sadasya vaarta:aasheesh bhatanaagar/puraalekha06

Archive
puraalekh

--vartamaan123456
789101112, • 13,
14, • 1516avaanchhit,--

saaaincha:prabandhakagatakatatatatan

ratan Singh

aasheesh ji, namaskaar raajasthaani bhaasha ke saahityakaar shri sobhaagya Singh ji par ek lekh mainne joda hai lekin photo sahi naheen laga pa raha hooain krupaya aap lekh dekh kar sanpaadit karade | saadar dhanyavaad ratan Singh

aasheesh ji namaskaar

ab viki par lekh va chitr aadi jodana dheere-dheere samajh aa raha hai koi dikkat aayegi to aapko jarur likhunga |

abhi tak nimn lekh viki par jode hai kisi me sudhaar ki gunjaais ho to kar dena |

http://hi.wikipedia.org/wiki/veera_durgaadaasa_raathaud http://hi.wikipedia.org/wiki/ranathanbhora_durg http://hi.wikipedia.org/wiki/raava_jodha http://hi.wikipedia.org/wiki/shekhaavat http://hi.wikipedia.org/wiki/sobhaagya_sinha_shekhaavat

maine aur bhi kai itihaas ke lekh apni vebasaait http:rajputworld.co.in aur blog http://gyandarpan.com par likh rakhe hai unhe bhi viki ki bhaasha ke hisaab se kuchh badlaav kar jald hi jodunga |

dhanyavaad --ratan Singh shekhaavat 17:29, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

pramukh chitr

krupaya sujhaav vikipeediya vaarta:pramukh chitr ummeedavaar par dekhein.--poornima varman 14:06, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

laal link

aasheesh ji, ye dekhiyega jara ki jo maine mudra sfeeti wala samaachaar mukhaprushth par lagaaya hai ,usapar mudra sfeeti dar ki kadi ko viki laal rang se kyo dikha raha hai.maine braausar cash bhi saaf kar ke dekha fir bhi kuchh nahi badla. balaki haal ki ghatnaaon mein use neele link se dikha rah hai.--sumit sinhavaarta 07:02, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

meediyaaviki:Customcssjsprotected‎

aapne uparokt prushth par likhe gaye vyavastha sandesh, "is panne par doosare sadasya ki vyaktigat vareeyataaeain hone ke kaaran, aapko yeh panna badalne ki anumati naheen hai." ko badal kar "aapko yeh panna badalne ki anumati naheen hai kyonki is mein kisi anya sadasya ki vyaktigat vareeyataaen hone ke kaaran." kar diya. yeh vaakya ashuddh hai aur prabandhak ke pad par is prakaar ki anuttaradaayitvapoorn bhaasha ka prayog aapattijanak hai. krupaya ise theek karein.--poornima varman 08:37, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

iska uttar aapki vaarta mein hai. krupaya dekhein.--aasheesh bhatanaagarsandesh 09:04, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
takaneek ka dhyaan rakhane ke liye dhanyavaad. krupaya bhaasha bhi sahi kar dein.--poornima varman 09:06, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

sadasya Evian

namaskaar! aapko haal ke parivartan ya mere yogadaan evam chaupaal dvaara vidit hi hoga, ki main bahut pehle se hi padm bhooshan lekh evam uske sabhi dhaarakon ke prushth bana raha hoon. in prushthon mein yatha sambhav lekin nyoonatam soochana daali gayi hai. jismein ki dhaarak ka naam, paane ka varsh, kshetr evam saancha ye sabhi hain. ye sabhi abhi tak mere banaae hue the, evam 1954 se 1991 tak ke dhaarakon ke pej nmainne hi banaae the. unke liye mainne chaupaal par vaalantiyr maange, kintu koi aage naheen aaya. tab main akele hi badh gaya. ab aapne kuchh prushth 1992 se aage ke dhaarakon ke banaae hain, jo ki maatr ya dhaarak hain, itni hi soochana upalabdh karaate hain, aur sadasya :evian dvaara banaae gaye angreji naam ke prushthon ka punarnirdeshan maatr hain.

  • ek to angreji naam ke prushthonko bina kisi khaas kaaran badhaava naheen dena chaahiye. aur
  • yadi kisi sadasya ne bana bhi diye hain tab ya to use chetaavani dein, ki unhein hindi mein banaae,
  • ya kam se kam unhein hata kar hindi ke banaaen,va judeehui kadiyon ko vahaan nirdeshit karein.
  • yadi judi hui kadiyaan 1 hi hain (jaisi ki is maamale mein hain) tab aapko pata hi hai, ki main unhein pehle hi bana raha hoon. ye us sadasya ne maatr pej badhaane ki hod se hi banaae hain, maatr usaki bhool sudhaar karein.

jabki aapne sabhi prushthon ka anaavashyak naam anuvaadakar maatr ek vaakya likh diya. ya to aap is kaam mein aain hain, to poora faarmait daalaen. anyatha, chhod dein, main to kar hi raha hoon. yeh sarv vidit hi hai. aasha hai, prabandhak hone ke naate aa chaupaal aur haal ke parivartan dekhti hi hongeen. anya poora faarmait banaaen, jisse ki lekhon mein ekaroopata bani rahe. mujhe aapki varishthata ka poora dhyaan hai, kintu is kaam se padm bhooshan pariyojana mein anaavashyak vyavadhaan hi padega. maatr is uddeshya se, ki aisa na ho paae, main aapko soochana de raha hoon. krupaya dhyaan dein aur aisa kadaapi na samajhein ki mera aashay ye hai, ki mere lॆkh mein kaam na karein. mainne to pehle bhi dheron baar aapakॊ sanpaadan ke liye aamantrit hi kiya hai.--aasheesh bhatanaagarsandesh 01:38, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

namaste aasheesh, mainne yeh soch kar panne bana diye taaki vaarta prushth bekaar na jaaeain. angreji panne sirf punarnirdeshit isliye kiye ki ve mukhya panne se jude the. mainne socha ki aap panne banaaeainge to suvidha rahegi. baad mein unhein hata deinge. mujhe naheen lagta ki Evian ne angreji panne apne aap likhkar banaae. ve aapke dvaara kaupi ki gayi soochi par klik kar ke hi banaae gaye hain. har vyakti apne samay aur yogyata ke anusaar hi kaam karta hai. mere vichaar se abhi kisi ko mana karne ka samay hindi mein naheen aaya jab pehle hi ham itne peechhe hain. aapne bhi to bahut se panne hod mein banaae hain aur kisi kaam ke naheen. lekin kabhi na kabhi ve sahi hokar mukhya dhaara mein aa jaaeainge. yahi sochakar hamein Evian ko kaam karne dena chaahiye. agar aapko vyavadhaan hota hai to main un vaartaaon ke lekh vaale panne naheen banaaooaingi. par aapka yeh sochana galat hai ki vaarta prushth gaharaai mein gine naheen jaate. aap gaharaai ka formula dekh sakte hain. kuchh din pehle chaupaal par bhi is vishay mein charcha hui thi. --poornima varman 15:45, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
jo kaam karta hai bhool usi se hoti hai jo kaam hi na kare usase kya bhool hogi. evian jo kaam kar rahe hain vo bahut hi mahatvapoorn kaam hai. gaharaai badhaani bhi bahut jaroori hai jo unke prayaason se badhi bhi hai. anya viki vaale ya yoon kahiye ki viki kamyooniti mein gaharaai ka ek alag sammaan hai yeh aap bhi maaniyega aur jo aadmi itni siddat se is vishesh kaam ko kai maheenon se lagaataar kiye ja raha hai usaki taareef karni hi chaahiye maine bhi ki. puraskaar dena bhi sarvatha uchit tha jo ki poornima ji ne diya. isse utsaah to badhta hi kaam ko recognition bhi milta hai. agar is dauraan vo koi bhool karta hai jo ki koi bhi kar sakta hai main bhi aur aap bhi, to usaka apamaan ya tirskaar na karke hamako usako sudhaarana chaahiye. --Munita Prasadvaarta 02:49, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

