sadasya vaarta:sanjeev Kumar

sar hirn gaaainv ke vaare mein madad chaaiye Prashanttiwari123 (vaarta) 15:55, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

viki logo mein kaun sa faunt upayog karna theek rahega? yahaaain --Sfic (vaarta) 07:32, 5 fravari 2016 (UTC)

sanjeev ji, mainne is chhavi ko kalam faunt se banaaya hai. yeh faunt Google faunt par ni:shulk milta hai. kya is faunt se logo banaaya ja sakta hai. kruti Dave faunt se logo banaana aasaan hota hai, lekin usaka koi jaankaari hi naheen dikh raha hai. --Sfic (vaarta) 14:56, 5 fravari 2016 (UTC)

kya ye laugo ke liye theek rahega?--Sfic (vaarta) 09:19, 6 fravari 2016 (UTC)

chhavi aur hindi naam ab vikisookti mein dikh raha hai. kuchh prashn bhi hai-

1. vikshanari mein 12,553 shabd hai dikhaai de raha hai aur ek jagah 1,20,000 se adhik hai?
2. yeh aur yeh yogadaan ko dekhein. bahut ajeeb tarah se shabdon ko banaaya gaya hai.
3. vikisrot mein do alag alag shreni hindi aur Hindi naam se hai. lekh donon mein hai. ismein se kaun sa hindi ke liye theek hai. Hindi vaale shreni mein adhik prushth hone ke kaaran mainne use yahaaain daal diya tha.

--Sfic (vaarta) 14:30, 13 fravari 2016 (UTC)

1. vikshanari par kul shabdon ki sankhya 12,553 hi hai lekin kul prushthon ki sankhya 1,20,000 se adhik hai. prushthon mein sabhi charcha prushth, sadasya prushth, saaainche, script prushth aadi shaamil hain. lekin shabdon ki sankhya mein keval mukhya naamasthaan vaale prushthon ki ganana hi hoti hai. udaaharan ke liye hamaare yahaaain hindi vikipeediya par kul lekh 1,01,403 hain lekin kul prushthon ki sankhya 5,57,542 hai.
2. ye yogadaan, vaibhav jain ji ka baut khaata hai aur baut khaate se sampaadan karte samay kuchh trutiyaaain sambhav hain. lekin mujhe inmein kuchh ajeeb naheen laga. kya aap koi udaaharan dekar bataayeinge? vishesh:yogadaan/WiktBot mujhe naheen mila.
3. https://wikisource.org/wiki hindi vikisrot] abhi tak bankar taiyaar naheen hua hai. at: aap jis roop mein chaahate ho us roop mein use moort roop de sakte ho. abhi main is baare mein kuchh naheen kah sakta. aap chaaho to iski charcha chaupaal par karna uchit hoga.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 14:23, 14 fravari 2016 (UTC)

baut ka galati se mainne hindi vikipeediya ka kadi daal diya tha. hi:wikt:vishesh:yogadaan/WiktBot aur hi:wikt:vishesh:yogadaan/VibhijainBot ke vikshanari ke yogadaan dekhein. mujhe yahaaain lekhon ki sankhya 120,270 dikh raha hai. table ke oopar mein article bhi likha hua hai.--Sfic (vaarta) 15:45, 14 fravari 2016 (UTC)

shaayad yeh sankhya, kisi truti ke kaaran dikhaai de rahi hai. iske alaava WiktBot evam VibhijainBot ke vikshanari sampaadanon ko hataaya ja sakta hai. iske liye aapko vahaaain chaupaal par ek sandesh chhodna hoga aur ek saptaah baad kaarya aarambh karna hoga.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 19:13, 16 fravari 2016 (UTC)

Are you interested in starting en:Capital punishment in India? WhisperToMe (vaarta) 07:43, 8 fravari 2016 (UTC)

@WhisperToMe: Done but not for the complete page.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 14:30, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Thank you so much! It's fine to just start with some content WhisperToMe (vaarta) 18:12, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

sanjeev ji, login/logout ka mainne pehle chaupaal par iske sthaan par pravesh/prasthaan ka upayog karne ke baare mein likha tha. jo Google, anya hindi se milte julate bhaashaaon ke viki mein bhi upayog hota hai. kya sabhi login/logout ko isi mein anuvaad karna theek rahega? aur suppressor ka hindi mein kya anuvaad theek rahega. krupaya ‎aVishvas vasuki ji ke chaupaal mein anurodh ko bhi ek baar dekh lein. aur Parvezsagar ne vikipeediya:prayogasthal ko sadasya:prayogasthal par sthaanaantarit kar diya. aur vikisrot mein mainne kuchh peedeeef faail bhi dekha tha, lekin mujhe samajh naheen aaya ki usamein kaise daala gaya hai. kya ismein upayog karne ke liye seedhe peedeeef faail ko kaumans mein daalna hai. --Sfic (vaarta) 16:30, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

mujhe lagta hai login/logout ke sthaan par pravesh/prasthaan karna uchit hai kyonki anya pariyojanaaon par ise pravesh/prasthaan hi kiya hua hai. sabhi sthaanon par ise pravesh/prasthaan karna uchit hoga ya naheen, ye sthaan dekhkar hi nirdhaarit kiya ja sakta hai. udaaharan ke liye mujhe kaheen likhna ho ki "pravesh/prasthaan ke tulya angreji shabd laug-in/laug-out hain." to ismein anuvaad sambhav naheen hai.

