vikipeediya:chaupaal/puraalekh 18

Wiktionary Hover: a JavaScript on double-click

namaste, Wikinews proposes a script to display the Wiktionary definition in a small board, when one double-click on a word. It's already been installed in at least 15 sister projects.

Before voting to install it here, I just invite you to test it individually on the site by copying my sadasya:JackPotte/monobook.js into yours.

To add it here, we should vote for an administrator, who in:

  1. MediaWiki:Gadget-dictionaryLookupHover.js, copies without the guillemets : "importScriptURI('http://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=MediaWiki:Gadget-dictionaryLookupHover.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript');"
  2. MediaWiki:Gadgets-definition, adds "* dictionaryLookupHover|dictionaryLookupHover.js"
  3. MediaWiki:Gadget-dictionaryLookupHover, describes the gadget.

JackPotte 12:46, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

As a sysop of Marathi and Hindi wiktionary I would welcome such a technology. As you said making it operational would not be a defficult thing , before that I would like to bring certain points to attention of Hind Wikipedians that first of all is presently Hindi Wiktionary pages are more of lists (ofcourse Marathi wiktionary still does not have that too) and lot of pages supported by non hindi bot so until we have atleast a good vocabulory how much real benefit we do get out of this.Secondly I want Hindi wikipedians with java background get the proposed script tested for security issues and last but not least I would request a consensus from Hindi languge wikipedians before we implement this.Can some one help me, translate proposal and reply in Hindi for further discussion to take place in Hindi Languge , please. (And why some of the above links are showing red? any guesses can some one help them to be corrected)

Thanks and Regards

Mahitgar 14:55, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi. I'm the maintainer of the gadget in question. You are correct that if the Hindi wiktionary is less developed, the gadget will be less beneficial. However it will still be somewhat beneficial, and would perhaps encourage people to fill in the gaps in the Hindi Wiktionary's coverage. The red links above are links not yet created. (you have to copy apropriate pages to these red links). As for security review - I would welcome that. Well there are no issues currently (There was a minor issue in an earlier version, that if you could find an exploit in mediawiki, you could potentially get an XSS in the script. thats now fixed, and it was not really an issue to begin with, as you would first have to find an issue in mediawiki to abuse it. Other than that there have been no security issues found so far in the scripts history), I am far from perfect, and would love if someone else to checks it. Just as a note, you'd want someone familiar with Javascript, not java to review it (java and javascript are very different from each other). Hope that answers your question, if you have any concerns, please don't hesistate to ask me. Bawolff 20:09, 3 December 2009 (UTC)


tankan mein pareshaani

pichhle do teen din se mujhe taaiping mein bahut pareshaani ho rahi hai shabd apne aap hi kabhi box ya ajeeb aakaar le rahe hain, iska kya kaaran hai? aur iska samaadhaan kaun karega?

dinesh 10:05, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

kaise hai dinesh,
aapko bataana chaahooainga ki aisi dikkat aane ka matlab ho sakta hai ki aap se likhne mein kahi koi galati ho rahi ho, kya aapne apna braaujr aadi to naheen badla? kher yeh kar ke dekhe, vikipeediya ke hindi mein likhne vaale tool ka istemaal karte samay jagah chhodne ke liye (do laainon ke beech mein) <br> ka prayog kare. kai baar line ki shuruaat mein space chhod dene se poori line ek box ka aakar le leti hai. yeh bhi jaache. aur agar dikkat door naheen hoti hai to krupaya mujhe galat bane lekho ke link de mein unka code dekhoonga.
dhanyavaad --siddhaarth gaud vaarta 13:27, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

nirvaachit chitr naamaankan

sabhi sadasyon evam aagantukon se nivedan hai ki ve varsh 2010 ke liye nirvaachit chitr sujhaayein. iske liye vikipeediya vaarta:pramukh chitr pratyaashi par jaayein. haan, pratyek chitr ke liye uske sang 1-2 parichay vaakya aavashyak hain, jismein kuchh link bhi diye hon to behtar hoga. haan ek link avashya us prushth ka ho jahaan chitr prayog hua ho. vaise koi sundar va upayukt chitr kisi lekh ke bina bhi ho to sujha sakte hain, prayaas kiya jaayega, ki use kisi lekh mein samaavisht kar sakein.

chitr sujhaane ke liye nimn praaroop prayog karein to behtar hoga:

{{chitr puraalekh|PalaceOfWestminsterAtNight.jpg|[[rajdhani]], [[London]] mein [[vestaminstar]] ke mahal mein [[England]] ka [[sansad bhavan]] sthit hai. }}{{-}}
yaani:
{{chitr puraalekh|chitr ka naam|parichay vaakya}}{{-}}

PalaceOfWestminsterAtNight.jpg

rajdhani, London mein vestaminstar ke mahal mein England ka sansad bhavan sthit hai.

--pr:aasheesh bhatanaagar vaarta 06:23, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

chitr naamaankan ki jatil prakriya ko itni sundarata se samajhaane ke liye sabhi sadasyon ki taraf se bahut-bahut dhanyavaad aasheesh ji. --Munita Prasadvaarta 14:16, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

dhanyavaad ka punardhanyavaad, kintu sujhaav to aaye naheen. itne din baad bhi maatr 2 sujhaav hi hain. haan sadasya sujhaav saaaincha:pramukh chitr pratyaashi /pratyaashi par bhi de sakte hain. is prakaar sujhaav mukhya pratyaashi prushth par dikheinge.--pr:aasheesh bhatanaagar vaarta 03:10, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

krupaya dhyaan dein

varshon se soe ek prabandhak himaanshu ji achaanak jaagrut hue hain aur unhonne mukhaprushth ke samaachaaron ko laal kadiyon se bhar diya hai. kya yeh uchit hai? ya isko theek kiya jaana chaahiye?--suruchi 11:57, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

kya hi achha ho agar himaanshu ji yeh nirantar kar sakein. koi kadi to banaae. rang koi aur chadha leinge. vikiya ko nirantar samaachaaron mein shaamil aitihaasik ghatnaaon par najar rakhane vaale prabandhak ki sakht jaroorat hai. aasheesh aur munita ji ke alaava shesh prabandhakon mein se koi ya himaanshu ji yeh aavashyakta poori kar sakein to nissandeh prashansa ke hakdaar honge.

aniruddh vaarta 17:09, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Bhagwan aisi jaagruti sabhi prabandhakon ko de. aniruddh ji ki baat ka poorn samarthan karoonga. suruchi ji ki chinta bhi sahi hi hai, kintu prabandhak mahodaya ki bhaasha aur kantent ko dekhte hue va poorv kaaryavrutt ke maddenajr ye kaarya saraahaneeya hi kahalaayega. vaise un laal kadiyon ko poornima ji ne bahut chaturaai se chhipa kar samaachaar pradarshit kar diye.--pr:aasheesh bhatanaagar vaarta 17:51, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

utkrusht saamagri se yukt hindi site

yaatra salaah
-- anunaad Singhvaarta 11:39, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

vikipeediya par vartani sudhaar hetu plagain (baut)

mitron, vikipeediya par pai jaane waali kuchh saamaanya vartani sudhaaron ko door karne ke liye koi plagain ya baut type hai athva banaaya ja sakta hai jo ki kisi shabd vishesh ki galat vartani ko sahi vartani se riples kar de. Find and replace ki tarah kaam kare. udaaharan viki par sabhi jagah maujood indiya ko indiya se riples kar de, kunji ko kunyaji se, shrrungaar ko shrungaar se riples kar de aadi.

yadi aisa baut banaaya ja sake to galat shabdon ki sarvasammati se ek soochi banaakar prabandhak baut ko us soochi par run kar dein. --ePandit 04:10, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Hurry Up German Wikipedia

I'm eagerly waiting for German wiki to cross 1 million mark. They have reached 994,500 mark already. Hurry up de wiki. keep it up di na...z --Saar 09:10, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

prabandhak log dhyaan dein

fir se kai lekhon ki puraani saamagri ko Google anuvaad se srujit hindi saamagri se daba diya gaya hai. kuchh naye sadasya yeh kaam kar rahe hain. shaayad in sadasyon ko isse sambandhit samyak neeti ka gyaan naheen hai. prabandhak log is par uchit kaaryavaahi karein. -- anunaad Singhvaarta 06:25, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

main aapki chinta ka samarthan karti hooain. aap krupaya dhyaan aakarshit keejiye jisse ki isko roka ja sake. main jahaaain bhi aisa dekhti hooain uchit kaaryavaahi karti hi hooain.--Munita Prasadvaarta 12:02, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

vartani sambandhit

jin shabdon mein yadi kahi par d aata hai aur us shabd mein aadha na ki dhvani uchchaarit hoti hai un shabdon mein bindi na lagaakar n prayukt kiya jaata hai. yeh maanak vartani hai. jaise kuchh shabd hain:

  • paandav naaki paandav ya paandav
  • uttaraakhand naaki uttaraakhand ya uttaraakhand
  • dand naaki dand ya dand
  • karmakaand naaki karmakaand ya karmakaand
  • pind naaki pind ya pind
  • thand naaki thand ya thand ityaadi

isliye vartamaan aur nae sadasyon se nivedan hai ki is maanak ka dhyaan rakhein aur vartani dosh ko sudhaarane ka prayaas karein. dhanyavaad. rohit raavat 14:13, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

ji haaain, bilkul theek kah rahe hai aap --- par aapne jo "nivedan hai ki is maanak ka" mein ki ka prayog kiya hai vahaaain ki hona chaahiye ----- kya aap ise jaante hain ? --122.177.205.81 15:33, 19 December 2009 (UTC)


devanaagari ke maanakeekaran ke liye Bhaarat sarkaar ke shiksha mantraalaya ki 1963 mein gathit vartani samiti ki mahatvapoorn aur sarvamaanya sanstutiyon mein shaamil sambandhit niyam-

jahaaain kisi varg ke panchamaakshar ke baad usi varg ka koi varn ho vahaaain anusvaar ka hi prayog kiya jaaya. jaise- ganga, ant, vandana, sampaadak aadi. aniruddh vaarta 17:52, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

blog

is shabd ki hindi hai chittha isliye mere vichaar mein is lekh ka naam parivrtit karke chittha rakh dena chaahiye ya is prakaar bhi likh sakte hain chittha(blog). jaisi sarvasammati ho. rohit raavat 14:17, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

ha bhaa‌aai, chittha ko badal keejiye - taiksavaala 17:21, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

taxmanji "badal keejiye" naheen "badal deejiye".--Yogendra.rai 18:45, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

uttar pradesh hindi sansthaan

--gunjan varmasandesh 09:52, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Today's featured article

Like everything else in India, this wikipedia has also been politicized (and thats why India can't progress and so the Hindi wikipedia). Why do I think so? Because in Today's featured articles only a few admins' articles are being published but no interest is being shown to feature members' articles. So from now onwards I'll stop editing Hindi wikipedia articles and I'll be editing articles on either En wiki or Simple En wiki, because they people are far better than you bloody Indians. What is the reson I don't know but you people always take pride in politicizing everything. Please be more open and receptive to members' articles too because one by one everyone will leave this wiki and then only those few admins will be left to do whatever they feel like doing. In fact I'm looking to request to wikimedia foundation to terminate this project.

aapko apna naam dena chaahiye, khair mein aapki baaton se sahamat hooain. yeh baat mere bhi anubhav mein I hai ki keval kuchh prashaasak apne man se apne banaaye lekho ko chhaape ja rahe hai bhale hi iske liye unhein lekho ko pun: prakaashit kyon na karna pade. main bhi kuchh aur din dekhta hooain fir main bhi is viki ko chhodne ka man bana raha hooain. haaain mein is pariyojana ko band karne ka nivedan naheen karooainga, kyonki dekhte hai ki kitna aur raajaneetikran is viki ka hota hai. dhanyavaad. rohit raavat 13:54, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
haaain main aapke banaaye lekho ki to naheen jaanta lekin mere banaaye lekh aap ya to mere yogadaanon mein dekh sakte hai ya mere sadasya prushth par bhi dekh sakte hain. in sabhi lekho ko dekhiye aur bataaiyein ki inmein se ek ek lekh ko banaane mein aapko kitna samay lagega. mujhe lagta hai ki yadi mein kisi anya viki par hota to meri mehnat ko dekhte hue mujhe ab tak kadaachit prashaasak bhi banaaya ja chuka hota lekin Bhaarat desh ki to raajaneeti mahaan hai na. is viki par to mujhe ab tak kisi sadasya ne ye tak naheen kaha ki main achcha kaam kar raha hooain, prashaasak banaana to khair door ki kaudi hai. khair mein kuchh din aur dekhta hooain fir aage nirnaya liya jaayega. rohit raavat 13:58, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
main is pachade mein kabhi padta hi naheen. mera bas ek uddeshya hai ki adhikaadhik vishyon par lekh hindi mein likhe jaanya. rohit ji evam anya se yahi kahooainga ki yadi koi bhedabhaav hai bhi to use anadekha karke apne mukhya uddeshya mein lag jaaainya. prashaasak banane se kya laabh hai, mujhe aaj tak samajh mein naheen aaya. yadi ham kuchh achha likhe hain to aaj naheen to kal koi use padhega, usase laabhaanvit hoga aur man-hi-man lekhak ki prashansa karega. haaain vah hame pata naheen chalegi. to kya hua? -- anunaad Singhvaarta 14:14, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

vikipeediya swayam itni khoobsoorat aur upayogi sankalpana hai ki samay ke saath usaki pragati sunishchit hai. kisi ek sadasya ke hone ya na hone ka fark vaise hi hai jaise ham kisi ek kitaab ko padh lanp ya na padhe hon. mujhe taareef ki apeksha naheen hai isliye dhanyavaad ko daayitv ki tarah nibhaane ki bhi maine kabhi koshish naheen ki. shaayad yeh sambhav bhi naheen ki har sau sanpaadan ke baad koi vaarta prushth par shaabaasi de. saath hi vikiya par kaam kar koi hindi jaati samaaj ya Bhaarat desh par ehsaan jataae to main swayam ko krutajnyaata ke bojh se mukt maanuainga kintu yadi kisi bhi jaati, praant ya raashtra ki satahi ninda karne se bachein iske liye main jarur krutajnya rahooainga. vaise kisi ko shukriya prabandhak bana diya jaaya jo sabka shukriya ada karte rahein to mujhe aapatti naheen hogi. bladi ve ho sakte hain jo neenv rakhakar nirmaan ka shreya chaahate hain. chaar kadam chalakar chaaaind par na pahuainchein to chaaaind ko gaaliyaaain dene par utar aate hain kisi samaaj ke sabhi log naheen. aniruddh vaarta 16:01, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

yahaan shikaayat shaayad hindi vikipeediya ke aalekh naamak stambh ke baare mein hai, jise pratham shikaayatakartta ne angreji mein tudej feechard aartikl ke naam se likha hai, jo ki tude hone ke kaaran aalekh va baad ke do akshar nirvaachit lekh ka aabhaas de rahe hain.
  • pratham to ye kehna chaahoonga ki shikaayatakartta ye spasht karein, ki ye shikaayat nirvaachit lekh ke baare mein hai ya aaj ka aalekh ke baare mein hai?
  • dviteeya apna hastaakshar likhein, jisse ki unka naam ya yogadaan gyaat ho sake, anyatha kaise pata chalega ki is shikaayat ki othentisiti kya hai. maatr I.pi. sankhya 120.56.168.225 se to mushkil hoga.
  • haan aalekh mein kuchh lekh punaraavrutt prakaashit hue hain, kintu ek to is baare mein stambh ki arhataaen poori karte hue lekh banein, unhein prastaavit kiya jaaye, tabhi un par vichaar kiya ja sakta hai. doosra yadi is stambh ke star mein giraavat laayi gayi to seedhe seedhe hindi viki ke star par bhi fark dikhega. haan punaraavrutti ki shikaayat mainne bhi kai baar ki hai, jis baare mein behtar munita ji bata sakti hain.
  • rohit ji ka naam mainne prabandhak ke liye prastaavit bhi kiya tha. shaayad unhein yaad bhi ho. saath hi mainne gunjan ji ka naam bhi prataavit kiya tha, jise unhonne swayam hi vaapas le liya hai.
  • samay samay par mainne kaaryasheel sadasyon ke yogadaan ko baarn star ke roop mein saraaha bhi hai, jiska uttar rohit, gunjan, aur kuchh anya sadasya de sakte hain.
  • anunaad ji ne apne sandesh mein itni moolyavaan baat likhi hai, ki us par kisi tippani ki aavashyakta hai hi naheen. vaise bhi ve varishth sadasya hain.
  • haan nirvaachit lekh ke baare mein meri is prakaar ki vaarta bahut pehle poornima ji se ho chuki hai. tab unhonne spasht kiya tha, ki nirvaachit lekh ke liye kya arhataaen va aavashyakataaen honi chaahiyein. ise sadasyagan vikipeediya:nirvaachit lekh aavashyakataaen par padh sakte hain. yadi koi lekh is par khara utarata ho, to avashya bataayein. mere bhi kai banaaye lekh abhi bhi parakh par prateekshaarat hain, jaise Lucknow. aur Akbar ke baare mein to vistrut charcha hui thi, jiska bharpoor virodh Akbar ko vivaadit kehkar kar diya gaya tha. par theek hai, main bhi tab chup raha ki bahumat ka aadar karna hi chaahiye. vaise vahaan bahut se aise log bhi the, jinhein kuchh prabandhak khaas sammaan dete hain, haalaanki un sadasyon ne kuchh khaas kaarya naheen kiya hai yahaan.
is prakaar aalekh ya nirvaachit lekh ke liye sadasyagan apne pratyaashi sujhaayein, saath hi kuchh drushtikon anunaad ji jaisa bhi banaayein. sabr ka fal sada hi meetha hota hai.--pr:aasheesh bhatanaagar vaarta 03:09, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