dhanyavaad

aasheesh ji baarn sitaaron se aaj ki subah jagamaga uthi dhanyavaad. aapke aasheervaad se bhavishya mein bhi isi tarah nirantar prayatnasheel rahooainga dhanyavaad --gunjan varmasandesh 05:16, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

kya kehne

kya kehne hain aapki lagan ke . pichhle kuchh dinon mein to aapne kamaal hi kar dikhaaya hai . yeh aap hi ka yogadaan hai ki ham kaakeshiyaai bhaasha jaurjiyn se spardha le rahe hain . yoon to aapke rahate isko peechhe chhodna koi badi baat naheen lagti par aapka vibhinn kshetron mein vividhta ke saath aapka yogadaan prashansaneeya hai . krupaya lage rahein ! --amit prabhaakar 18:38, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

naheen aasheesh ji, ismein meri hi galati hai ki main ab viki se utana sanlagn naheen rah pa raha hooain jitna pehle tha par ab ham 48vein sthaan aa gaye hain to atyant harsh ho raha hai . nirantar aage badhna gunavatta ke balidaan ke moolya par na ho iski koshish karta rahoonga . --amit prabhaakar 05:07, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
chaliye kisi ki bhi galati na maanein, to bhi ab to kaarya suchaaru hoga, is aasha ke saath aapko soochana deta hoon, ki kartooli bhaasha ko humne abhi abhi pachhaad diya hai. unke 28656 ke mukaabale hamaare 28683lekh ho gaye hain. aapka aagam kitna shubh raha hai. of jab chaahein, to mujhse jeetaak par bhi vaarta kar sakte hain.--aasheesh bhatanaagarsandesh 05:15, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
chaupaal par mera sandesh apni jagah se hataae jaane ka main sakht virodh karti hooain. krupaya use fir se lagaaeain. agar aapka sandesh main apni jagah se hata dooain to aapko kaisa lagega?--poornima varman 05:25, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

svapn jhade fool se meet chubhe shool se,
lut gaye shrrungaar sabhi, baag ke babool se
aur ham khade khade, bahaar dekhte rahe
kaaravaan gujr gaya, gubaar dekhte rahe . ------gopaal das "neeraj"

ham jaarjiyn (maaf keejiyega main yahaaain kkeshiyaai jaise visheshanon ka istemaal naheen karoonga, kyonki mujhe lagta hai ki ye bhi vivaad ka ek kaaran bana tha ) ki fatah ka jashn manaane mein leen the aur do varishth prabandhak ek doosare par tippaniyaan kas rahe the aur naam paane ki hod mein ek doosare ko bhala-bura kah rahe the . main yahaaain doshi ka nirnaya naheen kar raha . par isi beech jaurjiyn nikal gaya . shaayad madhyakaal mein ise hi haarna kehte the . bahut du:kh hua aur mujhe poora vishvaas hai ki mujhse adhik du:kh aap donon ko hua hoga is baat ka . khair jo hua so hua, hamein is baat ki seekh leni chaahiye ki aapasi matabhed ka vaartaajanit hal, yathaasheeghr nikaala jaana chaahiye . ummeed hai ki aage se anya sadasyon ko aisi tippaniyon ka silsila dekhne ko naheen milega . aasheesh ji, main aapka bahut sammaan karta hooain (aur poornima ji ka bhi) aur jaanta hooain ki aisi ghatnaaen kisi ghatne vaale samaaj mein hoti hi rahati hain, par chaahata hooain ki is kram mein jo avaanchhit pratyottar sunane ko mile hain use chaupaal aur anya jagahon se hata dooain taaki viki ke nae tatha anya yoojrs ka dhyaan hamaari bhinnamatta par na jaae - kyonki yeh viki ke bhavishya ke liye ghaatak hai . par iske liye zaroori hai ki aap donon bhi apne matabhed bhulaakar aapasi sahayog poorv ki tarah hi karein . aapke puraane bartaav ko dekhte hue to yahi lagta hai ki yeh turant bahaal ho jaaega . aur kyon na ho, aise matabhedon se hamaare ekamaatr lakshya viki ko to kuchh laabh naheen balki nuksaan hi hai .

to yadi aap apni sahamati de dein (mel ke dvaara, ya kisi aur prakaar se) to main takaraar ki vaarta ko hata kar viki ko adhik saamanjasyapoorn maahaul de doon .

prateekshaarat, amit prabhaakar . (maaf keejiyega aasheesh ji, main thoda prayaas karne ke baad bhi aapki imel-aaidi naheen dhoondh saka, sandesh yaheen chhod raha hooain . aapka uttar milte hi ise hata loonga ) --amit prabhaakar 17:10, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

namaskaar amit ji! aapse teen shabd mukhyat: kahoonga:
  • kshama
  • aabhaar
  • aashvaasan
inka vistrut byaura aapko mel ke aapke prashn mein de raha hoon. haan uparokt kathit sab kuchh hataane mein meri poorn sahamati, haardik ichha (jo ki kisi dar se dabi rahi) hai. mujhe lagta hai, ki in baaton ka yahaan uttar dena achha hota, par baad mein yahi uchit laga ki kuchh baatein parde mein hi rahein to atyottam hoga.

sahayog- nivedan

priya mitr aasheesh ! is jnyaaanayajnya mein aapki yeh sahabhaagita va yogadaan saraahaneeya hai .viki-jagat mein, mai navaagantuk hooain . sarvottam-sampoorn viki anubhav mein aapse sahayog apekshit hai

saprem

rishi Dwivedi

Rishi14101975@gmil.com

lekh sanpaadan hetu

bhaai ji,namaskaar shekhaavaati naam se aaj ek lekh joda hai lekin use kuchh sanpaadit karne ki jarurat hai krupaya ho sake to viki bhaasha anuroop sanpaadit karade | saadar ratan Singh

mahaabhaarat

aapka kehna bilkul sahi hai. lekin main soch raha huain ki pehle jitne bhi paatr hain un sabke baare mein likh looain, taaki jitne bhi laal dikh rahe hain neele ho jaaeain, aur kyunki saaainche mein bhi badlaav karne pad rahe hai, isliye sabke baare mein jo bhi jaankaari mil pa rahi hai, main likh de raha hooain, fir sabame saaaincha bhi daal doonga.--rohit raavat 18:08 9 April, 2009

vimaan kshetr

ek shanka thi Airport ka hindi vimaanatal hoga ki vimaan kshetr. mere hisaab se vimaan kshetr ko angreji mein airfield kaheinge. --gunjan varmasandesh 05:38, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Airport ke liye maanak shabd vimaan kshetr hai is baat par abhi bhi confusion ki sthiti hain . agar aap Google par "vimaan kshetr" daaleinge to ek bhi link aisa naheen milega jo ki kisi havaai adde ko sandarbhit ho.

