donon vikalp rakhane par dikkat ho sakti hai.--satyam mishr (vaarta) 14:52, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
sanjeev ji aap log behtar jaante hai, jo sahi lage vahi kariye. mujhe saaainchon ke baare mein zyaada jaankaari naheen hai.--peeyoosh mauryavaarta 15:56, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
prateek ji ki pratikriya ke baad upayukt kaarravaai ki jaayegi. anya sadasya bhi apna mat de sakte hain.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 19:35, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
sanjeev ji, doosare vikalp mein virodhaabhaas ki sthiti utpann ho sakti hai jiske kaaran hindi vikipeediya ko nuksaan ho sakta hai. mere vichaar se pehla vikalp suvidhaajanak rahega.--prateek maalaveeya 06:59, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

sadasya prushth se sambandhit niymaavali evam sahaayata

namaste doston, abhi tak vikipeediya:sadasya panna naamak prushth par keval ek hi pankti likhi thi jo naye sadasyon ko digbhramit karti thi. iske kaaran pichhle dinon kuchh sadasyon mein manamutaav bhi dekha gaya tha at: in sabhi kaaranon ko dhyaan mein rakhate huye anumodanaarth praaroop (masauda) taiyaar kiya gaya hai. yeh praaroop aap vikipeediya:sadasya panna par dekh/padh sakte ho aur apne vichaar vikipeediya vaarta:sadasya panna par prastut karein. ek saptaah tak kisi tarah ka virodh naheen hone par ise niymaavaali ke roop mein sveekaar kar liya jaayega. yadi aapko koi aapati ho to vikipeediya vaarta:sadasya panna par sujhaav dein. sambandhit badlaav sarvasammati se karne ki koshish ki jaayegi.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 17:35, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

mukhaprushth hetu chitr niymaavali

kuchh maah poorv shubham ji aur bill ji ne mukhaprushth par nirvaachit chitr hetu ek niymaavali ka laghu masauda taiyaar kiya tha. chooainki ab un donon sadasyon ke sakreeya naheen rahane ke kaaran niymaavali lataki hui hai. mera sabhi sadasyon se anurodh hai ki apna mat vikipeediya vaarta:mukhaprushth nirvaachit chitr par dein jisse niymaavali ko antim roop diya ja sake. yadi ek saptaah tak koi naya prastaav naheen aata hai to niymaavali ko antim roop mein sveekrut maan liya jaayega aur aage ka kaarya aarambh kar diya jaayega.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 17:41, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

en:WP:JSTOR

I am not aware if this is already announced on hi.wiki. But in case anyone is not aware, JSTOR is providing wikipedia with free accounts. JSTOR has been proved to be very useful in writing quality articles as several very old journals are hosted on JSTOR servers, which are otherwise not accessible. Main eligibility requirement is 1000 edits in total across all Wikimedia project. But the detail information and application procedure can be found at en:WP:JSTOR. I hope hindi wikipedia make use of this facility.--Vigyani (vaarta) 03:02, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

VisualEditor available on Internet Explorer 11

VisualEditor-logo.svg

VisualEditor will become available to users of Microsoft Internet Explorer 11 during today's regular software update. Support for some earlier versions of Internet Explorer is being worked on. If you encounter problems with VisualEditor on Internet Explorer, please contact the Editing team by leaving a message at VisualEditor/Feedback on Mediawiki.org. Happy editing, Elitre (WMF) 07:29, 11 September 2014 (UTC).

PS. Please subscribe to the global monthly newsletter to receive further news about VisualEditor.