aapne suppressor shabd kahaaain par dekha hai, usase hi iska anuvaad bataana uchit rahega. vi:prayogasthal ko pun: sthaanaantarit kar diya gaya hai. faayalein saamaanyat: kaumans se lena uchit hai aur achha rahega. yadi aapko kuchh jyaada hi aavashyak mahasoos ho to sthaaneeya prakalp par bhi upload kar sakte ho lekin isse bachane ka prayaas karna uchit rahega.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 08:50, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

dhanyavaad, jitne jagah mein pravesh/prasthaan shabd theek rahega vahaaain par isi ka upayog karoonga baaki jagah mein laug-in/laug-out ka. suppressor ek sadasya samooh hai. --Sfic (vaarta) 12:41, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

en:Aircraft ke liye mujhe vaayuyaan hi sahi sheershak lag raha hai. lekin yeh lekh en:Airplane se juda hua hai. mainne jab is lekh ko havaai jahaaj mein sthaanaantarit karne ki koshish kiya to pata chala ki yeh lekh vaayuyaan ko rpreshit kiya gaya hai. lekh pehle se bane hone ke kaaran use sthaanaantarit naheen kar paaya. --Sfic (vaarta) 10:05, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

@Sfic: vaayuyaan lekh ki saamagri bhi en:Aircraft ke anuroop hi hai. at: inhein sthaanaantarit karne ki aavashyakta naheen hai. sambandhit vikidaata kadi se vaayuyaan ko hataakar "havaai jahaaj" ko jodna hai. yaad rahe, yeh kaarya sampann karne se pehle havaai jahaaj naamak lekh mein kuchh saamagri daalna aavashyak hai. iske baad vaayuyaan naamak prushth ko sambandhit vikidaata kadi se jod do.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 08:31, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

mainne abhi kuchh saanche aayaat kiye the jinmein saaaincha:track gauge bhi tha. iske pej par "script mein truti , modyool naheen" likha aa raha hai to kya main modyool:track gej aayaat kar looain?(kuchh karne se pehle poochhana sahi samjha)....dhanyavaad. -- chakrapaani vaarta 05:49, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

@chakrapaani: ya to aap sambandhit modyool ko aayaat kar sakte ho anyatha iske puraane avataran ko sthaapit kar sakte ho. modyool aayaat karne mein abhi tak thodi samasya yeh hai ki kuchh modyool abhi tak hindi viki par kaam naheen karte. lekin aap behichk inko aayaat kar sakte ho. inko sampaadit karne ka bhi prayaas karo. yadi safalta milti hai to bahut achhi baat hai.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 10:18, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

sanjeev ji, mera prabandhak-pad ke liye samarthan karne ke liye bahut-bahut dhanyavaad. hindeeviki bhalaai ke liye mujh se jo bhi ban padega, main karooainga. --Hunnjazal (vaarta) 16:43, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

@Hunnjazal: prabandhak banane par badhaai ho. aasha hai ab aap prabandhakeeya kaarya mein apna rachanaatmak yogadaan doge aur hindi vikipeediya par sadasyon ko jodne mein sakaaraatmak yogadaan dete rahoge.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 19:09, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

namaste sanjeev ji! punareekshan ke dauraan mile is sanpaadan aur is sanpaadan dvaara joda gaya sandarbh vishvasaneeya hai? --styam mishr ^baatcheet 13:56, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

mujhe to vishvasaneeya website naheen lag rahi lekin ek-do kadi dene mein koi pareshaani naheen hai. yadi iski kadi dene vaale sadasya lagaataar aisa kaam karein to is sandarbh ko prachaar samajhakar hata dena chaahiye.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 20:09, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

tumhaari pareshaani kya hai, mere dvaara banaae gaye pej ko dileet kisliye kar diya. jyaada galatiyaaain dhooaindhane ki koshish na karein. apne kaam se kaam rakhana seekho. agar us pej ke liye tumhein srot naheen dikha to tumane dileet hi kar diya........vaah!--— is ahastaaksharit sandesh ke lekhak hain -Aman vikal arya (vaarta • yogadaan)

is sampaadan mein galati se aapse "mote akshar" likh gaya hai. aur pata naheen kyon mujhe aapka ye sampaadan jaaainchana pada (vaarta wala bhi).--peeyoosh ^{sadasya:hindusthaan vaasi (vaarta)} 16:35, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

dhanyavaad peeyoosh ji, ek prabandhak ko aisi galatiyon se bachana chaahiye. ye ek badi bhool thi. bhavishya mein bhi is tarah ki galati hone par krupaya mujhe bataayein.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 08:43, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

namaste sanjeev ji, ek jijnyaaasa hai. mujhe RTRC dvaara punareekshan karte samay aapka yeh sanpaadan soochi mein dikha aur yeh abhi bhi a-punareekshit hai . jabki aap prabandhak hain aur main keval gair-punareekshit sanpaadanon ki jaaainch kar raha tha. aisa kaise ho sakta hai?? mujhe ise punareekshit mark karna pada! --styam mishr ^baatcheet 17:19, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