yeh dekhiye 1 2 3

krupaya maargadarshan karein --gunjan varmasandesh 07:17, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

tumhaare bheje hue teen mein se baad ke do links to khule hi naheen ya khaali khule hain. aur pehle vaale mein to kuchh khaas mila naheen.
vaise jahaan bhi yeh sandarbh prayog hota hai, aikaansh jagah havaai adda prayog hota hai, kyonki yeh chaaloo (prachalit)ev aam shabd hai. doosare vimaanatal maraathi mein ya maraathavaada prabhaavit kshetron mein prayog hota hai, jo ki gvaaliyr se lekar uttar Karnataka tak jaata hai. ismein hindi ki shuddhata (tatsam naheen kaha) naheen milti, khaas madhya pradesh ke kuchh kshetron ko chhodkar, jahaan maraatha prabhaav naheen hai. par Pune nishchit hi ghor maraatha kshetr hai. mainne jo shuru se bhaa0vi0praa0 mein dekha suna padha vo bataaya. haan Delhi mein safdarajang havaai adde par board bhi laga hai. mauka milte hi foto kheench kar laga doonga. par tumhein jo sahi lage use karo, kintu ab tak bahut si jagahon par vimaanakshetr prayog hua hua hai, to ekaroopata ka bhi prashn hai. baaki jaisa uchit lage, koi achha bura maanane waali baat naheen hai. mainne kaha bhi tha, ki ye rai/sujhaav hai.tum bhi prabandhak banoge kal ko. apne nirnaya swayam lo. koi baadhya naheen karega, yahaan koi viki ka maanadand naheen hai. ek aur shabd hai- vimaanapattan; Airports Authority of India ≡ bhaarateeya vimaanapattan praadhikran

yeh shabd bhi kai jagah prayog hota dikhaai dega, aur sateek bhi hai.kintu saamaanya prachalan mein naheen hai. baaki tum swayam nirnaya lo. haan jaisa ki mainne bataaya ki bhaavipra mein prayog hota hai, to usaki website abhi hindi mein achhi bani naheen hai.aur kaaryaaleeya pralekh tumhein Google par sarch karne par mileinge naheen. ataev iska support bhaavipra se net par to naheen milega.--aasheesh bhatanaagarsandesh 10:53, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

vaarta:Delhi

uparokt pej dekhein. vahaan par Delhi ke liye ek naya jnyaaanasandook laga hai. use pasand karein, va bataaen. sahi hai, to puraana hata kar naya laga doon. iske saare links neele hain. sabhi pej bane hain. maanachitr aapki pasand ka hai, na ki vahi puraana Bhaarat ke nakshe par ek dot. bataaen.--aasheesh bhatanaagarsandesh 17:50, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

naya jnyaaanasandook behtar hai. use hi lagaana chaahiye. par aap ko sujhaav de kar to koi laabh naheen hai. aap ne meri vaarta par sujhaav maanga aur javaab ki pratiksha kiye begair parivrt kar bhi liya. khair, parivartan behtar hi hai aur aasha karti hooain aisa hi bhavishya mein bhi ho.--Munita Prasadvaarta 03:44, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
aap naaraaj na hon. usase pehle krupaya Delhi ko sanpaadan kar ke dekh lein, ki vahaan par puraana wala jnyaaanasandook bhi neeche hi surakshit rakha hai. pehle mainne socha tha, ki vaarta par laga doon, kintu baad mein mukhya lekh mein sahi sthaan par laga kar, puraane vaale ko kameint mein daal kar chhipaana hi uchit laga.yadi prateeksha na karni hoti to sandesh hi kyon deta. aapko shaayad pata na ho, ki saanche mein kuchh galatiyaan theen, jo ki vaarta prushth par naheen dikhaai deteen, jabki mukhya lekh mein dikhaai deti hain, kyonki vah ek lekh hai, na ki non-operational page jo ki vaarta hai. iseeliye use vahaan laga kar dekhna hi behtar hoga.isse adhik kuchh naheen kah sakta hoon. adhik charcha chait par kar sakte hain. pasand aane ka dhanyavaad.--aasheesh bhatanaagar sandesh 07:18, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

sahaayata ke liye dhanyavaad

pranaam! salaah ke liye dhanyavaad. mujhe vikipeediya par keval sanpaadan ka anubhav hai, anya maadhyamon se main abhi tak avagat naheen hoon. isliye munita ji ki vaarta par sandesh chhoda. utaar dene ke liye pun: dhanyavaad. --Priyanka 12:17, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

shreemaan us lekh ka naam pehle maansaahaari tha jo bilkool hi upayukt naheen tha. main jeev vigyaan ke lekh khojate khojate vahaan pahunchi thi. dekha ki lekh ka upasheershak jo ki vartamaan naam se hi tha, usako lekh ka naam de diya. aapko jo sahi naam pata hai vo badal dijiye.

--Munita Prasadvaarta 10:08, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

chandrashekhar veङakat raaman

chandrashekhar veङakat raaman ki sahi naam vartani chandrashekhar Venkatraman hai.--aasheesh bhatanaagarsandesh 15:51, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

chandrashekhar veङakat raaman lekh pehle se tha. main jab ismein sanpaadan kar rahi thi to mujhe bhi is par thoda sandeh hua. parantu chandrashekhar veङakat raaman ki vartani vibhinn jagahon par bhinn bhinn thi, main samajh naheen pai ki sahi vartani kya hai. is lekh par kai jaankaar logon ne kaarya kiya hai isliye maine badalna uchit naheen samjha. yadi aapke paas kuchh thos vajah hai to aap ni:sankoch sheershak badal sakat hain.--Munita Prasadvaarta 15:59, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
thos vajah ke liye yeh kahoonga.
  • raaman koi shabd naheen hota, sahi shabd raman hota hai, jo ki angrejon se bola naheen jaata tha, n ke kaaran.to Raman hua, aur english mein Raman ko Raman aur raman aur raman kuchh bhi padha ja sakta hai.
  • veङakat ko saral roop mein an ki maatra ke sang likha ja sakta hai, anyatha gaङaga likha jaata. jo vajah ganga ke liye hai, vahi veinkat ka bhi samarthan karegi.
shesh jaisa aap chaahein. mainne vahaan behtar saancha to laga diya hai.--aasheesh bhatanaagarsandesh 16:04, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
aap krupaya sandesh meri vaarta par hi dein maine aapse koi prashn naheen poochha hai jiska uttar mujhe aapki vaarta par jaakar dekhna hoga. vaise is lekh ke vaarta prushth par bhi is baare mein kisi ne likha hai usako bhi ek baar dekha ja sakta hai.

--Munita Prasadvaarta 16:09, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

aapka bahut dhanyavaad, yahi baat mainne ekabaar poornima ji ko bhi kahi thi ki mujhe javaab meri vaarta par hi dein. vajah yeh hai ki vaarta par javaab deinne par ek sandesh flaish hota hai aur mujhe pata chal jaata hai ki kisi ne kuchh likha hai aur padh leti hooain. jabki aapki vaarta par kya parivartan hua yeh mujhe jaldi pata naheen bhi chal sakta hai, aur koi khaash vajah naheen hai.--Munita Prasadvaarta 16:19, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

autocollapsed

aasheesh ji dhanyavaad ! saanche ko autocollapsed kaise baanaate hai.mainne dekha ki IE par apni aap saache collapse ho jaate hai lekin Fire Fox mein naheen | --gunjan varmasandesh 05:25, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

aasheesh ji salaah ke liye dhanyavaad. krupaya in chitron ko dekhiye ek internet explorerr se hai aur doosra fire fox ka. {{Kanpur}} IE mein to collapsed deekhata hain par fire fox main naheen. mainne angreji viki par test kiya hai par vaha donon braaujar collpased saanche dikhaate hain --gunjan varmasandesh 04:55, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