hindi vikipeediya par 21 vyaktiyon ko prabandhan ka adhikaar praapt hai jinmein se 3 prashaasak hain. prashaasakon ke naam hain: Hemanshu, Mitul0520 evam Wolf, ismein se prashaasakon ke lekh to kabhi milte naheen hai aaj ka aalekh ke liye. mitul ji kabhi kabhaar kuchh likhte hain. rohit ji ki ye baat ki keval kuchh prashaasak apne man se apne banaaye lekho ko chhaape ja rahe hai bhale hi iske liye unhein lekho ko pun: prakaashit kyon na karna pade sateek naheen hai. ye pratikriya kal ke lekh vaasko the gaama ke liye yadi thi jo ki pun: prakaashit hua tha to mera javaab yeh hai ki 24 December vaasko the gaama ki punya tithi thi jis ke avsar par yeh lekh pun: prakaashit hua tha. yeh pun: prakaashit lekh kisi prashaasak ka banaaya hua naheen hai. iske badlaav itihaas ke aakade bataate hain ki ismein sabse adhik sanpaadan sadasya:rohit ne kiye hain. yadi koi sadasya is viki ko chhodkar jaana chaahate hain to mera namr nivedan hai ki ve aisa na karein. mera yeh bhi poorn vishvaas hai ki chhodkar jaane ke baad bhi unka hindi evam viki prem unhein vaapas yahaaain le aaega.--Munita Prasadvaarta 04:59, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

munita ji ne namr, sateek aur seemit shabdon mein sahi baat kahi hai. mera poora samarthan unke saath is baat par hai. haan itna avashya kehna chaahoonga, ki yadi kisi sadasya nirmit lekh ko aalekh ke upayukt banaana ho to avashya kisi anya sadasya/prabandhak aadi ko us par mehnat karni padegi. aur lekh ur star ko paar karne par avashya aalekh mein dikhaayi dega. haan meri or se ye aashvaasan bhi lein, ki yadi koi lekh kisi sadasya ko lagta hai, ki us star par pahunchane laayak hai, to meri vaarta par bataayein, main swayam use yathaasheeghr aur aavashyak sudhaar kar munita ji se aagrah karoonga ki use aalekh mein sthaan dein. shaayad munita ji bhi is ka samarthan yahaan dein. kintu hindi viki mein jahaan sakreeya sadasyon ki itni kami hai, vahaan kaaryarat rahana apna daayitv samajhein. haan kuchh sadasyon ke liye avashya du:kh hota hai, ki ve prabandhak bante hi kahaan gaayab ho gaye, pata naheen. --pr:aasheesh bhatanaagar vaarta 05:42, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

saaaincha:Bhaarat ke vishay

sabhi sadasyon se nivedan hai, ki ve yathaasanbhav yogadaan dekar is saanche ki laal kadiyon ko neela karne mein madad karein. ye saancha lekh Bhaarat ke liye atayant mahattvapoorn hai.--pr:aasheesh bhatanaagar vaarta 01:57, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Bhaarat ham bhaaratavaasiyon ka pasandeeda vishay hai. iski laal kadiyon ko neela karne mein mera poora sahayog hai.--Munita Prasadvaarta 06:29, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

blogging sambandhi shreniyon ka vilay

koi prabandhak krupaya nimn shreniyon ka vilay kar dein.

  • shreni:chittha
  • shreni:chitthaakaarita
  • shreni:blogging
  • shreni:chitthaakaari

is vishay mein mera sujhaav hai ki pehli teen shreniyon ko chauthi par punarnideshit kar diya jaaye.-- shreesh e-pandit vaarta 07:19, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

shreniyon ka vilay ya punarnideshan koi bhi sadasya kar sakta hai iske liye prabandhak ki aavashyakta naheen hai. vaise bhi yeh koi saral kaarya naheen hai. shreniyon ko punarnideshit karne ka parinaam kuchh khaash achha naheen hota hai. behtar hoga ki pratyek shreni ke prushthon mein jaakar puraani shreniyon ko hata kar nai shreniyaaain lagaai jaaeain evam yeh kaarya koi aasaan kaam naheen hai.--Munita Prasadvaarta 08:21, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

chitthaakaari, chitthaakaarita aur blogging shreni mein ab koi lekh naheen hai. in shreniyon ke lekhon mein uparyukt shreni chittha laga diya gaya hai. at: shesh teen shreniyon ko yadi uchit samajhein to mita dein. aniruddh vaarta 20:45, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

hindi vikipeediya ke kisi chitr ko angreji vikipeediya ke lekh par lagaana

mainne hindi vikipeediya ke lekh - hindi chitthaajagat par ek file upload ki. main use angreji vikipeediya ke lekh en:Hindi Blogosphere par lagaana chaahata hooain. mainne kai tareeke se traai kiya par safal naheen hua. kya file dobaara angreji vikipeediya par daalani padegi. ek vikalp hai ki vikimeediya kaumans par daal kar donon jagah prayog ho sakti hai par vahaaain file upload karne ke liye lambi-chaudi janmapatri bharani padti hai. kya isi chitr ko angreji viki par lagaaya ja sakta hai?-- shreesh e-pandit vaarta 10:53, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

haaain file ko dubaara angreji vikipeediya par daalani padegi. ya fir jaisa ki aapne hi kaha kaamans par upload kar leejiye. dhanyavaad.--Munita Prasadvaarta 11:22, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

nav varsh ki kaamanaaen

sammaan

pichhle saal hindi vikipeediyn kuchh nae anubhavon se gujra. barbarata, shreshth anuvaad, teji se lekhon ki sankhya badhaane ka kaam inmein pramukh the. hamein in sab mein sahayog karne vaale logon ko alankrut karna chaahiye. ise dekh anek log viki par kaam karne mein swayam ke sammaanit anubhav kareinge.

  • haal mein hue parivrtanon par najar rakhane ke liye gunjan ji koRecent changes.png
  1. samarthan --raajeevamaas 04:13, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
  • aalok ji ko sundar sahaj aur stareeya hindi anuvaad ke liye rojeta baarn star Rosetta Barnstar.png ki sifaarish karti hooain.
  1. samarthan --raajeevamaas 04:13, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
  • chaaroo evam dinesh smeeta ko bhoogol ke kshetr mein vishesh kaarya karne ke liye bhoogol baarn star Globe-barnstar2.png
  1. samarthan --raajeevamaas 04:13, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
  • adrushya rahakar mahatvapoorn sahayog karne ke liye hindi ko adrushya baarn starInvisible Barnstar.png
  1. samarthan --raajeevamaas 04:13, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
  2. ghor aalochna --Logic 05:32, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
  • rohit raavat evam anunaad Singh ko nirantar kaaryasheel rahane ke liye nirantar kaaryasheel baarn star Tireless Contributor Barnstar.gifbaarn star ki sifaarish karti hooain.
  1. samarthan --raajeevamaas 04:13, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
  • shahaab ko islaam sanbaddhi lekho ko banaane savaarane ke liye Islamic barnstar.png (islaam baarn star)
  1. samarthan --raajeevamaas 04:13, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
  1. samarthan --raajeevamaas 04:13, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
  1. samarthan --raajeevamaas 04:13, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
  • anirooddh ji ko tithi se sambandhit aitihaasik kaarya ke liye Barnstar-stone2-noback.png (epik baarn star)
  1. samarthan --raajeevamaas 04:13, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
  • hindi vikipeediya par pehla sakriya baut banaane ke liye saurabh bhaarati ko Dykbb.png (The Bot Builder Award)
  1. samarthan --raajeevamaas 04:13, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
  1. samarthan --raajeevamaas 04:13, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
  • mai sakriya lekhak aur aadarsh prabandhika purnima varman ko nirvaachit lekhon ke liye mahatvapoorn sujhaav dene ke liye Compass barnstar.png aur vikipeediya ke baahar anya maadhyamon jaise patrikaaon evam anya jaalagharon mein hindi vikipeediya ke liye yogadaan ko utsaahit karne ke liye Press barnstar.pngbaarn star aur ki anushansa karti hooain. saath hi ullekh karna chaahati hoon ki hindi vikipeediya ka yeh saubhaagya hai ki hindi saahitya ki is star ki lekhika hamaare saath hai jo lekhan ke saath-saath uchch star ke lekh prabandhan me bhi maahir hain.
  1. samarthan --raajeevamaas 04:13, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

krupaya anya sadasya aur prabandhak apne vichaar prakat karein. aur kisi ka kaarya anadekha rah gaya hai to vah bhi soochit karein. baarn staaron ke vishay mein vistaar se jaanane ke liye yahaaain dekhein --Munita Prasadvaarta 17:14, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

