sadasya vaarta:satyam mishr

मुख्य सदस्य पन्ना mukhya sadasya panna बातचीत पन्ना baatcheet panna मेरा प्रयोगस्थल mera prayogasthal काम बाकी kaam baaki उपयोगी चीजें upayogi cheejein aadhaar prakaar

saaaincha

satyam ji, krupaya ek baar is saaainche ko dekh leejiye. pata naheen kya "afreeka" pradarshit naheen ho raha hai jo ki main pehle dekhna chaahata hooain. dhanyavaad.--mujmmil (vaarta) 07:27, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

mujmmil ji! kuchh jagahon par pipe (|) ki jagah alif ka nishaan laga tha jise theek kar diya hai.--styam mishr baatcheet 08:53, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

dhanyavaad!--mujmmil (vaarta) 09:16, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

madad

satyam ji, Popular science ko hindi mein kya kaheinge? google translate "lokapriya vigyaan" aur "saral vigyaan" sujha raha hai. par mujhe ye naam ajeeb lag rahe hain. krupaya kuchh sujhaaeain. dhanyavaad. --gaurav sood (vaarta) 13:28, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

@Gauravsood0289: ji! aap ise filhaal seedhe "paupular science" likh sakte hain. koi behtar vikalp mile to naam to baad mein bhi badla ja sakta hai. filhaal mujhe bhi koi sateek anuvaad naheen pata. --styam mishr baatcheet 18:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
dhanyavaad satyam ji. --gaurav sood (vaarta) 18:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

satyam ji vikipeediya par kisi pratishtit vyakti ki jaankaari kaise upload ki ja sakti hai krupaya sujhaav dein. Teradeewana (vaarta) 08:54, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

satyam ji vikipeediya par kisi pratishtit vyakti ki jaankaari kaise upload ki ja sakti hai krupaya sujhaav dein. Teradeewana (vaarta) 08:56, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

GoogleTrans gadget can do machine translation on Content Translation system

Hi there,

I noticed your request for Hindi language support for the Content Translation system at

[[1]]

You can try the GoogleTrans gadget, if you wish. It now does machine translation for Hindi to other languages, using the Google translation engine.

Help for this is at:

[[2]]

You can try the version of the gadget that uses the Yandex translation engine if you are translating from Cyrillic languages. Help for this is at:

[[3]]

I, myself, am an intermediate French reader, but since the French-English pair is quite good for Google, I have translated 24 frwiki articles on French forts to the enwiki in the last 6 weeks.

I'm not sure about the quality of the Hindi-English translation engine. Any feedback you can give on this would be most useful.

Endo999 (vaarta) 21:01, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Thanks Endo999 for this information and your work! I hope this work will certainly help our community.
@sanjeev Kumar: ji ! aap is upakaran ka prayog karte hain at: aapse nivedan hai ki ek baar uparokt ki jaaainch kar lein ki yeh kaarya kar raha hai athva naheen. main mobile par ctrl aur alt jaise batan anupasthit hone ke kaaran shaayad iski jaanch na kar paaooain. --styam mishr baatcheet 14:26, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
This tool is working for us too. But google translation from English to Hindi is not good. So, it is not yet very usefull.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 17:20, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
@sanjeev Kumar: thanks sanjeev ji! --styam mishr baatcheet 06:00, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

anurodh

@satyam mishr: yeh prushth dekhiye: Hindi languages. main iska sheeh naamaankan karna chaahata hooain, par kar naheen pa raha hooain. agar aapko theek lage to is prushth ko hata deejiye. --gaurav sood (vaarta) 20:57, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

yeh kaarya poora ho chuka hai! --styam mishr baatcheet 17:08, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

sampaadan ke baare mein

namaskaar, main hindi viki par naya hooain | main jaana chaahata hooain ki apne yahaaain prusht https://hi.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%A4%AD%E0%A5%82%E0%A4%97%E0%A5%8B%E0%A4%B2%E0%A4%B5%E0%A5%87%E0%A4%A4%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%A4%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%93%E0%A4%82_%E0%A4%95%E0%A5%80_%E0%A4%B8%E0%A5%82%E0%A4%9A%E0%A5%80 kis tarah se angreeji se hindi mein anuvaad kiya | agar aap mere sahaayata kar sakein to main viki mein apna yogadaan dena chaahata hooain |--— is ahastaaksharit sandesh ke lekhak hain -Sequencesolved (vaartayogadaan)

@Sequencesolved: ji! namaste, der se javaab dene ke liye maafi chaahata hooain - main in dinon hindi viki par sakriya naheen tha. aap ke dvaara bataaye prushth ka mainne anuvaad mainuali hi kiya hai - arthaat angreji viki se saamagri ko kaupi karke yahaaain pest kar diya - fir hindi mein naamon ko likh daala jaisa unka uchchaaran mujhe samajh mein aaya. bhoogol ka vidyaarthi hone ke kaaran jyaadaatar naamon se parichit tha parantu kaafi naam naheen bhi jaanta ki sahi uchchaaran kya hota hai.
mujhe lagta hai aap yeh poochhana chaah rahe ki is tarah ki list ko kaise banaaya gaya hai ki hindi aur angreji donon kadiyaaain maujood hain. iske liye main kaupi pest ke baad thode se parivartan faaind-riples vaale karke hindi naamon ke liye khaali jagah bana leta hooain. iske liye angreji ke kadi vaale naamon ke aage [[ aur, peechhe lage ]] ko kramash: [[]] - <small>([[:en:| aur |]])</small> se badal leta hooain. iska taaja udaaharan dekhna ho to aap ek anya viki par yahaaain dekh sakte hain jo aaj hi banaaya hai aur devanaagari mein naam likhne baaki hain.
faaind riples ka opshan sanpaadan box ke menoo mein daahine dikhta hai (jab aap "adhik suvidhaaeain" on kiye rahate hain). agar aap aisi list banaana chaahate hain to bataayein. --styam mishr baatcheet 17:07, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

chitr upload par maargadarshan

satyam ji, krupya chitr ko upload karne ke liye mera maargadarshan karein. filhaal to main poster ya screenshot upload kar raha hoon, lekin ismein bhi kaun-sa license laagoo hoga iska mujhe gyaan nahi hain. -Dedha9 (vaarta) 16:25, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

@Dedha9: ji! namaste! aap poster ke liye "gair mukt poster upayog auchitya" ka prayog kar sakte hain. iske liye aap upload vijaard mein "yeh ek gair mukt poster hai" wala vikalp chunein, iske baad yeh kadi khulati hai, jismein yeh license vikalp pehle se preelod rahata hai bas saanche ke praachal bharne hote hain. ismein praachalon ke bharne ka tareeka ki jaankaari aap {{gair mukt poster upayog auchitya}} ke pralekhan panne par padh sakte hain. Article = lekh ka naam, bina braiket ke bharna hota hai. license kuchh bhi na chunein, kyonki ismein pehle hi {{gair mukt poster}} juda hoga.
vaheen upload vijaard mein anya prakaar ke vikalp bhi maujood hain, jinmein skreenshauts ke liye bhi vikalp hai.
shubhakaamanaayein! --styam mishr baatcheet 18:44, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

madad chaahiye

namaskaar satyam mishr ji, draigan baul is prushth par main "angreji network" ke saath mein "hindi network" bhi rakhana hai mujhe par hindi network dikh hi naheen raha hai. iske liye kya karoo? mujhe infobox banaana bhi naheen aata hai. --chuniyaana 14:07, 1 January 2016 (UTC)Chuniyana

@Chuniyana: ji, mainne jnyaaanasandook enimaaainga mein network_hi naamal praachal laga diya hai, aap iska istemaal karke hindi network ke baare mein likh sakte hain. mainne yeh kaise kiya hai yeh aap itihaas mein dekh sakte hain. --chandra shekhar/Shekhar 14:20, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
dhanyavaad chandra shekhar/Shekhar ji !--styam mishr baatcheet 18:46, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

hirn gaaainv vikipeediya badhaane mein aapki madad chaaiye Prashanttiwari123 (vaarta) 13:45, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

hirn gaaainv vikipeediya ko hindi se angreji mein anuvaad kar do sar Prashanttiwari123 (vaarta) 13:47, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

kya aap jaante hain ?