75px 75px

main abhi yahi soch raha tha, ki ye chitr kyon upload kiye hain. utane mein tumhaara sandesh aa gaya. lekin main to flauk Flock prayog karta hoon, jo ki faayarafauks ka hi badla roop hai. usaman bhi vahi dikhta hai, jo IE vaale mein hai, yaani kolaipsd. faayarafauks mere paas naheen hai. sahi kahoon to mojilla naheen hai. flock bhi firefox hi hai. to ab yahi kahoonga, ki filhaal to IE ya flock hi prayog kar lo. pata naheen kya seting badalani hogi, ya androoni kami hai. haan chitr chaaho to hata dena. ya saancha:delete laga dena.--aasheesh bhatanaagarsandesh 05:07, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

vibhinn deshon ke jhande/pataakaaeain

aasheesh bhatanaagar ji aapse ek vinmr nivedan hai ki aap saare deshon aur anya aashray kshetron ke jhandon vaale saaainchein bana de kyonki ismein aapko mahaarath praapt hai. mainne bahut prayaas kiya lekin ye vaale saaainche mujhse naheen ban pa rahe hain. ek baar sabhi deshon ke jhande saaaincho mein aa jaaegein to ve sabhi lekh sundar lageinge jin par inka sandarbh liya gaya hai jaise Asiaee khel 2006. is lekh par bahut deshon ke jhande naheen hai aur yeh lekh bahut achha naheen lag raha hai. --rohit raavatsandesh 20:35 10 May, 2009 (IST)

aapke bataae gaye Asiaee khel ke lekh par upasthit sabhi deshon ke jhande taiyaar hain. iske alaava anya bhi lagbhag sabhi deshon ke saanche taiyaar hain. kintu unke laghuroop jaise {{IRQ}} Flag of Iraq.svg iraak ke sabhi saanche taiyaar naheen hain, kyonki unase sambandhit koi aisa lekh abhi tak bana naheen hai, jahaan ki ve saare prayog hue hon. haan, jo bhi milte gaye, mainne bana daale. sabhi ek sthaan par prayog hon, to unki poori soochi upalabdh hogi. khair, aage kabhi bhi koi is prakaar ka laghuroop ka saancha mileto usamein {{pataaka |iraak}} ki tarah paath daal dena, jis desh ka bhi ho.--aasheesh bhatanaagarsandesh 02:51, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

naya pratyaashi / sujhaae chitr

aasheesh ji ek naya chitr joda hai , krupaya dekh lein. --gunjan varmasandesh 03:48, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

dhanyavaad

Asiaee khel 2006 ko poora karne aur sabhi deshon ki pataakaon ke saaainchon ke liye dhanyavaad. rohit raavat 10:11, 12 May 2009 (UTC)rohit

chitragupt

aadaraneeya aasheesh ji, mere paas Bhagwan chitragupt se sambadhit chitragupt chaalisa, kaayasth dohaavali evn raamaayan ki tarj par chitraguptaayan hai . jo mere pitaaji dvaara rachit hai . ve pustak chhapavaana chaahate the magar 30-04-2007 ko peeliya ki bimaari ne unako ham logon se hamesha ke liye door kar diya. mai use aapki chitragupt waali jaankaari me jodna chaahata hooain . krupaya margadashan karein .

priya mitr, aapki ichha avashya poori hogi. kintu usase poorv 2-3 baatein bataata hoon.
  • aap sandesh ke baad --~~~~ avashya likha karein, jo ki hastaakshar hota hai. sev karne ke baad svat: hastaakshar ban jaata hai. varana mujhe kaise pata chalega, ki ye kiska sandesh hai, va kise uttar doon?
  • kya aap ke paas in pralekhon ki sauft kaupi hai? yaani type kar computer mein sev ki hui, na ho to aap hindi mein type kar (yunikod mein) ya yaheen main lekh ke link bana deta hoon, vahaan type kar sev kar dein. unki editing aur vikikran main swayam kar doonga. fir in lekhon ke link sabhi kaayasth sambandhit lekhon mein daal deinge. ya koi saaaincha bana deinge, jaise saaaincha:hindu dharm, saaaincha:hindu dharm soochana manjoosha saaaincha:jain dharm, ityaadi hain. abhi to kaayasth vishay par itne lekh naheen hain. aap ye lekh bana dein: chitragupt chaaleesa, kaayasth dohaavali evn chitraguptaayan, to main prateekshaarat hoon in lekhon ka. --aasheesh bhatanaagarsandesh 10:58, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

chitragupt

aadaraneeya aasheesh ji, namaskaar. mere paas Bhagwan chitragupt se sambadhit chitragupt chaalisa, kaayasth dohaavali evn raamaayan ki tarj par chitraguptaayan sabhi pralekhon ki sauft kaupi hai jo krati Dave hindi faaainnt me type kar computer mein sev ki hui hai jise(yunikod mein)kis tarah parivrtit karna hai mai nahi samajh pa raha hooain kyoki kaapi karke pest karne me usaki leingavej badal jaati hai . krupaya margadashan karein . --Sachin Shrivastava 11:02, 15 May 2009 (UTC) sachin shreevaastav, satana ma0pra0.--sandesh 11:02, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

sachin ji! ek baat to yeh, ki har baar itna aadar na dein. maatr namaskaar se kaam chal sakta hai. mujhe sharm si mahasoos hoti hai. doosra krutidev faunt ko aapko yunikod mein badalna hoga, tabhi kaam chalega. uske liye faant kanvartar aate hain net par. fontsuvidha.com par mileinge, jo ki 1500/- ka hai. iske alaava ni:shulk bhi milte hain, jinhein aap sarch kar lein. is samay mere paas koi hai naheen. mujhe swayam aavashyakta hai. is baare mein poorneema ji se rai le sakte hain. aur vikipeedeeya par bheeek lॆkh hai, jismein devanaagari ke baare mein sahaayata ki gayi hai. vo aapke laag in karne se pehle sabse oopar likha aata hai. krupaya vahaan dekh lein. yadi mujhe kuchh milta hai, to avashya bataaoonga. aapka--aasheesh bhatanaagarsandesh 11:12, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

saaaincha:mel ekspres

ji haaain jab maine is saaainche ko dekha tha to mujhe bhi laga tha ki yeh bahut lamba aur kuchh avyasthit sa hai. iske liye mere kuchh sujhaav is prakaar hain:

(1) ise hindi varn maala ke anusaar kramit kiya jaae. ek-ek akshar na bhi karein to samooh mein kar sakte hain jaise a-u tak fir oo-O tak aise. isse sabhi aksharon mein likhne se bacha ja sakega aur akshar smooh to jaahir si baat hai aksharon se kam hi honge. ya

(2) in railgaadiyon ko inke udgam sthal (shahar) ke naam par vargeekrut kar diya jaae, aur shaharon ke naam hindi varnamaala kram se ho. vaise ye adhik upayukt bhi hoga kyonki har kisi ko relagaadi ka naam ya sankhya to yaad naheen hogi lekin shahar ke naamaanusaar koi bhi ye dekh sakta hai ki kahaaain se kaun si relagaadi lagti hai. ya

(3) railway jon ke anusaar bhi vargeekrut kar sakatein hai. vaise bhi Bhaarat mein shaayad railway ke 9 hi jon hain. in sabhi jonon ke anusaar yahaaain se aarambh hone waali railgaadiyon ke naamon ko vargeekrut kar diya jaae. ya

(4) raajyon ke anusaar bhi vargeekaran kiya ja sakta hai.

mere anusaar to raajyon ya jonon ke anusaar theek rahega kyonki shahar to bahut saare hain lekin raajya bhi adhiktam 28 hi hain. rohit raavat 09:23, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

aasheesh ji mere sujhaav bhi rohitji se mel khaate hai| agar aap ko ICAO ka saancha yaad ho, is saanche me bhi varn maala ke anusaar vimaanakshetro ko vargeekrut kiya gaya tha| is pariyojana ke liye haardik shubhakaamanaae --gunjan varmasandesh 10:34, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
aap logoain ke sujaav dene ka dhanyavaad, kintu in se yeh nishkarsh niklata hai, ki
yadi jon ke anusaar baantein, to, evam yadi raajyon ya shaharon ke anusaar baantein to bhi pratyek gaadi apne udgam evam gantavya ke anusaar do-do jagahon par naam aaega. yadi naam ke aadhaar par baantein, to gaadiyon ke naam bhi ek se adhik hain, jaise Lucknow-Delhi mel ya Delhi Lucknow mel.
haan yadi aur koi upaaya naheen niklata hai, tab raajyon ke anusaar hi baanteinge. kyonki jon ka idea sabhi logon ko naheen hoga.
par yadi koi aur behtar upaaya mil paae, to pehle use dekhte hain. aage bhi sujhaav apekshit hain. vimaanakshetron aur gaadiyon ki sankhya mein bahut hi fark hai. ye 1600 to ve 90. aage yadi sambhav ho to chaupaal par hi vaarta jaari rakhein, : laga kar.--aasheesh bhatanaagarsandesh 13:39, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

saaaincha:mel ekspres

mitravar, hamako inko kai bhaagon mein baaaint dena chaahiye, jaise ki uttari railway, pashchimi railway aadi. anyatha iska prayog kaafi mushkil sa hoga.