ise dekhkar bhi aapke kathan ki pushti hoti hai. ise aap maita viki par likh sakte hain. shaayad vahaaain koi uchit samaadhaan mile.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 17:50, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

yahi cheej mainne upar bhi kahi hai. mujhe sanjeev ji ka sa:kya aap jaante hain par aur iske vaarta par kiya gaya sampaadan jaaainchana pada.--peeyoosh ^{sadasya:hindusthaan vaasi (vaarta)} 04:39, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

namaskaar sanjeev ji mainne dekha aapka bot kaafi kaarya karta hai. main paaithan 3.6 par kaarya kar raha hooain. aage pyvikeebot par bhi kaarya karne ka vichaar hai. shaayad bhavishya mein bot banaaoon. filhaal aapka kya vichaar hai abhi mainne pyvikeebot daaunalod to naheen kiya hai? jaisa mainne vikeebot pej par padha bot ofalaain(PC par paaithan aur pyvikeebot inastaul karke) inastaul karke chalana jyaada sahi rahega ya online matlab saait se seedhe. --- chakrapaani vaarta 15:19, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

@chakrapaani: aapka oflaain se kya matlab hai. main to baut se jo bhi sampaadan karta hooain vo usi samay karta hooain jis samay Internet hota hai. haaain, itna jaroor hai ki us samay main computer ke saamane baitha rahooain aisa aavashyak naheen hai. iske atirikt aap paayathaun 3.6 ke saath pywikibot ko kaam mein le sakte hain. aap chaaho to abhi baut khaate ke liye aavedan kar sakte hain lekin uske liye aapko kuchh sampaadan karke dikhaane honge. aap apne saadhaaran khaate ke saath aise prayog kar sakte ho.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 15:25, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

ji ise dekhein. iske alaava saait downliading pywikibot par do faail hain: (.tar.gz) aur (.zip) kya donon faail daaunalod karni hain ya ek links aur doosari vindoj ke liye hai.--- chakrapaani vaarta 15:34, 22 April 2016 (UTC) mujhe lagta hai chakrapaani ji yeh poochh rahe hain ki unhein py vikeebot ko apne system par instaul karna chaahiye athva seedhe online istemaal karna chaahiye. meri rai yeh hai ki instaul karke istemaal karein. --styam mishr ^baatcheet 20:42, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

achha. main to mere leptop aur computer par instaul karke rakhata hooain. seedha kaam mein naheen liya kabhi.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 20:45, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

sanjeev ji apne yeh naheen bataaya kaunasi faail daaunalod karooain vindoj ke liye??-- chakrapaani vaarta 06:35, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

@chakrapaani: ji, donon (.tar.gz) aur (.zip) ek hi faail hai. aap kisi ka bhi upayog vindoj mein kar sakte ho.--Sfic (vaarta) 06:39, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

@Sfic:shaayad aapka matlab kisi bhi ek se hai. mainne links par kaam kiya hai us par (.tar. gz) ka istemaal kaafi hota hai aur vindoj par zip faail ka. donon hi kampreshan elgorithm hai. to main zip faail daaunalod kar leta hooain.--- chakrapaani vaarta 06:46, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

@chakrapaani: ji, vaise main .tar.gz /.zip donon faail ka vindoj mein upayog karta hooain. isliye aapko donon mein se kisi bhi faail ko daaunalod karne bol raha tha. --Sfic (vaarta) 06:53, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

sanjeev ji! aapke baut hetu ek prashn hai. kya aapke baut dvaara sadasya vaarta prushth par svaagat hetu jodi gayi tempalet ko aap vaastavik svaagat tempalet se sabsteechyoot kar sakte hain? --styam mishr ^baatcheet 20:39, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

@satyam mishr: haaain, jaroor. kahaaain par karna hai ye kaam? aur kyon?☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 20:41, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

meri sakriyta waali doosari viki pe. mainne nae logon ke liye ise sabstichyoot hetu set kr diya hai. par jahaaain puraane sadasyon ke liye iska prayog hai vahaan aapko ise sabsteechyoot karna hoga. --styam mishr ^baatcheet 20:45, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

@satyam mishr: sabhi logon ke vaarta prushth par athva mere baut khaate dvaara huye sampaadanon ke liye? sabhi par karna mere liye aasaan rahega.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 20:47, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

aapko yaad hoga eak baar mainne saroj dhakaal ji ke sampaadanon ke baare mein aapse charcha ki thi. aapne bhi kaha tha ki svaagat sandesh vastut: tempalet ke dvaara naheen tempalet ke sabsteechyooshan dvaara hona chaahiye. at: mainne vahaan is tempalet ko aasaan karke sabsteechyooshan laayak bana diya hai. (laal kadiyaan do chaar din mein nipta looainga). yeh un sabhi sadasyon ke liye karna hai jo aaj se pehle apna khaata banaaye hain. matlab sabhi ke liye. --styam mishr ^baatcheet 20:53, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

theek hai, main ek do din mein kar dooainga. abhi neend aa rahi hai. agale saptaah mein sanskrut vikipeediya par bhi aaaindhi chalaani hai.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 20:55, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

nehal ji bhi badi shiddat se dhooaindh rahe hain mujhe. gud night ! --styam mishr ^baatcheet 20:59, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