  • ...ki "kya aap jaante hain" stambh ka upayog karke aap apne yogadaan ko mukhaprushth par la sakte hain.
  • ...ki "kya aap jaante hai" bhaag koi paheli naheen hai.
  • ...ki is bhaag ka uddeshya nae jode gaye pannon ki hi jaankaari pradarshit karna hai.
  • ...ki zaroori naheen hai ki prastaavit huk bahut rochak ho parantu ek seemit star par rochak va samaanya star par uske tathya se nai jaankaari praapt honi chaahiye.
  • ...ki "kya aap jaante hai" mein chayan hetu lekh aakaar mein kam se kam 1200 kairaiktar ka hona chaahiye aur vikipeediya ki lekh likhne ki shaili ke anuroop hona chaahiye.
  • ...ki iske liye vistrut niymaavali "yahaaain" upalabdh hai.

sabhi sadasyon ko is baat ke liye protsaahit kiya jaata hai ki jab bhi koi naya lekh banaaeain, is baat ka prayaas avashya karein ki vah kam se kam in sharton ka paalan kare aur us lekh mein se koi tathya (jise lekh mein uddharanasahit diya gaya ho) mukhaprushth hetu avashya naamit karein. dhanyavaad.

sthaayi hal ke liye madad chaahiye

satyam mishr ji naaromuraar prushth ki trutiyon ko sudhaara ja chooka hai, vikipeediya ke maapadandon ke anusaar, sudhaar ke baad hi teeno tags hataaye gaye the, Gauravsood0289 user ke dvaara yeh tags fir se jode ja chuke hai iska sthaayi hal kya hai?

@Dhananjay S!ngh: ji, aapne naaromuraar lekh se taig hataate samay koi sanpaadan saaraansh naheen diya tha. isliye mujhe laga ki aap lekh mein sudhaar kiye bina taig hata rahe hain. mera aap se nivedan hai ki aap taig hataane se pehle, ek baar taig lagaane vaale se poochh lein ki vo santusht hai ya naheen. --gaurav sood (vaarta) 17:19, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
@Gauravsood0289: ji, maafi chaahooainga gaurav ji, pure lekh se maananeeya shabd hata liye gaye hain, chandra shekhar ji sadasya ke dvaara lekh ke pramukh hisson jaise "naaromuraar praacheen kachahari ka naam badal kar" prashaashanik itihaas kar diya gaya, uske antargat kuchh vaakyon ko hataaya bhi gaya, sabhi prashanshaneeya shabd v vaakya sadasya satyam mishr ji ke tags jode jaane ke baad hata liya gaya tha, krupa kar tags ko hata diya jaaye
@Dhananjay S!ngh: ji, jyaada jaanch kiye bina aapka sanpaadan poorvavat karne ke liye main maafi chaahata hooain. mujhe ab ye lekh theek lag raha hai. satyam mishr ji ki rai bhi jaan lein. agar unako bhi theek lag raha hai, to aap taig hata sakte hain. --gaurav sood (vaarta) 18:12, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
@Dhananjay S!ngh: ji! vilamb ke liye kshama chaahooainga! sambandhit vaarta prushth par uttar diya hai. --styam mishr baatcheet 18:23, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
@satyam mishr: ji! dhanyavaad hamaara maargadarshan karne ke liye, jila v block staariye chitron ko lekh ke prashaashan khand se hata diya gaya hai, black death khand se bhi do mein se ek pairaagraaf ko hata liya gaya hai, kuchh vaakaya khand ko paribhaashit karne ke uddeshya se rahane diya gaya hai, prashaashanik khand se jyaadaatar vaakyon ko hata diya gaya hai kuchh vaakaya shesh hai jo khand ko paribhaashit karne ke uddeshya se rahane diya gaya hai, praarthana v samvidhaan ki uddeshyika ko bhi hata diya gaya hai, vidyaalaya khand se shikshako ke baayodaata ko hata diya gaya hai, krupa kar khand ki pun: ek baar jaaainch kar le, aapke maarg darshan ke liye bahut dhanyavaad (Dhananjay S!ngh (vaarta) 19:16, 2 January 2016 (UTC)).

hahech samaapan

namaste satyam ji, aapke dvaara taiyaar kiya gaya hahech-samaapan upakaran, kuchh sthaanon par sampaadan saaraansh Bhojpuri mein de raha hai. kya aap ise hindi mein anoodit kar sakte ho?☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 04:25, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

@sanjeev Kumar: ji! aapke dvaara jaitrasinh chauhaan waali charcha samaapt karne par vaarta:jaitrasinh chauhaan mein badlaav ke samay yeh Bhojpuri mein juda tha. use mainne tabhi dekh liya tha aur anuvaad kar diya tha. iske baad kisi mein aisa naheen hua lag raha. mainne sandeshon ko mool js script mein dekhne ki koshish ki hai aur ab yeh poori tarah hindi mein hain. uparokt sampaadan ke baad bhi kisi mein aisa hua ho to bataaiyega. --styam mishr baatcheet 06:07, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
dhanyavaad.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 21:48, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

jonapoor aur jaunapoor jila

satyam ji aadaab. prusht jaunapur mein jaunapoor jile ka samaachaar hai, aur jaunapur jila prusht mein samaachaar sandook aur parichay ke siva kuchh naheen hai. kya main in prushton ko theek karoon? --ahmad nisaar (vaarta) 19:46, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

ji nisaar saahab ! bilkul! jaunapur prushth se vah jaankaari jo jile ke baare mein hai, hata kar jile vaale lekh, jaunapur jila, mein le jaayein aur is jaunapur lekh ko shahar ke baare mein banaayein. --styam mishr baatcheet 07:16, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

itihaas vilay

namaste satyam ji, main ye to naheen jaanta ki sahi evam achha tarika kaun sa hai lekin mujhe lagta hai ki hamein kinheen bhi do prushthon ka itihaas vilay karne ke liye upakaran itihaas vilay kaam mein lena chaahiye.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 17:07, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

namaste @sanjeev Kumar: ji ! mainne donon ki tulana karne ka prayaas kiya hai. aaj mainne ek lekh raayata‍aar ko bina itihaas vilay ke seedhe anupreshit kar diya tha. abhi is upakaran dvaara ise srot prushth chun kar aur rauyatars ko lakshya prushth chun kar itihaas vilay kiya. is upakaran ne mujhe vo avataran dikhaae jinka vilay sambhav tha aur ve (sabhi raajeevamaas ji dvaara kiye gaye sanpaadanon ke) avataran lakshya prushth rauyatars ke itihaas mein chale gaye. kintu 15 fravari 2013‎ ke baad vaale avataran usi raayata‍aar prushth ke itihaas mein abhi bhi bache rah gaye.
doosra udaaharan dasharath maanjhi aur dasharath maaainjhi prushth ke vilay ka hai, jise kaafi pehle vilay kiya tha. ise sthaanaantaran karke (dasharath maaainjhi ko hataane ke baad itihaas ke avataran vaapas laakar) vilay kiya tha. is vilay ke baad dasharath maanjhi ke itihaas mein koi avataran naheen hai sivaaya sthaanaantaran ke. jabki baaki saare (donon prushthon ke avataran) dasharath maaainjhi lekh ke itihaas mein darj hain.
dasharath maaainjhi lekh chakrapaani ji ne angreji se aayat karke anoodit kiya tha, at: iska itihaas 12 March 2009‎ Be.human ke sanpaadan se shuroo hota hai. dasharath maanjhi lekh 21 September 2009‎ anunaad Singh ke avataran se shuroo hota hai. agar is avataran antar arthaat anunaad ji aur mayoor ji ke sanpaadanon ke beech antar dekhte hue agale antar dekhne ke liye klik karein to keval dasharath maanjhi vaale lekh ke antar deekhate hain jabatak ki ye samaapt naheen ho jaate (is beech angreji vaale lekh jise aayaat kiya gaya tha aur uske baad chakrapaani ke badlaav naheen deekhate). fir ye us avataran se shuroo hota hai jab anunaad ji ne lekh naheen banaaya tha aur ab dasharath maaainjhi vaale (aayaatit) ke avataran dikhne shuroo hote hain aur is dauraan hindi vaale puraane lekh dasharath maanjhi vaale avataran naheen deekhate. isi tarah yadi bilkul shuroo se shuroo karein (yaani angreji ke aayaatit avataranon ke antar dekhein yahaaain se) to beech mein hindi vaale lekh ke avataran naheen deekhate.
yaani kanteenyooiti mein hua ghaalamel antar dekhte samay alag ho jaata hai. haaain, itihaas mein donon ke saare avataran ulajhe hue maujood jaroor hain.
ab aap bataaiye ki ismein kaun sa tareeka behtar lag raha hai?--styam mishr baatcheet 18:18, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
yadi koi prushth pehle se maujood hai aur uske baad angreji athva anya kisi vikipeediya se prushth aayaat karne ke baad itihaas vilay karna ho to sthaanaantaran wala tarika achha lagta hai lekin pehle se maujood prushth ke liye hi yadi koi sadasya prushth nirmit karta hai to itihaas vilay upakaran uchit rahega. ye mera vyaktigat mat hai, aap chaaho to koi bhi tarika kaam mein le sakte ho.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 18:54, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
@sanjeev Kumar: uparokt tulana aur aapke vichaar jaanane ke baad mera bhi yahi mat hai ki yadi donon prushthon mein kuchh samayaavadhi ke liye kai mahatvapoorn sanpaadan samaanaantar hue hain to sthaanaantaran wala tareeka theek hai, naheen to, yadi donon ke itihaas mein puraana lekh, naye ke shuroo hone se pehle ka hai, aur naye lekh ke banane ke baad puraane lekh mein koi mahatvapoorn badlaav naheen hue hain, to aapke dvaara bataaya yeh upakaran aasaan aur achha hai.--styam mishr baatcheet 19:13, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