aap saaaincha:N ef L dekhiye. usase aapko sandaaja lagega ki main kis baare mei baat kar raha hooain. maneesh vashishthvaarta

aapke sandesh ko anya sandeshon ke saath rakh diya hai, chaupaal par; jisse ki poori charcha ek saath rah paae. baad mein is charcha ko saancha:mel ekspres ke vaarta prushth par rakh deinge. aasha hai aap sahamat honge.--aasheesh bhatanaagarsandesh 14:39, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

ati mahatvapoorn: hindi vikipeediya mukhaprushth

aaj ke mukhaprushth par aaj ka aalekh vaale sthaan par khaali sthaan aa raha hai, sampaadak krupaya ise dekhein aur sheegra sudhaar karein. rohit raavat 07:23, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

asabhaya bhaasha: turant hataaya jaae

mammi ki chaatana, is lekh ko turant hataakar iske likhne vaale ko hindi vikipeediya par pratibandhit kar diya jaae. rohit raavat 13:39, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

aapka kehna theek hai ki 1-2 sakriya prabandhakon ko bataane se chal jaata hai lekin yeh kaise pata chale ki kaunasa prabandhak sakriya hai? maine itne saare prabandhakon ko isliye soochit kiya tha taaki jo bhi pehle dekh le vah turant kaaryavaahi kare. rohit raavat 15:39, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

namaskaar

aasheesh ji namaskaar !! bahut dino ke baad viki par lauta hoo. aapko pehle ki tarah sakriya pa kar atayant prasanta hui. pramukh chitr ke pratyaashi dekhe, sabhi chitr anupam hai evam unase judi kadeeya bahut hi jnyaaanavardhak hai| sabhi chitro me se mujhe 33 saptaah wala chitr pramukh chitr ke laayak nahi laga. pehla to yeh imaarat lokapriya nahi hai, dusara photography ke hisaab se bhi mujhe yeh chitr saamaanya laga. krupaya is chitr ko sammaleet karne ka kaaran se mujhe avagat karaaenge. dhanyavaad --gunjan varmasandesh 04:43, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

aaj ka aalekh

aasheesh ji yeh bada dukhad hai ki hindi viki ke pramukh yogadaanakarta shubdh ho kar viki ko chhod kar chale gaye hai. mujhe dukh is baat ka hai ki aap log itne varishth sadasya ho kar bhi aapasi saamanjaya nahi baitha paaye. khair, jaisa ki angreji kahaavat hai The show must go on mere kuchh sujhaav

--gunjan varmasandesh 07:54, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

mere paas to filhaal ek hi lekh ka sujhaav hai: udn tastari. yeh lekh mainein hi banaaya tha. yadi ismein kuchh kami ho to bataaie main door karne ka poora prayaas karunga.

aur ek mahatvapoorn baat, jaisa ki mainne chaupaal par bhi padha ki kuchh pramukh yogadaanakarta chhodkar chale gaye hain, isliye main hindi viki par sampaadak ka kaam bhi karna chaahooainga taaki hindi viki par kaam suchaaru roop se chalta rahe. sampaadak banane ke liye kahaaain aavedan karna hota hai aur poori prakiya kya hai, krupaya mujhe bataane ka kasht karein. dhanyavaad rohit raavat 08:33, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

aaj ka aalekh-hindi vartani maanakeekaran 12 June

vartani ka arth bhaasha mein kisi shabd ko varnon se vyakt karne ki kriya ko kehte hain. hindi bhaasha ka pehla aur bada gun dhvanyaatmakata hai, jisse ismein uchcharit dhvaniyon ko vyakt karna bada saral hai. hindi mein vartani ki aavashyakta kaafi samay tak naheen samajhi gayi; jabki angreji va urdoo aadi anya kai bhaashaaon mein iska mahattv tha. kintu kshetreeya va aanchalik uchchaaran ke prabhaav, anekaroopata, bhram, parampara ke nirvaah aadi ke kaaran jab yeh laga ki ek hi shabd ki kai vartaniyaaain milti hain to inko vyakt karne ke liye kisi saarthak shabd ki talaash hui. is kaaran se maanakeekaran ki aavashyakta mahasoos ki gayi. is arth mein vartani shabd maanya ho gaya aur keindreeya hindi nideshaalaya, ne is shabd ko maanyata di, evam ekaroopata ki drushti se kuchh niyam bhi sthir kiye hain. hindi bhaasha ke, kai raajyon ki raajabhaasha sveekrut ho jaane ke falasvaroop Bhaarat ke bheetar aur baahar hindi seekhane vaalon ki sankhya mein paryaapt vruddhi ho jaane se hindi vartani ki maanak paddhati nirdhaarit karna aavashyak aur kaalochit laga, taaki hindi shabdon ki vartaniyon mein adhikaadhik ekaroopata laai ja sake. tab shiksha mantraalaya ne 1961 mein hindi vartani ki maanak paddhati nirdhaarit karne ke liye ek visheshagya samiti dvaara hindi bhaasha ke maanakeekaran ki sarkaari prakriya ka praarambh kiya. is satat prakriya ke mukhya nirdesh tay ho chuke hain jo Bhaarat ke sabhi sarkaari kaaryaalayon mein prasaarit kiye gaye hain. inka anupaalan sunishchit karne hetu bhi sansthaan kaaryarat hai. vistaar mein...
yahaan sandesh likhein--aasheesh bhatanaagarsandesh 03:37, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
mere vichaar mein to lekh uttam hai, chhota karne ki kya aavashyakta hai? itni to jaankaari kisi bhi lekh mein honi chaahiye. rohit raavat 04:15, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

karn

ji abhi bhi lekh vikaas kram mein hai. kuchh sheershak aur upasheershak abhi bhi rahate hain. sandarbhon ki chinta na karein, jab lekh poora hone ki avastha mein pahunchega to main sandarbh aur baahari kadiyaaainain bhi laga dooainga. rohit raavat 15:03, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

mere dvaara banaae gaye lekh

nimnalikhit soochi mere dvaara banaae gaye lekhon ki hai:

mujhe jitna yaad tha utane lekh to mainne aapko bata diye hain, yeh sankhya isse bhi kaheen adhik hai. aur mainne un lekhon ka to ullekh tak naheen kiya jo is vikipeediya ke kai mahaanubhavon dvaara ek-ek pankti ke banaae gaye jismein kai prabandhak aur varishth prabandhak bhi shaamil hain, jaise karn, shikhandi, Rakesh sharma, sahadev, jaraasandh ityaadi.

aur jahaaain tak prashn aapke dvaara yeh kehne ka hai ki mere sanpaadanon ki sankhya kaise badhi hai to main aapko yeh bata dooain ki mainne pichhle kuchh dinon mein jo sadasya aur lekh vaarta prushth banaaeain hain vo isliye naheen ki mere sanpaadanon ki sankhya badhegi balki mainne hindi viki ke sanpaadanon aur alekh prushthon ko badhaane ke liye ve prushth banaaen hain. aap to aise kah rahe hain jaise ki mainne hindi viki par vaarta prushth lagaane ke atirikt kuchh kiya hi naheen aur main prabandhak banane ke liye mara ja raha hooain. aur vaise bhi inheen vaarta prushthon ko lagaane se hindi viki ki gaharaai 9 se 13 pahuainchi hai. yadi keval mere lekh sanpaadanon ki sankhya bhi dekhi jaae to main 3 maheenon ke alp samay mein saatavein sthaan par hooain. vibhinn bhaashaaon ke lekhon ki soochi vaale prushth ke hindi sanskaran par bhi 70% bhaag mainne hi anuvaadit kar hindi mein likha tha. is prushth par main hi nirantar adyatit soochi lagaata rahata hooain. yaani ki main keval ek sthaan par hi sakriya naheen hooain.

