vikipeediya:aaj ka aalekh ummeedavaar

aaj ka aalekh
aaj ka aalekh aavashyakataaen (vaarta) aaj ka aalekh ummeedavaar (vaarta) mukhaprushth mein aaj ka aalekh (vaarta)

aaj ka aalekh ummeedavaar

आज का आलेख उम्मीदवार का सिम्बल
yeh taalika hindi vikipeediya mein aaj ka aalekh banane ke liye naamaankit ummeedavaaron ki taalika hai. nirvaachit banane ke pehle lekh ko aaj ka aalekh aavashyakataaon ko poora karna hoga. at: aap is soochi ke lekhon ke aage ya vaarta prushth par (lekh ke sudhaar se sambandhit) apne vichaar ya tippaniyaaain bhi daal sakte hain. isse viki shaili ke chhote lekh banaane mein madad milegi. nae sadasyon ko seekhane ka avsar milega ki viki ke lekh kaise hone chaahiye.
is pariyojana prushth ka antim sanpaadan chandra shekhar (yogadaanlaug) dvaara kiya gaya tha.

November ke chayan

dinaank: 1-10

dinaank: 11-20

dinaank: 21-31


December maah ke aalekh

dinaank: 1-10

dinaank: 11-20

dinaank: 21-31

pratyaashi

September 2010

October 2010

January 2012

Comments

kofi annaan

  • Try to summarize whole article in the lead.
  • Link Nigeria.
  • Translate "Stanley Meisler" and "Jussi M. Hanhimäaki"
  • What's a need of Hindi titles in the citations? as all the references are in English.
  • Make a sub-category under Ghana, like "Ghana ke log". It looks very out of place.
  • Space after "annaan" and "(".
  • Use most recent image.
These requirements are similar to C-Class assessment of English Wikipedia, but I expect an article to be of B-Class standard to appear on Main Page. One more thing, where's the name of nominator? I guess it's Sid, hmm?

Note: I'm not commenting on bhaarateeya vaayusena as article is tagged with underconstruction tag.<>< Bill william comptonTalk 15:38, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

fravari 2012

  • Salma Hayek

sitmbar 2012

main is lekh ko prastaavit karta hooain, prabandhak gan krupaya vichaar karein. dhanyavaad dau0kraant ema0ela0varma (vaarta) 07:13, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

November 2012

July 2013

krupaya rivaulvar (.32 bor) lekh ki or dhyaan dein. yeh saari aavashyakataayein poorn karta hai. mujhe prasannata hogi yadi aap log ise chunate hain. dau0'kraant'ema0ela0varma (vaarta) 08:16, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

tippaniyaaain
  1. uddharanon ka istemaal karein.
  2. "bahaari kadiyaaain" anubhaag mein linkon ke sheershak dein.
  3. "aagneya astr" kya hota hai?
  4. "inhein bhi dekhein" anubhaag mein un vishyon ke baare mein bataaeain jo lekh ke vishay se sambandh rakhate hon parantu unhein lekh mein link naheen kiya gaya hai. 'bandook' ek aam shabd hai, 'rivaulvar' lekh ka vishay hi hai tatha 'bhaarateeya aayudh nirmaani' ko pehle se hi lekh mein link kiya ja chuka hai.

<>< bill William kaumpatanvaarta 14:29, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

chooki mainne pehle is lekh ko angreji vikeepeediya ke lekh ka mainuali anuvaad karke banaaya tha at: svaabhaavik roop se baahari kadiyon me vahi sootr jyon ke tyon de diye the jabki usaki koi aavashyakta naheen thi. ab mainne unhein hata diya hai. aur bhi kai sanshodhan kiye hain. aap ise dubaara dekh lein. dhanyavaaddau0'kraant'ema0ela0varma (vaarta) 17:50, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
kraant ji, main aaj ka aalekh ke baare mein adhik jaankaari naheen rakhata lekin niyamon ke anusaar kuchh tippaniyaaain de raha hooain. ye tippaniyaaain aaj ka aalekh aavashyakataaen par diye gaye saat niyamon par aadhaarit hain:
  1. shabdon ki sankhya kam se kam 250 avashya ho. - (theek)
  2. kam se kam ek chitr avashya ho. - (theek)
  3. kam se kam 2 sandarbh avashya hon aur sandarbhon ko uchit taig dvaara theek se lagaaya gaya ho. - (sujhaav)
    • koi bhi sandarbh main meri sansthaan mein naheen khol pa raha hooain lekin sarn mein mainne ye sab kholkar dekhe hain aur sahi bhi hain. kehne ka taatparya yeh hai ki main ise sampaadit naheen kar sakta. sandarbh 2 aur 7 samaan hain tatha inke sheershak bhinn kiye gaye hain jinhein theek kiya jaaye. sandarbh mein {{cite web}} ka upayog karein to sundarata badhegi.
  4. lekh ki bhaasha saral lekin sateek ho. - (theek)
  5. lekh mein apne vishay pramukh jaanakaariyaaain avashya hon. - (theek)
  6. viraam chihnon ka sahi prayog ho. - (sujhaav)
    • iske alaava jnyaaanasandook mein India ke sthaan par Bhaarat likhein. laaghav chinh (॰) ke sthaan par dot (.) ka upayog na karein, (jaise: bor S. end dabloo.).
  7. lekh ka le out saaf suthara aur sundar ho. - (sujhaav)
    • kuchh vartani sudhaar karein, yatha: maadal -> model.