dhanyavaad sandesh

satyam mishr namaskaar aapne mufti muhammad Saeed lekh ka avlokan kiya,evam saraahana ki jiske liye dhanyavaad --Dwivedi Ashok (vaarta) 07:06, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

vikipriyojana ""vikipeediya aapke aaspaas 2016"

satyam ji,

aasha ki aap theek hain.

15 January 2016 ko vikipeediya ki sthaapana ke 15 saal poore ho rahe hain. isi ke sandarbh mein vibhinn bhaashaaon se sambandhit veekeepeediyaaon par alag alag roop se varsh gaaainthavarsh manaae ja rahe hain. hindi vikipeediya par yeh ek prastaav prastut kiya ja raha hai ki 12 se 17 January ke beech maananeeya sadasya apne shahar, gaaainv, mohalle se sambandh mein ya ullekhaneeya smaarkon, sansthaaon aadi ke sambandh mein lekh likhein (agar na ho to), sudhaarein, lekhon mein nai ullekhaneeya baaton ko sammilit karein (agar pehle se lekh maujood ho to). us ke alaava chooainki chitron ka lena chooainki ab camera aur mobaail se ek saadhaaran baat ho chuki hai, isliye sadasya apne lekhon se sambandhit chitr vikimeedaya kaumanj par upload bhi kar sakte hain. in chitron ko ve swayam prayog mein la sakte hain ya un chitron ka baad mein koi aur sadasya ki or se istemaal kiya ja sakta hai. sadasya vartamaan roop se kaumanj par maujood chitron ko bhi prayog mein la sakte hain.

krupaya is pariyojana prushth ko dekhein aur is pariyojana mein sammilit hon: vikipeediya:vikipeediya aapke aaspaas 2016

--mujmmil (vaarta) 06:21, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

mujmmil ji ! aapki yeh pahal vaakai taareef ke yogya hai. main aajkal kaheen aur, thoda vyast hooain, at: vaada naheen kar sakta parantu prayaas zaroor karooainga. --styam mishr baatcheet 16:24, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

mokaama

satyam ji krupya ek baar is prushth par nazar daalein. mujhe samajh naheen aaya iske liye kya saaaincha lagaaooain. mokaama prushth par lekhak ne maata ke mandir ke baare mein likha hai, aise anubhaagon aur lekhan shaili ke liye ham kaun sa saaaincha lagaate hain? --chandra shekhar/Shekhar 12:42, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

@chandra shekhar: ji, filhaal to satyaapan ke liye sandarbh aavashyak hain. aisi jaankaari jo satyaapit naheen hai use sankshipt karke uddharan aavashyak ka taig laga sakte hain, vaikalpik roop se aap aisi cheejein hata bhi sakte hain, kyonki Google khoj mein kaheen koi parinaam naheen mil raha sivaaya blog aur Facebook ke. --styam mishr baatcheet 16:22, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

ye prachar prasar nahi hain

satyam mishr bhai

kam se kam hum naye hain hindi wiki par guide to karte page hi gayab kar diya waaa satyam bahai jawab nahi aapka hame bhi moka do kuch kam karne ka guide karo ....... jai ho sataym bhai.... — is ahastaaksharit sandesh ke lekhak Hannubhai hai, (vaartayogadaan) 11:54, 14 January (UTC).

@Hannubhai: ji namaste ! aapka vikipeediya par yogadaan hetu sadaiv svaagat hai aur hamein aapki har sambhav sahaayata karne mein bhi khushi hogi. yadi aapke banaaye kisi prushth ko hata diya gaya hai to aap usaka sheershak bataaeain, main usaki saamagri aapke prayogaprushth par upalabdh kara deta hooain, aap usamein uchit sudhaar karke vikipeediya ke anuroop bana sakte hain. dhanyavaad ! --styam mishr baatcheet 20:23, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

satyam bhai meine ye page banay tha "peeyoosh Kumar Goyal" peeyoosh Kumar Goyal ne duniya ki pehli sui se madhushaala likhi hai aur paaainch tareeke se paaainch vishva prasheed pustake likh chuke hai krupaya links deinkhe

kripya is page ko jaisa aap kaha rahen hai dubara prayog prasth par laga the aur is page ko banvane mein bhi madad kare kyoki hindi wiki par yah mera pahal page hain...jai ho stayam bhai — is ahastaaksharit sandesh ke lekhak Hannubhai hai, (vaartayogadaan) 05:46, 16 January 2016 (UTC).

anurodh

satyam ji, vaarta:pulastya prushth par mere aur anunaad ji ke beech bahas chal rahi hai. bahas ka vishay hai ki mythological figures par bane lekhon ka lahaja kaisa hona chaahiye. main anunaad ji ko apne tark de chuka hooain. mujhe naheen lagta ki vo kabhi sahamat honge. isliye main apna aur samay barbaad naheen karna chaahata.
agar samay mile to krupaya ek baar vo charcha padhiye, aur bataaie ki aap uske baare mein kya sochate hain. main aapke har savaal ka uttar dene ke liye taiyaar hooain. --gaurav sood (vaarta) 15:17, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