aur jahaaain tak mere sabr karne ki baat hai to mujhe prabandhak na bhi banaaya jaae to mujhe koi apatti naheen hogi kyonki kaunasa yahaaain prabandhak bankar koi vetan milna hai. main to jaisa aalochak ji ne bhi kaha tha hindi bhaasha ko apna yogadaan dene aur apne bhaasha prem ke kaaran yogadaan de raha hooain, aur yadi main kisi cheej mein yogadaan de raha hota hooain to mera maanana yeh hai ki vah cheej poori tarah ubhar kar aae aur yogadaan saarthak ho. mainne hindi viki mein bahut si kamiyaan dekheen to prabandhak banane ki ichha prakat kar di.

vaise bhi aapko aur anya prabandhakon ko yeh samajh honi chaahiye thi ki hindi viki par prabandhakon ki sankhya badhaai jaae kyonki jitne adhik prabandhak honge utana hi kisi ek par dabaav kam rahega aur vikipeediya ka star sudharega. hindi viki par utpaat machaane vaale bhi kai logon ke baare mein mainne aapko soochit kiya tha unapar pratibandh lagaane ke liye. ab baaki mujhe naheen pata ki is viki par prabandhak banane ke liye aur kin aur kitne gunon ki aavashyakta hoti hai. aur yadi aap keval samay par ja rahein to mujhe lagta hai yeh bahut durbhaagyapoorn paimaana hoga kisi ko prabandhak banaane ke liye.

aage jaisi aapki aur anya prabandhakon ki ichha. mera E-mel pata hai rohitrawatom@hotmail.com rohit raavat 20:46, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

bhatanaagar ji mainne aapki baat ko bilkul anyatha naheen liya aur yeh main bhi dekh raha hooain ki aapka yogadaan anya prabandhakon ki tulana mein bahut adhik hai. lekin mainne jo kuchh bhi aapko likha vah isliye ki mere yogadaanon ki kaheen anadekhi na ho jaae. aur mujhe gyaat hai ki aapne bahut pehle hi mujhe ek barn star bhi diya tha jiska main aabhaar prakat karta hooain.

mainne anya prabandhakon ya sadasyon par tippani isliye ki thi ki jab maatr ek-ek lekh banaakar bhi log prabandhak ban gaye hain (yeh tippani aap par naheen hain, kyonki aap ne bahut adhik lekh banaaeain hai aur isliye yadi koi lekh chhote rah bhi jaaeain to us par mujhe kuchh aapatti naheen hai), to mainne to jo lekh banaae hain ve in ek pankti vaale lekhon se achhe heen hain, jabki un lekhon par bahut kuchh likha ja sakta tha.

aur jahaaain tak mere kisi lekh ke aaj ka lekh banane ka prashv hai to mere shaayad 3-4 lekh mukhaprushth par is vibhaag mein aaeain hain, lekin mujhe is par bhi koi aapatti naheen hai kyonki lekh to gyaan badhaane ka saadhan hai naaki main lekhon ko mukhaprushth par laane ke liye banaata hooain.

aur sabse mahatvapoorn baat ye ki mainne prabandhak banane ka prastaav itna sheegra isliye rakh diya kyonki mujhe hindi viki main bahut hi trutiyaan dikhaai Dean. saath hi mainne keval ek sadasya hokar bhi bahut baar vah kaam kiya hai jiski aasha kisi prabandhak se ki jaati hai jaise kisi nae sadasya ke prashnon ka uttar dena, kisi utpaati ki shikaayat darj karaana (aapko yaad hi hoga ki kisi lekh mein ek sadasya ne gandi bhaasha ka prayog kiya tha jiske baare mein mainne aapko soochit kiya tha), kisi anya ke lekh ko poorn banaane ke liye yogadaan dena. kai baar jab main ek naam ke kai lekh dekhta hooain to unka vilay kar deta hooain taaki ek lekh sampoorn ho jaae, aur kai baar ek naam ke kai lekhon ko dekhkar ek ko dileet karne ka prayaas karta hooain to yaad aata hai ki yeh kaam aur adhikaar prabandhakon ka hai, jaise fraanseesi bhaasha naam ke do lekh bane hue hai aur kisi ek ko to hataana hi padta hai na. jaise mainne kisi ek fraanseesi bhaasha vaale lekh par aage likhna aarambh kar diya aur jab bahut kuchh likha ja chuka tha to mainne anya bhaashon ke vikiyon par usaka link dene ka kaam aarambh kiya to pata laga ki kisi anya fraanseesi bhaasha ke lekh ki kadi pehle se hi vahaaain par de rakhi hai. lekin vah waali kadi vishv ki pramukh bhaashaaen vaale saaainche mein naheen tha aur fir bahut kaam karna pada sabhi bhaashaaon se us kadi ko hata kar us lekh ki kadi lagaane par jise mainne badhaaya tha.

mujhe laga ki anya prabandhakon ko bhi mera yeh yogadaan dikhaai dega. lekin mujhe lagta hai ki aapke atirikt kisi ko bhi is viki par prabandhak ka kaarya sambhaalane me ruchi naheen hai. abhi do prabandhakon ne to apna yogadaan isliye rok diya hai kyonki unhein kuchh sadasyon ki baat buri lag gayi hai. aur main aapki prashansa hi karta hooain ki aapne mere prabandhak nivedan ke liye sakriyta dikhaai aur mera maargadarshan karne ka kaam kiya, kyonki yahi baat darshaati hai ki kaun kitna sakriya hai.

mainne yeh baat kabhi naheen kahi ki mere lekh poorn hain ya ve hi sarvashreshth hain. aakhir kamiyaan to har lekh mein hi hoti hain, lekin jab bhi mere kisi lekh ko aaj ka lekh banaane ke liye chuna gaya aur usapar sampaadan karke poorn karne ke liye kaha gaya taaki vah mukhaprushth par lagaane yogya ho sake to mainne kabhi bhi sudhaar karne se mana naheen kiya.

mujhe mere lekhon ke nirvaachit hone se adhik chinta hindi viki ke star ko sudhaarane ki hai taaki yeh viki bhi vishv ki pramukh vikiyon ke samakaksh lekhon ki sankhya mein na sahi, gunavatta mein to thahare. angreji aur anya pramukh vikipeediyaaon par log keval yogadaanon ke liye hi naheen balki anya kai kaamon jaise utpaatiyon ko rokana, lekhon ko poorn banaana, bekaar ke lekhon ke baare mein prabandhakon ko bataana aadi kaam karke bhi prabandhak bane hain. angreji viki par to lagbhag 100 se adhik prabandhak rolabaik karne ke liye hi hai aur unka lekhon mein koi bahut yogadaan naheen hai. us viki par lekhon ki sankhya ke saath-2 prabandhakon ki sankhya bhi lagaataar badh rahi hai aur tabhi us viki ka star itna aage hai. baaki aapko yadi meri baat buri lagi to kshamaapraarthi hooain aur mera maargadarshan karne ke liye ek baar fir dhanyavaad. rohit raavat 06:15, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

baaki jaisa aapka nirdesh hai main samay milte hi kar dooainga. rohit raavat 06:17, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

chitr upload kiye gaye

bhatanaagaraji mainne dono chitr upload kar diye hain. krupaya dekh leejiye aur bataaie. rohit raavat 05:14, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

prabandhak pad ke liye nivedan ki prakriya

aasheesh ji, krupaya dhyaan deejiye, ye nimn vaakya vikipeediya:prabandhak pad ke liye nivedan prushth par likhein hain jise shaayad aapne padhe naheen honge ya aapka dhyaan shaayad naheen gaya hoga. main ise neeche de rahi hooain. iske anusaar naya naamaankan hamesha oopar hi rahana chaahiye.