uparokt sudhaar hone par main iska samarthan kar duainga. ☆a★sanjeev Kumar (baatein) 18:25, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

aapke sujhaav ke anusaar mainne aaj hi sanshodhan kar diye hain. dau0'kraant'ema0ela0varma (vaarta) 07:46, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
Yes check.svg samarthan. niymo ke anusaar ab yeh lekha aaj ka aalekh mein shaameel kiya ja sakta hai.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (baatein) 07:52, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

dhanyavaad kaumpatan ji! dau0'kraant'ema0ela0varma (vaarta) 08:08, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

August 2013

prabandhak! krupaya kaakori kaand lekh ki or dhyaan dein. kal yaani 9 August 2013 ke din yadi ise aaj ka aalekh mein sammilit kar sakein to sameecheen rahega. dhanyavaad! dau0'kraant'ema0ela0varma (vaarta) 10:58, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

kraant ji, mujhe lagta hai prushth ka aakaar "aaj ka aalekh" ki apeksha se kuchh bada hai.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (baatein) 13:40, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
sanjeev ji! prushth ka aakaar kam se kam 250 shabdon ka hona chaahiye adhiktam shabdon ki koi seema filhaal tay naheen ki gayi hai. doosari baat kal yaani 9 August ko iska aitihaasik mahatva hai uske baad aap beshak hata deejiyega mujhe koi bhi etaraaj naheen hoga. dau0'kraant'ema0ela0varma (vaarta) 15:03, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
kraant ji, aapki baat bhi theek hai lekin main to bill ji ke sujhaav ke anusaar tippani kar raha tha. unhonne mujhe kuchh dinon poorv isse milta julata sujhaav diya tha. theek hai main prushth ko dekhta hooain aur der raat tak mere sujhaav likh dunga.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (baatein) 15:55, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

May 2014

sudhaalekh pariyojana ke tahat sudhaare gaye is lekh ko main sadasyon ki or se naamaankit karta hooain. isse mukhaprushth ki gatisheelata bhi sunishchit hogi. ░a▒a▓shubham kanodiya vaarta 06:09, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

moolyaaainkan

  • aaj ka aalekh mein shabdon ki sankhya kam se kam 250 avashya ho. Yes check.svg
  • kam se kam ek chitr avashya ho. Yes check.svg
  • kam se kam 2 sandarbh avashya hon aur sandarbhon ko uchit taig dvaara theek se lagaaya gaya ho. Yes check.svg
  • lekh ki bhaasha saral lekin sateek ho. Yes check.svg
  • lekh mein apne vishay pramukh jaanakaariyaaain avashya hon. Yes check.svg
  • viraam chihnon ka sahi prayog ho. Yes check.svg
  • lekh ka le out saaf suthara aur sundar ho. Yes check.svg

tippani- lekh ki bhoomika mein, khaaskar ki praarambhik 3-4 panktiyon mein jinmein ki adhiktam moolabhoot jaankaari hai, vahaaain sandarbh diye jaane chaahiyeain. --manoj khuraana vaarta 06:53, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