@satyam mishr: shaayad aaj kaam ho jaayega. fir aap unki sahaayata kyon naheen karte. sanskrut vikipeediya aur vikshanari ko sudhaarane mein nehal ji, akele lage huye hain jabki unka takaneeki gyaan bhi abhi praathamik star par hai. aap sahaayata karoge to vo yeh kaarya aasaani se kar paayeinge. vaise Sfic ji nehal ji ki sahaayata kar sakte hain.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 11:02, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

ravivaar ki chhutti ka kuchh faayda uthaate huye mainne kaafi der tak chait par unki samasyaaon ka nidaan kiya. aapko mel dvaara jo nae lekh banaane se pehle ka chetaavani sandesh sthaapit karne ka anurodh unhonne kiya tha vah bhi poorn hua. iske aalaava aayaat, itihaas vilay aur anya kai cheejon par unki madad ki hai. bas unke yahaaain ke mukhaprushth ki ek samasya ka samaadhaan rah gaya tha, use bhi ekaadh din mein sulajha looainga. unki pragati achhi hai. -- styam mishr ^baatcheet 18:56, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

sanjeev ji lionaardo da vinchi lekh yahaan se poora kaupi kiya gaya hai , iska kya karna hai ? kyonki lekh jnyaaanakosheeya hai ? uchit sudhaar karein agar aapko inke baare mein kuchh pata ho to ' main bhi kar sakta hooain par abhi thoda vyast hooain . dhanyavaad . --raaju suthaar^vaarta 12:26, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

@raaju suthaar: ji, kisi ne vikipeediya ke lekh ko kaupi kiya hai. vikipeediya mein yeh lekh lagbhag 2009 ke aaspaas isi tarah ka tha aur blog mein yeh 2013 mein daala gaya hai. --Sfic (vaarta) 12:32, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

to fir Sfic ji guru jambheshvar lekh mein mainne hi poori saamagri daali thi aur fir mainne ek blog :- ismein bhi poori saamagri daali aur dekha to 0% kaupi bataata hai , iska kya matlab ho sakta hai ?

--raajoo suthaar 'svatantr'^vaarta 12:49, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

satyam ji aur Sfic ji, sambhav ho to raaju ji ki samasyaaon ka samaadhaan karo.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 12:53, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

@raaju suthaar: ji, yahaaain 99.5% kaupi dikha raha hai. lekin iske liye yooaarael daalna pada. vaise yeh blog, guru jambheshvar lekh ke paath ko khojane se dikhaai naheen deta hai. is kaaran is tool mein iski jaankaari naheen dikhaai di. --Sfic (vaarta) 13:15, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

theek hai Sfic ji samajh gaya . kyonki mainne jab isko jaancha tha to mainne lekh ke saath yooaarael naheen daali thi is kaaran kaupi kahaan se kiya gaya tha yeh naheen bata raha tha .--raajoo suthaar 'svatantr'^vaarta 13:38, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for information.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 04:49, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

mainne auto viki braaujr ke upayog anumati hetu aavedan kiya hai:vikipeediya vaarta:AutoWikiBrowser/CheckPage#chakrapaani dekhein. --- chakrapaani vaarta 06:42, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

namaste sanjeev ji krupaya mujhe bat de deejiye kyon mere yogadaan ko bauddh dharm aur aadi shankaraachaarya ke baare mein hata diya tha ? dhanyavaad. — is ahastaaksharit sandesh ke lekhak hain -Sophia000888 (vaarta • yogadaan) 13:00, 24 April 2016‎ (UTC)

aapke aadi shankaraachaarya par kiye gaye sampaadanon ko vaapas sthaapit kar diya gaya hai lekin bauddh dharm par aapke sampaadanon ki bhaasha samajh mein naheen aa rahi hai. yadi aap bhaasha mein sudhaar karke use pun: laga sakte hain to aapka svaagat hai.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 13:07, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

dhanyavaad sanjeev ji main samajhta hoon. hindi meri maatrubhaasha naheen hai. kya ho sakta hai ki aap meri madad de deejiye aur in donon yogadaan ko krupaya sahi karein ?--Sophia000888 (vaarta) 13:23, 24 April 2016 (UTC) maaf keejiye, sanjeev ji, abhi naaileejm ke bina theek hai . aur kuchh naheen . shukriya .--Sophia000888 (vaarta) 16:47, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

sanjeev ji, main vikipeediya par naya sadasya hooain. saath hi mera ek svatantr blog hai jiski kuchh kadiyaaain main yahaaain vikipeediya ke sambandhit prushthon par baahari kadi ke roop mein jodta hooain. haal hi mein mainne ek kadi chutakule prushth par jodi thi 'letest hindi chutakule'

par aapke dvaara vo poorvarat kar di gayi. kya main iski vajah jaan sakta hooain ?— is ahastaaksharit sandesh ke lekhak hain -Ilys article (vaarta • yogadaan) 16:21, 24 April 2016‎ (UTC)

aapke dvaara kiya gaya kaarya prachaar ki shreni mein aata hai. vikipeediya par prachaar karne ki anumati naheen hai.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 16:27, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