dhyaan dein: prabandhak pad ke liye jis sadasya ko naamit kiya ja raha hai, use yeh prastaav sveekaar hona jaroori hai. at: yadi aap kisi ko prabandhak ke liye naamit karte hain to sambandhit sadasya ke vaarta prusht par unke liye bhi sandesh likh deejiye aur unase aagrah keejiye ki yadi ve is prastaav se sahamat hain to is prushth par apni sahamati prakat karein. iske saath hi dhyaan rakhein ki naye naamaankan ka prastaav sabse upar hi likhein. --Munita Prasadvaarta 07:35, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

puraalekh

bhatanaagaraji mainne apne vaarta prushth par lambe hote mere vaarta prushth ko chhota karne ke liye puraalekh saaaincha laga diya hai lekin mere vaarta prushth par yeh vaisa naheen dikh raha hai jaisa yeh aapke vaarta prushth ya chaupaal par dikhtaa hai, arthaat sankhyaaeain naheen dikh raheen hai. kya kuchh aur bhi saaainche lagaane padegein mujhe? krupaya meri sahaayata keejiye. dhanyavaad. rohit raavat 20:58, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

puraalekh sahaayata ke liye aapka haardik dhanyavaad bhatanaagaraji. rohit raavat 04:47, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

saral hindi viki

mujhe 'simpal english' ki tarah 'saral hindi' viki shuroo karne ka sujhaav kai kaaranon se upayukt naheen lag raha hai-

  • angreji mein 'simpal english' ka aandolan 1921 se hi chal raha hai. hindi mein aisa naheen hai. iske baavajood bhi meri drushti mein simpal english vikipidiya anaavashyak kaarya hai. kyonki ismein log jo likhte hain vah vaastav mein 'simpal english' mein hota hi naheen.
  • 'simpal english' aur 'english' mein lekhon mein shabdon ki sankhya ka antar mahatvapoorn naheen hai. 'simpal english' us angreji ko kehte hain jiska vaakya vinyaas saral ho aur jiski 'shabdaavali' mein se kathin shandonko nikaal diya gaya ho. 'simpal english' ki shabdaavali mein ek hajaar se kam shabd hain.
  • hindi apni mool pravruti se hi saral bhaasha hai. hindi tab kathin hoti hai jab angreji ka anuvaad karte samay angreji vaakya ka hi dhaancha hindi mein bhi yathaavat rakha jaata hai. (jaise- "main naheen jaaoonga", usane kaha. iske bajaay yeh vaakya hindi ki prakruti ke anukool hai - usane kaha, "main naheen jaaoonga". )
  • hindi (ya koi bhi bhaasha) ek aur kaaran se kathin hoti hai - vaakya ko bahut lamba banaane se. jo baat teen-chaar saral vaakyon mein kahi jaani chaahiye use ek hi vaakya mein kehne ki koshish se bhaasha jaldi samajh mein naheen aati.
  • hindi viki mein ab bhi lekhon ki bahut kami hai. 'saral hindi' ki ek viki banaane se ham sabka prayaas do bhaagon mein bant jaayega.

anunaad Singh 08:48, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

dodo

aasheesh ji suprabhaat. dodo ko aaj ke aalekh ke liye chunane ka dhanyavaad. aajkal mai periodic table ({{jnyaaanasandook tatv}}aur elements ke lekh banaane mein vyast tha iseeliye kisi bhi vaarta mein sammalit naheen hua.. vaise mainne aaj ke aalekh kuchh aur lekh bhi sujhaaye the jis mein se naalanda vishvavidyaalaya , abhigyaan shaakuntalam aur maiksim gorki ko thode sudharo ke baad aaj ke aalekh laaya banaaya ja sakta hai. --gunjan varmasandesh 04:16, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

raameshvaram teerth lekh ke vaarta prushth par mainne kuchh sujhaav diye krupaya unhein bhi dekh le. --gunjan varmasandesh 04:16, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
ek baar lekh kiran bedi bhi dekh leejiye dhanyavaad --gunjan varmasandesh 04:00, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

aaj ka aalekh

namaskaar! main kaam kar rahi hooain. jo bhi aavashyakta hogi aapko soochit karooaingi. krupaya apni marji se lekhon ka chayan ab band kar dein. --Munita Prasadvaarta 05:10, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

namaskaar! baat paath ke kam ya jyaada hone ki naheen hai baat yeh hai ki leaaut ke saath kya match hota hai. jisko adhik padhna hai vah link klik kar ke bheetar padh sakta hai mukhaprushth ka leaaut aapke saaainchon ne khoob bigaada tha ab vaisa naheen karna hai. pramukh chitr ka saaaincha abhi bhi asantulit hai. --Munita Prasadvaarta 15:13, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
mere hisaab se mere uttar mein koi aapattijanak baat naheen thi. aapko bura laga to kshama chaahati hooain. theek hai agar aapke hisaab se aapka saaaincha sahi tha. mujhe apna wala yeh theek maaloom hota hai. pehle bhi itna paath hi saaainche mein jaata tha. ismein aapatti ki koi baat naheen hai.--Munita Prasadvaarta 15:29, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
krupaya pattadakal se laal shreniyon ko hata deejiye.--Munita Prasadvaarta 08:58, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
pattadakal 215 shabdon ka hai. yadi aapke paas kuchh saamagri ho to krupaya ise thoda sa badha deejiye jisse ki yeh lekh aaj ke aalekh ke upayukt ban sake. dhanyavaad.--Munita Prasadvaarta 14:41, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
dhanyavaad ji. --Munita Prasadvaarta 04:43, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

afreeka

haan, theek hai vo anuvaad aap kar deejiye. vo kaam aap ham sabse behtar kar bhi sakte hain. aap kar deejiye main jalavaayu, vanaspati aadi par hi abhi kaam kar rahi hooain. chitron ko aap laga rahe hain usamein se ek main pehle hi lekh mein prayog ki hooain aap usako hata kar koi anya chitr laga deejiyega.--Munita Prasadvaarta 05:48, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

