vikipeediya:chaupaal/puraalekh 25

hindi viki pratham I aar si sabha

namaskaar priya mitron, baaki sab sheersh vikipeediya pariyojanaaon ki tarah hamein bhi hindi viki par aanalaain sabha karni chaahiye jis par sabhi sakriya sadasya aapas mein vichaar vimarsh kar sakein evam aage ke liye kuchh neetiyaaain evam vikalp chun sakein. yeh sabha ham aanalaain tvaritvaarta ke maadhyam se kar sakte hai, krupaya iske liye ek samay nirdhaarit karne mein sahaayata karein. mere vichaar se har maheene ke pratham shanivaar ko raatri 8-9 baje ke madhya yeh sabha ki ja sakti hai.--Mayur (talk•Email) 05:41, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg mein iske samarthan mein hu, mere khyaal se har maheene ke pahele shanivaar ke raatri ke 9 baje ham 30 minute ya 1 ghante ki sabha kar sakte hai. isse hindi vikipeediya ko bahut sahaara milega. Vibhijain (vaarta) 05:57, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
  • Yes check.svg Although I support this type of initiative, but shouldn't we discuss policies and other issues on Wikipedia only, like we can make dedicated pages for technical and policy sections, similar to other major Wikipedias. — Bill william comptonTalk 12:18, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
Currently some important issues are on hi wiki, and a lot of initiatives have been done to resolve them, but most issues are still not resolved, that is why we decided to have a general IRC meeting one in a month. ♛a♚a★aVaibhav Jain★a♚a♛ Talk Email 12:22, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
  • Yes check.svg mere vichaar mein IRC channel banaana ek bahut achhi pahal hai, parantu iska upayog keval neetiyon par vichaar ke liye hi naheen, balki rojmarra ke kaaryon mein vichaar-vimarsh, kolaiboreshan evam kamyuniti badhaane ke liye hona chaahiye. mera sabhi se yeh anurodh hai ki ve jab bhi online hon evam hindi viki par kaarya kar rahein hon to ve channel par avashya aaen. isse nae sadasyon ko channel par live madad mil sakegi, kolaiboreshans badheinge evam kai kaaryon aur baatcheet karne mein kam samay lagega. --siddhaarth ghai (vaarta) 06:17, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

hindi vikipeediya sadasya

mene yahaaain par kuchh hindi vikipeediya sadasyo ke baare mein jaankaari daali hai. agar koi apne baare mein yahaaain se jaankaari hatavaana chaahata hai to krupaya mujhe bata de. agar koi khud ke baare mein ya jaankaari dalavaana chaahata hai to krupaya apne baare mein kuchh jaankaari (janm taareekh, pesha, aadi) bata de or ho sake to apni ek photo bhi bhej de. ♛a♚a★aVaibhav Jain★a♚a♛ Talk Email 14:43, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

vaibhav babu, aapke prati aabhaar ke alaava aur kya?- he. she.

raajeevamaas

mera pej sthaapit karne ke liye dhanyavaad, May hindi bhaasha par yogadaan dena chaahata hoo bas.ek aur nivedan hai ki mera is account ka vilay Rajeevmass se kar diya jaae taaki May apne puraane naam se yahaan aa sakoon -shukriya mayoor ya anya --Rajiv (vaarta) 16:21, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

kshama chaahooainga parantu aapke is khaate ka puraane khaate ke saath vilay naheen kiya ja sakta, hindi viki ke prashaasak aisa karne mein samarth naheen. parantu shaayad vikimeediya steevards aisa kar paaye. aap un se sampark karein. haaain aapke is vartamaan khaate ka naam badalkar Rajeevmass kiya ja sakta hai iske liye aap mujhe imel karke Rajeevmass khaate imel ki pushti de deinve. dhanyavaad--Mayur (talk•Email) 14:56, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
mein niraasha ke saath kehna chaahata hooain ki mein apne nae khaate "Rajiv" se bhi laagin nahi kar pa raha hooain. paas vard bhi kaam naheen kar raha hain. nae paas vard ka aapshan bhi pradarshit naheen ho raha hai jisse mein naya paas vard apne E mel rajeevmass@gmail par manga sakoon, yeh stithi theek rajeevmass ke khaate jaisi ban gayi hain. krupaya sahaayata karein. --14.98.95.86 (vaarta) 15:12, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
yeh sthiti kaafi aashcharyajanak hai krupaya aap mujhe apne imel patte rajeevmass@gmail se mere imel patte pe naye khaate ke liye sampark karein, apne naye khaate ka naam bhi bheje. iske pashchaat ham aapke liye naya khaata kholkar usaka paasavard aapko imel ke maadhyam se bhej deinge jise aap parivrtit kar sakte hai. vaise jab aap laag in karte hai to vahaan aapko imel dvaara naya paasavard bhejane ka vikalp bhi milta hai. dhanyavaad--Mayur (talk•Email) 05:03, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

dhanyavaad, saal bhar baad apne khaate ko khula dekh khushi ho rahi hain. mai raajeevamaas hoon. krupaya mere prabandhakeeya adhikaar mujhe lota dein taaki mai sakriya hokar aapke kathit user test dekh sakoon aur aapko bata sakoon ki asaliyt hai kya.bhoogol mein kya ho raha hai yadi usaki jaankaari bhi de to dhanyavaad --raajeevamaas (vaarta) 15:13, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

raajeevamaas ji, prabandhak adhikaaro ke liye aapko vaapis se unke liye nivedan karna parega. agar sadasyo mein aapko prabandhak banaane mein ruchi hui, to aapko avashya bana diya jaaega. ♛a♚a★aVaibhav Jain★a♚a♛ Talk Email 15:21, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
Rajiv ji check yujar test karne ka adhikaar keval vikimeediya steevards ke paas hota hai unhone hi yeh test karke bataaya tha ki laajik raajeevamaas naamak khaate ka hi doosra chhadam khaata hai is baat ki pushti aap vikimeediya steevard meta:jyothis se le sakte hai. khair main to yahi sujhaav dooainga ki in puraani baaton ko bhoolakar hindi viki ke uttthaan mein lag jaaye, main maanata hooain ki meri kai baaton ne aapka dil dukhaaya hoga parantu yadi aap meri jagah hote to shaayad prabandhak hone ke naate aap check yujar test k aadhaar par yahi pratikriya karte. ham sab aasha karte hai ki aap pun: hindi viki mein ek nayi urja ka sanchaar kareinge. shubhakaamanaaeain--Mayur (talk•Email) 16:37, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

mayoor ji aapka diya link meta:jyothis kaise kaam karta hai mujhe naheen pata. jab laajik khaata aapko mere khaate ke saamaan lag raha tha aur main kaafi samay se yahaan sakriya naheen tha to aapko tabhi mujhe mere E-mel (jaisa aapne baad mein kiya) par sampark karna chaahiye tha kher pichhle beete dinon mein kya hua mujhe bahut atpata laga, shaayad mujhe is nai sanskruti ke baare mein kaam karte-karte pata lagega. mai hindi vikipeediya ke sabhi sadasyon se kehna chaahata hoon ki mayoor ji ke meta:jyothis ne shaayad keval anumaanon aur maanaveeya sanvedanaaon se pare seemit takaneeki ka payog karke mere maathe par yeh kalank laga diya. mai apne shodh ke liye lagbhag pure ek saal se yahaaain se door tha, kher shodh abhi chal hi raha hai lekin is ek saal mein hindi vikipeediya se door hokar mein praarambhik aankadein ekatr kar paaya. mai abhi bhi poori tarah sakreeya naheen ho paaunga is lik maafi chaahata hoon . mere khaate aur laajik ke khaate mein kya samaanata thi, mera nivedan hai ki mujhe ye to bata dein, apne seemit takaneeki ka is sambandh mein saboot to dein, taaki hindi vikipeediya ke sadasyon ke saamane main bhi kuksh baate rakh sakoon. koi aur nahi ab to main raajeevamaas hi hoon, mera paasavard chaahe kisi ne bhi upalabdh kara ho -raajeevamaas (vaarta) 16:01, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

yeh kaarya mera naheen apitu check yujar test ka hai jo vikimeediya steevard [Jyothis] ne kiya tha krupaya aap unase is baat ki pushti le. samast vikis mein is test ke aadhaar par kasooravaar paaye jaane vaale sadasyon ko block kar diya jaata hai. is test ke anusaar aapne evam laajik ne ek hi kampayootar, braaujar prayog kiya tha. --Mayur (talk•Email) 16:12, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
ab aapne in [Jyothis] ka sahi link bheja hain --raajeevamaas (vaarta) 16:29, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

mayoor ji ,Jyothis ne jo is sandarbh mein aapko jo aankade aapko bheje the aur jinke aadhaar par aapne mujhe bina chetaavani ke blok kiya tha aur blok karne ke baad hi mere mel I di mel bheja tha, aapne nivedan hai ki ve aankade mujhe upalabd karaaen taaki mai bhi in par aakalan kar sakoon -- raajeevamaas (vaarta) 15:54, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

jyothis ne aapka check yujar test kiya tha jismein usane yeh paaya ki aapka evam laajik ka I pi patta, kampayootar evam braaujar ek hi hai. jaisa ki main bata chuka hooain ki samast vikis mein is test ke aadhaar par doshi paaye gaye sadasya avarodhit kar diye jaate hai. ab main aapse anurodh karuainga ki in baaton par samay na vyaya karte hue aage badhe evam apni oorja se hindi viki ko laabhanvit karein, is charcha ko aage badhaane se koi laabh naheen. aapko is test se sambandhit koi jaankaari chaahiye to jyothis se levein. dhanyavaad--Mayur (talk•Email) 16:35, 15 August 2011 (UTC)


raajeevamaasane prabandhakake tulsaka galat istemaal karke kai sadasyoko hairaan keeya hai or heendeeveekeepeedeeyaaka naam kharaab keeya hai. raajeevamaasake is kukarmamein or bhi prabandhakane sahayog deeya hai. Mumbai veekeekonfaransamein is muddepar charchaake leeye maine leekha hai. raajeevamaasane prabandhakake tulsaka jo meesayus keeya hai vo sansaarake sabhi prabandhakakoko maalum hona chaaheeye. Vkvora2001 (vaarta) 16:58, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

chaupaal prushth sanpaadit kar dein

yeh prushth kaafi lamba ho gaya hai. krupaya ise sanpaadit kar devanaagari sambandhi charcha ko puraalekh mein laga dein. aur yadi uchit samajhein to mayoor par tippani karne vaale anaam sadasya ka auऱ usapar I meri evam anya pratikriyaaon ko bhi mita dein. keval devanaagari ke prayog wala ansh surakshit rahane dein. aniruddh vaarta 10:19, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