• sanjeev ji,

main naam naheen lena chaahoonga par kuchh anya hindi blaugars bhi jo ki meri tarah blogs likhte hai vikipeediya par apne sambandhit lekh ko baahari kadi ke roop mein jodte hai.

mera maanana hai agar vikipeediya ke sambandhit pej par agar main mool: vishay se hatkar kisi alag vishay sambandhit kadi jodi jaae to vah prachaar kaarya hoga. aap mera yogadaan panna dekh sakte hai mainne aise vikipeediya panno par hi sandarbh joda hai jo mool: vishay vaastu se joda ja sake.

aasha karta hooain aapki taraf se sakaaratmak evam prerak uttar milega.

sanjeev ji, yeh ek 50 varsh puraani film ka screenshot hai. maine vikipeediya par aur bhi kai screenshot deinkhe hai. mujhe iske liye upayukt license ka gyaan nahi hai krupa aap sahaayata kare. -Dedha9 (vaarta) 17:24, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

@Dedha9: 50 varsh puraana screenshot mukt license mein naheen aata aur yadi aapke paas chitr ka mukt license hai to use viki-kaumans par upload karein.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 17:47, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

saaaincha:mukhaprushth samaachaar ka srot dekhein https://hi.wikipedia.org/s/70x

samaachaar kaise adyatan jaaeain vahaan to yeh likha aa raha hai:

aapko is prushth ko sampaadit karne ki anumati naheen hain, nimnalikhit kaaran ki vajah se:

yeh panna surakshit hai, kyonki yeh nimnalikhit panne ki suraksha-seedhi mein samaavisht hai:

mukhaprushth
aap is prushth ka srot dekh sakte hain aur usaki nakal utaar sakte hain:

--- chakrapaani vaarta 02:50, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

krupaya vishesh:sadasya_soochee/templateeditor dekhein. aapko yeh adhikaar diya ja chuka hai. adhik jaankaari ke liye maita par steevards se sampark karein. mujhe isak adhikaar ki kaaryapranaali ki jaankaari naheen hai.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 05:44, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

pranaam sanjeev shreemaan ji, aasha hai ki aapse sab khairiyt hai. mujhe muaaf kar deejiye kintu yeh jnyaaanakosh hai, mandir naheen. shri Ram sena beshak ek majhabi tanajeem hai - lekin iska arth yeh naheen hua ki yeh aatanki tanajeemon ki shreni mein kabhi naheen aa sakti hai, vaise bhi, yeh majhabi tanajeem se zyaada mere khyaal se siyaasi tanajeem hoti hai. jaise ki riyaasat-A-islaamiya, al-kaaida aadi aatanvaad ki shreni mein aati hai, vaise hi yeh shri Ram sena aatankvaad ki shreni mein aani chaahiye. aakhir angreji viki mein us lekh vahi shreni mein daali gayi hai. yeh prayaas keval hindi vikipeediya ko zyaada nishpaksh banaane hetu hai - arthaat ek zyaada shreshth jnyaaanakosh banaane hetu hai. saadar, --Salma Mehmood 18:18, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

@Salma Mehmood aur chakrapaani: ji, dishaanirdesh WP:TERRORIST mein likha hai ki Value-laden labels—aasuch as calling an organization a cult, an individual a racist, terrorist, or freedom fighter, or a sexual practice a perversion—aamay express contentious opinion and are best avoided unless widely used by reliable sources to describe the subject, in which case use in-text attribution.. krupaya is dishaanirdesh ko dhyaan mein rakhein.

not: yahi niyam muslim sangathanon se sambandhit lekhon par bhi laagoo hota hai. --gaurav (vaarta) 20:18, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

gaurav ji, aapka mat rakhane ke liye shukriya. yeh niyam angreji viki se hai, to paaribhaashik roop mein yeh poora niyam hindi viki par laagoo naheen ho sakta. par fir bhi, dhyaan deejiye ki yeh niyam lekh ka shurooaati anubhaag ke sandarbh mein hai. misaal ke taur par kisi lekh (alakaaida aadi mein bhi) ka shurooaati anubhaag mein vishay ko "aatankvaadi", "naslavaadi" aadi ke roop mein pesh karna is niyam ke mutaabik anuchit hai. (khair, yahaaain par harek ugravaadi islaami tanajeem lekh mein yeh hi hota ja raha hai) lekin lekh ke vistrut anubhaagon aur shreniyon mein is prakaar ke shabdon ka prayog kiya ja sakta hai. angreji aur hindi viki par yeh bhi kiya ja raha hai aur aap sab bhi dekh sakte hai shri Ram sena ka angreji lekh mein "hindu aatankvaadi" ki shreni maujood hai - to yahaaain par is lekh mein shreni ko mitaane ki kya vajah ho sakti hai (jaati aur majhabi jajbaaton ke alaava)? saadar, --Salma Mehmood 21:07, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

yeh ek vivaadit mudda hai aur iski al-kaaida jaise sangathanon se tulana karne ke baad main kuchh naheen kar sakta.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 22:39, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