gaurav ji, uparokt charcha mainne sarasari taur par padha aur lekh bhi. aapke is vichaar se sahamat hooain ki ise aisi lekhan shaili ka paalan karna chaahiye jisse yeh pata chale ki lekh mein varnit baatein mithkeeya hain, tathya naheen. saath hi anunaad ji ke kathan se bhi sahamat hooain ki ismein (mainne vartamaan avataran hi padha hai) hindu mithkon ityaadi ka aadhikya ho gaya hai. udaaharan ke liye ye vaakya dekhein -
"vishnupuraan ke anusaar ye rishi un logon mein se ek hain jinke maadhyam se kuchh puraan aadi maanavajaati ko praapt hue. vishnupuraan ke anusaar inhonne brahma se vishnu puraan suna tha aur use paraashar rishi ko sunaaya, aur is tarah ye puraan maanav jaati ko praapt hua. vishnupuraan yeh bhi kehta hai ki brahma ke kahe hue aadipuraan ka manushyon ke beech inhonne prachaar kiya tha."
ismein teenon vaakyon mein vishnupuraan likhne se bacha ja sakta hai. chaahein to ise
"vishnupuraan ke anusaar ye rishi un logon mein se ek hain jinke maadhyam se kuchh puraan aadi maanavajaati ko praapt hue. iske anusaar pulastya ne brahma se vishnu puraan suna tha aur use paraashar rishi ko sunaaya, aur is tarah ye puraan maanav jaati ko praapt hua. yeh bhi varnit hai ki brahma ke kahe hue aadipuraan ka manushyon ke beech inhonne prachaar kiya tha."
ya
"vishnupuraan ke anusaar ye rishi un logon mein se ek hain jinke maadhyam se kuchh puraan aadi maanavajaati ko praapt hue. brahma se inhone vishnu puraan suna tha aur use paraashar rishi ko sunaaya, aur is tarah ye puraan maanav jaati ko praapt hua. iske anusaar, brahma ke kahe hue aadipuraan ka manushyon ke beech inhonne prachaar kiya tha."(yahaaain sandarbh)
kyonki yadi teenon vaakya ek kram se hain aur unke ant mein sandarbh hai to suruaat mein vishnu puraan ke jikr se spasht ho jaayega ki aage ki panktiyaaain usi par aadhaarit hain. dubaara jikr tab kiya jaayega yadi pairaagraaf badal raha ho, ya beeche mein kisi anya srot se sandarbhit karke koi baat kahi gayi ho aur uske baad fir vishnupuraan ke havaale se kuchh kaha gaya ho.
mere kehne ka aashay yahi hai ki srot ki jaankaari ka ek kram mein duharaav naheen hona chaahiye. --styam mishr baatcheet 20:57, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
main aapki baat samajh raha hooain. main naheen chaahata ki har vaakya mein "vishnu puraan ke anusaar" likha ho. main bas chaahata hooain ki padhne vaale ko samajh aa jaae ki vikipeediya ye daava naheen kar rahi hai ki ye baatein sach hain. mujhe aapke dvaara prastaavit parivartan achhe lag rahe hain. main lekh ko inke anusaar parivrtit kar deta hooain. --gaurav sood (vaarta) 21:08, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
@satyam mishr: ji, main naheen kahooainga ki har vaakya mein "hindu mithk ke anusaar" prayog kiya jaae. par kam se kam anunaad ji sveekaar to karein ki ye hindu opinion hai, fact naheen. par ve ye sveekaar naheen kar rahe hain. vaarta:pulastya par unki ye tippani padhiye:
"yahaaain sabse pehle padhiye, 'aind deyar is no serias dispyoot' -- jahaaain tak pulasti ka prashan hai koi gambheer vivaad naheen hai. kya aapko kisi vivaad ki jaankaari hai oopar likhi baaton ko kisi ne chunauti di ho; unase alag mithk (katha) hone ki baat kahi ho. pulasti ke baare mein jo likha hai uske lagbhag shat pratishat hindu maanate hain, isaliye vah ek mithkeeya tathya hai. usamein koi vivaad naheen hai."
anya dharmon ke log hindu-devi devataaon ke astitv aur hindu granthon ki factual accuracy par sandeh karte hain, aur atheist sabhi dharmon ke devi-devataaon aur dhaarmik granthon par. isliye anunaad ji ka kehna ki koi vivaad naheen hai, galat hai. unhonne to ek nai term "mithkeeya tathya" bana di. --gaurav sood (vaarta) 06:46, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
gaurav ji ! hamaara lakshya lekhon mein aapasi sahamati se sudhaar karna hai. :) --styam mishr baatcheet 07:13, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
@satyam mishr: ji, mujhe naheen lagta ki mere aur anunaad ji mein kabhi sahamati ban paaegi. isliye main chaahata tha ki koi nishpaksh vyakti hamaari charcha padhkar tippani kare. --gaurav sood (vaarta) 07:33, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
gaurav ji ! sahamati dheere-dheere banti hai, umeed par kaayam rahein, kisi anya vyakti ki tippani se bhi naheen banegi. lekhon ke vaarta prushth par charcha mein anya sadasyon ko shaamil karne ke liye aap saaaincha {{dhyaan dein}} ka prayog karte hue chaupaal par sandesh daal diya karein (vastut: yeh charcha shuroo karne vaale ka daayitv hota hai, parantu koi bhi kar sakta hai). isse charcha ko do logon ke beech paksh-pratipaksh ki bahas banaane se bacha ja sakta hai aur baaki sadasya bhi apne vichaar rakh sakte hain. --styam mishr baatcheet 07:55, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
@satyam mishr: ji dhanyavaad. main abhi chaupaal par sandesh daalata hooain. --gaurav sood (vaarta) 08:02, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

mere dvaara banaae gaye saanche

mere dvaara banaae gaye saanche:

  • tatasthata sambandhit
  1. saaaincha:dharm praathamik, angreji saaaincha: Template:Religion primary
  2. saaaincha:dhaarmik granth praathamik, angreji saaaincha: Template:Religious text primary
  3. saaaincha:chhadm vigyaan, angreji saaaincha: Template:Pseudoscience
  4. saaaincha:kiske anusaar, angreji saaaincha: Template:According to whom
  5. saaaincha:kahaaain, angreji saaaincha: Template:Where
  6. saaaincha:drushtikon anubhaag, angreji saaaincha: Template:POV section
  7. saaaincha:Relevance-inline, angreji saaaincha: Template:Relevance-inline
  8. saaaincha:paribhaasha, angreji saaaincha: Template:Definition
  9. saaaincha:spasht karein, angreji saaaincha: Template:Clarify
  10. saaaincha:sandigdh, angreji saaaincha: Template:Dubious
  11. saaaincha:Manual, angreji saaaincha: Template:Manual
  • anya
  1. saaaincha:parichay dekhein, angreji saaaincha: Template:See introduction
  2. saaaincha:parichyaatmak lekh, angreji saaaincha: Template:Introductory article

--gaurav sood (vaarta) 16:24, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

anya sampaadkon dvaara banaae gaye tatasthata sambandhit saaainche:

  1. saaaincha:Weasel-inline, angreji saaaincha: Template:Weasel-inline
  2. saaaincha:Peacock term, angreji saaaincha: Template:Peacock term
  3. saaaincha:POV-statement, Template:POV-statement
  4. saaaincha:Tone-inline, angreji saaaincha: Template:Tone-inline
  5. saaaincha:By whom, angreji saaaincha: Template:By whom
  6. saaaincha:kaun, angreji saaaincha: Template:Who
  7. saaaincha:Quantify, angreji saaaincha: Template:Quantify

kya ham angreji vikipeediya ke is prushth se sabhi saaainchon ko bot ke maadhyam se import kar sakte hain? --gaurav sood (vaarta) 18:13, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

gaurav ji soochi upalabdh karaane ke liye dhanyavaad ! Wikipedia:Template messages ke saaainchon ko bot dvaara aayaatit kiya ja sakta hai athva naheen yeh main naheen jaanta, kyonki aayat ke liye sadasya ka aayaatak athva prabandhak hona aavashyak hai. haalanki sanjeev ji ke bot ko prabandhak adhikaar praapt hain, parantu usase ve prushth aayat kar sakte hain athva naheen, pata naheen. par inhein ek ek karke aayaat kiya ja sakta hai. sabse pehle to Wikipedia:Template messages jaise prushthon ki hi jaroorat hai. jisse in tags ko, aur inke istemaal ki sankshipt jaankaari ko ek hi jagah par paaya ja sake. vastut: mere poochhane ka uddeshya bhi yahi tha. thoda samay lagega, parantu yeh kiya ja sakta hai. main kuchh samay baad aapko soochit karta hooain. --styam mishr baatcheet 21:05, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
baut se yeh kaarya kiya ja sakta hai kyonki baut bhi prabandhan adhikaaron ke saath hai lekin anuvaad to kisi sampaadak ko hi karna padega. at: ek-ek karke aayaat karna uchit rahega.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 05:57, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
@sanjeev Kumar aur Gauravsood0289: dhanyavaad sanjeev ji! vaise main prayogadharmita vaale kaarya doosari vikipeediya par karta hooain, at:, yahaaain is kaarya ko pareekshan ke roop mein karke fir soochit karta hooain. vaise sanjeev ji aayaatak aap vahaaain bhi hain, madad karein to maja aa jaae.
aise prushth ki aavashyakta isliye bhi hai ki sabhi sadasya inhein shreniyon mein ja kar naheen khoj sakte. kai tags rakhane waali shreniyaaain hi maujood naheen hain. abhi haal mein mujhse chandra shekhar ji ne ek lekh mein sudhaar hetu oopar poochha tha ki kaun sa taig lagaaeain, main unhein koi kadi naheen de paaya jahaaain aisi jaankaari upalabdh ho.--styam mishr baatcheet 07:38, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
@satyam mishr aur sanjeev Kumar: ji, is prushth ki bahut jarurat hai. abhi hindi vikipeediya par sahi taig dhoondhna bahut mushkil hai. main taig pehle angreji vikipeediya par dhoondhta hooain, aur us se hindi taig par aata hooain. --gaurav sood (vaarta) 07:58, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