YesY poorn hua--♛a♚a★aVaibhav Jain★a♚a♛ Talk Email 10:51, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

sitmbar ke pehle hi hindi viki ko ek lakh tak pahuaincha diya jaaya

mitro,

is August maheene ke ant hote-hote hindi viki ko 1,00,000 ke paar laga diya jaaya. uske baad is shubh soochana ko hindi blaugajagat aur samaachaaron ke maadhyam se adhikaadhik hindeepremiyon tak prasaarit kiya jaaya. apna agala lakshya yeh ho ki sakriya hindi viki lekhakon ki sankhya badhaaya jaaya aur lekhon mein vividhta aaye. to shuroo ho jaaiye ... -- anunaad Singhvaarta 06:48, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

ati uttam! — Bill william comptonTalk 13:46, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
bill ka hindi mein likha sandesh padh kar achha laga. vichaar ati uttam hai aur mujhe vishvaas hai yeh avashya faleebhoot hoga.Dinesh smita (vaarta) 10:39, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
ham jis raftaar se nae lekh bana rahe hai, usase ham ek lakh ka star chhu hi lege. ♛a♚a★aVaibhav Jain★a♚a♛ Talk Email 15:37, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
haan abhi hindi ka star 99,510 (10 August ko) hai. is prakaar hamein 500 se bhi kam lekh hi chaahiye, jinhein ham is varsh hindi diwas par hindi ko 1 lakh sankhya pahuncha kar sammaan/bheint svaroop de sakeinge. --ये सदस्य हिन्दी विकिपीडिया के प्रबंधक है।prasha:aasheesh bhatanaagarvaarta 06:38, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

dya

namaskaar, main yeh jaanana chaahata hooain ke hindi vikipeediya par varnamaala ke dya varn ka prayog kyon naheen ho raha hai. main ab tak tankan ki kisi pranaali mein yeh varn naheen dhooaindh paaya hooain. iski jagah dya likha jaata hai. kya yeh computer tankan mein upalabdh hi naheen hai? mainne ab tak iska prayog keval uttar pradesh praavidhik vishvavidyaalaya ki website par hi dekha hai. parantu ise dekh ke lagta hai ki yeh tankit hai, keval chitr naheen. krupaya is baare mein jaankaari upalabdh karaaen evam ho sake to vikipeediya:devanaagari mein kaise tankan karein? par bhi nae sadasyon ke liye daalein. aapka aabhaari--siddhaarth ghai (vaarta) 16:06, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

aapki samasya jaayaj hai. lekin iska kaaran vikipeediya (yaani meediyaaviki) na hokar vindoj ke saath aane vaale mangal faunt hain. vindoj 7 ke saath mangal faunt ka jo naya sanskaran aaya hai usamein dya milkar sanyukt naheen dikhaata hai, jabki puraane mangal faunt mein aisa ho jaata tha. alabatta abhi bhi ddh, dm aadi sanyukt ho rahe hain. main jaanana chaahooainga ki aap kaunase vindoj par hain. aur yadi aap puraana mangal faunt rakhate hain (shaayad yeh muft upalabdh naheen) to usapar bhi kya yeh samasya aa rahi hai. vaise yeh keval vyooing ki samasya hai, isse vikipeediya ke kantent par koi frk naheen padta. aur haaain aapka vah dya maatr ek chitr hi hai - is chitr ki faail yeh hai- [1]. - Hemant wikikoshvaarta 17:00, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

siddhaarth ji, pahele to mein aapko aapke yogadaanon ke liye shukriya karna chaahuga. jesa hemant ji bata chuke hai, aapki samasya jaayaj hai, vaase to mein vindoj eksapi intamaal karta hu, isliye mein jaanana chaahuga ki kya usame bhi ye samasya hai, ham bas ye ummeed kar sakte hai ki agale saal rilees hone waali vindoj 8 mein ye samaaya naheen hogi. ♛a♚a★aVaibhav Jain★a♚a♛ Talk Email 17:07, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
vaibhav ji, vindoj eksapi mein, jahaaain tak mujhe yaad hai, yeh samasya naheen thi. vaise ise aap swayam dekh sakte hain ki yadi dya to aapke computer par notapaid mein judkar dikh raha ho, ya maaikrosauft vard mein, to samajhiye ki aapke O.S. mein puraana mangal faunt hai.
sach poochhiye to mere sadasya prushth par mainne isi dya ka udaaharan "jud jaane vaale varn" ke roop mein diya hua tha, jo ab naye mangal par bina juda hi dikhne laga tha, at: use badalkar kal hi mainne naya udaaharan ddh kiya hai. dhanyavaad. - Hemant wikikoshvaarta 17:16, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

...aur ab mainne swayam jaaainch liya hai. daraasal yeh vindoj esks-pi tatha vindoj vista mein judkar dikhta hai, tatha vindoj 7 mein alag hokar (d‌aaya jaisa) dikhta hai. at: jo paathak is charcha ko vindoj 7 mein naheen padhkar vindoj ke pichhle edeeshan mein padh rahe hain, unhein yeh saari charcha shaayad samajh mein naheen aa rahi hogi. kyonki unhein saare dya jude hue dikh rahe honge. -Hemant wikikoshvaarta 05:27, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

iska ek sambhav upachaar hai sanskrut 2003 faunt. sanskrit2003 font daaunalod kar use apne eksplorar ki devanaagari ki deefault faunt bana lein aur samaadhaan paayein. mainne to pehle hi ye faunt instaul ki hui hai, at: is sandesh ko padhne mein kuchh kathini hui, kyonki sabhi jagah mujhe dya hi likha dikha, apne sahi evam vaanchhit roop mein. --ये सदस्य हिन्दी विकिपीडिया के प्रबंधक है।prasha:aasheesh bhatanaagarvaarta 06:10, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
aap sabhi ko mera namaskaar aur is jaankaari ke liye dhanyavaad. main vindoj 7 ka prayog karta hooain. mujhe yeh jaanakar khushi hui hai ki yeh gadbadi hindi vikipeediya ki naheen hai.
aasheesh ji ke kahe anusaar mainne sanskrit 2003 font daaoonalod kiya evam vindoj ke hindi bhaasha ke difault faunt ki tarah lagaaya. isse intaranet eksaplorar mein to dya juda hua dikhna shuroo ho gaya parantu Google krom mein main abhi yeh kaarya naheen kar paaya hooain.
saath hi mujhe Arial Unicode MS naamak ek faunt mila jisme bhi dya juda hua deekhata hai. en:Arial Unicode MS ke anusaar yeh faunt office xp ke saath ship hona shuroo ho gaya tha aur Mac OS X 10.5 se ship hona shuroo ho raha hai. mere computer mein office 2007 hai, aur mere paas bhi iska varjan 1.01 hi hai. isse lagta hai ki kaafi logon ke paas yeh faunt avashya hoga. at:, ham paathakon ko naya faunt daaoonalod karne ko to naheen kah sakte hain, parantu is faunt ki jaankaari vikipeediya:devanaagari mein kaise tankan karein?, vikipeediya:Devanagari Help evam vikipeediya:Setting for Indic scripts par daal sakte hain. aapka aabhaari--siddhaarth ghai (vaarta) 07:32, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

pramukh lekh

aakhir kab tak jagadguru raamabhadraachaarya pramukh lekh bana rahega? krupaya ab iski jagah kisi anya lekh ko lagaaiye aur kisi bhi lekh ko ek saptaah se jyaada mat lagaaiye.Dinesh smita (vaarta) 14:04, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

kisi bhi naye nirvaachit lekh ke na chune jaane ke kaaran yeh lekh 9 July se abhi tak mukhaprushth pe bana raha, parantu hamaari tay neetiyon ke anusaar ham nirvaachit lekh ko 1 maah se poorv naheen hataate. ab kyonki 1 maah ho chuka hai to mainne poorv mein nirvaachit lekh Delhi ko mukhaprushth par laga diya hai.--Mayur (talk•Email) 14:15, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

hindi ankon ka prayog

namaskaar, jahaaain tak mujhe pata hai, hindi vikipeediya par hindi ankon ka prayog karne ka nirnaya liya gaya hai. tab bhi meediyaaviki ke prayog mein abhi bhi kai jagah angreji ank hi dikhaai dete hain. vaarta mein sabke hastaaksharon ke baad samay angreji ankon mein likha nazar aata hai, prushth itihaas mein tithi evam samay angreji ankon mein deekhata hai. yahaaain tak ki mukhyaprushth par bhi tithi, varsh evam lekhon ki ginti angreji ankon mein hi hai. mera anurodh hai ki yadi hindi ankon ke prayog ka nirnaya pakka hai to in sab jagah ankon ko hindi mein karne ke liye kuchh kadam uthaaye jaaeain. aapka aabhaari--siddhaarth ghai (vaarta) 15:20, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

vikishnari par lagbhag har jagah hindi ankon prayog ho rah hai. udahaaran ke liye yeh prashth hara dekhein. ise dekh kar lagta hai ki hindi vikipeediya par bhi hindi ankon ka sabhi jagah prayog sambhav hai. -- vinod Singh (vaarta) 09:46, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

panjeekrut sadasyon ki sankhya 50000 ke paar

namaskaar mitron hindi viki par panjeekrut sadasyon ki sankhya ab 50000 se adhik ho gayi hai yeh pratham bhaarateeya bhaasha ka vikipeedeeya hai jismein 50000 se adhik panjeekrut sadasya hai.--Mayur (talk•Email) 03:29, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

is par to apna dhyaan hi naheen gaya. hindi ke sukhad sthiti E or sanket hai. 1.38.211.218 (vaarta) 04:08, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
hindi vikipeediya parivaar ke sadasyon ki sankhya 50,000 ke paar pahuainchane par sabhi ko badhaaiyaaain. vaise hindi viki par sadasya vruddhi anya kisi bhi samay ki tulana pichhle ek varsh mein sarvaadhik rahi hai. mainne hindi vikipeediya naamak prushth par bhi is jaankaari ko adyatit kar diya hai. Bhaarat ke svatantrata diwas ke saath-saath hindi viki par sadasyon ki sankhya ka 50,000 ke paar pahuainchana ham logon ke liye dohare utsav ka avsar hai. khair sabhi ko svatantrata diwas ki haardik shubhakaamanaaeain. aao sankalp lein ki isi August mein hindi viki ko ek lakh ke paar pahuaincha dein. rohit raavat (vaarta) 03:11, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
sadasyon ki sankhya pahuchane par sabhi ko badhaai evam 65veen svatantrata diwas ki mangalamaya kaamanaaen-bhavaani Gautam (vaarta) 04:45, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
aaj sadasya sankhya 51000 se aage chali gayi hai. iska matlab hai ki is samay sadasyon ke vruddhi ki dar lagbhag 2000 sadasya prati maas hai. -- anunaad Singhvaarta 12:04, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

Huggle

namaste saathiyo, hindi vikipeediya par ab huggle saksham ho gaya hai. ab hindi vikipeediya ke pratyaaharta(rolabaikars) aur prabandhak is barbarata rodhak upakaran ka prayog kar sakte hai. ♛a♚a★aVaibhav Jain★a♚a♛ Talk Email 08:11, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

yeh to ek badi upalabdhi hai hindi viki pehla bhaarateeya viki hai jis par yeh upakaran saksham hua hai.--Mayur (talk•Email) 12:05, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

A shorturl tool defn.me

Hi, folks,

Sorry for English, and I just want to notify India Wikipedians that a shorturl tool developed by me can help you post links to articles on twitter, facebook, email and other websites. This tool is Wikipedia-specific, so you can use it safely, and no worry about dangerous links behind it. And by using a userscript, you can copy-paste the short link very conveniently, please visit blow links for details:

Thanks for any comments. --Mountain (vaarta) 04:13, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

