vaarta:devanaagari ank

yeh prushth devanaagari ank lekh ke sudhaar par charcha karne ke liye vaarta panna hai. yadi aap aap apne sandesh par jaldi sabka dhyaan chaahate hain, to yahaaain sandesh likhne ke baad chaupaal par bhi soochana chhod dein.

lekhan sambandhi neetiyaaain

prayog sambandhi vivaad

hindi vikipeediya par naagari ank prayog sambandhi vivaad

hindi vikipeediya ke chaupaal prushth par hui charcha ke sanpaadit ansh diye ja rahe hain.

devanaagari ank ka aam evam sansthaagat prayog

mitron, hindi viki mein devanaagari ankon ka prayog kiya jaata raha hai yeh svaabhaavik hai parantu Bhaarat ke adhikaarik evam agrani hindi sansthaan ne bahut saal pehle hindi mein roman ank chalaane nirnaya le liya, shikshakon ko bhi isi prakaar taalim diya ja raha hai, Bhaarat bhar mein hindi me roman ankon (0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ) ka hi prayog kiya jaata hai. sansad ke vidheyak, kaanoon sambandhit baatein aadi aadi. dekhiye kendreeya hindi sansthaan ka roman anko mein likha yeh prushth. aajkal ke bachche devanaagari sankhya nahi jaante iska kaaran hindi sansthaan ke nirdesh anusaar roman number hi unhonein padha hai, aane waali peendhi hi jab samajh na paaegi to hindi viki ka bhavishya kya hoga? bhavaani Gautam 04:17, 21 May 2011 (UTC) Bhaarat ke adhikaarik evam agrani hindi sansthaan bhi roman anko ka prayog karte hai, krupaya anya sadasya bhi apne vichaar prastut kare.--Mayur (talk•Email) 04:29, 21 May 2011 (UTC) bhaarateeya/devanaagari ankon ke upayog mein kya buraai hai? aur rahi baat inke ekdam se samajh mein na aane ki to yeh bata dooain ki jab koi cheej bahut baar upayog mein hoti hai to vah aadat ban hi jaati hai. mumbai jaise mahaanagaron mein to bason ki maarg sankhyaaon ke liye bhi devanaagari ankon ka upayog hota hai --.rohit raavat (vaarta) 02:17, 23 June 2011 (UTC) mitron mainne pehle bhi kaha tha ki aakhir hindi ke saat ankon ko seekhana (shoonya aur do to ek jaise hi hote hain, teen bhi lagbhag vaisa hi hai) itna kathin kyon lagta hai kuchh logon ko. ham log khud bhi aur apne bachchon ko angreji ke saikadon shabd ratate huye gauravaanvit mahasoos karte hain kya hindi ke saat ank naheen seekh sakte. rahi baat samajh na aane ki to jab sab jagah se hata deinge to samajh kahaaain se aayeinge. aaj filmi sitaare kehte hain ki unhein devanaagari samajh naheen aati, ve romanaagari mein script padhte hain. kal ko aane waali peedhi kahegi ki devanaagari mushkil hai to kya hindi vikipeediya ko romanaagari mein badal daaleinge. Maharashtra aur uttaraakhand mein devanaagari ankon ka prachalan hai, aur bhi uttar bhaarateeya raajyon mein hoga. rahi baat in sansthaanon ka to hindi ke poornaviraam aur ankon ka katl to ve kar hi chuke hain. -- shreesh e-pandit vaarta 17:03, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

  • agar samay ke saath naheen chaleinge to hindi khtm ho jaaegi. vikipeediya ke jriye hindi ko koi mod naheen diya ja sakta. prashan seedha hai aur keval do raste hain - (k) shuddh hindi likhein jo koi naheen padhega aur ham chaar-paaainch ginti ke log khush hote raheinge (g) aisi hindi likhein jo aam hindeebhaashiyon ko angreji se adhik samajh aaye aur vah anaayaas hi yahaaain lekh padhein. (k) ka koi faayda naheen - yeh ek vyarth prayaas hoga. …avyaktigt star par mujhe hindi mein naagari ank pasand hain - unase hindi ki sugandh aati hai. lekin yeh mahaj meri akele ki bhaavana hai. … hindostaani ank poore jahaaain par is tarah chha gaye ke sabko apni ank pranaaliyaaain chhodkar unka daaman pakadna pada. roman ank kahaaain hain? mar gaye. cheeni ank kahaaain hain? mar gaye. yeh kya kam jeet hai? agar un bhaashaaoain ki haani naheen hui to hindi ki jra si fer-badal kar apne hi ankon ka ek aur roop apnaane mein bhala kya hogi? --Hunnjazal (vaarta) 07:54, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
  • kya oopar kahi saat ankon waali baat kisi ke gale se naheen utari, jo log yahaan hindi bhaasha mein jaankaari lene aate hain, ve kya hindi ke saat ank naheen seekh sakte hain, ya maan lein ki yeh bhi ek jaankaari hai. --ये सदस्य हिन्दी विकिपीडिया के प्रबंधक है।prasha:aasheesh bhatanaagar vaarta 04:56, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