hindi diwas, ravivaar

shaayad is vichaar ke liye der ho chuki hai, lekin kya aap hindi diwas manaane ke liye Chandigarh aana chaaheinge? 14 September ravivaar ko hai. mera sujhaav hai ki shanivaar va ravivaar ko ham log ek chhoti si sabha kar sakte hain. pichhle kuchh samay mein hindi viki par kaafi uthal puthal rahi hai jisse bahut sadasyon ka manobal is samay mujhe ksheen hota lag raha hai. aise mein hindi viki sammelan ka aayojan ek nai urja ka sanchaar kar sakta hai. main aap sabko Chandigarh aane ka nimantran deta hooain. --manoj khuraana 10:04, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

manoj khuraana ji,
  1. sabse pehle to aapko is achhe vichaar ki badhaai dena chaahooainga.
  2. Chandigarh mein aap ek nai parampara shuroo karne ja rahe hain, iske liye meri or se shubhakaamanaaeain.
  3. mere vichaar se aap yadi is prakaar ke aayojan ke liye kisi saanskrutik ya audyogik sangathanon ki madad lein to is ke kuchh laabh ho sakte hain:
    1. kuchh sadasyon ke aane-jaane aur rahane ki suvidha pradaan ki ja sakti hai.
    2. aap bade paimaane par hindi diwas ek uchit sthaan par aayojit kar sakte hain.
    3. media mein ise haailaait kiya ja sakta hai jisse nae sadasyon ko hindi diwas ke baad bhi apne beech pa sakeinge. --mujmmil (vaarta) 12:00, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
mujmmil ji, Chandigarh mein is samay shaayad mere atirikt koi sakriya sadasya hindi viki par naheen hai. aapke sujhaav nishchit hi uchit hain lekin main yeh idea dene mein shaayad thoda let ho gaya hooain. doosra yahaaain AC kisi sanstha aadi se meri koi baatcheet naheen hai. aur is samay mera aashay hai maatr itna hai ki chaahe ek restraaain mein 8-10 log milkar 2-3 ghante baith lein vahi bahut hai. thodi der pehle hi jagadeesh ji ke vaarta prushth par dekha unhonne likha tha ki kuchh nae sadasyon ke vyavahaar se kshubdh hokar puraane log chale gaye. is samay main bhi kuchh AC hi manodasha se gujar raha hooain aur usi se anumaan laga sakta hooain ki baaki log bhi aisa hi mahasoos kar rahe honge. main naheen chaahata ki hindi viki ek baar fir usi tarah veeraan ho. at: is samay aapas mein milne julane se saamoohik prerana li ja sakti hai, apni baitari chaarj ki ja sakti hai. teen din ke chhote se antaraal mein ham log yadi kuchh chhota sa bhi aayojan kar lein to bahut achha rahega. aap log Chandigarh aana chaahein to svaagat hai, Delhi ya Jaipur mein bhi yeh gate-tugedar rakhi jaae to main shaamil ho sakta hooain. vaise 2 se 6 October ki bhi chhuttiyaaain hi hain. tab bhi yeh aayojan kiya ja sakta hai. --manoj khuraana 12:27, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
mujhe achaanak hindi viki sammelan par charcha ki yaad I. chaaroo ji ne kaha tha: "mere khyaal se agar baaki baatein tay ho jaae to sammelan main bhilaai mein karaane ka prastaav de sakta hoon. main dainik akhbaar mein reporter ke taur par kaam karta hoon, shiksha meri beet hai. takaneeki sansthaanon mein meri dakhal hai. agar aap log sahamat hon, to kisi bhi takaneeki sansthaan ko praayojak banaane par baat kar sammelan ka aayojan kiya ja sakta hai." - yadi koi chaaroo ji ke sampark mein hon to "hindi diwas" ya "hindi viki sammelan" ke sandarbh mein unase baat kar sakte hain. --mujmmil (vaarta) 12:43, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
bhilaai ek kone mein hai, mujh jaise ko vahaaain aane jaane ke liye hi chaar din alag se lageinge. Delhi, Jaipur aadi ka vikalp bhi rakha ja sakta hai. Jaipur mein @sanjeev Kumar: ji aajkal adhyaapan kar rahe hain to shaayad ve apni sanstha mein yeh aayojan karva paaeain. kraant ji ne bhi kaha tha ki ve Delhi mein aayojan karva sakte hain. yadi October pratham saptaah ke liye sahamati banti hai to Chandigarh mein main prayaas kar sakta hooain. --manoj khuraana 14:01, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
main kshama chaahata hooain. is varsh ke ant tak (December 2014 tak) main na hi to aisa koi aayojan kar sakta hooain aur na hi kisi aayojan mein bhaag lene mein saksham hooain. yeh meri vyaktigat vyastata ke kaaran hai. main vikipeediya par bhi sakriya isliye hooain kyonki maala ji ke alaava anya koi prabandhak yahaaain sakriya naheen hai. aap mere sampaadan dekh sakte hain: jo sadasya pichhle varsh pratimaah 1000 se adhik sampaadan karta tha aur 100 se adhik naye prushth banaata tha vo prabandhak adhikaar hote huye bhi utana yogadaan dene mein samarth naheen ho pa raha hai.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 16:54, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
aise mein do-teen kaam shaayad kiye ja sakte hain:
1)jin sadasyon ne apne shahar/ nivaas-sthaan saarvajanik kiye hain unase doosare mitr yadi unke shahar aaeain to vaarta prushth ke maadhyam vyaktigat roop se poorv soochana dein aur ek hi sthaan mein jab log hon, apni suvidha ke anusaar ek jagah jama ho sakte hain aur milkar baat kar sakte hain, bhale hi ab ho ya baad mein ho.
2) mere vichaar se yadi sadasya kisi sangathan se samarthan praapt karein to hindi vikipeediya ke liye bhi ham vikipeediyn in rejidens shuroo karne ka prayaas kar sakte hain.
3) yadi sadasya koi ek shahar aa rahe hain to agar vo kuchh samay de sakte hain to chaupaal par iski saarvajanik poorv soochana de sakte hain taaki sadasyon mein mel-milaap ho aur aapasi taalamel hamaara kaarya aage badha sakta hain. --mujmmil (vaarta) 18:57, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