Is it functional for Hindi language? do we've to set http://defn.me/s/ as bookmarklet? what's the significance of using importScript("sadasya:Mountain/shorturl.js"); under /Vector.js? and you can detail me [technically] as I'm also a J2EE developer. — Bill william comptonTalk 16:55, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

hindi vikipeediya sammaan vaapas

main raajeevamaas, hindi viki prashaasakon ke galat aur bhedabhaav poorn ravaiye ke kaaran, Bhaarat ki svatantrata diwas ke din apna sammaan vaapas kar raha hoon --raajeevamaas (vaarta) 16:15, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

krupaya is prakaar ke vaakya likhne se bache, yeh viki ki niji tippaniyaaain evam aakshep neeti ke pratikool hai.--Mayur (talk•Email) 16:39, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
Rajiv ji! main aapki kai galat harkaton ka aur usaka hindi vikiya par pade ghaatak prabhaav ka saakshi raha hooain. isliye aapke prati apanaae gaye prashaasakeeya ravaiye ko anivaarya maanata hooain aur usaka samarthan karta hooain. aur aap jabatak apni galati ki chaupaal par sveekruti ke saath hi uske liye maafi naheen maaaingate tabatak aapke saath kisi bhi tarah ki riyaayat kiye jaane ka virodh karuainga. aur vaapas vah kiya jaata hai jo aapke paas ho. use naheen jise aap kho chuke hon. yeh is sandarbh ki aakhiri tippani hai. kyonki ismein bahas ki gunjaaish naheen hai. aniruddh vaarta 21:16, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
raajeevamaasane prabandhakake tulsaka galat istemaal karke kai sadasyoko hairaan keeya hai or heendeeveekeepeedeeyaaka naam kharaab keeya hai. raajeevamaasake is kukarmamein or bhi prabandhakane sahayog deeya hai. Mumbai veekeekonfaransamein is muddepar charchaake leeye maine leekha hai. raajeevamaasane prabandhakake tulsaka jo meesayus keeya hai vo sansaarake sabhi prabandhakakoko maalum hona chaaheeye. Vkvora2001 (vaarta) 16:52, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

bahas ki gunjaaish mai bhi nahi maanata. lekin jab ek prashaasak apne lekh par samarthan ke liye mujhe mel likh sakte hai to mayoor ji ne jab yeh dekha ki unhein laga ki mere khaate ka galat istemaal (takaneeki aadhaar par ) ho raha hai to inhone mujhe tatkaal mel kyon nahi bheja, jabki mai ek prabandhak tha,jimmedaar tha ? bataaie ? aniruddh ji aap dekhe ki sahi kya hai, mai ab bhi mayoor ji ko kah raha hoon ki jis aadhaar par aapne ek prabandhak ko blok kiya use is baat ka saboot to de, vo naheen de pa rahein . mujhe galat to saabit karein, mai aapko aur sabhi hindi sadasyon ko yeh bhi bataana chaahata hoon ki mai laajik ko janta hoon unhein mainne hi hindi viki par aane ke liye protsaahit kiya tha (mai apne vishvidyaalaya, kaaryaalaya, mitron ev ghar ke sadasyon ko bhi hindi vikipeediya par aane ko protsaahit karta hoon) ve pehle blog likhte the (ab bhi likhte hain, mai naam naheen kholana chaahata) lekin in saahab ne jab dekha ki ek anaam sadasya mujhe itni gandi baate hindi vikipeediya par likha raha hai to ye aa gaye meri gairahaajari mein, mai dukhi tha aur shodh ka dabaav mai yahaaain se chala gaya lekin shaayad mere bina bataae ye lage rahe apne blog ki khujali mitaane yahaan (mai maafi chaahata hoon lekin is se adhik kade shabd mere paas nahi hain). mayoor ji mainne kisi par vyaktigat tippani naheen ki keval prashaasak kaha lekin aniruddh ji to mere baate mein vyaktigat tippani kar rahein hain, mai shikaayat naheen kar raha lekin mai poochhana chaahata hoon ki meri kya galat harakate hain? harkat kya hoti hain? mayoor ji baat agar jimmedaari ki kare to aap hi jimmedaar the aapko chaahiye tha ki ek baar to mujhe mel kar baate saaf karte, aapne mel kiya lekin mujhe blok karne ke baad--raajeevamaas (vaarta) 16:24, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

pehli baat aapko mainein kabhi bhi mere lekh par koi samarthan karne hetu imel naheen likha, doosari baat viki par aisi koi neeti naheen jismein avarodhit kiye jaane vaale sadasya ko imel karne ka praavadhaan ho, aapko block karne se pehle hamanein kuchh vikineetiya banaayi thi jise 10 sadasyaon ke samarthan ke saath laagu kiya gaya tha usamein chhadam khaate ki neeti ke anusaar is aadhaar par kisi bhi sadasya jis par aapko sandeh ho, ko ek chetaavani avashya dein. yadi iske baad bhi vah apna vyavahaar naheen chhodta to uske samast khaate block kiye ja sakte hai. mainne laajik ko ek naheen kai chetaavaniyaan di, chaupaal par bhi yeh sandesh diya gaya. tab jaakar laajik ke samast khaate jismein aapka khaata shaamil tha use bhi avarodhit kiya gaya. Rajiv ji ab main aapse yeh antim baar nivedan kar raha hooain ki aap laajik hai ya naheen isse hamein koi matlab naheen, yeh baat ab 6-7 maah puraani ho chuki hai. aapke hindi viki ko pun samruddh banaane ke sakalp nein mujhe aapko avarodhan se mukt karne hetu prerit kiya. aapka khaata check yujar test ke aadhaar par avarodhit kiya gaya tha iske anusaar aapka evam laajik ka khaata ek hi tha kyonki us samay aapka khaata sakriya na hokar laajik naam wala khaata sakriya tha isaliye mainein laajik ko kai chetaavaniyaan di kyonki aap uske chhadam rup check yujar test ke aadhaar par siddh ho chuke the. ab main aapse antim baar nivedan karuainga ki krupaya is vishay par mera evam anya sadasyon ka samay na nasht karein. koi chhadam khaate se kisi ko pareshaan karna koi aparaadh naheen hai bas vikipeediya par iski anumati naheen kyonki ham sab yahaan ek jnyaaanakosh banaane aaye hai. aur main aapko yeh bhi bataana chaahooainga ki ye prashaasak ya prabandhak kuchh bhi naheen hota. ye keval kuchh tools hai jo kuchh atiskriya sadasyon ko diye jaate hai jisse vah kuchh aavashyak takaneeki evam mainntineins kaarya kar sake, jaisa ki aniruddh ji ne bahut samay pehle kaha tha ki prashaasak sadasya varg ka naam vyavasthaapak hona chaahiye main is baat se 100% sahamat hooain. aapke check user test ho jaane ke baad evam aapko block karne se 3 maah pehle mainein imel dvaara iski soochana gunjan varma evam anunaad ji ko de di thi ki check yujar test mein aap evam laajik ek hi sadasya siddh hue hai. mainein kaafi pratiksha ki laajik apni gatividhiyaan sudhaar le parantu aisa naheen hua fir use bataaya gaya ki usaka evam raajeevamaas ka khaata chhadam hai evam use chetaavaniyaaain bhi di gayi fir chaupaal par bhi chetaavani jaari ki gayi. jaisa ki laajik aapka mitr tha aur usane aapko bataaya tha to aapko usi samay aana chaahiye tha parantu mere imel karne ke vaabajood aap naheen aaye. khair ab in sab baaton ko bhoolakar hindi viki mein sakaaraatmak yogadaan dein, viki ka har paathak ham sabhi sakriya sadasyon prashaasak ya prabandhak ke rup mein naheen apitu hamaare yogadaanon ke liye yaad karega. aapko bhoogol ke liye, aniruddh ji ko samaachaaron ke liye, anunaad, dinesh, Hunzalal evam aasheesh ji ko kai achhe lekh banaane ke liye, mujhe kai takaneeki sudhaar hindi viki ka devanaagari tool evam anya tools banaane ke liye evam isi prakaar anya sabhi sadasya jo kai prakaar se is jnyaaanakosh ko banaane mein lage hai un sabke rini aap, main evam samast vikipaathak hai. aap laajik hai ya naheen mujhe ab is baat se koi matlab naheen, aapke andar mainein ek sakaaraatmak oorja dekhi ki aap mein abhi bhi yogadaan dene hetu tattparata hai jise dekhkar mainein aapka khaata avarodhan mukt kar diya. ab is prakaar baar baar tippaniyaaain dekar shaayad aap mere is nirnaya ko galat saabit kar rahe hai, pehle main aapko yeh bata doon ki viki par sampaadan se avarodhit hona koi jail ya badi saja naheen ise keval viki ko sanchaalit karne mein jab koi khaata samasyaaen utpann karta hai ya vikineetiyon ka paalan naheen karta tab iska upayog kiya jaata hai. mujhe aasha hai ki ab aap meri kisi bhi tippani ko nakaraatmak nalete hue is charcha ko aage naheen badhaayeinge. aapka pun nayi oorja ke saath hindi viki par svaagat hai. shubhakaamanaaeain--Mayur (talk•Email) 18:55, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
mere vichaar mein, is charcha ko rokakar ye aasha karni chaahiye, ki Rajiv ji apne avarodhamukt hue khaate par sanpaadan aarambh/jaari karein. jaisi lagan va kaarya kshamata ki unase ummeed hai, uske anuroop kaarya star mein parinnaam mileinge... tatha aage kaalaantar mein is aadhaar par adhikaar vardhan kiya ja sakta hai. tab tak sanpaadan jaari rakhein... aasha hai is baat par kisi ko asahamati naheen hogi, na hi vartamaan sthiti mein sanpaadan karne mein koi kathinaai hain. at: is vaartta ko viraam milega is apeksha sahit poorn viraam lagaata hoon.--ये सदस्य हिन्दी विकिपीडिया के प्रबंधक है।prasha:aasheesh bhatanaagarvaarta 06:52, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

mai bhi is vivaad ko samaapt karna chaahata hoon, kuchh puraane sanbandho ke kaaran mai lekhan samarthan par adhik naheen bata sakta. mai nahi aaya ye baat aapko jyaada maalum hogi . mera paasavard jo aap jaise hi kisi ne mujhe vaapas diya, pehle mai yahaaain katai bhi laagin naheen kar pa raha tha aur ye shikaayat mainne bahut pehle kar di thi is prakaar ka tools koi maahir hi laga sakta tha. khair jra laajik ki kya khata thi jisme mujhe bhi aapne lapet liya, jra mujhe bhi bataane ka kasht kareinge? mai yeh savaal ek prashaasak se kar raha hoon jisne ek prabandhak ko hi pratibandhit kar diya, teen maheene pehle doosaro ko to bataaya lekin mujhe kabhi naheen bataaya ki mere khaate ka galat prayog ho raha hain. ek puraane lekhak hone ke naate mujhe bataae ki laajik ki kya khata thi ki uske saath ek prabandhak ko bhi blok kar diya gaya yahaaain tak ki mere pej par likh diya gaya ki yeh sadasya pratibandhit hai . humne bhi anek lekhakon ko pratibndhi kiya lekin is tareeke se taanaashaahi nahi ki, mai aapse savaal kar raha hu kyoki ye aapne kiya aur prashaasak hine ke naate yeh aapka kartavya banta hai ki apni karni ko sahi saabit kare, meri jo maanahaani hui vo alag baat hai --raajeevamaas (vaarta) 14:52, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

kshama kare, mainne jitne uttar dene the dein diye, aapko seedha seedha check yujar test ke aadhaar par block kiya gaya tha ab main baar baar is baat ko na doharaate hue is charcha mein apna aur samay vyaya naheen karuainga. dhanyavaad--Mayur (talk•Email) 15:28, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

check yujar test hota kya hai mujhe bataaie ? saath hi mere prabandh ke adhikaaron ko kyon hataaya gaya kya vo bhi check yujar test tha ?--raajeevamaas (vaarta) 15:36, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

krupaya aage ki charcha vikipeediya:tippani ke liye anurodh/raajeevamaas par kare. chaupaal iske liye sahi jagah naheen hai. vaibhav jain vaarta imel 15:13, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

lekh pratikriya

sadasyo, aapke liye ek aur khushakhabari. hindi viki par aartikl feedabakk aa gaya hai, jise paathak lekh par apni pratikriya de sakte hai. vaibhav jain vaarta imel 15:00, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

yeh achha hai. kuchh naya karte rahiye. yeh angreji vikiya aur Bhaarat kosh aadi par pehle se hi saksham tha. ab aapke prayaason se yahaaain bhi ho gaya. badhaai ho. aniruddh vaarta 15:06, 19 August 2011 (UTC) kintu yeh abhi angreji vikiya ya Bhaarat kosh ki tarah naheen ban saka hai. kya iske sabhi vikalp theek dhang se pradarshit hon iske liye kisi tarah ki seting karni hogi? abhi kaumbo box sakriye naheen hue hain. aniruddh vaarta 15:15, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

is suvidha mein abhi aur marammat ki jarurat hai jaise shaayad chaupaal jaise prushthon par iski jarurat naheen evam kuchh anya aap sabhi is par apni pratikriyaaen de jisse ise aur behtar banaaya ja sake, dhanyavaad--Mayur (talk•Email) 15:17, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

ek aur sujhaav hai ki is suvidha ko kuchh is tarah vyavasthit karein ki yeh keval lekh prushth par dikhaai de, chaupaal, sadasya prushth, vaarta prushth shreni, saaaincha prushth aadi par naheen. aniruddh vaarta 15:22, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