dharohar ko shuddh rakhana jitna aavashyak hai, utana hi aavashyak hai use aage badhaana. is tarah in donon ke beech ka raasta chuna jaaye, jisse ki adhik mushkil bhi na ho, adhik ashuddhi bhi na ho, kintu adhik kathin bhi na ho. jaisa ki oopar kisi ne kaha bhi hai ki maatr 7 ank hindi ke seekh lena kaun sa kathin kaarya hai - is par amal karna saral hi hai, aur isse shuddhata evam dharohar bhi bani rahegi. jisne hindi ke 56 akshar seekh liye to 7 aur sahi.

--ये सदस्य हिन्दी विकिपीडिया के प्रबंधक है।prasha:aasheesh bhatanaagar vaarta 06:07, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
  • samvidhaan se baahar aakar school collegeon ke kitaabon ko dekhein to raashtrabhaasha, jise saare Bhaarat mein vyaapak paimaane par padha aur padhaaya jaata hai, ki paathya pustakon mein naagari ankon ka hi prayog hota hai. hindi bhaashi pradesh mein vyaapak roop se padhi-padhaai jaane vaale hindi saahitya mein naagari ankon ka istemaal hota hai. yeh hindi vishay sangh lok seva aayog ki pariksha ka bhi ek lokapriya vishay hai. gaaainv ki paathashaala mein aaj bhi bachche naagari ank mein hi pahaada seekhane ki shuruaat karte hain. kam-se-kam meri aur mere aas-paas ke bachchon ki paathashaala ki shiksha ki shuruaat inheen ankon mein hui thi. hindi ke kuchh akhbaar aur kai patrikaaon mein naagari ank prayog kiye ja rahe hain. aur inki vitran sankhya angreji akhbaaron se adhik hai. aniruddh vaarta 04:36, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
  • maraathi, sanskrut, nepaali aadi mein devanaagari ank hi chal rahe hain. -- anunaad Singhvaarta 09:00, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
* darasal poore Bhaarat mein hindi ke vaastavik svaroop ko mitaane ka jo kuchakr chal raha hai yeh usi niti ka bhaag hai. aur aajkal dekhne mein aa raha hai ki hindi viki par angreji ke ghaalamel ka chalan bhi aa chuka hai. fraanseesi hi kyon, cheeni, Japani, Koreai jaisi bhaashaaen bhi vishv ki kathintam bhaashaaen hain, aur unki lipi bhi to kya un logon ne apni lipiyon ko badal daala hai? naheen na. ... rohit raavat (vaarta) 16:27, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
  • sab jaante hai ki adhikaansh hindi vaktaaon ko devanaagari sankhyaaon se zyaada antararaashtreeya sankhyaaon zyaada gyaan hai. mein naheen chaahata ki hamaare paathako ko Google traanslet ya samaan kisi upakaran se devanaagari anko ka matlab pata lagaana pare. isliye mein antararaashtreeya sankhyaaon ko samarthan deta hu. ♛a♚a★aVaibhav Jain★a♚a♛ Talk Email 09:45, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
  • main swayam aaj tak saintis tiya igarahaaain se aur pandrah chhaka nabbe hi padhta hooain. aur na main anootha hooain na akela. hindi vikiya par naagari ankon ke prayog ka nirnaya gaaainv, dehaat ki paathashaalaaon auऱ shahari hindi padhne vaalon ke aadhaar par hona chaahiye. keval vikiya sanpaadanakartaaon ki takaniki suvidha ko dhyaan mein rakhakar naheen.

