vaarta:devanaagari ki vaijnyaaanikta

yeh prushth devanaagari ki vaijnyaaanikta lekh ke sudhaar par charcha karne ke liye vaarta panna hai. yadi aap aap apne sandesh par jaldi sabka dhyaan chaahate hain, to yahaaain sandesh likhne ke baad chaupaal par bhi soochana chhod dein.

lekhan sambandhi neetiyaaain

lekh mein devanaagari ki kami ke roop mein bataaya gaya hai ki sh aur sh jaise kuchh shabd anaavashyak jaan padte hain. lekin mein samajhta hooain ki yeh sahi kami naheen hai. udaaharan ke liye jaise aap dekhein to 'usha' aur 'usha' mein antar hai, vartani ka hi naheen balki uchchaaran ka bhi. pehle vaale shabd mein uchchaaran mein sh ka uchchaaran halka hai yaani aur doosare vaale mein sh adhik gahra hai. rohit raavat 10:02, 12 May 2009 (UTC)rohit

lekh hataana ka naamaankan

@sanjeev Kumar: ji, main maanata hooain ki yeh lekh sheeh-naamaankan niymaavali ke anuroop naheen hai. main ise angreji vikipeediya ke Wikipedia:Articles for deletion mein naamaankit karna chaahata tha. par mujhe ye hindi vikipeediya par naheen mila. isliye mainne iska sheeh-naamaankan kar diya. main iske liye maafi chaahata hooain.
main ab bhi ise Wikipedia:Articles for deletion ke tahat naamaankit karna chaahata hooain. krupaya bataaeain ki hindi vikipeediya par ye kaise kar sakte hain. dhanyavaad. --gaurav sood (vaarta) 22:13, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

@Gauravsood0289: hamaare yahaaain ki vartamaan niymaavali ke anusaar is prushth ko sheegra hataane ke liye naamaankit naheen kiya ja sakta. aap ise hataane hetu charcha ke liye naamaankit kar sakte ho aur uske baad usapar charcha aur anya logon ki tippaniyaaain hi ise hataaye jaane ke samay ka nirdhaaran kareinge. ho sakta hai aapka naamaankan vahaaain bhi asafal ho lekin vahaaain aapke sandarbhit tark isko hatava bhi sakte hain.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 22:17, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
@sanjeev Kumar: ji dhanyavaad. main yahi dhoondh raha tha. aapka samay barbaad karne ke liye maafi chaahata hooain. --gaurav sood (vaarta) 22:23, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

hataane ke liye naamaankit karne ka kaaran

California vishvavidyaalaya, Berkeley ki website par "vigyaan kya naheen hai" lekh dekhiye. ismein "Science doesn't make aesthetic judgments" anuchhed padhiye. ismein likha hai ki "Science can reveal the frequency of a G-flat and how our eyes relay information about color to our brains, but science cannot tell us whether a Beethoven symphony, a Kabuki performance, or a Jackson Pollock painting is beautiful or dreadful.". isi prakaar vigyaan naheen bata sakta ki hindi bhaasha jyaada achhi hai ya angreji. yeh ek vaigyaanik prashn naheen hai.

isliye "devanaagari ki vaijnyaaanikta" naam arthaheen hai. yeh kaha ja sakta hai ki hindi bhaasha ke angreji bhaasha ki tulana mein bahut laabh hain. par yeh naheen kaha ja sakta ki hindi bhaasha vaigyaanik drushti mein jyaada achhi hai kyonki yeh ek vaigyaanik prashn naheen hai. --gaurav sood (vaarta) 23:42, 18 November 2015 (UTC)