Yes check.svg sampoorn, dhanyavaad aniruddh ji aapke sujhaavaanusaar ab samast sudhaar karke is suvidha ko upayog karne laayak bana diya gaya hai. baaki sudhaar ham meediyaaviki sandeshon ka anuvaad karke kar sakte hai.--Mayur (talk•Email) 20:13, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

pratyaaharta va pareekshak

mene khud ka pratyaaharta va pareekshak pad hetu sv-naamaankan kiya hai. krupaya tipni kare. vaibhav jain vaarta imel 05:09, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Vibhijain, please don't use chaupaal as a medium of your personal correspondence. On every Wikipedia chaupaal/Village Pump/Le Bistro is a place for serious discussions/announcements. Concerned admin will definitely comment on the respective pages, you don't need to canvass people there, I hope you'll understand. — Bill william comptonTalk 06:00, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
I understand your views. Earlier when hunnzajal and utcurch were nominated for SU, that also was put on VP. Hi wiki community is not so big, thats why VP can be also used for casual discussions. BTW, I just put this notice here, so people comment and i can get permanent right, as earlier it was granted temporarily. However, i shall take care of that in future. vaibhav jain vaarta imel 06:31, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
bill saahab aap aksar bahut hi sakht andaaj mein tippani karte nazar aate hain, jo mere vichaar se thoda jyaada ho jaata hai. aap bhi to hindi viki par hamesha angreji mein likhte hain lekin aaj tak mainne kisi ko bhi iske liye aapko samajhaate/virodh jataate naheen dekha. meri aapse praarthana hai ki apne svabhaav mein thodi narami laaiye.Dinesh smita (vaarta) 09:37, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
vaibhav ji aap to lagta hai achhi hindi jaante hain, krupaya apni baat rakhane ke liye adhikaadhik hindi ka hi prayog karein taaki log yeh na samajh le ki yeh bhaasha aapasi baatcheet ke bhi laayak naheen hai.Dinesh smita (vaarta) 09:46, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
ji mein aapki baat se sahamat hu likin kyonki bill ji ne savaal angreji mein poochha to meinne javaab isliye angreji mein diya. vaibhav jain vaarta imel 09:51, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
dinesh ji, mujhe chhama kare, par jesa ki mene kaha mujhe hindi likhne me thodi samasya hoti hai. mene pehle bhi yahi kaha tha ki jab mai bina Google Translate ke likhne me saksham ho jaayaga tab me prashnta se hindi me vaarta karege. Vibhijain ko mene koi "sakht andaaj mein tippani" nahi ki, vaastav mein English bhaasha hi is tarah ki hai. agar mein hindi me likhta to shaayad aapko esa nahi lagta, parantu jesa mene kaha hindi me likhne me bahut samay lagta he, isliye mene English me likha tha.
aap khud hi antar dekhale:-
Vibhijain ji, krupaya chaupaal ka prayog apni vyaktigat vaarta ke maadhyam ke roop mein na kare. har ek vikipeediya par chaupaal/Village Pump/Le Bistro vo sthaan hota he jaha gambhir vichaar-vimarsh ya ghoshanaaeain ki jaati hai......
hindi aur English me yeh bahut bada antar he, aur rahi baat hindi me vaarta ki to mene jesa pehle bhi kaha he ki mujhe hindi me likhne ya vaarta karne me koi sharm nahi aati, bas me isame theek se likhne me saksham ho jaaya, aasha karta hu ki aap sanjhege. — Bill william comptonTalk 03:27, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
bill mujhe jaanakar achha laga ki aapne apni baat rakhi. aap hamesha hi jaayaj baat ka paksh lete najar aate hain (kuchh apavaadon ko chhodkar). main bhi bill ki is baat se sahamat hoon ki chaupaal ka prayog apni vyaktigat vaarta ke maadhyam ke roop mein naheen karna chaahiye. bill agar aapko hindi bhaasha mein lekhan ko lekar koi bhi sahaayata chaahiye to aap behichk mujhe kah sakte hain.Dinesh smita (vaarta) 08:08, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

tridib mitra ke photo

prashaasakon ne mera apna hi photo mit diya. kya amariki niyam Bhaarat mein bhi laagu hai ? bhukhi peedhi aandolanakaari kabhi kaapiraait aavadhaaranaako naheen sveekaara kyon ki yeh upaniveshavaadi manan se paida huya hai. mahaabhaarat, raamaayan, geeta, raamacharitmaanas aadi ka kaapiraait naheen the.Tridib Mitra (vaarta) 06:34, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

ji kyonki vikimediya faaundeshan ke sarvar yooesae mein hai isliye samaan pe yooesae ke kaapiraait kaanoon laagoo hote hai. vaibhav jain vaarta imel 06:55, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

AutoWikiBrowser/CheckPage

main otovikibraaujr ka upayog karna chaahata hooain. kya vikipeediya:AutoWikiBrowser/CheckPage mein naam jodne ke liye vishesh nivedan ki zaroorat hai? agar haaain, to is pej ko surakshit kiya jaana chaahiye. saath hi, nivedan ke liye nirdesh jode jaane chaahiyeain. utkarsharaaj (vaarta) 07:56, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

ji ye pej surakshit naheen hai, likin abus filtar ki vajah se sirf prashaasak is pej ko badal sakte hai. aap nivedan vaarta prushth par kar sakte hai. vaibhav jain vaarta imel 08:03, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Livery

krupaya railway ke sandarbh mein shabd Livery ka uchit hindi paryaaya sujhaayein. yadi koi railway mein kaaryarat hai ya kabhi vahaan kaarya kiya hai to Livery ka maanak hindi shabd bataayeain.Dinesh smita (vaarta) 09:32, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

mere khyaal se rang yojana sahi rahega. vaibhav jain vaarta imel 09:56, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
vaigyaanik tatha takaneeki shabdaavali aayog ki site par vaigyaanik shabdaavali khoj karne par is shabd ka arth 'vardi' de raha hai. -- anunaad Singhvaarta 09:17, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
raajabhaasha vibhaag ke E-mahaashabdakosh par bhi iska arth vardi hi diya hai.--siddhaarth ghai (vaarta) 20:26, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
aam sandarbh mein vardi, but more precisely railway ke sandarbh mein railway engine ka rang, krupaya dekhein ise ya iske vivran ko. — Bill william comptonTalk 23:41, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
father kaamil bulke ke shabdakosh mein ek shabd parichhad sujhaaya gaya hai jo mujhe kaafi had tak theek laga, krupaya apni rai dein.Dinesh smita (vaarta) 17:54, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

dhanyavaad

main pichhle kuchh maheenon se vyast tha to isliye vikipeediya par aana kam ho gaya tha. is beech mere vaarta prushth par mayoor aur vaibhavajain dvaara mujhe teen star diye gaye. vyastata ke kaaran mein aabhaar prakat na kar saka iske liye khed hai. isliye in staaron ke liye haardik dhanyavaad. haalaanki meri vyastata abhi bhi jaari hai lekin fir bhi hindi viki par meri or se yogadaan jaari rahega. rohit raavat (vaarta) 05:24, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

saaainchon ke oopar ki patti

aajkal hindi viki par jitne bhi saaainche hain unke oopar ki patti bahut chaudi aa rahi hai. lagta hai kisi ne inke praarup se chhedchhaad kar di hai. chaudi patti achhi naheen lag rahi hai. krupaya koi sadasya jo takaneeki baatein jaanta ho ise sahi kar de. dhanyavaad. rohit raavat (vaarta) 16:51, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

samaachaar

hindi viki ke mukhya prushth par samaachaar sheershak ke antargat pehle ghatnaaon ka din bhi diya jaata tha jo paathako ke liye nimnalikhit kaaranon se mahatvapoorn tha :

  1. samaachaaron ka mahattv ghatna ko darshaata hain, aur kisi bhi ghatna ka ek mahattv uske samay par aadhaarit hota hai.
  2. kisi bhi ghatna ko bhavishya mein uske samay aur parinaam se jaana jaata hain.
  3. paathakon ko ghatna ke baare mein sahi gyaan milaata tha.
  4. pratiyogita mein baithane vaale pratoyogiyo ke liye to ye atyant mahatvapoorn hain.
  5. samaachaaron ko jordaar aur asarakaari tareeke se prastut karta hain aur unki neerasata ko kam karta hain.

at: nivedan hai ki samaachaar likhte samay uske din ka bhi ullekh kiya jaae -raajeevamaas (vaarta) 07:18, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Rajiv ji. aapke bahut saare prashnon ke uttar chaupaal ke puraalekhon mein mil jaaengein. samaachaar ki tithi jaanani ho to krupaya 2011 prushth par jaaen. is varsh ke suru se lekar abhi tak ke saare samaachaar din sahit vahaaain darj hain. pratiyogita parikshaarthi ke liye shaayad yeh adhik upayogi hoga. yahi naheen 2010 ke samaachaaron ki pramukh ghatnaaen 2010 ke aur anya varshon aur dinon se judi mukhya ghatnaaen un dinon ke prushth par mil jaaengein. aniruddh vaarta 12:31, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

aniruddh ji, aapne bataaya to mein vahaan gaya aur dekha ki din likhe hue hain maan liya. lekin yeh baat aap sabhi ko nahi bata paaenge ya yeh kahe ki sab nahi poochh paaenge. dekhiye kisi bhi jaal prushth ka ek mukhya prushth hota hain. jo paathak yahaan pehli baar aaya hai ya bahut kam aata hai ya ye baat poochh nahi paata uske liye mukhya prushth par bana samaachaar ka link use hindi vikipeediya ki ek chhavi pradaan karta hai, yeh chhavi use samaachaaron ki gatisheelata aur unke nirantar adyatan rahane se banti hain. yadi ham din bhi yaheen par likhde to paathakon ko bhi update milega. iska doosra laabh yeh hoga ki puraane hote din ko dekh kar jo lekhak samaachaaro ko upadet karte hai un par bhi samaachaaron ko nirantar update karne ka jor rahega. yahi ham ek din ki ek bhi dainik upadet likh de din ke saath to vaha hindi vikipeediya ko ek gatik chhavi pradaan karega. jab mai prabandhak tha to mera yahi sochana tha, baaki aap log adhik jnyaaanavaan hain --raajeevamaas (vaarta) 15:10, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