vikipeediya par sanpaadan sambandhi samasyaaen

viki me bhi saaaincha (Template) ka nirmaan karte samay bahut saari samasyaaen aateen hai, dekhe yeh saaaincha. bhavaani Gautam 04:17, 21 May 2011 (UTC) meedeeyaaviki poorn rup se antarraashtriya anko par kaarya karta hai, jaisa ki utkarsh ko maheenon ke kailendar banaane mein samasya hui thi isi prakaar kai koding vaale saanchon ka istemaal bhi devanaagari anko ke saath sambhav naheen. --Mayur (talk•Email) 06:21, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

  • haan jahaan prograaming ki baat aati hai, to avashya ham angreji ke ank prayog kar sakte hain, aisa mainne bhi kai baar kiya hai. --ये सदस्य हिन्दी विकिपीडिया के प्रबंधक है।prasha:aasheesh bhatanaagar vaarta 04:56, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
  • main maafi chaahooainga lekin hamein shaayad in ankon se samjhauta karna padega kyonki meedeeyaaviki mein aisi kai saaainche evam sandesh hai jo keval antarraashtriya ank hi sveekaar karte hai jaisa ki aapne dekha ki utkarsh ko kailandar ka saaaincha banaane mein kaafi pareshaani hui. yeh parivartan sirf saaftaveyar samasya ko sulajhaane ke liye meediyaaviki devalepars dvaara kiya gaya. --Mayur (talk•Email) 16:36, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
  • jiska samaadhaan upalabdh ho uske liye samjhauta karne ki jaroorat naheen hai. aapka ek baut aaj ka aalekh aur samaachaar sahit saare prushthon ke antarraashtreeya ankon ko naagari ankon mein badal sakta hai. saaaincha aadi takaniki kaamon mein mushkil aa rahi hai to vahaaain antarraashatreeya ankon ka istemaal karne mein koi harj naheen hai. kintu is majaboori ko saiddhaantik roop se sarvamaanya maanak ka roop to mat deejiye. aniruddh vaarta 03:41, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
  • bye difaalt seting mein agar devanaagari ank kar diye jaaye to kai saaainchon ko banaane mein samasya aayegi evam aati rahi hai, hamanein hamaare taayaping tool se abhi tak yeh suvidha naheen hataayi hai hamanein keval bye difaalt devanaagari ki jagah antarraashtriya ank kar diye hai jisse ki saaftaveyar intarafes mein koi samasya na aaye. parantu bye difaalt kar dene se kai jagah antarraashtriya ank dikheinge jaise hamaare hastaakshar karne par dikhte hai agar hamanein devanaagari ankon mein likha to aadhe jagah devanaagari evam aadhe jagah antarraashtriya ank dikhaayi deinge. jo achha naheen lagega, isaliye nirnaya antarraashtriya anko ke paksh mein liya gaya. vaise koi devanaagari ank prayog karna chaahe to kar sakta hai ham baat ki sahaayata se aise samast lekhon ko antarraashtriya ankon mein parivrtit kar sakte hai.--Mayur (talk•Email) 13:01, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
  • aajkal aise tool hain jo keval ek kunji dabaane maatr se devanaagari se antararaashtreeya ankon mein ya iske ulta badal sakte hain. isaliye isse kisi ko asuvidha naheen hogi.

-- anunaad Singhvaarta 09:00, 3 August 2011 (UTC) jab tak aur jahaaain tak yaantrik baadha ho tabatak aur vahaaain tak antarraashatreeya ankon (yadyapi yeh bhraamak shabd hai) ka prayog karte rahana chaahiye. kintu lakshya to naagari ank hi hain ya ho sakte hain. pehle aadhaar ke liye stab saaaincha lagta tha shreni ke liye kaitegari. kintu kya is disha mein kiya gaya parivartan hi sahi naheen hai? ... tab yaantrik baadhaaen bhi jyaada theen. pehle ke liye gaye nirnayon ko badalne se pehle uske peechhe ke nihit bhaav ko poore sandarbh mein samajhne ki jaroorat hai. suvidhaaon ke anusaar badalne ke bajaay suvidhaaon ka nirmaan karne ki sanskruti kya adhik behtar naheen hai. kam se kam aisi aakaanksha to rakhani hi chaahiye. aniruddh vaarta 04:41, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