anunaad Singh ke ad hominem attacks

anunaad Singh ji mujh par baar-baar ad hominem attacks kar rahe hain. chaupaal par unhonne mere baare mein ye tippani ki hai:

gaurav sood ji, chaliye achha hua ki ab doosaron ki rai to poochhane lage. mera vichaar hai ki angreji vaale lekh ka Google anuvaad karke hindi viki par daal deejiye. lekin Google anuvaad ke baad aapko kaafi mehnat karna padega. mehnat naheen karna ho to 'kiske anusaar' ka taig lagaana adhik vaigyaanik rahega.

ve Google anuvaad waali baat mere dvaara banaae gaye lekh "kram-vikaas se parichay" ke liye kar rahe hain. aap khud hi is lekh ko padh kar dekh leejiye, aur bataaie ki kya ye aapko Google anuvaad lagta hai.

vaarta:pulastya par unhonne ye likha tha. aap hi bataaie is se ve kya sanket de rahe hain.

premachand ki 'bade bhaai saahab' kahaani to aapne padhi hogi. bade bhaai saahab har baar pareeksha mein fail ho jaate the ya kheenchakhaanchakar paas hote the. chhota bhaai padhne mein bahut tej tha. kintu usako shiksha dete rahate the ki aise padhna chaahiye, vaise.....

agar aapko aur udaaharan chaahiye to main de sakta hooain. --gaurav sood (vaarta) 13:05, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

@Gauravsood0289, Manojkhurana, sanjeev Kumar, Hindustanilanguage, aur hindusthaan vaasi: isnt it strange that this fellow anunad or what ever he is....seems to have problem with every other user here and on other hand he himself is biggest problem here.....i got tired of asking these lazy admins to check his work as majority of it lack references and appear like a story presenting his own point of view....and he is well renown for provoking others by name calling them and later playing a victim.... he appears more like a en:Schizophrenia case to me....Gaurav take my advice ignore that person and do what you deem is correct....dogs bark when elephant walk....we are elephants......keep contributing mate....happy editing.....and yes dont expect any kind of help from these admins as they are like 3 monkeys of gandhi...lol....Sperm whale fluke.jpg Darth Whale vaarta 14:26, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
chooainki yeh maamala kaheen na kaheen dhaarmik aastha se juda hai, isliye ho sakta hai ki ve bhaavuk ho gaye hon. --mujmmil (vaarta) 18:35, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
gaurav sood ji aapko mere vyaktigat vaarta prushth par meri vyaktigat salaah yahi hogi ki aisi tippaniyon se vichlit na hon aur nirbheek hokar apna kaarya karein, charcha mein athva vivaad ki dasha me apni taarkikta banaaye rakhein aur aap (oopar mujmmil ji wala shabd) bhaavuk na hon. chooainki, aapne chaupaal par anunaad ji se spasht roop se kah bhi diya hai ki ve vyaktigat tippaniyaaain na karein, main aasha karta hooain ve bhi charcha ko vishay keindrit hi rakha kareinge. --styam mishr baatcheet 19:47, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
ji, 1) main anunaad ji ko pehle bhi bahut baar kah chooka hooain, par ve fir bhi aisi tippaniyaaain karte rahate hain. aise mein baat karna bahut mushkil ho jaata hai.
2) main un par koi kaaravaai naheen karavaana chaahata. bas unhein ek baar samjha deejiye. --gaurav sood (vaarta) 19:56, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
ji theek hai, agar aage bhi ve vishay se hat kar aapke sanpaadanon aur aapke oopar tippani karte hain to main khud bhi avashya unase aagrah karooainga. --styam mishr baatcheet 20:07, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

sir page dehke aur kuch kami ho to likhe

satyam sir namaskar

prayog prast par kaam kiya bahut kuch sikha bhi hain is page ko dehe aur koi kami ho to batain aur bhi kuch pages par edit kar na chahata huin kripya batain.....

https://hi.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%A4%B8%E0%A4%A6%E0%A4%B8%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%AF:Hannubhai/%E0%A4%AA%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%B0%E0%A4%AF%E0%A5%8B%E0%A4%97%E0%A4%AA%E0%A5%83%E0%A4%B7%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%A0

— is ahastaaksharit sandesh ke lekhak hain -Hannubhai (vaartayogadaan)

Bhojpuri vikipeediya

satyam mishr ji, namaste.

ganatantr diwas ki aapko haardik badhaai!

pichhle dinon mein vikimeediya Bhaarat ki website dekh raha tha. us website par main 2011 mein panjeekaran hua tha. tab se ab tak mainne keval ek sampaadan kiya tha aur maaniye ya na maaniye yeh sampaadan Bhojpuri vikipeediya se juda hai, jaisaaki aap dekh sakte hain .

kuchh samay poorv aapne kaha tha ki aap vahaaain ke ek-maatr yogadaanakarta hain. vartamaan sthiti kya hai? kya sadasya sankhya mein kuchh pragati hui hai. krupaya bataaeain. dhanyavaad!! --mujmmil (vaarta) 11:48, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

anurodh

satyam ji main jara aapse Google haingaaaut par milna chaahata hooain .--Ashoka Chakra.svgraaju suthaarvaarta 17:15, 23 fravari 2016 (UTC)

nivedan

vi:visheshaadhikaar nivedan par varishth sampaadak par krupaya apna maat dein aur charcha samaapt karein. dhanyavaad.. - chakrapaani vaarta 10:46, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

chakrapaani ji main uparokt mein se koi ek kaam hi kar sakta tha. ya to charcha samaapt kar deta ya mat deta. mainne mat de diya hai at: is charcha ka samaapan ab kisi aur ko karna hoga! :) --styam mishr baatcheet 19:29, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

namaskaar

satyam ji kya aapko paaithan(prograaming laingvej) ke baare mein koi jaankaari hai??main filhaal paaithan par kaam kar raha hooain. kuchh samay baad main pyvikeebot par bhi kaam karne ki soch raha hooain.--- chakrapaani vaarta 08:55, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

@chakrapaani: ji varttamaan mein to naheen. kuchh samay pehle mainne paaithan mein kuchh bahut chhote-chhote kaarya kiye the. parantu aab bilkul bhi sampark mein naheen hooain, at: koi sahaayata naheen kar paaooainga. haaain aapka vichaar uttam hai. Sfic ji aur sanjeev ji prograaming ke kshetr se hain. ve log avashya aapakeemadad kareinge. mera prograaming gyaan bas itna hi hai ki main pehle se likhe hue code mein vaise hi milte julate code se nakal karke thoda bahut badlaav kar leta hooain. agar kabhi maatr itni hi jaroorat ho to bata sakte hain, prayaas karooainga. --styam mishr baatcheet 09:41, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

hanumaan langoor mein pooainchh vahan

satyam ji, aapko hanumaan langoor mein pooainchh vahan lekh ka jnyaaanakosheeya hona athva naheen hona samajh mein aa raha hai kya? main to ise samajh naheen pa raha ki yeh lekh bandaron ki shailiyaaain bata raha hai ya kuchh aur?☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 11:41, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