jin dinon din aur tithi likhi jaati thi aapke dvaara ginaae gaye donon laabh vikiya ko naheen mila tha. 31 July ko bhi mukh prushth par 10 June ka samaachaar rahata tha. maano uske baad koi ghatna hi na hui ho. yeh nirantar adyatit bhi naheen kiya jaata tha. vaastav mein is saaainche mein samaachaaron mein I aitihaasik mahatva ki ghatnaaen hi shaamil ki jaati hai taatkaaleek khabarein naheen. in samaachaaron ke saath samaachaar prushth ki gupt kadi bhi hoti hai. koi bhi naya paathak uske sahaare akhbaar ke us panne tak pahuainchakar ghatna ke sambandh mein vistaar se jaan sakta hai. din aur tithi vikiya kaaryakartaaon ki akarmanyata ka sanketak si ban gayi thi. iske viprit jab samaachaaron ko nirantar adyatit kiya jaane laga aur ek hi din ki do ya adhik ghatnaaen saaainche mein shaamil ho gayi tab din aur tithi likhna haasyaaspad lag raha tha. kalpana keejiye ki saaainche mein chaar samaachaar ek hi din ke hon to kya drushya banega. aniruddh vaarta 21:07, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

aapne sahi likha ki "din aur tithi vikiya kaaryakartaaon ki akarmanyata ka sanketak si ban gayi thi" yahi baat vikiya kaaryakartaaon mein honeen chaahiye ki tatkaal hi din ki kisi ek mahatvapoorn ghatna ko yahaan likhe sansaar bhar mein har pal kuchh na kuchh ghatata hain. yadi ek din mein bhi kai mahatvapoorn ghatnaaen hui hai to ve sabhi samaachaar mein aa sakti hain. uddeshya samaachaar ke saanche ke bharna nahi balki paathakon ko nit nai jaankaari pradaan karna hai taaki paathak jaise hi hindi vikipeediya par aae use N taajagi ka ehsaas ho.
doosari mahatvapoorn baat "likhne ki shaili" samaachaar par ek samaachaar hai "Lokpal aandolan: raamaleela maidaan mein anna hajaare ka anashan jaari. anna ke aahavaan par mantriyon, saansadon evam vidhaayakon ke gharon par pradarshan shuru ho gaya." is samaachaar mein anek vaakya galatiya hain:
  1. Lokpal aandolan ke bajaae jan Lokpal hona chaahiye
  2. raamaleela maidaan mein anna hajaare ka anashan jaari ke bajaae Delhi ke raamaleela maidaan mein anna hajaare ka anashan dasvein din bhi jaari hona chaahiye.
  3. anna ke aahavaan par mantriyon, saansadon evam vidhaayakon ke gharon par pradarshan shuru ho gaya ke bajaae anna ke aahvaan par mantriyon, saansadon evam vidhaayakon ke gharon par pradarshan shuru ho kiya gaya hona chaahiye.

hindi vikipeediya par lekhakon ki tatparata aur hindi ka sahi gyaan hi jaroori hai, aur poornima varman ke aabhaav mai yeh yeh aur bhi jaroori hain --raajeevamaas (vaarta) 15:54, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

na aapke tark theek hain na sujhaae gaye sudhaar. fir bhi yadi koi sadasya aapka samarthan karte hain to main samaachaar saaainche mein kisi bhi tarah ke hastakshep se parahej karne ko taiyaar hooain. yadi aap swayam ke dvaara bataai gayi visheshataaon ko samaachaar saaainche mein laagoo kar sakein to main aapka samarthan karooainga. aniruddh vaarta 02:43, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

hujur mere tark bhi galat hai aur mere sudhaar bhi ye to aap ki soch hain. mai samaachaar saaainche ko durust kar sakoon ye aapke oopar hain, aapka samarthan to mujhe milta hi rahega --raajeevamaas (vaarta) 16:48, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

anuvaad nivedan

namaskaar, main vikipeediya se jude nimn shabdon ka uchit anuvaad jaanana chaahooainga.

  • spam
  • cleanup(Also used as spam cleanup)
  • peacock terms
  • weasel words
  • dead end(as in dead end articles)
  • non-free content
  • conflict of interest

dhanyavaad--siddhaarth ghai (vaarta) 13:05, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

  • spam-spaim
  • cleanup(Also used as spam cleanup)-shuddheekaran
  • peacock terms-mor sandarbh
  • weasel words-kadaachit shabd
  • dead end(as in dead end articles)-gatirodh
  • non-free content-kaupeeraait surakshit saamagri
  • conflict of interest-dilchaspi ka takaraav

--vaibhav jain vaarta imel 13:11, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

yadyapi peacock terms ka aapka anuvaad sahi hai, parantu mere vichaar mein hamein iska seedha anuvaad prayog naheen karna chaahiye. aakhir mor Bhaarat ka raashtreeya pakshi hai. isliye mujhe "mor" shabd ka kisi bhi negative sense mein prayog karna sahi naheen lagta. aur jahaaain tak main jaanta hooain, aisi koi neeti naheen hai jo ye kahe ki hamein angreji vikipeediya ke bane shabdon ka hi prayog karna hai. at:, "mor" shabd ke prayog bina bhaavana ka anuvaad hona chaahiye.

saath hi interest ka kya koi bahatar anuvaad ho sakta hai? aur article needs spam cleanup lekh ko/mein spaim shuddhikran ki aavashyakta hai ya fir lekh se spaim hataane ki aavashyakta hai. dhanyavaad--siddhaarth ghai (vaarta) 13:44, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

vaise vaibhav ji ne achhe anuvaad bataaye hain. kuchh sujhaav is prakaar hain-

  • spam cleanup ki aavashyakta hai- spaim-safaai ki aavashyakta hai.
  • peacock terms- atiranjit padaavali/shabdaavali (yadi aap mor ko vida karna chaahate hain to uske rangon (...ranjit) se kaam chalaaie; atiranjit ka literal meaning hota hai- highly colored, i.e. obscuring its natural appearance.)
  • weasel words-kadaachit shabd (achha anuvaad hai, keval ek halant ki kami thi)
  • dead end(as in dead end articles)-mrutaagr or alternatively mrut sira; dead end articles= mrutaagr vaale lekh or mrut sire vaale lekh(gatirodh shabd deadlock ke liye hai, jo yahaaain praasangik naheen hai)
  • non-free content-kaupeeraait surakshit saamagri (yathaavat)
  • conflict of interest-hiton ka antarvirodh (kyonki yahaaain dilchaspi yaani ruchi ki baat naheen ho rahi hai, balki hiton ki baat ho rahi hai).

dhanyavaad. -Hemant wikikoshvaarta 14:47, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

chaliye, main bhi apna haath aajma looain. aksar kaha jaata hai ki anuvaad mein angreji ki hi jeet hoti hai kyonki yeh to anuvaadit shabd adhik lambe hote hain ya apraakrutik lagte hain. mere hisaab se aise shabd lein jo sunate hi sahi bhi, desi bhi aur saral bhi lagein. main yeh naheen kah raha ke mere anuvaadon mein aisi koi baat hai ya doosaron mein naheen hai :-)

  • spam = junk - raddi, kabaad
  • cleanup - safaai
  • spam cleanup - kabaad safaaya, raddi hataav
  • peacock terms ~ hyperbole - atishyoktiyaaain
  • weasel words - bhraamak shabd - yeh vaastav mein koi pramaan na dekar tathya ka bhram paida karte hain
  • dead end article - band lekh (dead-end alley se yeh aaya hai jise hindi mein "band gali" kehte hain, yaani is lekh mein pahuainch kar aap yahi ruk jaate hain - band jalasambhar ki tarah)
  • non-free content - amukt saamagri
  • copyright - mudraadhikaar
  • copyrighted content - mudradhikaarit saamagri
  • conflict of interest - arth sangharsh, svaarth sangharsh

--Hunnjazal (vaarta) 03:16, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

  • spam = spaim
  • cleanup(Also used as spam cleanup) = spaim ki safaai
  • weasel words = ghise-pite shabd
  • dead end(as in dead end articles) = supt lekh ya ekaaki lekh
  • non-free content = moolya saamagri ya kharcheeli saamagri
  • conflict of interest = hiton ka takaraav

Jsatpal (vaarta)

bhool sudhaar

hindi vikipeediya ke mukhya prushth par di samaachaar ke antargat, standard end puars ka ek samaachaar hai, jo kehta hai ki "standard end puars ne America ki rin saakh ko 70 saal ke itihaas mein pehli baar AAA+ se ghataakar AA+ kar diya." yeh galat hai standard end puars ke anusaar pehli shreni AAA thi naaki AAA+.[[2]], krupaya theek karein --raajeevamaas (vaarta) 17:25, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

us samaachaar ki kadi bhi vahaaain di gayi hai. kai aur akhbaaron mein bhi yahi khabar hai. ho sakta hai ki ve sabhi galat hon isliye maine filhaal samaachaar ko mukhaprushth se hata diya hai. aniruddh vaarta 21:25, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

bilkul ve sabhi akhbaar jo aapne dekhe ve galat the. iseeliye mainne aapko standard end puars ke aadhikaarik jaal prushth ko srot bana kar bheja tha. aapne bhi bajaae theek karne ke samaachaar hi kaat diya --raajeevamaas (vaarta) 16:01, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

kuchh nae samaachaar aa gaye the isliye use to hatna hi tha. samaachaar saaainche ki ek seema hai. is khabar ko 2011 prushth par aap chaahein to sudhaar dein. main poornat: aashvast hone tak aisa naheen karunga. haaain aapke sudhaarane se bhi mujhe koi aapatti naheen hogi. aniruddh vaarta 02:23, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

is javaab par to yahi kahunga, kamaal hain --raajeevamaas (vaarta) 16:42, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

about the daily article

SIR, I request you that i am getting wiki eng article daily, i want to convert it in hindi language. please convert this daily article in hindi regards jaspal garg email gargjaspal162@gmail.com

in lekhon ko hindi mein badalne mein yadi aap hindi vikipeediya ki madad karein to hamein behad khushi hogi. aniruddh vaarta 21:28, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

i want to convert my daily article of eng into hindi.. helpppppppppppppppppppppppppp pleaseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

Jaspal, please see this for help or click on the bright yellow bar on the top which says aapke liye nae sandesh hain.--siddhaarth ghai (vaarta) 10:44, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

shaili maargadarshak

saathiyon, saadar namaste! mainne "en:Wikipedia:Manual of Style" ka hindi mein "vikipeediya:shaili maargadarshak" par anuvaad aur hindeekaran (arthaat hindi ke liye uchit banaana) aarambh liya hai. krupaya ispar apni rai iske vaarta prushth par dein. chaupaal par na dein taaki yahaaain aur kaarya chal sake. dhanyavaad! --Hunnjazal (vaarta) 02:10, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

nirdeshaank

aajkal nirdeshaank dashamlav ke praaroop mein najar aa rahe hain jisse disha ka gyaan naheen hota. krupaya koi jaankaar ise theek kare.Dinesh smita (vaarta) 06:41, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