@Salma Mehmood: ji, angreji vikipeediya par al kaayada ko "terrorist organization" naheen, "millitant organization" kaha gaya hai. mere hisaab se hindi vikipeediya par bhi aisa hi hona chaahiye. --gaurav (vaarta) 22:53, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

agar kisi ko "terrorist organization" kehna hai, to "in-text attribution" ke saath hona chaahiye. --gaurav (vaarta) 22:57, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

meri rai ye hai ki angreji viki par ye lekhamein hindu aatankvaad shreni upasthit hai. Google khoj karne par ye sangathan ki pravruttiyaaain kaafi had tak aatankvaad ke daayare mein aati hai aur goaa mein ye sangathan par pratibandh lagaaya gaya hai. musleem aatankvaadi sangathano ke lekh mein bhi aatankvaad se joodi shreeneeyaaain hai. apitu filhaal ye sahi hai. ha, aatankvaadi sangathan kise kaha jaayega unape charcha ka avakaash hai aur ye muslim aatankvaadi sangathano ke liye bhi laagoo hota hai. hindu ho ya musleem ho koi majahab/dharm aatankvaad naheen sikhaata. haaain yuddh/svabachaav mein ki gai jaanahaani aatankvaadi pravrutti nahi kahelaaegi.-yogesh kaveeshvar (vaarta) 07:01, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

lekh ke vaarta prushth par tippani de raha huain. krupaya aage ki tippani vahaaain karein.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 07:32, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

namaste sanjeev ji, maine prashaasak adhikaar hetu aapka naamaankan kiya hai. aap ye adhikaar lena chaahate hain to krupaya sabandhit prushth par aapani sveekruti pradaan karein. taaki matadaan prakriya aage badh sakein. shubhakaamanaaeain.-yogesh kaveeshvar (vaarta) 12:34, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

sanjeev ji maine aapki ichha ke anusaar filhaal prashaasak ke liye aapka naamaankan vaapas liya hai. aapne satyam ji ko padonnit karne ke liye soochit kiya hai; vah kaafi sakriya, anubhavi aur sadasyo ki sahaayata hetu hanmesha tatpar rahate hai. krupaya aap hi unase ye vishay pe charcha karale. main to chaahooainga ki aap dono prashaasak bane. hame poorn taiyaari ke saath matadaan karna hai, isabaar 25 mato ka lakshyaank jaroor paar hoga. aap bhi prashaasak bane to achha hai. aap khud bhi prabandhako ke saath charcha karne ke baad jo/jitne naam tay ho unka naamaankan kar sakte hai. matadaan jyaada-se-jyaada ho iske liye main sakriya prayatn karooainga.-yogesh kaveeshvar (vaarta) 01:38, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

satyam ji, krupaya chakrapaani ji ke prashn par apni rai vyakt karein. yadi aap paryaapt samay de sakein to aapka naamaankan kiya jaaye!!!☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 12:26, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

sanjeev ji maita par satyam ji ki ye vinti dekhake main pareshaan hooain. aise anubhavi prabandhak ko ham khona naheen chaahate. krupaya tatkaal dhyaan dein.-yogesh kaveeshvar (vaarta) 13:04, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

yogesh ji, satyam ji ne apna naamaankan vaapas le liya hai.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 12:00, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Hi!

Iberocoop has launched a translating contest to improve the content in other Wikipedia related to Ibero-American Culture.

We would love to have you on board :)

Please find the contest here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Translating_Ibero_-_America/Participants_2016

Hugs!--Anna Torres (WMAR) (talk) 15:06, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

namaste sanjeev ji! kya yeh koi upayogi prushth hai?--styam mishr ^baatcheet 02:34, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

@satyam mishr: mujhe lagta hai ye prushth kisi kaaran se us samay banaaya gaya tha lekin abhi iska koi upayog naheen hai aur hataaya ja sakta hai.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 11:46, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Hello. My name is Gnosis from en:Persian Wikipedia. I was hoping if you could help with the translation of en:Tehran Museum of Contemporary Art to Hindi language. If somehow you can't help with this regard, could you direct me to someone in Italian wikipedia that can help with this matter? Thanks! --Gnosis (vaarta) 05:15, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

@Gnosis: Hello, he is on a temporary break so he might not be available for translation, in that case I can help you translating this page in hindi. Do you want me to do so? Awaiting your answer ;)--- chakrapaani vaarta 07:09, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

@chakrapaani: Hello, I appreciate if you could do it. Many Thanks. --Gnosis (vaarta) 07:31, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

@Gnosis: Thank you for your answer, I'll make it avilable in hindi as soon as possible.Till than wait and let me know if there are any other page/s that need hindi translation. --- chakrapaani vaarta 07:53, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