@sanjeev Kumar: ji, lekh to jnyaaanakosheeya lag raha hai. jitna meri samajh mein aaya, langoor ke chalne ke samay usaki pooainchh ki aakruti kaisi hoti hai iske aadhaar par hanumaan langoor (gray langur) ko upaprajaatiyon mein baaainta gaya hai. pooainchh vahan (tail carriage) se Google khoj karne par ye parinaam mil rahe hain. INSA ke journal mein chhapa yeh lekh bhi peedeeef mein upalabdh hai. ek najar aap bhi daalein. lekh rakhane laayak lag raha hai, sandarbh bhi theek-thaak dikh rahe hain. --styam mishr baatcheet 12:23, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
@sanjeev Kumar: ji, is lekh ke lekhak raghubeer Singh ji vikipeediya ki lekhan shaili se poori tarah parichit naheen hain. par mere hisaab se unke dvaara chune gaye vishay ullekhaneeya hote hain (mujhe ye vishay bhi ullekhaneeya aur jnyaaanakosheeya lagta hai), aur lekhon mein vishvasaneeya sandarbh bhi hote hain. mujhe lagta hai unhein thode se maarg darshan ki jarurat hai (ve kisi bhi sujhaav ko bahut sakaaraatmakata se lete hain). isliye, agar aapko lekh mein kamiyaaain lag rahi hain, to unhein bataaie. main daave se kah sakta hooain ki ve baat samjheinge aur lekh mein jaruri sudhaar kareinge. --gaurav (vaarta) 12:42, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
@sanjeev Kumar aur satyam mishr: ji, inke dvaara sampaadit kiye gaye anya lekh ye hain. agar samay mile to in lekhon ke baare mein bhi kuchh feedback de deejiye (inhone apne banaae har lekh ke vaarta prushth par iske liye nivedan kiya hai). --gaurav (vaarta) 13:19, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

svadharm

namaste satyam ji,
aapki pratham bhaasha Bhojpuri hai aur meri gujaraati hai to ham hindi bhaasha ke liye yogadaan karke bhayaavah type ka kaarya kar rahe hai esa bilkul bhi naheen hai aur na hi ye paradharm hai. svadharm itna sankuchit naheen hai. svadharm prati vyakti, sthal, sthiti, sanyog ke anusaar bhinn-bhinn ho sakta hai. svadharm matlab praapt kartavya. hamein janm, sdal, samay, sanyog evam kaarya se alag-alag vyakti, sanyog, kaarya karne ki bhoomika ityaadi ki praapti hoti hai aur unke prati kartavya paalan ka hamaara jo dharm hai vahi hamaara svadharm hai. kartavya paalan na karte hue ham unase vipreet aacharan kare yahi paradharm hai.
hamein janm se maatrubhaasha ke rup mein jin bhaasha ki praapti hui hai unke prati bhi hamaara dharm hai aur hindi ko ham apni raashtrabhaasha ke rup mein sveekaar karte hai ya to ham hindi sikhe hai, bolte hai, hindi mein kaarya karte hai, hamein hindi se prem-lagaav hai to unke liye hamaara kartavya kya hai ye hamein hi tay karna hota hai.
pr-hamein janm se praapt bhaasha ke alaava doosari bhaasha (hindi) ke liye kaarya karna paradharm naheen hai ?
u-naheen hai. ham maatrubhaasha ka tyaag karke doosari bhaasha ko apni maatrubhaasha ke rup mein sveekaar karale to paradharm hoga. hindi mein, hindi ke liye kaarya karne se bhi maatrubhaasha ka jo sthaan hai vah Bhojpuri aur gujaraati ka hi rahega. kuchh sanyog mein kisi ek ke prati hi poornat: vafaadaar rahana hota hai jaise ki patni ko chhodkar anya stri ke saath patni jaisa vyavahaar karna. ye paradharm isliye hai kyoonki vivaah mein ham ek doosare ko poorn vafaadaar rahane ka vachan dete hai. uske baavajood ham esa karte hai to paradharm hai. patni ki anumati se doosari stri ke saath vivaah kiya jaae to paradharm nahi hai.
hindi vikipeediya se ham joode hai aur unke prati hamaara kya kartavya hai ye hame khud tay karna chaahiye. hindi vikipeediya mein hindi hi sarvopari hai. kisi kaarya se hindi ki gunavatta ko haani hoti hai to esa koi kaarya na karna hamaara kartavya hai. astu.-yogesh kaveeshvar (vaarta) 04:31, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

@YmKavishwar: ji! uparokt spashteekaran hetu bahut-bahut dhanyavaad! aapne kaafi achhe se apni baat samajhaaya hai. chaupaal par aapki jis tippani ke sandarbh mein mainne vahaaain prashn kiya tha pehle us par baat kar lein. aapne kaha hai "hame selari naheen milti fir bhi jyaadaatar yogadaanakarta viki mein yogadaan kyoon dete hai ? ek pramukh kaaran hai bhaasha ke prati prem."
aisa naheen hai! kam se kam main khud iska udaaharan hooain, mujhe hindi se koi prem naheen hai (pehle bhi kah chuka hooain kisi charcha mein)! fir bhi yahaaain kuchh yogadaan karta hooain. kya kaaran ho sakta hai? ek Nepal vaasi hindi viki par prabandhak tak rah chuke hain aur Bhojpuri viki aur sanskrut viki par abhi bhi hain (go ki vartamaan mein sakriya naheen hain) kya kaaran ho sakta hai? prem? ya kartavya ? ya unki inmein se koi unki raashtrabhaasha hai? sakriya sadasyon mein se bhi kai hain jinki hindi na to maatrubhaasha hai na raashtrabhaasha (vaise aapko bata dooain Bhaarat ki raashtrabhaasha hindi naheen hai shaayad aur daftari kaamkaaj ke liye angreji ke saath sveekrut hai bas)? Germany mein baitha vyakti fiji hindi vikipeediya par utpaat rokane mein madad karta hai (lagaataar teen saalon se), to kyon? kaun se kartavya ka paalan kar raha hai? main nepaali viki par jaakar sanpaadan kar leta hooain (vaise sanpaadan sankhya kaafi kam hai par apratyaksh roop se sahaayata karne ka kaarya vahaaain bahut kiya hai of-viki) kaun se kartavya ka paalan kar raha hooain?
arabi anko ko lekar aapko samasya hai. main kisi ka himaayati naheen hooain. arabi anko ka saanchon mein prayog hamaari majaboori hai kyonki unke bina ganana sambhav naheen hai. charcha hoti hai to tamaam log kood padte hain samaadhaan aur sujhaav lekar, kiya aajatak kisi ne kuchh naheen. aur "ghuseda gaya" aisa naheen hai. kisi ka nirnaya hai, kyon liya usane hamein naheen pata; hindi viki ke difault ank arabi hain aur hindi vikshanari ke naagari. vaise Bhaarat ka samvidhaan Bhaarat mein (viki iske liye baadhya naheen) daftaron ki kaaryakaari bhaasha ke roop mein hindi ka vikalp dete hue antarraashtreeya anko ke prayog ka nirdesh karta hai. kya vahaaain bhi ghuseda gaya hai? vahaaain bhi sudharavaane ka prayaas karein to behtar ho!
hindi mein arabi-faarasi aur angreji shabdon ke pravesh ke kaaranon par aapko thoda aur vichaar karne ki jaroorat hai. aur is samasya ke niraakaran hetu jis tarah se hindi sanskrutaashrit hui aur abhi tak ho rahi hai vah kitna sahi yeh bhi vivaad ka vishay hai.
anumati waali baat par mujhe sandeh hai, kaun deta hai aisi anumati?
mere liye viki aanand hai, na prem, na kartavya, na dharm, na bojh ! vikipeediya vaishvik hai! hindi viki bhi! aanand leejiye! --styam mishr baatcheet 18:44, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

hindi lekhak sanjaya agnihotri

namaskaar satyam ji aap va Gaurav561 dvaara vikipeediya par mere dvaara joda gaya hindi lekhak sanjaya agnihotri ka naam tatha mere dvaara banaaya prushth sanjaya agnihotri baar baar hataaya jaata raha hai . kaaran "va7 • saaf prachaar/la2. saaf prachaar: paath tha:" kaaran jis takaneeki dhang se likha hai meri samajh ke baahar hai krupaya spasht bataae ki mere dvaara likha kaun sa hissa "va7 • saaf prachaar/la2. saaf prachaar: paath tha:" ke antargat aata hai taaki main us bhaag ko dileet kar sakooain ya aap swayam sanpaadit kar bata dein athva swayam prakaashit kar dein . — is ahastaaksharit sandesh ke lekhak Pt Surya Kant hai,--Pt Surya Kant (vaarta) 00:23, 25 April 2016 (UTC) (vaartayogadaan).