  • ab jaalaprushthon ke naam yaani ki websiton ke naam tak laatin lipi mein rahane aavashyak naheen hai. yadi Bhaarat mahaan ke log hote to kehte yeh to sambhav hi naheen hai. aur baat bhi sahi hai, aakhir kisi bhi praudyogiki par keval ek hi bhaasha ka dabadaba kyon ho! rohit raavat (vaarta) 16:27, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
  • main swayam ek prograamar (bhi) hooain, aur bhali-bhaaainti samajhta hooain ki naagari ankon se kya-kya samasyaaeain aa sakti hain, lekin is nyaayya maaaing ke viruddh mujhe (ku)tark karne ki koi ichha naheen hai. kabhi koi samasya aayi to ham sab mil-baithakar sulajha sakte hain, aakhir ham sabhi khule dimaag ke log hain. oopar ki bahas mein, jinhein hindi naheen aati hai unka stand to samjha ja sakta hai, parantu hamaare hindi jaanane vaale mitr to is baat ko samjheinge aisi aasha hai. dhanyavaad. -Hemant wikikoshvaarta 07:11, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

saanskrutik tatha asmitaaparak sarokaar

sabhi maananeeya sadasyon ka dhyaan main ek mahatvapoorn tathya ki or aakrusht karna chaahata hooain, ki angreji mein prayog hone vaale ank 1 2 3 aadi roman ank naheen hain (roman ank I, II, III, IV aadi hote hain), yeh bhaarateeya anko ka hi antararaashtreeya svaroop hai, jo Bhaarat se arab gaya aur vahaan se Europe. main bhi bhaarateeya ankon ke antararaashtreeya svaroop ke prayog ka himaayati hooain. Dinesh smita 04:55, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

antarraashtreeya ank achhe raheinge, lekin puraane hindi ankon mein bhi kuchh bura naheen. cheeni aur Japani mein antarraashtreeya ank prayog hone lage hain aur theek lagte hain. arabi-faarasi mein unke ank istemaal hote hain. ve bhi theek lagte hain. mere khyaal se nepaali mein abhi bhi hindi-jaise puraane ankon ka rivaaj hai. bangaali mein bhi bangaali ankon ka hi rivaaj hai. apne alag ank hone ka thaath hota hai - sirf praacheen aur sthaapit sabhyataaon mein unke apne ank milte hain. --Hunnjazal 05:54, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

  • yadi bhaarateeya hindi bhaashi hi devanaagari ankon ka prayog naheen kareinge to ye ank samay ke saath hi vilupt ho jaayeinge. jo garv ham ye kehte hue mahasoos karte hain ki roman ank bhaarateeya - mool ke hain, usaka saakshi kya rah jaayega. kya ham sada hi udhaar ki bhaasha, udhaar ke ank aadi prayog karte raheinge?
  • jinhein yahaan roman ank prayog karne hon, ve svatantr hain, kintu poochha jaaye to praaroop mein devanaagari ank hi prayog hone chaahiye. --ये सदस्य हिन्दी विकिपीडिया के प्रबंधक है।prasha:aasheesh bhatanaagar vaarta 12:57, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

|- |} |} antarraashtreeya ank roman ankon se alag hain aur bhaarateeya mool ke hain.

doosari baat, bhaasha ek bahti nadi ki tarah hai. agar aap use "sanrakshit" karne ke naam par uske bahaav ko rok deinge, to vah lupt ho jaaegi. sanskrut ke saath bhi yahi hua. agar aap sochate hain ki hindi vikeepeediya par devanaagari ankon ka prayog karne se aane waali peedhi bhi inheen ankon ka prayog karne lagegi, to aap galat sochate hain. agali peedhi to vikeepeediya ki bajaay kuchh aur padhne lagegi, jo unhein samajh mein aata ho. hindi ki durdasha ka sabse bada kaaran sanrakshan ke naam par iska jabaran sanskruteekaran hai, jo ise nai peedhi se door le ja raha hai. agar aisa hi chalta raha to dheere-dheere sanskrut ki yeh bhaasha bhi lupt ho jaaegi. utkarsharaaj (vaarta) 05:55, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
  • kabhi kabhi ye bhi prayaas karna chaahiye ki ham pehle bane sabke chalne ke raaste par hi sada kyoon chalein, kabhi to kuchh apna bhi vishesh banaaye rakhein, jis pr shaayad kal vishv chalne lage aur use apna bataaye...... :::::::::::--ये सदस्य हिन्दी विकिपीडिया के प्रबंधक है।prasha:aasheesh bhatanaagar vaarta 06:07, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
  • darasal poore Bhaarat mein hindi ke vaastavik svaroop ko mitaane ka jo kuchakr chal raha hai yeh usi niti ka bhaag hai. aur aajkal dekhne mein aa raha hai ki hindi viki par angreji ke ghaalamel ka chalan bhi aa chuka hai. fraanseesi hi kyon, cheeni, Japani, Koreai jaisi bhaashaaen bhi vishv ki kathintam bhaashaaen hain, aur unki lipi bhi to kya un logon ne apni lipiyon ko badal daala hai? naheen na. ...
  • angreji ka vikaas hone se bhi hajaar parsh poorv Bhaarat ek susanskrut raashtra tha. adhik door naheen keval pados ke cheen mein jaaie tab pata chalega angreji ki kya aukaat hai. ... aur dekha jaae to hindi bhaasha aur devanaagari lipi apne aap mein itni poorn hain ki hamaara kaam angreji ka ek bhi akshar likhe bina chal sakta hai. kya kabhi aisa din bhi aaega ki duniya ke baaki deshon ke log hamaare baare mein kaheinge ki bhaarateeyon ko isse koi farkh naheen padta ki duniya kya kar rahi hai ya America kya kar raha hai, un logon ki to apni neetiyaan aur pranaaliyaaain hain! shaayad ham logon ke jeevan kaal mein to naheen. rohit raavat (vaarta) 16:27, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