  • muneeta ji ke anvarat evam athak yogadaano ke liye varsh 2009 ka nirantar kaaryasheel baarn star Tireless Contributor Barnstar.gif aur aaj ke alekh evam anya pramukh lekho me bahamulya yogadaan ke liye pramukh lekh medal Wiki medal.jpg se sammaanit karna chaahooainga.
  1. ghor aalochna --Logic 05:32, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
  2. samarthan --raajeevamaas 04:13, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
  • aalochak ji ki rachanaatmak aalochna , samay samay par sabhi yogadaanakartaao ke path-pradarshan, evam lekho ki vartani evam vyaakaran sudhaarane ke liye vishesh baarn star SpecialBarnstar.png se sammaanit karna chaahooainga.
  1. samarthan --raajeevamaas 04:13, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
  • hemant ji ko unke mahatvapoorn yogadaan ke liye vishesh baarn star SpecialBarnstar.png se sammaanit karna chaahooainga.
  1. samarthan --raajeevamaas 04:13, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

sabhi ko nav varsh ki shubhakaamanaae. aasha karta hooain ki naye varsh me bhi ham log is hi tarah aapasi matabhedo se upar uth kar hindi gyaan kosh ke vikaas me paraspar saahayog kareinge. dhanyavaad --gunjan varmasandesh 04:34, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

aalochna - Rajiv maas anunaad aur mitul jaise anubhavi aur gatisheel logo ko kyo bhoola ja raha hai.bandar revadiya baate aapas mein khush hon--Logic 08:08, 1 January 2010 (UTC) (first logic)
dhanyavaad aalochna karne ke liye parantu shaayad aapne dekha naheen ki anunaad ji ko puraskaar dene ki sifaarish ki gayi hai. Rajiv ji evam mitul ji anubhavi avashya hain parantu yeh puraskaar varsh 2009 ke liye diya ja raha hai jismein unke yogadaan naganya hai.--Munita Prasadvaarta 08:43, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

uprokt puraskaaro se pata chalta hai ki kis prakaar hindi vikipeediya teji se intarnet par hindi bhaashi logo ko apne saath le rahi hai . nae sadsya aur puraane aur anubhavi sadsyon ke beech taalamel hindi vikipeediya ko teji se badh raha hai . ham in puraskaaro ko protsaahan ke roop mein dekh sakte hain . sadsya is prakriya ko ek prerak ke roop mein lein . kahin se achaanak avatarit hokar is prakriya ko nakaaraatmak na hone dein . kehte han na aasma se aage jahaaain aur bhi hai, abhi puraskaar yahaaain aur bhi hain . :) --raajeevamaas 05:05, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

sammaan

varsh 2009 ke liye sammaanon ke baare mein ye kehna chaahoonga ki baarn star aadi sammaan to koi bhi kisi ko bhi kabhi bhi bina kisi charcha ke de sakta hai. angreji baarn star par dekhein, chaahe varishth ya kanishth ko, bas dene vaale ko lagana chaahiye ki puraskrut vyakti adhikaari ho. haan kisi achhe yogadaanakarta ka naam chhoot na jaaye isliye charcha karna achha rahata hai.

  • hindi ki adrushya hone ki baat antim/pichhle sandesh mein jo likhi hai, kuchh had tak theek hai. mera bhi yahi sochana hai ki sadasya:hindi ko koi anya behtar star diya ja sakta hai. unhonne naam hi hindi chuna hai. aise kai naam hain jaise kingaraam ka mool naam hai raaja Ram. kintu unke yogadaan adrushya naheen kahalaayege. balki adrushya yogadaan I.pi yoojrs ke hote hain. khair ye to chhoti si baat hai.
  • Rajiv ji aur mitul ji ke baare mein munita ji ki baat sahi hai.
  • mukta aur suruchi ji ke baare mein mujhe naheen laga ki unki yogadaan maatra itni hai, kintu munita ji ne dekha hai to theek hoga.
  • khaas baat gunjan ji ke vishay mein hai jinhein maatr haal ke parivartan mein diya hai. unhein kuchh behtar diya ja sakta hai. vaise main to yatha sambhav aur yatha samay aavashyakta lagne par star de hi diya karta hoon. varshaant par kuchh khaas dene ki prateeksha naheen karta hoon.
--pr:aasheesh bhatanaagar vaarta 10:23, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
  • bahut hi afsos ki baat hai ki 132 sanpaadan vaale shaahaab ko baarn star dena aapko nyaaya sangat laga, jinhonne vivaadon ko bhi janm diya doosari or 397 sanpaadanon ke saath mukta paathak aur 855 sanpaadanon ke saath suruchi ke yogadaan ki maatra aapko kam lagi.--suruchi 13:06, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
aap munita ji aur gunjan se poochh sakti hain, ki sadasya:shahaab ke liye mainne kya kaha tha. ye baat niji mel par hui thi, isaliye saakshya upalabdh naheen hain. haan unka kaaran bata sakta hoon: islaam khaas vishay hai, jis par koi muslim hi likh sakta hai. sadasya:shahaab ko gunjan ne khaas is vishay ke liye nivedan aur aamantran diya tha. tab usane aakar maatr is vishay par likha hai. is kaaran mainne bhi baat ko naheen kaata aur maan liya. haan ginti ke anusaar sanpaadan bahut hi kam hain, kintu un sabhi ki ek hi disha hai, tabhi islaam baarn star hi mil raha hai, na ki koi anya prakaar. aasha hai aap samajh jaayeingeen aur anyatha na leingeen. haan itna vaada karta hoon, ki kisi khaas vishay ki kami ko yadi aap poora karti hain, to meri or se bhi pakka hai. iske baare mein gunjan, siddhaarth, shreesh aur kai anya log bata sakte hain.--pr:aasheesh bhatanaagar vaarta 13:14, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
yeh uttar santoshajanak naheen hai. islaam lekh kis drushti se khaas hai? agar iske lekhak ko 132 sanpaadanon ke aadhaar par baarn star ke yogya samjha jaata hai to samaanata ke aadhaar par 132 tak sanpaadan karne vaale har sadasya ko us lekh ke liye vishesh baarn star diya jaana chaahiye jo usane banaaya hai. islaam lekh mein koi par to naheen lage hain ki sirf usi lekh ke rachayita ko vishisht baarn star diya jaaya.--suruchi 15:28, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
uttar to maatr pratham do vaakyon mein diya hai mainne. haan shahaab ke liye kaaran bataaya gaya jise mainne maan liya, theek vaise hi jaise aap donon ke naam to bina kaaran hi mainne chaupaal par hi maan liye, maatr iseeliye ki munita ji ne socha hai to theek hi hoga. aap to kaheen behtar sthiti mein hain (yogadaan ke hisaab se). baad mein kaaran likhe the, jo mujhe bataaye gaye. vaise ye to aap bhi maaneingi ki E ne 400 pedon par 2-2 vaar kiye hon, to uske nishaan saaf dikheinge kintu ped khade raheinge, vaheen kisi aur ne 300 vaar hi 1-2 pedon par kiye aur ped dharaashaayi ho gaya to aamtaur par kya samjha jaayega? (ye meri rai naheen hai, bahumat hai). bilkul vaise hi jaise mainne Akbar ke vivaadaaspad hone ke kaaran nirvaachan se roke jaane ko maana tha. shesh ke liye shahaab ke baare mein munita ji se sampark kar sakti hain. --pr:aasheesh bhatanaagar vaarta 06:29, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
vaah vaah to islaam ka ped gir gaya? kya kamaal ki baat ki hai aapne. kya bhaasha hai! ham yahaaain ped kaatne naheen unako seenchane aate hain. par aapki nazar islaam ke kate ped se hatkar hariyaali par thahare tab baat hai. mujhe munita ji se kuchh naheen kehna aapse kehna tha kah diya. dhanyavaad.--suruchi 09:18, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