@chakrapaani:, I appreciate your time and effort to help me out here. There are two important people in connection with this article. They are Empress Farah, Iran's former queen who assembled the art collection and Kamran Diba, a prominent architect and a cousin of Empress Farah who design the museum. If you could maybe help with translation to hindi, it would be so great. Meanwhile if you want any particular article in Persian, let me know. I'll be glad to return the favour. Many Thanks. --Gnosis (vaarta) 08:29, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

namaste sanjeev ji! aapke 11 April ke naamaankan par kuchh sujhaav diye gaye hain. krupaya in sujhaavon par vichaar karein. dhanyavaad !--styam mishr ^baatcheet 05:53, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

dhanyavaad satyam ji, kuchh sudhaar kiye gaye hain aur kuchh aur karne karne ke baad main pun: sampark karooainga.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 06:15, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

namaste sanjeev ji! krupaya lekh navatol, sarisbapaahi mein prayukt chitron ki sameeksha karein. sadasya ne kuchh upagrah chitron ko bhi apna kaam kah kar prakaashit kiya hai. saath hi is lekh mein varnit saamagri ki sameeksha bhi karein. main to inhein sandarbh ke baare mein samjha kar thak chuka. --styam mishr ^baatcheet 07:00, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

chitron ki sameeksha kar chuka hooain. lekh ki sameeksha abhi bhi baaki hai.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 18:13, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

yeh theek se naheen hua hai kyonki kaaran likhne mein yadi nai line (Dr baar entar) ya bulet ka prayog kiya gaya ho to yeh script dvaara theek se pakad mein naheen aata hai. jaateeya party lekh mein kaaran ki kuchh laainein jud gayeen hain jinhein mainuali hataana padega. --styam mishr ^baatcheet 08:34, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

yeh kaaran likhne ka tareeka (poori baat ek hi line mein bina entar batan dabaaye likhne ka) sadasyon ko bataana padega. pehle susheel ji aisa karte the to unhein mainne bata diya tha). --styam mishr ^baatcheet 08:37, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

satyam ji, maine mainuali hata diya hai. ab se kaaran bina ऍntar dabaaye hi likhooainga. dhanyavaad.-yogesh kaveeshvar (vaarta) 08:55, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

@YmKavishwar: ji, dhanyavaad ! --styam mishr ^baatcheet 12:00, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

sanjeev ji, mujhe lagta hai ki is saaainche ka hindi viki mein koi aavashyakta naheen hai. hindi mein hamesha pehla naam aage hi likhte hain. is saaainche ke kaaran shreni mein naam dekhne mein pareshaani hoti hai. udaa॰ poonam mahaajan ka naam shreni mein dekhein. p ke sthaan par r vaale mein dikh raha hai. --Sfic (vaarta) 09:31, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

@Sfic: mujhe bhi aisi hi aavashyakta mahasoos hoti hai lekin apne star par kuchh naheen kah sakta. pehle yeh lekh "P" par dikhaai de raha tha. aap chaaho to chaupaal par sambandhit ek charcha aarambh kar do. baad mein aapki aur meri baut milkar ismein sudhaar ka kaarya sampann kar sakte hain.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 14:09, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

yahaaain par mera sanpaadan kyon poorvavat kiya gaya?---- chakrapaani vaarta 15:35, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

@chakrapaani:kyonki aisa naheen karne par ek hi samaachaar ko "mukhaprushth samaachaar" aur poorv par pratilipi ho rahi thi.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 16:23, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

par mainne to us samaachaar ko mukhya prushth samaachaar se hata diya tha.--- chakrapaani vaarta 13:52, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

@chakrapaani: pehli baat to main aapse yeh puchhana chaahata hooain ki kya aapne kabhi svashiksha li hai? kyonki aap jahaaain kaheen bhi charcha karte ho, niymaavali ko dhyaan mein naheen rakhate.

ab aapke prashn ka uttar: aisa karne par bhaarateeya antareeksh vigyaan se sambandhit 2 samaachaar mukhaprushth par ho jaate. hamein yeh kosheesh karni hoti hai ki ek jaise vishay par athva ek hi sansthaan se jude do samaachaar ek saath mukhaprushth par naheen hon. at: mainne uske sthaan par ek anya samaachaar ko hata diya. aap us saaainche ke itihaas mein jaakar antar dekh sakte ho.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 14:06, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

krupaya, apne is vaktavya ko spasht karein : pehli baat to main aapse yeh puchhana chaahata hooain ki kya aapne kabhi svashiksha li hai? kyonki aap jahaaain kaheen bhi charcha karte ho, niymaavali ko dhyaan mein naheen rakhate. (?_?)--- chakrapaani vaarta 16:51, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

@chakrapaani: krupaya vikipeediya:svashiksha aur iske aage ke prushth padhein. uske baad main shaayad aapko kuchh samjha paauainga.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 17:12, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

ji mainne padha na to vikipeediya:samaachaar par aur na hi vikipeediya:svashiksha par hamein yeh kosheesh karni hoti hai ki ek jaise vishay par athva ek hi sansthaan se jude do samaachaar ek saath mukhaprushth par naheen hon. se sambandhit kuchh mila.