@Pt Surya Kant: ji, ye lekh isliye hataaya gaya tha kyonki sanjaya agnihotri ji ki ullekhaneeyata sthaapit naheen ho pai thi. ullekhaneeyata ke baare mein vikipeediya ke dishaanirdesh aap yahaaain padh sakte hain : Wikipedia:Notability (people) (filhaal in dishaanirdeshon ka hindi anuvaad upalabdh naheen hai). agar aap in dishaanirdeshon ke anusaar sanjaya ji ki ullekhaneeyata sthaapit kar sakte hain, to bataaie. dhanyavaad. --gaurav (vaarta) 13:02, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
@Gaurav561 aur Pt Surya Kant: ji ,vikipeediya:ullekhaneeyata upalabdh hai.--yogesh kaveeshvar (vaarta) 16:10, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

saaaincha:mukhaprushth samaachaar

samaachaar kaise adyatan jaaeain vahaan to yeh likha aa raha hai:

aapko is prushth ko sampaadit karne ki anumati naheen hain, nimnalikhit kaaran ki vajah se:

yeh panna surakshit hai, kyonki yeh nimnalikhit panne ki suraksha-seedhi mein samaavisht hai:

mukhaprushth
aap is prushth ka srot dekh sakte hain aur usaki nakal utaar sakte hain:

sanjeev ji to is baare mein kuchh bata naheen paaye kya aapko kuchh pata hai. --- chakrapaani vaarta 11:21, 27 April 2016 (UTC) --- chakrapaani vaarta 11:21, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

satyam ji jab prabandhak samaachaar update karte hain to kya isi saanche se karte hain ya kahi aur se? chakrapaani vaarta 09:08, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

@chakrapaani: ji aapko is saanche ko sanpaadit karne ka adhikaar hona chaahiye. kyon naheen hai iske liye mujhe meta viki par kisi se poochhana padega. main aapko iske baad soochit karta hooain. --styam mishr baatcheet 09:16, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
satyam ji kuchh pata chala? chakrapaani vaarta 08:30, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
@chakrapaani: abhi to naheen !--styam mishr baatcheet 08:47, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
yeh kaise pata lagega ki saaaincha surakshit hai ya naheen aur ye saaainche mileinge kaha. agar aapko kuchh aise saanchon ka naam pata hai to bataaen unako sampaadit karne ka prayaas bhi kar ke dekh leta hooain. chakrapaani vaarta 13:17, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
@chakrapaani: aapko surakshit prushthon ki soochi vishesh:surakshit prushth par mil jaayegi. agar inhein sanpaadit karne ki aapko anumati naheen hogi to keval "srot dekhein" ka vikalp vahaaain dikhega jahaaain "sanpaadan" ka vikalp dikhta hai. jaisa ho bataaen. ise phabricator ki us charcha par hi uthaana padega jahaaain se yeh user right laagoo hua hai. --styam mishr baatcheet 17:35, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
ji sabhi surakshit prushthon par "sanpaadan" likha aa raha hai, aur ek baat mainne gaur curry ki main keval mukhyaprushth se jude saanchon ko edit naheen kar pa raha hooain baaki saaainche to edit ho rahe hain jo surakshit hai par mukhyaprushth se naheen jude hain.--- chakrapaani vaarta 03:37, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

┌a─a─a─a─a─a─a─a─a─a─a─a─a─a─a─a─a─a─a─a─a─a─a─a─a─a─a─a─a─a─a─a─a─a┘
@chakrapaani: ji! aap eka baar {{Coor title d}} ko sanpaadan ke liye khol kar dekhein. agar aapko iske liye anumati hai to fir shaayad keval un saaainchon ko aap sanpaadit naheen kar pa rahe jinhein seedheedaar suraksha (cascading protection) pradaan ki gayi hai. iske liye hamein faibriketar par bag fil karna padega. aap bataayein fir main yeh kaarya kar deta hooain. --styam mishr baatcheet 08:05, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

@chakrapaani aur sanjeev Kumar: ji! mainne yeh samasya faibriketar par uthaaya, yahaaain uttar dekh sakte hain.--styam mishr baatcheet 13:44, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
faibriketer par likha hai- "Cascade protection intentionally allows only those people to edit who have the "protect" right." (vistrut faibrikter par padha ja sakta hai) ab protekt raait kya kiya jaaye? kya mujhe protekt raait lena hoga? ya kuchh aur?? --- chakrapaani vaarta 14:20, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
@chakrapaani: jahaaain tak mujhe pata hai protection adhikaar keval prabandhakon ke paas hote hain, (ho sakta hai main galat hoooain). mujhe lag raha hai, jis kaarya (mukhaprushth adyatan) ke liye is "template editor" adhikaar ki sthaapana ki gayi thi usamein isse safalta naheen mil paayegi. kyonki mukhaprushth hamaara sarvaadhik mahatvapoorn prushth hota hai aur cascading protection ki vyavastha ijaad hi isi liye ki gayi hai. ab isse jyaada mujhe bhi naheen pata. --styam mishr baatcheet 14:39, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
ham phab par project:site request ke taur par ye sadasyasamooh ko prushth surakshit karne ka adhikaar dene ki maang kar sakte hai. vartamaan mein seedhi suraksha hata ke surakshit karne se ho jaaega. aap hi kar dijiye.-yogesh kaveeshvar (vaarta) 17:58, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

teen baatein hain is sandarbh mein:

  1. main vyaktigat taur par mukhaprushth se cascading suraksha hataane ke paksh mein naheen hooain.
  2. main varishth sampaadak ko prushth surakshit karne ke adhikaar dene ka koi kaaran naheen maanata. isse aasaan hai, sadasya ko prabandhak daayitv hetu hi nivedan kar dena chaahiye.
  3. shuroo se mera yeh prashn raha hai (jiska koi uttar naheen deta) ki zyaada logon ko mukhaprushth par sanpaadan karne ke adhikaar mil jaane se yeh teji se kaise adyatan hone lagega.

at: main ab kuchh naheen kar paaooainga, kshama praarthi hooain. --styam mishr baatcheet 18:29, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Lily arul ka sadasya prushth

namaste satyam ji, s:Lily arul ko sheeh-naamaankan ka kaaran prabandhak soochanaapat ki charcha thi. at: us charcha ke anusaar iske puraane avataran chhupaana aavashyak hai ab kaunase avataran chhupaane hain, is baare mein to mujmmil ji hi bata sakte hain. mujhe to poora itihaas hi ek jaisa laga at: iska sheeh-naamaankan kiya tha.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 11:23, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

@sanjeev Kumar: mujmmil ji se poochha hai, jaisa ve kahein! vaise mujhe bhi uchit yahi lag raha ki prushth hata diya jaae. mujhe aise sanpaadanon ka anumaan naheen tha varna keval khaali naheen karta apitu hata hi deta. --styam mishr baatcheet 17:54, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
main aapse sahamat hooain. --mujmmil (vaarta) 19:14, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
mujmmil ji dhanyavaad !--styam mishr baatcheet 19:16, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

nivedan

satyam ji aapse nivedan hai ki sheeh naamaankan mein itni sheeghrata na karein jaisa aapne vivo aur roopaantarit code ke saath kiya hai. thoda samay dekar inhein sudhaar ja sakta hai. filhaal mainne sudhaar kar diya hai. pratyek jnyaaanakosheeya vishay ka pej keemati hai bhale hi vah pareekshan prushth hi kyon na ho. agar thoda sa bhi sudhaar karke unhein bachaaya ja sakta hai to avashya karein . saadar--- chakrapaani vaarta 17:56, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