susvaagatam 2010

meri or se hindi vikipeediya ke sabhi sadasyon ko navavarsh 2010 ki haardik shubhakaamanaaeain. rohit raavat 18:10, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

gat varsh ki garimaapoorn upalabdhiyon ke liye karmanishth aur kartavya paraayan vikipeediynon ka shukriya tatha aane vaale varsh ke liye dheron shubhakaamanaaeain. main kaamna karta hooain ki is varsh ke ant tak sakriye sadasyon ki sankhya chaar ankon mein tatha sanpaadanon ki sankhya saat ankon mein pahuainch jaaya. aniruddh vaarta 01:30, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

sankalp 2010

varsh 2010 mein vibhinn kshetron mein ghatne waali aitihaasik mahatva ki ghatnaaon se hindi vikiya na to vanchit rahegi na hi iski poorti angareji vikiya ke lekhon ke anuvaad ke jariye hogi. vikiya par main kuchh aur bhale hi furasat milne par karuain lekin is kaam ko samay nikaalkar karne ka sankalp leta hooain. main vishvaas karta hooain ki aavashyakta padne par evam aagrah karne par ise poora karne mein meri madad ki jaaegi evam vishvaas dilaata hooain ki saamaanya sthiti mein sahayog ka anurodh kam-se-kam paaainch mahinon ke baad hi karuainga. aniruddh vaarta 01:33, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

ishvar aapke liye sahaayak rahe aur aapke sankalp mein ham sada hi saath hain. nav varsh ke sang ye shubhakaamanaaen bhi grahan karein.--pr:aasheesh bhatanaagar vaarta 11:19, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
hindi viki par yogadaan karne vaale sabhi sadasyon aur prabandhakon ko nav varsh ki haardik shubhakaamanaaeain.--daa0 jagadeesh vyom 11:49, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
kisi aalochak ko vishesh vaarn star ka sammaan dena nishchaya hi is drushti ka parichaayak hai ki viki par kaarya karne vaalon mein gaambheer log hain jo apni aalochna ko sakaaraatmak drushti se lete hain. dhanyavaad. sabhi ko nav varsh mangalamaya ho.--aalochak 11:55, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
meri or se bhi sabko nav varsh ki mangal kaamanaaeain.--mukta paathak 06:35, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

pramukh chitr

mukhaprushth par jo chitr lagaaya gaya hai vah Australia ke Sydney mahanagar ki aatishbaaji ka drushya hai florida ka naheen. krupaya bhool ko sudhaara jaae. dhanyavaad. rohit raavat 08:27, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Bhaarat 2010

aniruddh ji ke dvaara yeh prushth niyamit roop se viksit kiya ja raha hai. prabandhako se nivedan hai ki ise haal ki ghatanaao me niyamit roop se jod deeya jaaye. --gunjan varmasandesh 12:10, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

prabandhak munita ke khilaaf shikaayat=

mane ek aadarsh sadsya hone ke naate "sammaan" shirshk ke antargat apni tippni de thi lekin munita prasaad ne apne adhikaaro ka durupayog karte hue is tippni ko hata diya . aisa kyon --Logic 04:12, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

shreemaan aapki tippani jaisi ki taisi hai. main to hataai naheen hooain. yadi kisi aur tippani ki baat kar rahe hain to kisi maananeeya sadasya ne hataai hogi, bekaar mein mujhe dosh na de. pooraane avataranon mein iski jaaainch kar leejiye.--Munita Prasadvaarta 05:00, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

ha.... ha ...ha ... aise prabandhak hai yahaan jo apni galati doosaro par thop dete hain aur maje se tark dete hain . mai yaha naya nahi hoon aat tak I pi ades se kaam kiya majaboori mein yaha pana khaata banaana pada mai mulat: angeji viki se aata hoon . aap mere savaalo ka javaab dein aur kere puraane avataran ko pun: sthaapit karein . aapko shaayad prabandhak giri se niche laana padaiga .--Logic 05:56, 4 January 2010 (UTC) aapse vinmr nivedan hai ki is prushth ko ek baar pun: dekh lein. sammaan shirshak ke antargat ki gayi aapki tippani naheen mitaai gayi hai. aniruddh vaarta 10:03, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

munita prasaad angreji vikipidiya par blok

ek mitr dvaara suchana mili hai ki is tanaashah prabandhak ko aan agreji vikipidiya par blok kar diya gaya hain . srot [1]Logic 04:43, 4 January 2010 (UTC) ya jaae http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Munita_Prasad

shreemaan Bhaarat ke gaaainvon mein sabhi ke aai pi edres paramaanent naheen hote hain. mera bhi naheen hai. ek aai pi kisi baut ne blok kiya tha kisi aur ka choonki mera aai pi daayanaamik hai jo ki badalta rahata hai isliye ek samaan aai pi seyar hone ke kaaran mera aai pi bhi blok ho gaya tha. iske liye mainne turant angreji viki ke ek prabandhak ko E mel kiya. mera aaipi badalate hi blok anablok ho gaya. kisi ne mujhe jaanabujhakar blok naheen kiya hai jaisa ki aap chaupaal par soochana dekar logo ko bhramit karke dena chaah rahe hain.--Munita Prasadvaarta 04:58, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

maidam ji shaayabad aap viki ko nahi jaanti . aap apne shanvaad par dekhe ki aapko vk nahi do baar chetaavani mil chuki hai. aur bata dun ki aapka naam blok huva hai kuchh aur nahi samajhi prabhandhk ji

Stop x nuvola.svg yeh prayogakarta hindi vikipeediya par blonkd hai


aapke liye --Logic 06:37, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

aap poori baat pehle samajhiye evam meri baat suniye, fir kisi faisale par aaiega, ek I pi blok hua tha evam mera kankashn daayanaamik I pi hone ki bajah se ho sakta hai kabhi vahi I pi mera ekaaunt bhi seyar kiya ho isliye kuchh samay ke liye jab tak ki main kanekted thi das minute ya aadhe ghante mera I pi bhi blok hua ho. main angreji viki par blok naheen hooain mahaaraaj. aap ko yadi saakshya chaahiye to theek hai main ek pej mein edit kar rahi hooain usaka link yahaaain de rahi hooain evam aap jaaainch kar leejiye.[2] aapne yeh masala chaupaal par uthaaya tha evam main naheen chaahati ki aapke ya kisi aur ke man mein mere prati koi galatafahami janm le isliye mainne safaai di hai evam main samajhti hooain ki mainne apni baat spasht kar di hai. yadi iske baad bhi aap meri aalochna jaari rakhate hain to fir mujhe kuchh naheen kehna hai.--Munita Prasadvaarta 06:39, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
  1. ) aapko do baatar chetaavani liki thi sahi ya galat
  2. ) aapne apne ko blok se hataane ke le aavedan kiya th sahi ya galat
  3. ) taduparaant hi aapko ek samay diya gaya tha apne bartaav ko theek karne ke liye. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikipedia_blocking
  4. ) aapne oopar likhe mere savaalo ka javaab abhi tak nahi diya hai .
  5. ) aapne puraskaaro ka vitran apne tak simit sakha aur bevajah apne psand ke sadsyon ko baataaain is baar se anya prabadhak bhatnaagar bhi aahat hain .
  6. ) maine adrshya hokar yogadaan kiya tha aur aapne alankrut kar diya hindi ko
  7. ) agar aap kehti hai ki aapne mera lekh nahi hataaya to kisne hataaya aur kyon ???
  8. ) ab aap prabandhak hai aap pata lagaaie aur doshi ka naam bata kar ise chetaavaki dein .--Logic 07:01, 4 January 2010 (UTC)



thodi der ke liye maan lete hain ki munita ji ko angreji vikipidiya par roka gaya tha. to kya hua? usaka hindi vikipidiya par unke yogadaan ko nakaarane ke liye upayog kiya ja sakta hai kya?