vi:kathaputali

mujhe shak hai ki sadasya vaarta:Shekhar kumar rajput, sadasya vaarta:Niyati thakur, sadasya vaarta:Rajapandeywiki, sadasya vaarta:115.111.245.10 ek hi vyakti hai jinka kaam Baba raamadev aur unase sambandhit cheejon ka prachaar karna hai. ye in sab ke yogadaan se jaahir hai. meri vinti ki sabhi sadasya ispar apne vichaar rakhein.--peeyoosh mauryavaarta 12:22, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

peeyoosh ji, thoda dharya rakho. aap punareekshan kaarya achhe se kar rahe ho aur yeh kaarya karte samay shuruaat mein is tarah ki samasyaaon ka saamana karna padta hai aur hamein is tarah ke sadasyon ka saamana bhi karna padta hai.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 13:27, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
sanjeev ji, main inapar pratibandh lagaane ki naheen kah raha hooain. mainne isliye yahaaain likha hai jisse sabhi sadasyon ko inke baare mein jaankaari rahe.--peeyoosh mauryavaarta 15:15, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

vikipeediya:vikipriyojana bhaarateeya chunaav

main sabhi nae sadasyon ka dhyaan vikipeediya:vikipriyojanaa_bhaarateeya_chunaav ki taraf dilaana chaahata hooain. nivedan hai ki ise ek baar dekhein aur yathaasanbhav sahayog karein. koi prashn ho to bejhijhk poochhein. dhanyavaad. --manoj khuraana 12:19, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

sampaadan yuddh se bachane ke liye

hamaare mitr s:ashok Bajaj ji se shaayad ek ullekhaneeya lekh radio shrota diwas likha hai. parantu ek to lekh ke kuchh vaakya nibandh ke roop mein lage aur lekh srotaheen tha. isliye mainne ise srot-sahit chhote-se lekh ka roop diya tha. par shaayad ashok ji yeh achha naheen laga aur unhonne ise poorvavat kiya. main sampaadan yuddh se bachane ke liye anya sadasyon ki rai jaanana chaahooainga. iske saath main ashok ji se hindi vikipeediya par yogadaan karne ke dhanyavaad kahooainga. unase keval kuchh niyamon ko dhyaan rakhane ke saath apna shubh kaarya jaari rakhane ka nivedan karta hooain. --mujmmil (vaarta) 19:03, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

mujmmil ji, aisi sthiti mein taig pun: lagaakar sambandhit sadasya ke vaarta prushth par ek saral sandesh chhod dena chaahiye.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 16:47, 15 September 2014 (UTC)