• Do not take life too seriously. You will never get out of it alive. (^_-)

--- chakrapaani vaarta 17:34, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

hailo, aapne uttar naheen diya?--- chakrapaani vaarta 07:04, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

aapke dvaara upar angreji mein likha vaakya 2 varsh poorv mainne bhi mere vhautsaepp states ke roop mein rakha tha. lekin main vikipeediya par charcha ke samay aisi baaton ka uttar dena uchit naheen samajhta.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 13:44, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

main oopar jo apne kaha tha, hamein yeh kosheesh karni hoti hai ki ek jaise vishay par athva ek hi sansthaan se jude do samaachaar ek saath mukhaprushth par naheen hon. us baare mein kah raha hooain. mujhe ye jaisa mainne oopar bataaya, kaheen likha naheen mila hai. matlab is prakaar ka koi niyam ya anivaaryata. --- chakrapaani vaarta 14:58, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

aisa koi niyam aur anivaaryata naheen hai. lekin ise anubhavajanit athva saamaanyabodh maana ja sakta hai. yadi ek hi vishay se mukhaprushth bhara raha to use adyatan karne ka hi kya arth hua?☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 16:18, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

dhanyavaad. aage se dhyaan rakhooainga. aur chitr ke sambandh mein jaise 1 chitr ya 2 chitr rakhana? kyonki jab mainne saamaachaar post kiya tha tab 2 chitr the. ek aaraelavi-teedi ka ek shaayad kambodiya ke mandir ka.--- chakrapaani vaarta 01:59, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

vahaaain upalabdh sthaan ko dekhte huye ek hi chitr rakha jaata hai. saamaanyat: sabse naveen samaachaar ka chitr rakha jaata hai lekin vahaaain rakha hua chitr hamesha mukt license mein hona aavashyak hai aur kisi naveen ghatna (jo ham samaachaar mein likh rahe hain) ka naya aur mukt chitr milna bahut aasaan bhi naheen hota. at: us sthiti mein ham puraane samaachaar ka chitr bhi rakh sakte hain. lekin chitr 1 se adhik naheen rakhe jaayeinge.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 06:25, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

@satyam mishr:saaaincha:Infobox Weapon/sandbox kya mainne sahi sanpaadan kiya hai? mujhe ismein parivartan kahaaain aur kaise dikhaai deinge. matlab keval saindabauks vaale badlaav. --- chakrapaani vaarta 10:38, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

chakrapaani saindabauks vaale badlaav dekhne ke liye ise prayog karein. vaise hi jaise Infobox Weapon ka prayog hota hai. jis lekh mein iske parinaam dekhne hon us lekh mein jahaaain Infobox Weapon likha hai usaki jagah Infobox Weapon/sandbox likhkar preevyoo dekhein. --styam mishr ^baatcheet 11:52, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

namaste sanjeev ji, krupaya "chitr:Qur'an.jpg" aur "chitr:Shiv kawad sewa sangh bhabat Reg medical camp .jpg" ka laaisans jaaainche, inke vivran mein 28 aur 19 May ko kuchh joda gaya tha use bhi dekh lein. --styam mishr ^baatcheet 16:10, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

ek anurodh aur hai, bhaarateeya raajyon ke vartamaan mukhyamantriyon ki soochi ke haaliya itihaas dekhkar kiye badalaaon ki sameeksha karein, mujhe to lagta hai ki jyaadaatar utpaatajanak badlaav hata diye gaye hain. --styam mishr ^baatcheet 01:33, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

jaaainch poorn hui. vaise main chitron ki sameeksha 14 din baad mein karta hooain jisse har tarah ke naamaankan kiye ja sake.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 17:20, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

aage se main bhi aisa hi karooainga. ek aur jijnyaaasa hai, mujhe koi jariya kabhi mila naheen ki nae upload kiye gaye chitr ko jaaaincha hua kaise chihnit karte hain. yeh vikalp kahaaain hota hai? --styam mishr ^baatcheet 20:24, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

yahaaain par Quraan vaale chitr ko kisi pustak ka mukhaprushth bataaya gaya tha. chooainki kisi bhi pustak ke mukhaprushth ka license ya to pustak prakaashak ke paas hota hai ya fir lekhak ke paas. aise chitr ko vikipeediya par upload naheen kiya ja sakta. iske atirikt jab mainne is chitr ko Google chitr khoj par dekha to isse bhi adhik gunavata ke chitr anya sthaanon par mile. jabki jin vishvasaneeya sthaanon par chitr upalabdh tha, vahaaain par usako kaupeeraait mukt naheen rakha gaya tha. at: yeh chitr hindi vikipeediya kaupeeraait ullanghan ki shreni mein aaya.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 07:37, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

sanjeev ji! angreji vikipeediya aur kuchh anya prakalpon par sandarbh jodne aur sudhaarane se sambandhit ProveIt naamak upakaran ko yahaaain hindi viki par sthaapit kiya hooain. ise sakriya karke iske dvaara kuchh sanpaadan karke dekhein aur pareekshan aur iske sudhaar mein madad karein. yeh sabhi sadasyon ko prayog ke liye upalabdh hai kintu pareekshan se poorv abi mainne sabhi ko soochit karna uchit naheen samjha! --styam mishr ^baatcheet 00:03, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

mainne angreji vikipeediya par ise kaam mein lene ki koshish ki thi lekin safal naheen hua tha. ab mujhe kaaran yaad naheen hai. yahaaain main isko kaam mein lekar aapko soochit karooainga.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 07:32, 7 June 2016 (UTC)