samvaidhaanik sthiti

Bhaarat ke samvidhaan ke anuchhed 343 ke anusaar "sangh ki raajabhaasha-- (1) sangh ki raajabhaasha hindi aur lipi devanaagari hogi, sangh ke shaasakeeya prayojanon ke liye prayog hone vaale ankon ka roop bhaarateeya ankon ka antarraashtreeya roop hoga.." utkarsharaaj 19:24, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

  • bhaarateeya sanvidhaan roman ankon ki anumati deta hai, kintu ye naheen kehta ki hamein devanaagari ankon ke sthaan par anivaarya roop se roman ank hi prayog karne chaahiye. --ये सदस्य हिन्दी विकिपीडिया के प्रबंधक है।prasha:aasheesh bhatanaagar vaarta 12:57, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

|- |} |} baar-baar log kehte hain ki samvidhaan mein antarraashtreeya ank hain, samvidhaan mein to hindi ko raajabhaasha banaane ki baat kahi gayi hai kya usaka paalan hota hai? -- shreesh e-pandit vaarta 17:03, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

  • utkarsh ke samvaidhaanik praavadhaan ke sandarbh ke liye itna jaroor kahooainga ki hindi ke samvaidhaanik praavadhaanon ko us samay ki aur baad ki bhaashaayi raajanitik sandarbh se kaatkar sarvasammat nirnaya ke roop mein dekhne se bachein. lekin agar samvaidhaanik praavadhaanon ke ullekh se hi kuchh tay hona hai to utkarsh dvaara uddhrut praavadhaan ke nirmaan ke 4 saal baad raashtrapati da. raajeindr prasaad jinke adhyakshiya mat se hindi raashtrabhaasha ke roop mein darj ho pai thi, ne naagari ankon ke prayog ke liye adhyaadesh jaari kiya tha.
  • Bhaarat sarkaar ki raajabhaasha neeti ka koi arth naheen rah jaata kyonki vah neeti 'sampoorn roop' mein laagoo kahaaain hai? hindi vaalon ko jo-jo tyaagana tha unhone tyaag diye-- anunaad Singhvaarta 09:00, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
  • aur jahaaain tak rahi baat samvidhaan ki to Bhaarat ka samvidhaan bhi ameriki samvidhaan ki nakal hai. aur kaun sa Bhaarat ki sarkaar hi samvidhaan ka paalan karti hai. samvidhaan ke anusaar hindi Bhaarat ki pratham raajabhaasha hai aur sarkaar ke sabhi dastaavej hindi mein to hone hi chaahiye lekin ahindi bhaashi raajyon mein bahut baar keval us raajya ki bhaasha aur angreji jaisi videshi bhaasha mein hi dastaavej upalabdh karaae jaate hain hindi mein naheen. duniya ke dhang ke deshon mein unki apni bhaashaaon mein kaaryakram banaae jaate hai aur unka angreji anuvaad kiya jaata hai aur Bhaarat mahaan mein angreji mein kaaryakram banaae jaate hai aur unka bhaarateeya bhaashaaon mein anuvaad kiya jaata hai.