  • moolyaankan ki drushti se aaj ka aalekh hetu yeh sarvatha upayukt prushth hai. bhoomika mein sandarbh ka istemaal na karein. yadi sambhav ho to sandarbh sankhya 5 ka istemaal kisi anya anubhaag mein kiya jaaye.--maala chaubevaarta 07:48, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
@Mala chaubey: mujhe lagta hai bhoomika mein aaj ka aalekh ke liye naamaankit prushthon mein sandarbh ho sakte hain lekin vaise aapka kehna bhi theek hai yadi yeh sandarbh kaheen anya sthaan par ho to achha hoga.
iske atirikt main soch raha hooain ki prushth mein thode sudhaar aur kar diye jaayein to ise nirvaachit prushth ke roop mein naamaankit karna uchit rahega. vaise mujhe yahaaain bhi koi aapatti naheen hai.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 04:31, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
@sanjeev Kumar:ji, main aapke vichaaron se sahamat hooain ki thode sudhaar aur kar diye jaayein to ise nirvaachit prushth ke roop mein naamaankit kiya ja sakta hai, kintu filhaal iska naamaankan aaj ka aalekh hetu hua hai. isliye adyatan kar diya jaana chaahiye.--maala chaubevaarta 13:07, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
@Mala chaubey: mujhe koi aapati naheen hai. chooainki abhi anya prabandhak (siddhaarth ji, Hunnjazal ji aur aasheesh ji chhuti par hain) aniruddh ji aur bill ji ki upasthiti bhi bahut kam hai at: is avastha mein yeh kaarya aap ya mujhe hi (shubham ji naamaankanakartta hone ke naate naheen kar sakte) karna hai. at: yadi samay mile to ise aaj hi "aaj ka aalekh" mein jod dein. mainne aaj ka aalekh mein kabhi adhik ruchi naheen li at: prakriya ko poornataya padhna padega.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 16:28, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

June 2014

vaise mainne to is lekh ko na banaaya aur na sudhaara par ye lekh aaj ka aalekh ki saari aavashyakataaeain poori karta hain. isliye main is lekh ko aaj ka aalekh ke liye naamaaainkit karta hooain.peeyoosh mauryavaarta 03:40, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

peeyoosh ji, yeh ek vivaadit lekh raha hai aur ise aise naamaankanon se bachaakar vivaad se door rakha jaaye to hi achha hai. yahaaain naamaankan ise pun: vivaadon mein dakhel sakta hai. (mera vyaktigat vichaar)☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 07:04, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
sanjeev ji mujhe to iska vivaadit hone ke baare mein jaankaari naheen thi, vo to ye lekh kaafi achha banaaya gaya tha to mainne socha isko naamaaainkit kar dooain. agar aap ko koi aapatti na ho to kya mein is vivaad ke baare mein jaan sakta hooain?--peeyoosh mauryavaarta 09:17, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
aap kuchh tippaniyaaain dekh sakte ho. sabhi vivaad bataana vyaktigat hamle aur puraane murde ukhaadne jaisa rahega at: main aapke saath poorn vivaad saajha naheen karna chaahata. vaise aapko bata deta hooain ki isi vivaad ke parinaamasvaroop prushth ke 336 sampaadan hataaye ja chuke hain.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 09:25, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
vaise mujhe saari baat to samajh mein naheen I par mujhe lagta vivaad shaayad hiton ke takaraav tha. par mere khyaal se us vivaad vaale lekh ko to hataaya ja chuka? ye lekh to dobaara kisi aur banaaya hai jismein aap ka, naajiya ji ka, aur kisi parikalpana ka yogadaan hai. agar fir bhi aap ko lagta hai isse koi naya vivaad shuru ho jaayega, to main ye naamaankan vaapis lene ko taiyaar hooain--peeyoosh mauryavaarta 10:35, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
peeyoosh ji, mujhe aisa lagta hai. pun: bane huye lekh ki shuruaat mainne hi ki thi. vo aai॰apee॰ pata us samay mera hi tha. lekin us lekh mein pehle bhi mujhe naheen lagta koi vivaadit saamagri thi at: ab bhi lekh par vivaad hona ek svaabhaavik prakriya hai aisa mujhe lagta hai at: is vivaad ki sambhaavana se door raha jaaye utana hi achha hai.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 11:30, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
raveendr prabhaat ji ke mainne kai saakshaatkaar liye hain. unke baare mein tatha unki saahityik visheshataaon ke baare mein khoob jaanti hooain. unki blog aalochna ki pravruti par jaagruti sharma ne shodh prabandh prastut kiya hai. main bhi aajkal unke gjlon mein maanaveeya moolyon ki jhalak vishay par pi H di kar rahi hooain.unki gjlon ki pehli pustak hamasafr ka urdoo mein tarjuma bhi main kar rahi hooain. jab vikipeediya par I to raveendr prabhaat ji ke adhoore lekh dekhkar mainne kaafi sanpaadan kiya hai. lekin main naheen jaanti ki puraana vivaad kya hai? aur na aaj ke aalekh mein lekh ki kya kraaiteriya honi chaahiye yeh bhi naheen jaanti. sanjeev ji prabandhak hain aur ve is lekh ko aaj ka aalekh ke liye upayukt nahi maanate to vaad-vivaad karne se kya faayda?Naziah rizvi (vaarta) 16:15, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
naajiya ji, main yeh naheen kah raha ki lekh mein pehle saamagri vivaadit thi. pehle bhi lekh mein saamaanya saamagri hi thi. keval kuchh sadasyon ka aapasi manamutaav ho gaya tha. main naheen chaahata ki mukhaprushth par ise dekhkar anya sadasya pun: manamutaav karne lagein. anya prabandhak yadi is lekh ko "aaj ka aalekh" ke liye upayukt samajhein to aisa kar sakte hain mujhe koi aapati naheen hai, lekin main yeh kaarya naheen karna chaahata kyonki main is tarah se ek naye vivaad ko janm naheen dena chaahata.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 17:27, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
is lekh ki ek anya charcha aap yahaaain dekh sakte ho. us charcha ke baad lekh ko rakha gaya tha aur uske baad ke vivaad ne prushth ko hatava diya tha at: aap vivaad ka star samajh sakte ho.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 17:31, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
oopar ke samast vivaad aadi se hatkar main apna nishpaksh mat prastut karna chaahata hooain. main saahitya aadi ke kshetr ka koi jyaada bada jaankaar naheen hooain at: meri rai ko ek aam aadmi ki rai ki tarah dekha ja sakta hai. ek do din pehle aaj ka aalekh mein "bhaaratendu hareeshachandr" ji ka lekh mukhaprushth par pradarshit hua tha. mere jaisa saahitya mein vishesh ruchi na rakhane wala ek aam aadmi bhi unke naam se vaakif hai. mukhaprushth par pradarshan hetu mere vichaar se ati-ullekhaneeya vishay hon to jyaada achha hai. prabhaat ji ka naam mainne vikipeediya se pehle naheen suna tha, apne udaaharan se main anumaan laga sakta hooain ki yeh vishay adhik paathakon ki ruchi jaagrut karne wala shaayad na ho. aadhunik saahityakaaron mein bhi kai aur naam hain jo adhik prasiddh tatha adhik paathakon ki ruchi jaagrut karne vaale hain jaise Khushwant Singh, chetan bhagat, amruta preetam aadi. at: is kaaran se main is lekh ko mukhaprushth par sthaan dene hetu abhi uchit naheen samajhta. --manoj khuraana vaarta 05:09, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
sanjeev ji,