aap adrushya ya gupt rahakar hindi mein yogadaan de rahe hain, yeh to bahut achhi baat hai. kintu 'sammaan' ke liye jhagada kar rahe hain yeh charitra ka dogalaapan hai (ek taraf adrushya rahana, doosari taraf puraskaar naheen mila)
-- anunaad Singhvaarta 08:41, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

bhaiiya mai 'sammaan' ke liye nahi lad raha balki nyaaya ke liye lad raha huain. chlo sammaan nahi mila koi baat nahi lekin mere lekh ko mitaane ka kya matlab . 'sammaan' to ek bahaana hai ye prabandhak log apna varchasv kaayam rakhane ke liye aisa khel khelte hain . --Logic 08:49, 4 January 2010 (UTC) • ) aapne puraskaaro ka vitran apne tak simit sakha aur bevajah apne psand ke sadsyon ko baataaain vikipeediya par sammaan chinhon ka vitran kisi vishishth vyakti ke adhikaar kshetr mein naheen aata hai. aisa upayukt tark ke saath aap bhi kar sakte hain. • is baar se anya prabadhak bhatnaagar bhi aahat hain . aasheesh ji ki tippani se aisa to naheen lagta hai! vaise unke jaise varishth aur jimmedaar prabandhak se iski aasha bhi naheen ki ja sakti hai. • ) maine adrshya hokar yogadaan kiya tha aur aapne alankrut kar diya hindi ko aapne yogadaan kiya tha iska yeh arth to naheen ki hindi ne yogadaan naheen kiya tha aur unka sammaan karna galat hai. • ) agar aap kehti hai ki aapne mera lekh nahi hataaya to kisne hataaya aur kyon ??? agar sanpaadan hataae gaye hain to usaki jaaainch aap puraane avataran mein to kar hi sakte hain. yadi lekh hataaya gaya hai aur koi asaavadhaani hui hai jiski guainjaaish naheen ke baraabar hai, to yeh saarvajanik kshati hai ise vyaktigat maankar dvesh na rakhein.

krupya apni tippami ko vyaktigat hone se bachaaeain. hindi vikiya ke maatr do sau sakriye sadasyon tatha maatr do ya teen sakriye prabandhakon mein se kisi ki bhi kshati apoorniye hogi.

aniruddh vaarta 10:31, 4 January 2010 (UTC) to kya ham yaha anyaaya sahane ko majaboor hain . munita ji ko ab apne kiye gaye kaamo ka danbh ho chala hai . oopar jinhe puraskaar diye gaye hai aadhe se jyaad te unhi ke group ke hai . ulta jinke nyaaya ke liye mai lad raha hu vo bhi in danbhi prabandhika ka saath de rahe hai . mujhe to apne hisse ka puraskaar hi chaahiye . kaam mera aur puraskrt ho koi aur . ye anyaaya hai ghor anyaaya --Logic 05:23, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

sadasya:Logic ki baatein haasyaaspad aur ajnyaaan se bharpoor hai. unako viki par block ki paddhati ka theek se gyaan naheen hai. jis bhaasha mein ve tippaniyaaain likh rahe hain vah ashuddh aur ashobhaneeya hai. aisi bhaasha mein viki par kaam karna bhi anuchit hai. prabandhak aasheesh bhatanaagar aur munita prasaad par unke aarop unki aparipkvata hi prakat karte hain. prabandhak aasheesh bhatanaagar aahat hain? kamaal hai lagta hai inse hi maraham patti karavaane gaye the. ve saaf saaf likhte hain ki baarn star dene ke liye charcha ki aavashyakta naheen koi bhi kisi ko bhi de sakta hai. ve to itni badi baat likh gaye. jahaaain tak munita ka savaal hai ve apni marji se kisi ko bhi kabhi bhi baarn star de sakti thi lekin unka badppan hai ki unhonne is saarvajanik kiya aur sabki rai maaaingi. ismein ghamand aur danbh kahaaain se aa gaya. aapko apne hisse ka puraskaar chaahiye yeh baat hi galat hai. puraskaar maaaing kar aur ruvaab dikhaakar milta naheen. apna apna najriya hai. aur yahaaain group kaun se hain jinki aap baat kar rahe hain? mujhe kaam karte ek saal ho gaya mujhe koi group naheen dikhaai diye. hamein yaad rakhana chaahiye ki ham yahaaain kaam karne ke liye aate hain puraskaar ke liye jhagadne ke liye naheen. jo log is prakaar jhagadane ka ravaiya apanaaeain unka sabko virodh karna chaahiye.--mukta paathak 06:12, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

sammaan jabardasti haasil naheen kiya ja sakta. jo sachmuch kaam karte hain agar usapar (aapki bhaasha mein) danbh karein to main usaka samarthan hi karooainga. jo soe hain unka jikr bhi naheen, jo kabhi kabhi aate hain unke liye puraskaar ki jid aur jo nirantar kriyaasheel hain unapar laankshan! dhanya hai anyaaya ke khilaaf nyaaya ke liye aapka sangharsh. 15,000 sanpaadanon ko kabhi minute, ghante aur varsh mein badal kar dekhiyega. shaayad aap samajh sakein ki tippaniyaaain aapke paksh mein kyon naheen aa rahi hai.

kshama karein. main apne hastaakshar karna bhool gaya tha .aniruddh vaarta 07:43, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

aap sahi logo ki rai theek ho sakti hai lekin hindi ko adshya hone par khitaab dena kaha tak sahi hai . (bhatanaagar saahab ke lekh ko theek se dekho akl ke dushmano) . yahaan sabhoo vartamaan kriyaasheel log ise apna blog bana baithe hain aur isame se jyaadaatar ye aurate hain (leingik tippni ke liye kshma par yya karoo). --Logic 06:51, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

jis bhaasha aur shaili ka prayog sadasya Logic kar rahe hain vah sabhya shikshit samaaj mein sveekrut naheen hona chaahiye. sharm! sharm! main usaka virodh karti hooain aur prabandhakon se nivedan karti hooain ki unhein turant block kiya jaana chaahiye. ve ashishtata ki sabhi seemaaeain paar kar chuke hain. aise sadasyon ko yahaaain rahane ki anumati naheen honi chaahiye.--suruchi 07:31, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

e laingik tippani akshamya hai. vyakti chaahe kshama kar bhi de kintu samay aparaadhiyon ko kabhi maaf naheen karta. log aparaadh karne se naheen darate kyonki unhein lagta hai ki unka koi kuchh bigaad naheen sakta. samajhdaar logon ke liye itna sanket kar dena kaafi hai ki yaad rakhein ki vikiya par ek baar darj kar di gayi tippani fir kabhi naheen mitti. aur duniya mein jiniyson ki kami naheen hai. har minute aaipi pata badalne waali takaneek bhi kaam naheen aaegi. isliye yeh behtar hai ki pratibha nirmaan mein lagaai jaaya. aniruddh vaarta 07:36, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

sadasya laujik ki tippani

mainne apne pichhle satr kal praat: 0730 ke baad aaj apaharan 2 baje satraaranbh kiya hai. usi beech uparokt charchaaen astitv mein aayeen hain. is kaaran abhi hi dekhi hain. is baare mein mere vichaar kuchh is prakaar se hain:-