Coordinates? krupaya kisi lekh ka udahaaran dein. — Bill william comptonTalk 06:47, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
dekhein maalavan nirdeshaank daaen haath ke oopari kone par darshaaye gaye hain par inka praaroop dashamalaveeya hai.Dinesh smita (vaarta) 11:23, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
Coding sahi hai pata nahi kahaaain kami hai, English aur hindi ke mixture ki vajah se {{jnyaaanasandook Bhaarat ke kshetr}} bahut jatil hai, maaf keejiye mein koi madad nahi kar paaya.
daraasal yahaaain Bhaarat ke kshetron ke do saaainche hain jinka vilay karne ki aavashyakta hai, {{Infobox Indian Jurisdiction}} aur {{Infobox Indian Jurisdictions}}. is lekh mein {{Infobox Indian Jurisdiction}} ka prayog hua hai, arthaat {{jnyaaanasandook bhaarateeya kshetr}} ka, na ki {{jnyaaanasandook Bhaarat ke kshetr}} ka.--siddhaarth ghai (vaarta) 14:42, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
Yes check.svg partially done. mainne {{jnyaaanasandook Bhaarat ke kshetr}} ko haath lagaana uchit naheen samjha, lekin input ke star par (lekh maalavan mein) kuchh ekspreshan lagaakar aavashyak sudhaar kar diya hai. yadi koi sadasya chaahe to isi eksapreshan ko {{jnyaaanasandook Bhaarat ke kshetr}} mein yathochit tareeke se traansfr karke poore saaainche mein sudhaar kar sakta hai. (To verify correctness of expression, one may refer to corresponding English article en:Malvan.).-Hemant wikikoshvaarta 06:55, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
This template was copied from English Wikipedia. English Wikipedia has decided to delete it and replace it with the generic {{Infobox settlement}}. utkarsharaaj (vaarta) 08:04, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

gyaan kaise likha jaae

koi sadasya krupaya mujhe yeh bataae ki opera par gyaan kaise likha jaaega. pehle is akshar ko likhne ke liye shift J dabaakar N dabaana padta tha. rohit raavat (vaarta) 16:13, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

iske liye ab aap shift dabaakar G dabaaye--Mayur (talk•Email) 09:36, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
gyaan 


USE LIKE AS : GIYAN / GYAN --SADHURAM---------------------------- 08:14, 7 September 2011 (UTC)MAHENDRA NATH CHATURVEDI

sholaapur ya solaapur

Maharashtra ke is shahar ka naam hindi mein kya hai? Dinesh smita (vaarta) 16:04, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

samaachaar saaainche ke neeche ki patti

samaachaar saaainche ke neeche ki patti 'Bhaarat – vigyaan evam prau. – saahitya–sangeet – khel' ko hata dein. yeh 2010 mein mere hi aagrah par banaayi gayi thi. tab ye chaaron prushth sambandhit samaachaar pannon ki or le jaate the. parantu 2011 mein samaachaaron ko is tarah alag alag prushthon par sanjoya naheen gaya hai aur ye link abhi 2010 ke prushth ki or hi le jaate hain. isse behtar yeh hoga ki usapar 2009, 2010 evam 2011 varsh ka link bana dein jisse ki in varshon ke samaachaaron ko jaanane ko utsuk logon ko aasaani ho jaaya. aniruddh vaarta 21:02, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

bhaiya mere, samaachaar ke pehle hi pankti mein Lokpal aandolan: anna hajaare... ko jan Lokpal aandolan: anna hajaare... mein badal dein --raajeevamaas (vaarta) 15:45, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

hindi viki ek lakh ke paar

mitron hindi viki ke ek lakh paar hone par sab sadasyon ko badhaaiyaaain evam shubhakaamanaaen, yeh ek badi upalabdhi hai jiska shreya hindi viki ke samast puraane evam naye sakriya sadasyon ko jaata hai. rohit ji ko vishesh badhaai jinhone hindi viki ka 1 lakh vaaain lekh banaakar is lakshya praapti mein apna mahattvapoorn yogadaan diya--Mayur (talk•Email) 17:12, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

is upalabdhi ka shreya sabhi sadasyon ko jaata hai, jismein vah sadasya bhi sammilit hai jisne hindi viki par pehla lekh likha hoga. is badi upalabdhi ke liye meri or se bhi sabhi ko badhaaiyaaain aur shubhakaamanaaeain. mere vikshaar se hindi viki ke logo par bhi kuchh dinon ke liye 1,00,000 likhna chaahiye taaki sabko pata chal sake ki hindi viki bhi ek lakhiya ho gayi hai. iske saath hi mainne meta viki soochi par bhi badlaav kar diya hai haalaanki abhi soochi ko update hone mein samay lagega. rohit raavat (vaarta) 17:55, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
sabhi sadasyo ko bahut-bahut badhaaiyaaain. --mitul (vaarta) 19:50, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
saare saathiyon ko bahut badhaai. sanjog se aaj Eid bhi hai. sabhi ko mubaarak. --Hunnjazal (vaarta) 02:57, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
bahut-bahut badhaai ! ab hindi viki ke vikaas mein kis lakshya ki praapti par jor diya jaaya? krupaya apne vichaar rakhein. -- anunaad Singhvaarta 04:10, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
2012 ke ant tak dhaai lakh --Hunnjazal (vaarta) 04:50, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
sabhi ko ek lakh ki sankhya paar karne aur Eid ki dher saari shubhakaamanaayein. hunjaajl ka kathan "2012 ke ant tak dhaai lakh" bhi prerana srot bana rahega.Dinesh smita (vaarta) 06:34, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
uparokt kathanon par samarthan ke saath, lekin lekhakon ki naitikta aur lekhon ki gunavatta par dhyaan dena hoga -raajeevamaas (vaarta) 06:52, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
Rajiv ji, lekhon ki gunavatta to theek, par lekhakon ki naitikta se aapka kya abhipraaya hai? aur usaka viki se kya vaasta hai?Dinesh smita (vaarta) 07:25, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
lekhako ki naitikta se abhipraaya hai ki lekhak viki shaili ko apnaate hue, lokataantrik roop mein, yadi ve galat hai to use maanate hue apne lekho ko bhaashaai athva viki lekhan shaili ke anuroop theek kare athva apne samarthan mein saakshya prastut kar samasya par ek sakaaraatmak samvaad sathaapit karein. sabhi prashaasakon, prabanndhako aur vishesh suvidha praapt lekhakon ko apne adhikaaron ko sanyamit hokar prayog karna chaahiye, yahi naitikta hain --raajeevamaas (vaarta) 14:04, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
sabhi sadasyon ko bahut-bahut badhaaiya| mujhe lagta hai ki hindi viki ka social networking par prachaar-prasaar karna chaahiye, vaise bhi aaj kal sab kuchh markiting se hi to hota hai| Jsatpal (vaarta)
sabhi sadasyon va paathakon ko bahut bahut badhaai. hamein naye lekhon ke saath-saath peechhe mudkar bhi dekhte rahana hoga aur bane hue lekhon ki gunavatta uthaane va unhein adyatan rakhane par bhi poora dhyaan dena hoga. shubhakaamanaaon sahit. -Hemant wikikoshvaarta 09:41, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

yaiङakatan

krupaya koi mujhe 'yaiङakatan' ke sahi uchchaaran se avagat karaaye, yeh yainkatan hai ya yaankatan ya kuchh aur? mujhe yeh bhram isliye ho raha hai kyonki ise likhne ke liye ek aprachalit varn (vo bhi aadha) ka prayog kiya gaya hai jiska prayog hindi ke raajabhaasha banane aur uske maanakeekaran ke pashchaat band ho gaya hai aur aaj ise sirf nepaali aur sanskrut mein hi prayog kiya jaata hai. devanaagari bhale hi sabhi svaron ko likhne mein saksham ho par hindi ki apni prakruti hai aur hamein usaka sammaan karna chaahiye. is tarah ke aprachalit varnon ko prayog karne se na sirf ek bhram ki sthiti paida hoti hai varan bhaasha anaavashyak roop se klisht bhi ho jaati hai. meri sabhi sadasyon se vinti hai ki hindi ko uske aadhunik svaroop mein hi sveekaar karein aur jin varnon ko usane tyaag diya hai ( jaise ki puraane tareeke ka a, n, jh aadi jinhein main abhi likh paane mein aksham hooain) ko prayog na karein, saath hi anaavashyak roop se ऍ aur o ke prayog se bhi bachein. ek baat aur hindi mein sirf za, k, kh aur g ko hi nukte ke saath sveekaar kiya hai jiska prayog faarasi aur urdu ke kuchh shabdon ko likhne mein kiya jaata hai.Dinesh smita (vaarta) 07:25, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