aasheesh ji vo afreeka ka baayom wala chitr bhooprakruti ke saath mel naheen khaata hai. aisa karte hain ki mai jalavaayu ke baad Africa ki vanaspati, ek anubhaag banaaooaingi usamein usako laga deinge.
--Munita Prasadvaarta 15:58, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
aasheesh ji jalavaayu evam jalavaayu ke pradesh vaale anubhaag ke liye koi chitr naheen mil raha hai. koi najar mein ho to laga deejiye na.
--Munita Prasadvaarta 16:01, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
saaaincha itna badhiya bana hai evam itni mehnat ki hai aapne usapar ki taareef ke liye shabd naheen hain. saaaincha ki sabse badi khaashiyt to mujhe ye lagi ki itna bada hone ke baavajood bhi ek din mein poora neela neela ho gaya. itihaas wala chitr parafekt hai haan mere paas maitar naheen hai itihaas ke liye par shaayad dheere-dheere anoodit ho jaaega, gunjan ji bhi afreeka par kaam kar rahe hain.. haan, jalavaayu ke liye koi upayukt chitr mile to laga deejiyega. baayom vaale chitr ko baad mein vanaspati mein laga deinge filhaal rahane dete hain. --Munita Prasadvaarta 16:32, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
afreeka ka bhautik maanachitr wala chitr laag kar achha hi kiya aapne.--Munita Prasadvaarta 16:35, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
par vo drekensabarg parvat wala chitr thoda neeche laana hoga ithiyopiya ke pathaar vaale chitr ke jast oopar ya jast neeche. vo poorv evam dakshin ke uchch pathaar anubhaag ka chitr hai.--Munita Prasadvaarta 16:38, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
afreeka mein sab theek-thaak lag raha hai bas janavaayu vaale anubhaag ke liye chitr mil naheen raha hai. jo saancha aapne lagaaya hai uske daahine taraf ke khaali sthaan mein chaar chitr hain achha hai par neeche ka baaki sthaan khaali lag raha hai vahaaain kuchh sambandhit chitr laga deinge jisse poora bhara hua lage. kya kehte hain. kaaman par ek etalas hai afreeka ka vahaan se kuchh madad mil sake shaayad aur oopar sabse jo chitr hai usamein chaar chitr hain ek saath. usamein kuchh aur chitr daal kar lekh mein kaheen aur daal deingein. achha lagega.--Munita Prasadvaarta 04:59, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
aap afreeka ke itihaas ka anuvaad jaroor keejiye main naheen kar rahi hooain. vaise bhi mujhe yeh bahut kathin kaam laga. main uske bhoogol evam jeev vigyaan se sambandhit hisse par hi kaam kar rahi hooain evam karne ki ichha rakhati hooain. haan mujhe kuchh maitar mila ya kaheen kuchh sudhaar kar sakti hooain aisa laga to avashya karoongi.--Munita Prasadvaarta 17:29, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
aasheesh ji ek kaam karte hain aap anuvaad ka kaam afreeka ka itihaas mein keejiye. vahi mukhya lekh hai. baad mein sankshep karke usako afreeka mein laga degein. utana vistrut itihaas afreeka lekh mein naheen likh kar usako afreeka ka itihaas lekh mein likhte hain. gunjan ji aur main dono hi is par kaam kar rahe hain.--Munita Prasadvaarta 05:06, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
afreeka ke itihaas ki tarah kya bhoo-prakruti ko bhi sankshep mein likh diya jaae kya? aapka kya vichaar hai nirvaachit hone ki disha mein ye kaisa kadam hoga?--Munita Prasadvaarta 15:45, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
afreeka ko dekhne ka samay abhi mere paas naheen hai aap ne jo sandesh diya usaka matlab bhi poora samajh mein naheen aaya mujhe. khair aap jo karna chaahate hain karein, sudhaar ham vichaar kar karasakate hain. afreeka mein maitar kaafi hai bas chaturaai se use saja legein to nirvaachit ho jaaega, itihaas mein kuchh maitar kam hai. vo aap aur gunjan ji dekh leejiye. mujhe samay milega to dekhoongi hi. haan ek baat vo aaj ka aalekh mein Armenia ko jo sujhaav diya tha aapne vo mainne chayanit karke laga diya hai. par chayanit hone ke bad jo anuchhed aapne achaanak joda hai usamein vartani evam vaakya rachana ki ashuddhiyaaain hain yadi samay mile to door kar dein.--Munita Prasadvaarta 05:07, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
aasheesh ji pehle se ek shreni hai afreeka evam aapne ek nai bana di hai Africa. aapki nayi banaai shreni mein das lekh evam paaainch upashreniyaaain bhi ban gayi hain. pooraani shreni mein 119 lekh evam 10 upashreniyaaain hain. main nai shreni ke sabhi lekhon evam upashreniyon ko pooraani shreni mein daal rahi hooain. krupaya iska dhyaan rakhiyega ki aisa dubaara naheen ho kyonki is kaam ko karne mein bekaar ki oorja evam samay nasht ho raha hai. dhanyavaad.--Munita Prasadvaarta 16:05, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
ye kya ji aapne praveshadvaar bhi usi mein bana diya hai. ab usamein shreni kahaan daala hai aapne vo mujhse dhoode bhi naheen milega is kaam ko aap hi keejiye evam krupaya REDIRECT naheen keejiyega. usase koi laabh naheen hoga ulta pulta result aata hai.--Munita Prasadvaarta 16:08, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
bhoo-prakruti ki angreji physical feature hona chaahiye. kitaabon mein to yahi likha hai.--Munita Prasadvaarta 02:18, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

afreeka lekh mein jo itihaas anubhaag hai uske do anuchhed karte hain. pehle mein praacheen afreeka ka itihaas ho tatha doosare mein aadhunik ka. is prakaar itihaas bada bhi naheen hoga aur sab kabhar bhi ho jaaega. haan dono hi anuchhed bade-bade rakhate hain kyonki lekh ki lambaai bhi to rakhani hai. kya kehte hain?--Munita Prasadvaarta 09:27, 19 July 2009 (UTC) main kuchh aur badlaav ki hooain usapar bhi kament deejiyega.--Munita Prasadvaarta 09:29, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

aaj ka aalekh

haan ji armeniya ko kal ke liye chayanit kar liya gaya hai.--Munita Prasadvaarta 15:35, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

main bheemabetaka paashaan aashray par kaam kar rahi hooain. aadhe ghante mein shaayad ho jaae.--Munita Prasadvaarta 17:20, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
theek hai ji. OK.--Munita Prasadvaarta 17:33, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
bheemabetaka paashaan aashray naam aapko kaheen mila ki aapne angreji naam ka anuvaad swayam kiya hai. anyatha na leejiyega mujhe naheen mila iseeliye poochh rahi hooain.--Munita Prasadvaarta 17:42, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
Bandra-worli samudrasetu ka chitr dekhiye. abhi lagaai hooain. kaisa hai?--Munita Prasadvaarta 03:02, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

vo baandraavarli samudra setu ke samvaad ki baat kar rahe hain na? to kuchh naheen karna hai kya karna hai. kahiye. vo ek aaipi ka sandesh hai vahi na.--Munita Prasadvaarta 13:00, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

aap aaj saari raat online hain kya?

--Munita Prasadvaarta 15:26, 19 July 2009 (UTC) naheen ji aisi koi baat naheen bas kal ke aalekh ke liye dakshini America taiyaar kar rahi hooain. aap thoda dekh leejiyega.--Munita Prasadvaarta 15:45, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

aap sahi kehte hain Bhaarat par hi adhikaansh kaam hona chaahiye yahi hamaari pehchaan banani chaahiye. dakshini America ek mahaadveep hai evam ispar maatr do panktiyaaain likhi hui thi jiske kaaran hi isko mainne shooroo kiya. itne bade mahaadveep jismein saikade desh hain maatr do panktiyaaain mujhe ajeeb laga to likhne baith gayi. isko aaj raat taiyaar kar lete hain. fir baaki aapki baat ka samarthan hai.--Munita Prasadvaarta 15:57, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

main khaana khaane ja rahi hooain yadi aapko samay mile to isko theekathaak karke kalake liye laga deejiye. chitr deergha mein pehle teen chitr praakruti sondarya ke liye tatha baaki ke teen vahaan ke maanaveeya vikaash ko darshaane ke liye sochi hooain. dekh leejiyega.--Munita Prasadvaarta 16:28, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

mere oopar vaale sandesh par shaayad aapne dhyaan naheen diya ya shaayad vyast hain. dakshini amareeka ko dekh leejiye. kuchh kami beshi ho to. main chali sone ab aapki marji jisko daalna hai daaliye ya fir subah dekheinge. shubharaatri.

--Munita Prasadvaarta 17:58, 19 July 2009 (UTC) vaah bahut khoob badhiya hai ji.--Munita Prasadvaarta 18:04, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

pooraalekh

aasheesh ji suprabhaat. ab jara pooraalekh ko kasht deejiye, yeh panna 124 kilobaaits ka ho gaya hai. daayal ap kanekshan ho to lod hone mein kaafi samay lagega.--Munita Prasadvaarta 03:36, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

do sujhaav

hindi viki ke mukhyaprushth par mainne do sujhaav diye the.

1. mukhyaprushh par pramukh chitr mein Infosys ki ek bildeeng dikhaai gayi hai. iske kaipshan mein likha gaya hai ki infosees Bhaarat ki sabse badi IT Company hai, jo ki glat hai. infosees doosari sabse badi IT Company hai, sabse badi IT Company of India is TCS :-)

2. vikimeediya mein har saptaah ek article aata hai, jise vishv ki adhiktam bhaashaaon mein anuvaad karne ka aagrah kiya jaata hai. aisa isliye taaki doosari bhaashaaon ki bhi prushth sankhya zyaada ho. yahaaain dekhein - m:Translation requests . is par dhyaan diya ja sakta hai.