sadasya laujik
  • sadasya laujik ko jo kuchh kehna hai, ve sabhyata ki seema ke andar svatantr hain.
  • abhi tak shaayad vo seema unhonne laanghi naheen hai, ataev unhein pratibandhit karna, vo bhi bina kisi bhi chetaavani ke ekdam galat hoga. shaayad ye ek aur vi.ke.vora maamale ko janm de.
  • laujik ka yogadaan vi.ke.vora se adhik hi hai, va saath hi ve angreji ke bhi sadasya hain.
munita ji
  • inhonne jo bhi puraskaar ya sammaan ki charcha ki hai, unke baare mein mainne pehle hi likha hai, ki koi bhi kisi ko bhi de sakta hai, aur jaisa ki mukta ji ne bhi kaha hai ki munita ji ne charcha ki to maatr sarv sammati aur koi chhoot na jaaye, isaliye.
  • main aahat hoon ya naheen, is baat ko abhi alag rakh dein, to kaheen mainne kuchh aisa likha naheen hai (laujik ji kshama karein, unhonne mere baare mein socha aur main hi baat ko kaat raha hoon) aur yadi main aahat hoon bhi, to ye mera aur munita ji ka aapasi maamala hai, yadi ham donon mein se koi bhi ise saarvajanik charcha mein laata hai to tab hi kisi ko adhikaar hoga ki is baat ka prayog kare. aur shaayad ye ham donon ke liye hi galat hoga.
  • munita ji ko bhi meri bahut si baatein galat lagti hongeen, kintu usi prakaar ve ya to sabr karti hain, ya sabhyata ke bheetar rahakar bataati hain, ya ham niji mel par charcha kar lete hain. yahaan baat karna uchit naheen hota.
  • yadi munita ji ne koi lekh hataaya bhi hai, to
  • pratham to ye use vaapas la sakte the (itihaas se dekhkar),
  • dviteeya munita ji se us baare mein nivedan karte.
  • teesara kam se kam ek baar us lekh ka naam to bataate.
  • haan yadi kisi tippani ke baare mein ye baat hai, to bhi use itihaas se vaapas laaya ja sakta hai.
sammaan ke baare mein
  • is baare mein main pehle bhi likh chuka hoon, ki koi bhi kisi ko bhi de sakta hai, haan maang ya daava naheem kar sakta hai. dhyaan rahe ki munita ji ne apne swayam ko is ginti se hata liya hai, jo ve doosaron ke liye gina raheenhain. mainne bhi aaj tak bahut kaam kiya hai aur bahuton ko baarn star bhi diye hain, kintu swayam apne liye to naheen maanga.
  • ye to jise sahi lagta ho, va uske liye paryaapt kaaran dekhe vo de sakta hai. haan angreji viki mein paryaapt kaaran ke liye jasteefaai shabd mote aksharon mein likha gaya hai. at: use vahi vareeyata milni chaahiye, na ki khule aam aaloo pyaaj ban jaayein.
is prakaar sadasya laujik ko pratibandhit karne ka paryaapt kaaran naheen dikhta hai. saath hi unhein bhi is prakaran ko bhula dena chaahiye( mere vichaar se) aur ruchi va lagan se yahaan kaaryarat ho jaana chaahiye.
kisi kaaranavash yadi munita ji ko angreji mein pratibandhit kiya bhi gaya hai, to usase ham hindi vaalon ka sarokaar kya hai. haan yahaan to unhonne lagan va nishtha ke saath kaam kiya hai, jiske liye unhein dhanyavaad svaroop kuchh sammaan dena chaahiye. is baare mein vishesh kehna chaahoonga ki main pichhle samvaad mein unke liye sammaan ki anushansa karna bhool gaya tha. kaaran shaayad gunjan ji dvaara pehle hi prastaavit karna raha hoga. khair ab karta hoon. haan mukta ji ko dhanyavaad dena chaahoonga ki mainne chaupaal par munita ji ke prastaav mein inke naam par paryaapt yogadaan ki kami ki baat kahi thi, fir bhi use bhula kar unhonne meri baat ka sahi hi arth lagaaya hai. (kshama karein ye maatr yogadaan maatra ke baare mein tha) is aasha ke saath ki sadasya laujik mujhe ya kisi ko bhi anyatha na leinge va sambhav galatiyon ke liye man hi man kshama kareinge, samvaad samaapt karta hoon. --pr:aasheesh bhatanaagar vaarta 09:19, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

masheeni anuvaad athva anuvaadak baut se bane lekh

he mitron mainne dekha ki hindi viki par kuchh lekh masheeni anuvaad karke banaaye gaye hain ya fir kisi baut ke dvaara unhein banaaya gaya hai. aisa ek-do jagah wikitrans naamak baut ke dvaara bhi kiya gaya hai. main yeh jaanana chaahata hooain ki is prakaar ke lekh ka kya auchitya hai? masheeni anuvaad karke bane lekh jara bhi pathaneeya naheen hote, unhein samajhne se aasaan hota hai ki mool angreji lekh padh liya jaaya. to main yeh jaanana chaahata hooain ki is baare hindi vikipeediya par kya paulisi hai? agar masheeni anuvaad se hi lekh likhne hain to fir log-baag kyon mehnat kar rahe hain. pachaas-saath baut banaakar chhod deejiye, ve poore angreji vikipeediya ka hindi anuvaad kar deinge.-- shreesh e-pandit vaarta 11:18, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

shreesh ji is prakaar ke masheeni anuvaadon ko roka jaana chaahiye. is prakaar ke staraheen lekhon se achha hai ki angreji vikipeediya ke lekhon ke padha jaaeain. aapke vichaaron se sahamat hooain. main aise lekhon ko poorvavat karti hi rahati hooain. kya karein hamaare yahaaain sakriya sadasyon ki bhi to badi kami hai na ji.--Munita Prasadvaarta 11:27, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
munita prasaad viki par jitni mehnat or lagan se kaarya kar rahi hain usaki jitni taareef ki jaae vah kam hi hogi. is tarah ki teeka tippani karna theek naheen hai.--aalochak 04:06, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

sadasya laujik par pratibandh

pratibandh ke liye atyadhik kaaran upalabdh karaane ke baavajood prabandhakon se aagrah hai ki sadasya laujik ko pratibandhit na kiya jaaya. yeh kadam samasya ka samaadhaan naheen balki nai samasyaaeain paida karega. poorv mein uthaae gaye pratibandh ke kadam iske pramaan hain. aur vikiya par pratibandhit kar bhi dein to samaaj mein maujood yeh soch mit naheen jaaegi. haaain ham sarvasammati se laujik ki chaupaal sahit kisi bhi prushth par ki gayi abhadr tippaniyon ko mitaane ka adhaikaar le sakte hain. aniruddh vaarta 07:53, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

mera bhi yahi vichaar hai ki 'laujik' ki baaton par dhyaan na diya jaaya - yaheen inke liye paryaapt hai. ham log kaam mein lage rahein. aage ki kaaryavaahi do-teen din aur dekhne ke baad ki jaaya. -- anunaad Singhvaarta 08:04, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

mujhe pratibndh karne se pehle ye dekhna jaroori hai ki mai kis prakaar ke dosh kar raha hun . mene anyaaya ke khilaaf aavaaj uthaai hai. mai pehle aisa nahi tha na meri hindi itni kharaab hai ki mai thik se likh bhi na sakuain . aur bina mujhe vidhivt chetaanani diye mujhe nilambit karne ki baat kehna bhaashaii aatanvavaad hai . aap sahi kathit logo ko bhi nilambit kiya ja sakta hain yaad rakhein . mane pehle bhi maafi maang li thi (chaahe meri tppni dekh lo) . --Logic 08:33, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

yeh kya hai laajik-

Stop x nuvola.svg yeh prayogakarta hindi vikipeediya par blonkd hai


is baare mein meri rai bhi rinaatmak hai. poorn vichaar oopar sadasya laujik ki tippani upasheershak ke antargat likhe hain.--pr:aasheesh bhatanaagar vaarta 09:22, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
laajik ji itna uchhal kood k rahe hai hindi viki ke paathak yeh jaanana chaahate hain ki aakhir inka hindi viki ke liye kya yogadaan hai angreji viki par kuchh kar rahe honge ----- isse hindi viki ka kya lena dena hai-------122.177.202.1 04:15, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

jaang ching

Needs a bit of translation but could be a great choice for featured article since sources and all are present.selvaraajbaat 20:04, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

mukhaprushth par chhoti si bhool

taatya tope Bhaarat ke pratham svaadheenata sangraam ke ek pramukh senaanaayak the janaki bhoomika mahattvapoorn, preranaadaayak aur bejod thi. aniruddh vaarta 18:57, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

krupaya janaki bhoomika mein janaki ko jinki kar dein. aniruddh vaarta 08:02, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

hindi viki par dhokha dhadi

prabandhak munita prasaad dvaara pikshkshale kai mahino se galat aur bhraamak soochana di ja rahi hai . unhone apne sadsya pej par bataaya hai ki daadheekesh prabandhak hai lekin vo prabandhak nahi hai . jab maine is baare mein rivaaj ke anusaar unke varta prashth par unase baat ki to unhone dar ke maare apna prashth hi sev kar diya. aap sahi se gujaarish hai ki is baare min munita se baat kare . --Logic 07:25, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

shabdaarth jaise lekh hone chaahiye?

mitron vikipeediya par ek lekh hai amit, jara ise dekhein aur bataayein ki kya vikipeediya par is tarah ke lekh hone chaahiye? mere vichaar se yeh lekh vikshanari par hona chaahiye. is baare kya parampara hai?-- shreesh e-pandit vaarta 23:37, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

mahilaaon ka apamaan karne aur sahane vaalon ke liye

kaafi puraane sanvaadon ka adhyayan kar ke yeh likh rahi hooain-

  • aasheesh ji ka vichaar hai ki sadasya logic ne "abhi tak shaayad vo seema unhonne laanghi naheen hai, ataev unhein pratibandhit karna, vo bhi bina kisi bhi chetaavani ke ekdam galat hoga. shaayad ye ek aur vi.ke.vora maamale ko janm de."
shaayad aap yaad naheen kar sakte hai ki taiksamain ne vi ke vohara ko kaise niyantrit kiya tha. ho sakta hai ki aap taiksamain waali niyantran-paddhati na jaante hon lekin aap seekh sakte hain ya unase nivedan kar sakte hain.
  • mahilaaon ke sambandh mein ek doosra vichaar hai ki "vikiya par pratibandhit kar bhi dein to samaaj mein maujood yeh soch mit naheen jaaegi." theek baat hai samaaj (keval purush) to naheen badalega par mahilaaeain to badal chuki hai. isliye vikipeediya par ab keval vahi mahilaaeain kaam kareingi jo gaaliyaaain kha-khaakar kaam karne ki aadi hain. koi bhi sammaanit mahila ab is viki par kaam naheen karegi.--suruchi 04:39, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