dineshaji mainne is vishay par lekh banaaya tha. iska uchchaaran is prakaar samajhaana jo saral naheen hai lekin fir bhi bataata hooain. yai ka uchchaaran vaise hoga jaise angreji mein Japan ki mudra yen ko uchchaarit karte hain. ham log likhne ko hindi mein yen likhte hain lekin yen aur yain mein antar hai. aap pain, pan, aur pen ko uchchaarit kariye. pain ko pen, pan ko pain, aur pen ko pain uchcharit kiya jaaega. mujhe bhi is baat ka gyaan naheen tha lekin Hunnzalji dvaara mujhe is baare mein avagat karaaya gaya tha. yadi aapko yaiङakatan ke uchchaaran ko lekar fir bhi sandeh hai to aap Google anuvaad mein jaakar iska uchchaaran jaan sakte hain. aur rahi baat ङ ka upayog karne ki to mainne yeh isliye likha taaki isse uchchaaran mein bhram na ho. ab yadi main yaiङakatan ke sthaan par yainkatan likhta to yeh aur bhi adhik samajh naheen aata. aur ङ likhna vyaakarink drushti se poornataya sahi hai. yadi yaiङakatan ko yainkatan likha jaata to yeh vyaakarink roop se poornataya galat hota. bhale hi ye akshar ab hindi mein upayog mein na ho lekin bahut se aise sthaan hain jahaaain par in shabdon ke bina kaam naheen chal sakta. ek aisa hi udaaharan song hai. is shabd ko hindi mein kaise likheinge? sauङag ya song. donon ka uchchaaran bhinn hai. mere vichaar se ham logon ko hindi vikipeediya par ek lekh is baare mein banaana chaahiye jispar ङ, nya, ऍ, o ityaadi jaise shabdon ka uchchaaran udaaharan sahit samajhaaya gaya ho. aur jahaaain par aise shabd upayog kiye jaaeain vahaaain par us lekh ka sandarbh de diya jaae. aisi meri rai thi. rohit raavat (vaarta) 17:09, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
rohit ji aapki baat ho sakta hai sahi ho par yadi aapke hisaab se hi hindi ka vikaas hota to tadbhav shabd kabhi astitv mein hi naheen aate kyonki devanaagari to sabhi svaron ko likh paane mein saksham hai to shabdon ko sthaaneeya logon ke anusaar dhalane ki kya aavashyakta thi? maine pehle bhi likha tha aur aaj fir likh raha hooain ki devanaagari lipi aur hindi bhaasha ek hi cheej naheen hai, devanaagari sirf bhaasha ko likhne ka ek saadhan hai jise roman ya fir faarasi lipi mein bhi likha jaata hai. isliye meri aapse aur hunjaajl donon se praarthana hai ki yadi aapko kisi shabd ka sahi uchchaaran dena hi hai to use koshthak mein de sakte hain aur shabdon ko aisa rakhe jo amooman sabhi log prayog karte hain ya unhein iske prayog mein aasaani ho. saath hi ek baat aur aap yeh tark de sakte hain ki hindi mein jo likha jaata hai vahi padha jaata hai, lekin yeh tathya devanaagari par laagoo hota hai hindi par naheen. Dinesh smita (vaarta) 03:53, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
dinesh ji, aapki baat meri samajh mein I aur aapka main aadar karta hooain. lekin asahamat hooain. mera drushtikon yeh hai: vah svar jinhein hindeebhaashi kah sakane mein samarth hain, jismein ऍ bilkul shaamil hain, unhein dhvanaatmak paddati se likha jaana chaahiye. aur aisa hindi ka rivaaj bhi raha hai varana John (john) jaise shabd na hote. agar "john ki jaan" likhna chaahe to kaise likhein - "John ki jaan" ya "jaan ki jaan"? dhvanaatmak lipi hote hue gair-dhvanaatmak prayog mein likhkar asamanjas paida karna ya uchchaaran glat karna theek naheen lagta.
ham jaisa hindi jnyaaanakosh banaane mein jute hain, vaisa jnyaaanakosh hindi ke 800 saal ke itihaas mein kabhi naheen bana. ham aisi cheejein likh rahein hain jo hindi mein kabhi naheen likhi gayi. ab agar ham kisi shabd ko theek vaisa likh sakte hain jaise usaka uchchaaran hai to kyon na likhein? hindeebhaashiyon ko ek atyant shaktishaali varnamaala dharohar mein mili hai. usaka prayog na karna usaka apamaan-sa prateet hota hai. vaastav mein kuchh svar aise hain jinhein hindeebhaashi bolne mein aksham hain ya fir sahasvaaniki aadatein unhein ek tarah ke uchchaaran ke liye majaboor kar deti hain. hindeebhaashi 'l' naheen bol paate. hindeebhaashi "v" aur "w" ka antar karte hain lekin apni marji se naheen karte. "wow" aur "vow" donon "vaao" ban jaate hain jabki angrejeebhaashi inka kaafi alag uchchaaran karte hain. chaliye ve sthitiyaan samajh bhi aati hain. lekin agar hindeebhaashi kuchh kehne mein saksham hain aur unki lipi mein bhi usako darshaane ki kaabaliyt hai to khul ke likhna chaahiye aur yahi pratha hai. varana in aksharon ka aavishkaar hi kyon hota? agar donon pair salaamat hain to langada ke kyon chalein? unhein tod-marod karne deejiye jinki lipiyaaain kamzor hain. angrejeebhaashi to is chakkar mein meelon chale hain. agar aap angreji mein Mathura ko likha hua dekhein to "mathura" hota hai. bhala kyon? aapke tarkaanusaar aisa naheen hona chaahiye kyonki angreji mein "t", "tha​", "t" aur "th" mein koi antar naheen hai (sivaaya sahasvaaniki ko chhodkar). "mattura" likhna chaahiye, jaisa ki puraana rivaaj tha. hantar ityaadi ne jor lagaakar roman lipi ko naagari tak laane ki koshish curry (lekin poori tarah safal na hue). Japani mein "l" aur "r" mein antar naheen hota, jis se bahut se Japani log "Delhi" ko "dirri" kehte hain. fir bhi vah sahi uchchaaran ki koshish karte hain. agar ham bahut si ahindi cheejon ko hindi mein likh rahein hain to sahi uchchaaran denein mein kya aapatti hai? yahi hindeebhaashiyon ke hit mein hai. main rohit ji se sahamat hooain ki kisi lekh mein uchchaaran ki yeh baate spasht kar deni chaahiye - mere vichaar mein antarraashtreeya dhvanyaatmak varnamaala ka lekh achha rahega. ya fir devanaagari ka. sambandhit lekhon ke bheetar bhi agar uchchaaran sahaayata daali jaae to munaasib hai. jahaaain tadbhav ya prachalit videshaj ban chuke hain vah prathaanusaar rahane chaahiye. varana to jangalaraaj ho jaaega jismein maanakata ka koi matlab hi naheen banega. bahut se hindeebhaashi "shoshan" ko "sosan" kehte hain. vaastav mein kai kshetron mein yahi paaramparik tadbhav hai. adhiktar hindeebhaashi "n" ki jagah "na" bolte hain (kaaran-kaaran, keetaanu-kitaanu). aur bhi aisi bahut si cheejein hain. ham bhi aisa likhne lage to manamaani hogi. ham aisa naheen karte kyonki ab ham us yug mein pahuainch gaye hain jahaaain tadbhav banane ki gati bahut dheemi ho gayi hai aur bhaashaaoain mein maanakata ki reet hai. angreji ke saath bhi yahi hua tha. aap yeh dekhiye ke rohit ji agar kuchh aisa likh rahein hain ki kisi gaaainv mein baitha koi paathak use padhkar kisi bilkul ajnabi jagah ka naam aise bolega jaise us sthaan ke nivaasi bolte hain to yeh kya kamaal ki cheej hai. ise chhoti baat na samajhein. main kisi aur anya bhaasha ko naheen jaanta jismein aisi shakti ho. hajaaron saal ki bhaasha-soch aur anusandhaan ke baad yeh lipi bani hai. maamooli cheej naheen hai. (meri praarthana hai ki aap meri kisi kahi baat ko anyatha na lein - mujhe yeh siddhaant pyaare hain, lekin aapki mitrata se adhik naheen). --Hunnjazal (vaarta) 05:08, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

hindi viki deeveedi pariyojana

is pariyojana ke antargat kin lekhon ya kis prakaar ke lekhon ko rakha ja raha hai? yaani ki is pariyojana mein rakhe jaane ke liye kisi lekh ya prushth ko kin maanakon ko poora karna hota hai? rohit raavat (vaarta) 17:08, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

rohit ji is pariyojana mein apni ruchi dikhaane hetu dhanyavaad, is pariyojana mein aap apne ya kisi ke bhi un lekhon ko rakh sakte hai jo aaj ka aalekh ki samast aavashyakataaon ko santusht karte hai, bas yeh dhyaan rakhein ki lekh mein koi laal kadi na ho. baaki anya aavashyakataaen aap yahaan dekh sakte hai. --Mayur (talk•Email) 18:51, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

kuchh prashn

1. shreni kaise banaai jaati hai?

2. kaanoon se sambandhit lekho me infobox kaise daala jaae? kya har vishay ke liye alag infobox paribhaashit karna padta hai?

3. kisi lekh ka sheershak kaise edit kiya jaata hai? kya ye adhikaar sirf moderators ko hai? Jsatpal (vaarta)

1. shreni kaise banaai jaati hai? uttar:- shreni banaane ke liye jis prushth par shreni banaani hai usamein usase oopar ki shreni daal dein. udaaharan ke liye maan leejiye aapne hindi naamak lekh mein ek shreni daali hai Bhaarat ki bhaashaaeain to Bhaarat ki bhaashaaeain naamak prushth par aap dakshin Asia ki bhaashaaeain naam ki shreni rakh rakate hain. fir dakshin Asia ki bhaashaaeain naamak shreni mein aap Asia ki bhaashaaeain naamak shreni daal sakte hain. is prakaar shreniyon mein us shreni se ek star oopar ki shreni daalani chaahiye usase neeche ki naheen. iske atirikt jis prushth par shreni bana rahein hain us prushth par usi naam ki shreni na daalein. jaise Bhaarat ki bhaashaaeain naamak shreni mein Bhaarat ki bhaashaaeain naamak shreni na daalein.

2. kaanoon se sambandhit lekho me infobox kaise daala jaae? kya har vishay ke liye alag infobox paribhaashit karna padta hai? uttar:- kaanoon ya kisi bhi vishay se sambandhit lekhon mein infobox daalne ke liye infobox banaana aavashyak hai. ya to aap ise swayam banaaeain aur yadi yeh pehle se upalabdh hai to ise uchit lekh mein daal dein. haaain aapko har baar infobox lagaane par us lekh ya prushth ki jaankaari us infobox mein bharani hoti hai. udaaharan ke liye yadi vyakti jaankaari naam ka koi infobox hai to ismein naam, pata, aayu, vyavasaaya ityaadi jaankaari maaaingi jaaegi. lekin pratyek vyakti ke liye jaankaari to aapko bharani padegi hi.

3. kisi lekh ka sheershak kaise edit kiya jaata hai? kya ye adhikaar sirf moderators ko hai? uttar:- kisi lekh ke sheershak ko sampaadit karne ke liye shaayad visheshaadhikaar hona chaahiye. is baare mein adhik jaankaari ke liye vikipeediya:visheshaadhikaar nivedan par jaaeain.

aasha karta hooain ki aapko aapke prashnon ke uttar mil gaye honge. fir bhi yadi koi sanshaya hai to aap bina sankoch poochh sakte hain. rohit raavat (vaarta) 13:05, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

rohit ji, aapke uttar kuchh mushkil se lage, at: main kuchh aasaan uttar dene ki koshish karooainga.

1. shreni kaise banaai jaae?

uttar: shreni banaana lekh banaane ke saamaan hi hota hai, bas naam mein pehle shreni: hona chaahiye. udaaharan: shreni:xyz yadi banaai jaae to ek shreni hogi. bas aise hi jo shreni banaani hai, uske prushth par jaaeain, us shreni ke baare mein thoda sa likh dein aur sahej dein. isse shreni ban jaaegi.

ab savaal aaega pannon ko shreni mein daalne ka. to iska uttar hai ki kisi bhi panne par jaaeain aur uske ant mein(sabse neeche) [[shreni:xyz]] likh dein. isse veh prushth shreni:xyz mein aa jaaega.

shreni banaate samay bas yeh dhyaan rakhein ki shreni aisi hi banaai jaani chaahiye jismein kuchh lekh ho sakein. keval ek lekh ke liye shreni banaana tarkaheen hai. shreni banaane ka uddeshya hai ki padhne wala shreniyon ke maadhyam se sambandhit lekh khoj sake.

2. kaanoon se sambandhit lekho me infobox kaise daala jaae? kya har vishay ke liye alag infobox paribhaashit karna padta hai?

uttar:infobox paribhaashit karna aur prayog karna do alag baatein hain. paribhaashit karne ke liye aapke paas wikisyntax ka achha gyaan hona chaahiye. upayog to koi bhi kar sakta hai. kisi bhi lekh mein infobox daalne ke liye keval prayog karna hota hai, paribhaashit naheen. aap kaanoon sambandhi anya lekhon mein dekh lein, yadi mil jaata hai to bahut achha, naheen to ho sakta hai abhi kaanoon ke liye infobox paribhaashit na ho. yadi aisa hai to kisi wikisyntax ke jaankaar ko yeh banaana padega. yadi aapko infobox mil jaata hai to aapko uske prayog ke liye keval parameters ki values badalani hongi. aur aapka kaam ho jaaega.