aapke dvaara diye gaye link ko mainne dekha hi naheen, balki usaki riviyu bhi ki hai aur main is nishkarsh par pahunchi hooain ki is lekh mein saamagri na to pehle vivaadit thi aur na ab hai. vivaad keval maanasikta ka hai. taang kheenchne ki pravruti waali Asiaee maanasikta mein yeh jagajaahir hai. aapne sahi kaha ki puraane lekh mein keval kuchh sadasyon ke aapasi manamutaav saamane aaye hain. maala ji ne shaayad pakshapaat se bachane ke liye apne aap ko is prushth ke sanpaadan se alag kar liya ho main naheen jaanti, lekin agar nae lekh ka avlokan karein to yeh saaf ho jaata hai ki is lekh ko aapne banaaya hai aur mainne sanpaadan kiya hai. na to aap raveendr ji ke rishtedaar hain aur na main aur na piyoosh ji. fir niymaanukool baat kyon naheen ki ja rahi hai?

  • aaj ka aalekh mein shabdon ki sankhya kam se kam 250 avashya ho. Yes check.svg
  • kam se kam ek chitr avashya ho. Yes check.svg
  • kam se kam 2 sandarbh avashya hon aur sandarbhon ko uchit taig dvaara theek se lagaaya gaya ho. Yes check.svg
  • lekh ki bhaasha saral lekin sateek ho. Yes check.svg
  • lekh mein apne vishay pramukh jaanakaariyaaain avashya hon. Yes check.svg
  • viraam chihnon ka sahi prayog ho. Yes check.svg
  • lekh ka le out saaf suthara aur sundar ho. Yes check.svg