@chakrapaani: ji! pehle main aisa hi karta tha. bachaane ki koshish. ;) par koi samasya naheen. agar lekh mahatvapoorn hua to koi baad mein bana dega. vikipeediya ek din mein naheen bani hai, agar sheeh naamaankan na karooain to pata naheen kitne din tak aise hi pade rahein ye lekh. agar mahatvapoorn hain to koi bana dega sudhare hue roop mein. aapne inhein sudhaara iske liye dhanyavaad !--styam mishr baatcheet 18:15, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

sheegra hataane ka nivedan

satyam ji saadhuvaad,

aapne mere prushth mein meri kai krutiyon ko sheegra hataane ke baare mein charcha mein daala hai. mera aapse nivedan hai ki jo bhi aapko sahi gyaat padta hai karein kyonki ismein hindi viki ki bhalaai hai kisi ek vyakti ki naheen. chaahe aap mere saare lekh hata dein main tanik bhi kshubdh naheen hoonga kyonki aisa mera vishvaas hai ki aap log jo bhi kareinge vah hindi viki ki behatari ke liye hi hoga. dhanyavaad.somesh tripaathi vaarta 10:57, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

@Somesh virgo: ji ! kshama chaahata hooain. ye saaainche sahi naamasthaan mein naheen hain. agar aap inka upayog karna chaahate hain to "saancha:" ke bajaay "saaaincha:" naamasthaan par inhein sthaanaantarit kar lein, ya main khud kar dooainga. tokane ke liye dhanyavaad !--styam mishr baatcheet 19:31, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Request for translation: Robert Abajyan

Dear satyam mishr. Warm greetings from the Armenian Wikipedia! Could you please help me translate the article Robert Abajyan into this unique and honourable language? Even a couple of sentences is good enough and in return I could translate something your choice in our Wiki. Thank you in Advance. --Narek75 (vaarta) 09:13, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

pushpak vimana ....

A flying machine like a flower, Like a lotus flower .

Which is activated by power of nature ,

The person who knows the secret of power of nature , can activate that machine or “asystem"

Hanuman got the secret of that manhine from sun(The God Sun) so they recocknised that machine in Rawana's Ashok vatika .

(From the book:- THE TRUTH UNDELIVERED )

B.s. — is ahastaaksharit sandesh ke lekhak hain -106.79.209.58 (vaarta • yogadaan)

aap lekh ka vistaar kar sakte hain. lekh mein pushpak vimaan ke baare mein upalabdh saamagri yathochit vajan ke saath prastut ki jaani chaahiye aur sroton ke vi:vishvasaneeya srot aur sahaayata:sandarbh dekhein. lekh is tarah na likhein maanon yahi saabit karne ke likha gaya ho ki yeh vimaan vaastav mein tha. --styam mishr baatcheet 05:32, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

FormattingError

satyam ji, saaaincha:tirchha sheershak ke puraane avataran se kisi lekh jaise jaya ho (film) ki jhalak dekhein. ismein truti dikhaai de raha tha. mujhe lagta hai ki aapke saaaincha:Formatting error ke aayaat karne ke baad se yeh truti dikhna shuroo hua. mujhe keval filmon ke lekhon mein hi truti dikha, jo tirchha sheershak saaainche ke angreji viki ki tarah banaane se hat gaya. shaayad kuchh anya prakaar ke lekhon mein bhi is tarah ki truti dikh raha ho. --Sfic (vaarta) 04:58, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

@Sfic: ji, truti pehle dikhni shuroo hui thi aur use pradarshit karne wala yeh saaaincha:Formatting error maujood naheen tha jiske kaaran isi ki laal kadi truti sandesh mein pradarshit ho rahi thi. at: mainne ise aayaat kiya. haaain uske baad yeh truti sandesh theek se disple naheen hua balki vah dikhne laga jo abhi tirchhe akshar ke puraane avataran se poorvaavalokan mein dikh raha hai. haaain, main us samay yeh naheen samajh paaya tha ki truti {{tirchhe akshar}} ke puraane hone ki vajah se dikh rahi hai. aapne ise sahi kar diya iske liye dhanyavaad! lekin abhi bhi is {{Formatting error}} ka parinaam sahi naheen aa raha hai. ise bhi sudhaarana hoga. aur filhaal mujhe naheen lagta ki is saaainche ke aayaat se kaheen aur truti dikh rahi hogi. --styam mishr baatcheet 08:16, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
{{Formatting error}} ke dvaara paas kiya jaane wala sandesh theek se na dikhne ki vajah shaayad {{Error}} ka puraana hona hai. par main ise update karne ka risk naheen le sakta. pata naheen kahaaain kahaaain kya ho. baad mein dekha jaayega. ya aap sudhaar sakte hon to bataayein, mujhe bahut naheen pata. --styam mishr baatcheet 08:28, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
@Sfic: ji, mainne abhi dekha ki aapne saaaincha:Error ko luaa varshan se adyatan kar diya hai, kya isse kuchh safalta mili?--styam mishr baatcheet 12:11, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
mujhe to koi antar dikhaai naheen diya. vaise {{Formatting error}} mein sandesh mujhe theek se hi dikh raha hai. /2 --Sfic (vaarta) 07:20, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

sthaanaantaran anurodh

krupaya Brigadier bhavaani Singh ko bhavaani Singh par sthaanaantarit kar de. kaaran aap jaante hai.--peeyoosh sadasya:hindusthaan vaasi (vaarta) 10:02, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Sabjan hussain/prayogaprushth

satyam ji, yeh lekh mukhya naamasthaan mein hai. sadasya:Sabjan hussain/prayogaprushth ke hatne ke baad sadasya ne mukhya naamasthaan mein hi prayogaprushth bana diya hai. --Sfic (vaarta) 02:28, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

@Sfic: ji, ise hata diya hai. dhanyavaad !--styam mishr baatcheet 02:48, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

sthaanaantaran

sadasya:Dharm singh rajoriya ji ne apna sadasya prushth sadasya:Dharm singh Mahawar par sthaanaantarit kiya hai.--Sfic (vaarta) 08:11, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

@Sfic: ji ise vaapas usi naam par kar diya hai. unke vaarta prushth par sandesh bhi de diya hai. aapko dhyaanaakarshan hetu dhanyavaad !--styam mishr baatcheet 12:07, 1 June 2016 (UTC)


naamon ke anuvaad ke baare mein

satyam ji, prushth saanti di tito mein is chitrakaar dwaar banaai gaye chitron ke naam hai par samasya ye hai ki chitr ke naamon ka anuvaad kis tarah se kiya jaaye | ek tareeka to ye hai ki angreji naam ko hi hindi aksharon mein likh de ya doosra tareeka hai ki angreji naam ka jo arth hindi bhaasha mein hai, use likha jaaye . main to arth vaale tareeke ko jyaada sahi samajhta huaiain . hindi viki ki is baare mein kya niti hai ?

ye samasya kai baar saamane aati hai jaise kitaabon ke naam ke anuvaad mein, daarshanik siddhaanton ke naam ke anuvaad mein, upaadhiyon ke naam ke anuvaad mein .

agrim dhanyavaad ! -sadasya:Sequencesolved

@Sequencesolved: ji aisi koi bahut spasht neeti naheen hai aur naamon ke anuvaad mein yeh samasya aksar aati hai (mujhe bhi). aap jin do tareekon ki baat kar rahe hain unamein se kisi ko bhi apna sakte hain bas kam se kam ek baar un naamon ke roman vartani ko braiket mein jaroor rakhein. main niji taur par arth vaale tareeke ke bajaay uchchaaran ko devanaagari mein likh dene mein jyaada yakeen karta hooain lekin ek tarah se dekha jaaya to is lekh mein naamon ka pehle hi angreji mein anuvaad (arthaanuvaad) ho chuka hai. mool naam angreji mein to rahe naheen honge. at: aap chaahein to chitron ke naam ka arth wala anuvaad karte hue saath-saath vartamaan avastha mein bhi (roman mein bhi) chhod sakte hain. myoojiym aur sthaan ka lipyantaran kar dein. styam mishr baatcheet 00:38, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

sampaadan upakaran ka kaam naheen karna

namaste satyam ji, pichhle 2-3 din se (shaayad) Edittools upakaran kaam naheen kar raha hai.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 16:54, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

@sanjeev Kumar: ji, namaste ! iske baare mein mainne Sfic ji se madad maaaingi hai. --styam mishr baatcheet 17:05, 6 June 2016 (UTC)