• samaaj mein maujood yeh soch mit to naheen jaaegi. baat yahi khatm naheen ho jaati. balki vaastav mein yahaaain se kabatak, kaise, aadi anek savaalon ki shuruaat hoti hai. lekin chaupaal uske liye shaayad uchit manch naheen hai. vishvaas rakhiye mahilaaon ke sammaan ki aur apamaan ke pratikaar ki kisi bhi koshish ko vikiya ka samarthan aur saath milega. aasha hai ki munitaaji, poornimaaji, muktaaji, aadi aur aap sarikhe sadasyon ke karmon ki raushani aur kai sadasyon ko vikiya par kheench laaegi.

kisi sadasya par pratibandh lagaana maut ki saja ke samaan hai. aur meri jaankaari mein laingik apamaan ki keval ek tippani ke aadhaar par aisi saja ka praavadhaan Bhaarat ke keval ek sansthaan mein hai. vahaaain bhi iska istemaal samasyaaon ko niyantrit karne ke liye kiya gaya hai, kisi ko samaapt karne ke liye naheen.

aniruddh vaarta 07:15, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

aniruddh ji, yeh aadha aasheesh bhatanaagar aur aadha munita ji ka dialogue aapke oopar kuchh jama naheen. aapka to apna andaaj hi sahi tha- baat niklegi to... par aapne us samvaad ko hi katl kar diya.--suruchi 05:19, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
suruchi ji, kisi ne koi galati ki ya galat bhaasha ko prayog kiya to bhi use najar-andaaj karke kaam karte rahane mein hi hindi viki ki bhalaai hai. isaliye saare vivaad peechhe dafan karte hue aage badha jaaya.-- anunaad Singhvaarta 06:04, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Featured Article

Wow, front page containing this section is looking good. Keep up this work hi wikipedians.

chaupaal par sandesh

main vigat kuchh dinon se baahar gaya hua tha, jiske kaaran yahaan ki pragati se anbhigya raha hoon. aaj 11 January ko raatri 8:30 ke baad se satraaranbh kiya hai.

  • sadasya laujik ne laingik tippani ki avashya thi, inhonne laingik tippani ke liye kshama yaachana bhi vaheen ke vaheen ki thi. isaliye ye apni seema mein rahe.
  • sadasya ke laujik ke baare mein mainne avashya likha tha jo mujhe laga. vo ye ki us samay tak mere vichaar se unhonne seema naheen laanghi thi (ye mera vichaar tha, us samay).
  • kintu aage chalakar inhonne munita ji ke prushth par chhedkhaani ki hai, unke prushth par avaanchhit saanche lagaaye hain.
  • inhein yadi munita ji se koi aapatti thi, to
    • unki vaarta par sandesh de sakte the,
    • unhein E-mel kar sakte the.
    • adhiktam unki shikaayat kar sakte the.

kintu inhonne aisa na karke, seedhe unke baare mein avaanchhit tippaniyaan chaupaal par saarvajanik roop se keen, va unke sadasya prushth ko sanpaadit bhi kiya, jo saamaanya sthiti mein sadasya ke niji sanpaadan adhikaar mein aata hai. us adhikaar ka hanan sarvatha galat evam ashobhaneeya hai, aur saamaanyataya varjit hi samajhna chaahiye. ham kisi ko baarn sammaan bhi dete hain, to uske vaarta par hi. ye aage sadasya ki ichha hai ki vo use sadasya prushth par lagaaye ya naheen.

munita prasaad ke vaarta mein maine koi galat evam ashobhaneeya baat nahi jodi mene kaha tha ki "yeh angreji viki par blokd raheen hai jo sahi hain . ulta ek I pi adres se mere mukhya pej par galat baat likhii gaii hai aur mera shak in maidam par hi hain haaain ki na --Logic 06:32, 12 January 2010 (UTC)"
  • sadasya daadeekesh ke prabandhak hone ke baare mein yadi kuchh galat bataaya bhi ho, to ismein koi galat baat naheen hai. ve ek puraane sasdasya hain, jinke baare mein mera bhi vichaar yahi tha. aur koi bhi sadasya unke sadasya prushth par dekh lein, ya prabandhak prushth par bhi dekh sakte hain. iske liye kisi ko dosh dena ekdam galat hai.
mera mat - yeh saaaincha prabandhko ke naam darshaane ke liye nirmit huva tha . daadeekesh prabandhak nahi hai at: ye lekhako ko bhramit karne wala tathya hain . doosari or anunaad to daadeekesh se bhi jayaada hindi viki par aate hain aur unki lekhani kisi prabhandhak ya prabandhika (maaf karein) se kam naheen to fir unka naam bhi daale (haanlaaki ye bhi saanche ke naam ke saath galat hi hoga) . haaain ki na --Logic 06:32, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
is prakaar inhein chetaavani di jaati hai, ki is gatividhiyon se door rahein. vikipeediya ki garima banaaye rakhane mein sahayog dein. anyatha kuchh kaaryavaai prateekshaarat rahegi. meri vyaktigat salaah hai ki aapke yogadaanon ki yahaan atyaavashyakata hai. sakriya sadasyon ki bahut kami hai. at: hamein ek sakriya sadasya khone ka du:kh hoga. ataev aap bhi yahaan rahein evam atyant kaaryasheel sadasya munita ji ko bhi apne kaam mein lage rahane dein. haan yadi aapko lagta hai, ki aapke yogadaan kisi anya puraskaar ke liye chune gaye sadasya se adhik hain, va aap usase pehle adhikaari hain, to vyaktigat roop se mujhe E-mel karein. aasha hai doosari chetaavani ka avsar naheen milega. --pr:aasheesh bhatanaagar vaarta 15:27, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
aapki chetaavani sir maathe likin bhaiya inko bhi to samajhaao ki galati aur amaryaadit vavhaar na karein --Logic 06:32, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
suruchi ji ke liye vishesh kehna chaahoonga. kisi ki tippani se ekdam itna vichlit na hon. ek to unhonne tatkaal kshama jodi hui hai. doosra kuchh to samay deingeen na kaarravaai hetu. asal mein main 5 din chhutti par tha. isaliye deri ke liye kshama chaahoonga. mera vichaar hai ki hamein sadasya khoe bina hal nikaalna chaahiye.--pr:aasheesh bhatanaagar vaarta 15:35, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
suruchi ko kehna chaaghiye ki hindi me shodh karne se hindi hi aati hai maanavata ki samajh nahi . maanavata ki lekhani par bhaasha ka bandhan nahi --Logic 06:32, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
"hindi me shodh karne se hindi hi aati hai maanavata ki samajh nahi....." yeh tippani to aapattijanak hai..... kya hindi mein shodh karne vaalon mein maanavata naheen hoti ?? ...... yeh kaise kah diya laajik ne...........--aalochak 15:01, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
vaah munitaaji kaise kaise roop mein aati hain (mujhe lagta hai bas) hindi ek bhaasha hai maanavata nahi jo bechaare apni bhaasha bol nahi sakare arthaat gunge hai aap unge kya kahegin . aapattijanak to vah shabd hai jo maidam suruchi ne kaha tha ki jo islaam ke ped ke girne par tha . vak kaise ek samaudaaya vishesh ke dharm ke baare mein is prakaar ki tippni kar sakti hain . --07:06, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

pramukh chitr

mukhya prushth par pradarshit pramukh chitr abhi bhi January ke pratham saptaah ka chitr dikha raha hai. prabandhak gan krupaya dhyaan de.--gunjan varmasandesh 04:57, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

News Update

Hope you Hindi wikipedians will update news status about the earthqueake in Haiti. See thats why you people can't progress. Burj building was inagurated on 4th Jan 2010 and its still on the main page which is for news updates. All you people are just involved in getting your articles published on the main page and which makes Hindi wiki the worst wiki in terms of quality and updates. All fools on one platform. You idiots get updates here: [3]