manoj khuraana ji ne kaha ki prabhaat ji ka naam mainne vikipeediya se pehle naheen suna tha. mujhe hansi aati hai aisi baatein sunakar. vikipeediya par vyakti naheen bolata hai,sandarbh bolte hain. rahi vishay ki ullekhniyta ki baat to kya yeh kam hai ki unki kitaabein vaishvik pustak soochi mein shumaar hai. unhonne hindi blogging ka itihaas likha hai aur aisa karne vaale ve ek maatr bhaarateeya hain. unhonne hindi blogging ki pehli mulyaankanaparak pustak ka sanpaadan kiya hai. unhonne samakaaleen nepaali saahitya ka sanpaadan kiya hai jiske liye unhein Nepal ki saahitya academy kahe jaane waali Nepal ki sheersh raajakeeya sanstha Nepal prajnyaa pratishthaan ne prashansit aur sammaanit kiya hai. unke oopar lekh angreji sahit vishv ki chaar darjan se jyaada bhaashaaon ki viki par hai. aap Punjab ke ho shaayad, iseeliye Khushwant Singh, chetan bhagat aur amruta preetam ke alaava anya saahityakaar ko naheen jaante.

is lekh ko kya iseeliye aaj ka aalekh mein shaamil naheen kiya ja sakta, kyonki kuchh sadasya lekhak ko naheen jaante. ya fir isliye shaamil naheen kiya ja sakta, kyonki puraane lekh mein kuchh sadasyon ke aapasi manamutaav saamane aaye the? agar yahi kaaran hai to aaj ka aalekh ke niymaavali ka kya matlab hai? pehle niymaavali badaliye fir baat keejiye.Naziah rizvi (vaarta) 17:01, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

@Naziah rizvi: mainne lekh ki saamagri ko kabhi vivaadit naheen kaha. na hi ise hataane se pehle ki saamagri ko vivaadit kaha.
manoj ji ki baat par aapko hansi aaye ye bhi aapke liye mumakeen ho sakta hai lekin mera haal bhi manoj ji jaisa hi hai. aap yahaaain ye bhool rahi hain ki manoj ji vaanijya se sambandhit jaankaari rakhate hain at: yeh unke liye sambhav hai. main vigyaan se sambandhit vishyon ki jaankaari rakhata hooain aur bahut se vaigyaaniko ko vyaktigat roop se jaanta hooain. kya aap 5 se adhik bhaarateeya (jeevit) vaigyaaniko ke naam bata sakti hain shaayad naheen. kyonki aapka vo kshetr naheen hai.
ab rahi baat aaj ka aalekh ki. to main aapko yahi samajhaane ka prayaas kar raha hooain ki mujhe ismein koi aapati naheen hai aur na hi main iska samarthan kar raha hooain. yadi anya koi prabandhak ismein jaisa uchit samajhe apna faisala le sakta hai. main ismein apni taraf se kuchh naheen kahooainga.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 18:24, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
@sanjeev Kumar: ji, yahi baat main lagaataar samajhaane ki koshish kar rahi hooain, ki vivaad ka naheen samvaad ka hissa bana jaae. vikinitiyon se baahar jaakar baatein na kiya jaae.Naziah rizvi (vaarta) 02:51, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
@Naziah rizvi: kai baar samvaad hi vivaad ka roop le leta hai aur main us vivaad se bachana chaahata hooain jo samvaad ke kaaran bane.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 07:02, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

7 June 2014

vahi puraani kahaani ki na to mainne is lekh ko banaaya hai aur na sudhaara par ye lekh aaj ka aalekh ki saari aavashyakataaeain poori karta hain isliye main is lekh ko aaj ka aalekh ke liye naamaaainkit karta hooain.--peeyoosh mauryavaarta 08:17, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

ummeed hai ispar to koi vivaad naheen hua tha aur na hoga.--peeyoosh mauryavaarta 15:25, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

July 2015

  • pratyaashi lekh: haarda_diska_draaiv

kaafi achha lekh hai, ummeed hai jald mukhaprushth par dikhega. chandra shekhar/Shekhar 10:48, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

August 2015

@Manojkhurana, sanjeev Kumar, hindusthaan vaasi, aur Mala chaubey: ji, krupya is prushth ko parakhein va mukhaprushth par jagah dein. vahaaain kai dinon se kuchh hi lekh ripeet ho rahe hain. --chandra shekhar/Shekhar 16:21, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

  1. ek baar fir aap @Manojkhurana, sanjeev Kumar, hindusthaan vaasi, Mala chaubey, satyam mishr, aur anunaad Singh: prabandhakon ka is taraf dhyaan dilaana chaahooainga. --chandra shekhar/Shekhar 12:28, 11 September 2015 (UTC)