3. kisi lekh ka sheershak kaise edit kiya jaata hai? kya ye adhikaar sirf moderators ko hai?

uttar:kisi lekh ke sheershak ko edit karne ka seedha arth hua usaka naam badalna. iska matlab hai ki yadi aap kisi lekh ka sheershak badalna chaahate hain to aapko use move karna hoga, arthaat sthaanaantarit karna hoga. aisa karne ke liye aap lekh ke oopar "itihaas dekhein" jahaaain likha hota hai, uske saath ke star ki daahini or ki arrow par jaaeain. isse menoo khulega jismein "sthaanaantaran karein" naamak option hoga(yahi ek option hoga). is klik karein, naya naam daalein aur aapka kaam ho gaya.

kuchh baatein jo dhyaan rakhein:

  • yeh kaarya tabhi karna chaahiye jab abhi ke naam mein kuchh gadbadi ho.
  • yeh karne ke baad puraane naam ke punarnirdeshan jaaainch lein aur unhein #REDIRECT [[puraana naam]] se badalkar #REDIRECT [[naya naam]] kar dein. isse dugana punarnirdeshan theek ho jaaega, jo aisa kare bina kaam naheen karta hai.

raha savaal is adhikaar ka, to sthaanaantaran karne ka adhikaar sabhi svat: sthaapit sadasyon ke paas hai, aapke paas bhi. aur hindi vikipeediya par moderators naam ka koi samooh naheen hai. adhikaar vaale samoohon aur unke adhikaaron ke gyaan hetu aap vishesh:ListGroupRights dekh sakte hain.--siddhaarth ghai (vaarta) 17:13, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

rohit ji, aur siddhaarth ji aap donon ka bahut shukriya

siddhaarth ji jaisa aapne kaha ki shreni banaane ke liye bas aage shreni: likhna hota hai mainne vaisa hi kiya tha magar mainne koi content naheen daala shaayad isliye prushth bana naheen|

aur kya ye sambhav hai ki angreji viki se infobox le kar use hindi me anuvaad kar hindi viki ka infobox paribhaashit kiya ja sakta hai? kyonki mujhe lagta hai ki wikisyntax angreji aur hindi viki par ek jaisa hi kaam karta hoga|Jsatpal (vaarta)

namaskaar satapaal ji, jahaaain tak mujhe pata hai yadi khaali panna banaane ki koshish kareinge to koi bhi panna naheen banega. iseeliye achha hota hai ki us shreni ke baare mein ek line likh dein jaise: "is shreni mein svatantr Bhaarat ke xyz adhiniyam aate hain." isse paathak ko shreni panna kholne par yeh bhi saaf pata chal jaaega ki veh jo dhoondh raha hai, use us shreni mein milega bhi ya naheen.
jahaaain tak rahi infobox ki baat, to haaain yeh sambhav hai ki angreji vikipeediya se use hindi vikipeediya par laaya jaae, aur kai jagah aisa kiya bhi gaya hai. aapka yeh sochana bhi theek hai ki wikisyntax ek hi hota hai. yeh angreji bhaasha mein likha hai, aur syntax angreji mein hi rahata hai. parantu saaainche mein dikhne vaale content ka anuvaad kiya ja sakta hai. kyonki infobox mein kai parameters ka prayog hota hai, to un parameters ke naam bhi hindi mein karne honge, aur saath hi usamein dikhaai dene wala text bhi anoodit karna hoga. yadi aap yeh kaarya karne ki koshish karna chaahate hain to angreji vikipeediya se saaaincha kaupi karein aur use apne userspace mein kisi subpage par daal lein. fir ek aur subpage bana kar usaka prayog test kar sakte hain. jab anuvaad sampoorn ho jaae to use mainspace mein daal dein. bas is baat ka dhyaan rakhein ki angreji vikipeediya se copy karte samay edit summary mein aap mool saaainche ka permanent link avashya dein. isse creative commons mein jo attribution ki aavashyakta hoti hai, vah poori ho jaaegi. permanent link
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:xyz&oldid=123456789
roop ka hoga.--siddhaarth ghai (vaarta) 07:32, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

itna vistaar se samajhaane ke liye shukriya siddhaarth ji| ab main svaya prayaas karke dekh sakta hu ki infobox kaise banta hai| Jsatpal (vaarta)

varta.tv

aane vaale 20 saal baad manushya ki aayu 1000 varsh ho sakti hai , iska daava kiya hai Britain ke prasidhya vaigyaanik da aabare di gre ne inka poora vishvaas hai, ki unke hi jeevanakaal mein doctoron ke paas ve sabhi saadhan maujood honge jinse ve budhaape ka ilaaj kar aage dekhe www.varta.tv

is baat ka chaupaal se kya sambandh hai? rohit raavat (vaarta) 13:06, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

shikshak diwas se sambandhit samaachaar

hindi vikipeediya par samaachaaron ko adyatan karne ke baare mein chintan ki aavashyakta hain. 30 taareekh se aaj tak lagta hai ki naato Bhaarat ganaraajya mein aur na hi akhil vishv mein kuchh aisa ghatit huva hai jiska jikr samaachaaro mein kiya gaya hain. samaachaaron ko adyatan karne vaalon se vinmr vinti hai ki kal shikshak diwas hai, at: aap sarvapalli Radhakrishnan se sambandhit ek samaachaar avashya hindi vikipeediya ke samaachaar varg mein daale. jaankaari ke liye bata doo ki unka janm 5 sitmbar 1888 ko huva tha, ve Bhaarat ke pratham up-raashtrapati aur dviteeya raashtrapati the. unke janm diwas ko shikshak diwas ke roop mein manaaya jaata hai --raajeevamaas (vaarta) 14:39, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

aap jise samaachaar saaainche mein dekhna chaahate hain vah aaj ka din sheershak saaainche ke liye upayukt hai. hindi vikiya par abhi din vishesh ka mahatva pradarshit karne wala saaaincha mukhaprushth ka ang naheen bana hai. mayoor ji ne bataaya tha ki aasheesh ji nae mukhaprushth par kaam kar rahe hain. aniruddh vaarta 07:25, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

doosari baat vikiya ke samaachaar saaainche ko gali akhbaar ka pehla panna aur use adyatit karne vaalon ko khabariya channelon ka samvaadadaata maanane ke bhram se bachiye. Bhaarat aur duniya mein anekon ghatnaaen ya kahein to jyaadaatar durghatanaaen hui hain. Japan mein toofaan mein, deharaadoon mein durghatana mein Pakistan mein bam visfot mein, libiya mein yuddh mein sainkadon logon ki mrutyu hui hai. tennis, daud, cricket, badminton, baudigaard, bol, share baajaar, sansad visheshaadhikaar hanan, lokaayukt CBI, anna team, aadi se judi khabarein bhi lagaataar aa rahi hai. itna isliye likh raha hooain taaki aapko itni samajh aa jaaya ki vikiya ke mukhaprushth ke saaainchon mein khabaron ke lagaane ke peechhe ek khaas kism ka chayan vivek kaaryasheel hai jo vikiya ke stareekaran ke liye anivaarya hai. dainik samaachaaron ke prati adhik aakarshan ho to vikiya ka bandhu prakalp viki samaachaar iske liye upayukt sthal hai. aniruddh vaarta 07:38, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

mai tabhi lekhakon ki naitikta ki baat karta hoon. aapke hi anusaar "din vishesh ka mahatva pradarshit karne wala saaaincha mukhaprushth ka ang naheen bana hai" aur "mukhaprushth par kaam kar rahe hain" to bhaiya samaachaar par is paavan avsar ko daalne mein kya mushkil thi, kal aap Bhaarat ke savatantrata diwas ko gali akhbaar ka pehle panne ka samaachaar kaheinge. is avsar par hindi vikipeediya ka bhi sammaan apne Bhaarat desh ke bhootapoorv up-raashtrapati aur raashtrapati ke liye banaata tha ki nahi. shikshak diwas ki mahatvata Bhaarat jaise desh mein kya hai, aisa lagta hai ki samaachaar ko adyatit karne vaale nahi jaante. "khaas kism ka chayan vivek"??? yeh sab dekhkar du:kh hota hai, yeh saabit hai ki America se sambandhit samaachaar galat tha yahi naheen anna ke aandolan ko bajaae "jan Lokpal bill" kehne ke Lokpal bill se sambodhit kiya jaata hain. "vikiya ka bandhu prakalp" ka upaae bata kar apni karni ko aap theek nahi saabit kar sakte, kyoki ham log hindi vikipeediya par aate hai yeh aapko samajhna hoga. aap shikshak diwas ko "dainik samaachaaron ke prati adhik aakarshan" bata kar apne hi guruon ka apamaan kar rahe hain. aakhir ham bhi to yahaaain gyaan ka hi prasaar ka rahe hai haan ye baat alag hai ki lekhan ke alaava yahaan baaboogiri adhik ho rahi hain.--raajeevamaas (vaarta) 14:25, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

vikipeediya ke mukhaprushth par hindi viki ka khoj link

priya mitron hindi viki ke 1 lakh paar karte hi hai yeh vikipeediya ke mukhaprushth par khoj link evam 1 lakh se adhik lekhon ke vikis ki shreni mein aa gayi hai jo ek achhi upalabdhi hai. isse poorv hindi viki ko kai varsh pehle mukh prushth se lekhon ki kharaab gunavatta ki vajah se hata diya gaya tha parantu ab ise vahaan pun: shaamil kar liya gaya hai.--Mayur (talk•Email) 16:24, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

yeh atyant khushi ki baat hai. hindi viki ek lakh ke paar chali gayi hai, lekin yeh mahaan upalabdhi bahut kam logon ko pata hai. vishesh roop se hindi ke samaachaar patron ki yeh jimmedaari banti hai ki iske baare mein logon ko bataaeain, sampaadakeeya likhein, logon ko iske mahatva ke baare mein jaagruk karein. ham bhi yathaashakti iska prachaar-prasaar karein. duniya mein hindi ke prayokta koi 50 karod hain. yadi inmein ek vyakti prati hajaar bhi hindi viki se jude to paaainch lakh ki sankhya aati hai. (abhi ham lagbhag pachaas hajaar sadasya sankhya par hain; arthaat lagbhag 1 sadasya prati 10 hajaar hindeebhaashi) yadi ham samuchit prachaar-prasaar se yeh haasil kar lein to hindi viki sada pehle sthaan par rahegi. ismein lekhon ki sankhya karodon mein hogi. lekhon ki gunavatta sarvotkrusht hogi. -- anunaad Singhvaarta 04:32, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
sabse pehle to main is link padonnati par badhaai deta hooain. ...anunaad ji ki baat bilkul sahi hai. lekin dikkat yeh hai ki in pachaas hajaar mein se kitne sadasyon ne ek naya lekh bhi banaaya hoga? yadi pratyek aisa vyakti do lekh bhi banaata to hindi viki ko ekalakhiya hone ke liye itne din intajaar naheen karna padta (yeh sahi hai ki naya lekh banaana hi sabkuchh naheen hai, lekin) bilkul bhi naya lekh na banaane ya ऍdit hi na karne vaale sadasya vaastav mein upalabdhi naheen hain, mujhe lagta hai ki jyaadaatar aise log, usi tarah apna ऍkaaunt banaate hain, jaise koi nausikhiya vyakti Yahoo aur jeemel par ऍkaaunt banaakar bhool jaata hai. khair us maamale mein ham kya kar sakte hain. lekin yeh sahi hai ki sadasya sankhya badhne se unamein se sakriya sadasyon ki sankhya bhi usi anupaat mein badhti hai. yahi ek raahat ki baat hai. -Hemant wikikoshvaarta 04:47, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

main bhi anunaad Singh ji ki baaton se 100% sahamat hooain. darasal Bhaarat ke samaachaar patron ko pashchim ke samaachaar patron ki baraabari par aane mein bahut samay lagega bhale hi ye log jitni marji nakal kar lein. mainne bhi ek baat par gaur kiya hai ki Bhaarat mein videshi cheejon ko lekar to itna gajab ka aakarshan hai lekin svadesh ki upalabdhiyaaain aise upekshit kar di jaati hain jaise inka koi mahatva hi na ho. America aur anya pashchimi deshon mein ve log apne-apne bhaasha vikipeediya sanskaranon ke baare mein nirntar lekh chhaapate rahate hain, logon ko jaagaruk banaate rahate hain. lekin yahaaain ek bhi akhbaar ki itni himmat naheen