sadasya vaarta:Bill william compton

puraalekh
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

If I left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it. If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, so please add it to your watchlist. Please click here to leave me a new message.

priya Bill william compton, hindi vikipeediya par aapka svaagat hai! vikipeediya ek mukt jnyaaanakosh hai jo vishvabhar ke yogadaanakartaaon dvaara likha ja raha hai. kuchh bhi likhne se pehle krupaya sahaayata ke nimnaankit prushthon ko dhyaan se padhein:

devanaagari mein kaise tankan karein lekh ko kaise badalein naya prushth kaise aarambh karein prayogasthal (yadi aap sochate hai ki aap kisi lekh ko bigaad deinge, to prayogasthal par jaakar jitna chaahein prushth badalne ka prayog kar sakte hai.) khaata banaane ke laabh apna parichay dein (parichay dena aavashyak naheen hai). pariyojana ke baare mein bahudha poochhe jaane vaale prashn sahaayata prushth — parivartan karne par sahaayata, nae lekh kaise banaaeain, aur kai anya vishay. antaraviki dootaavaas — Interwiki Embassy Setting up your browser for Indic scripts yogadaan dena achhe lekh likhne ke sujhaav yogadaanakartaao ke liye neetiyaaain va dishaanirdesh kisi bhi vaarta/samvaad prushth, chaupaal ya anya kaheen bhi jahaan sadasyon ke madhya vaarta hoti hai, par apna sandesh chhodne ke baad apna hastaakshar avashya chhode. iske liye apne sandesh ki samaapti par --~~~~ likh dein. ham aasha karte hai ki aapko vikipeediya se judne mein aanand aaega.

--Jain.dhrj 13:09, 18 fravari 2011 (UTC)

priya bill kaumpatan! maine uparokt lekh ke infobauks mein chitr aplod kar diya hai. krupaya ise dekh lein kya yahi sahi dhaing se aplod hua hai? yadi koi kami rah gayi ho to avashya hi sujhaayein. sahayog ke liye aabhaar - dau0'kraant'ema0ela0varma (vaarta) 14:57, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

kraant ji, mujhe vishvaas hai ki is chitr ko upload karte vakt aapne viki paathakon ke hit mein socha hoga, parantu jis laaiseins (kriyetiv kaumans ऍtreebyooshan/share-alaaik license 3.0) ke saath chitr yahaaain upload kiya gaya hai usaki koi pramaanikta naheen hai. mera taatparya yeh hai ki jis srot, Indiatimes.com, se aapne chitr liya hai vo yeh kahi naheen ghoshit karta hai ki is chitr par usaka svaamitv aur kaupeeraait adhikaar hain. aisi paristhiti mein vikipeediya par yeh chitr naheen rakha ja sakta. agar aapke man mein koi prashn hai to krupaya poochhein.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 05:09, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

theek hai main is chitr ko swayam hi lekh se hataaye de raha hooain. yadi lekh mein aur koi truti ho avashya bataaiyega. dhanyavaad dau0'kraant'ema0ela0varma (vaarta) 06:11, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

priya bill kaumpatan ji! krupaya yahaaain par dekhein ismein mujhe 21 June 2011 ko tatkaaleen prabandhak shri mayoor ji ne svat: pareekshit adhikaar pradaan kiye the jinhein shaayad aapne bhool se bina dekhe hata diya. yeh baat mujhe aaj tab pata chali jab mainne apne sadasya prushth ko adyatan kiya. krupaya ise sudhaar dein. dhanyavaad dau0'kraant'ema0ela0varma (vaarta) 07:54, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

punashch: priya bill kaumpatan ji! krupaya aap is sootr ko bhi dekhein. chooainki aap prabandhak hain isliye kah raha hooain is or dhyaan dene ki krupa karein. dhanyavaad! dau0'kraant'ema0ela0varma (vaarta) 11:57, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

kshama karein kraant ji doosare sadasyon dvaara jodi gayi charchaaon ke kaaran aapka anubhaag "aapke liye ek anya sadasya ke ek naya sandesh hain" mein naheen dikha. main adhikaar pun: bahaal kar raha hooain.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 12:26, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

dhanyavaad kaumpatan ji! mainne apne user pej par vikeekaunfreins mumbai ki photo aplod kar di hai. use dekh leejiyega aur yadi kaheen koi kami nazar aaye to bataaiyega. dau0'kraant'ema0ela0varma (vaarta) 13:49, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Can i ask on Meta for temporary bot flag for recategorization? Here does not exist flood flag. Greeting! --Kolega2357 (vaarta) 03:06, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

I have no problem whatsoever.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 03:10, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Can I start via Python to do recategorization? I always Stewards assume bad intent but it is not. On the Vietnamese Wikipedia have 1702 edits. There I work well re-categorization without error. --Kolega2357 (vaarta) 12:25, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Please leave your message at the community discussion page. I suggest to show your "without error" contributions at vi.wiki. This way you'd have community wide approval. Regards.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 08:10, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

I have just written en:Sonja Schlesin and thought of you. I hope you are well on your way to being a qualified engineer. I know your primary interest is US TV but I thought it might be useful for the Hindi Wiki The article is a mentioned at en:Satyagraha House, which is a "Gandhi House" and it has a QRpedia plaque on the front of it! and is in a small number of African Languages. Victuallers (vaarta) 12:08, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi Roger,

It's been weeks since I last heard from you! How are you? Have you gotten yourself involved with Johannesburg? :) I'm doing post grad, so I don't have as much time or freedom for Wikipedia as I did before. But I'll try to create decent articles. What happened to GPedia? I didn't hear from John.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 05:42, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks so much for the article - I'm just helping with Joburgpedia because I think its a cool location GPedia got to 1000 new articles and we got an FA as featured article on the en:front page. The GHib Government are now getting the plaques but Joburg has beaten them to it. Project has slowed but I have about a dozen new pics to load today that will brighten up a few pages. I might have a go at copying some to Hindi pages but its a tricky thing to do when I cannot even read the beautiful script. Pleased to hear that your education is continuing and that the wiki stuff has ruined your career!! I'll write off line too, but don't think that we have forgotten you! R Victuallers (vaarta) 08:57, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

priya bill ji, namaskaar! main saaaincha:hindi film kalaakaar ko collapse karne ki bahut koshish kar chuka hooain lekin naakaamayaab raha hooain. krupaya madad karein. dhanyavaad--somesh tripaathi ^vaarta 18:39, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Y poorn hua. somesh ji krupaya dekhalein ki kya aap aisa hi parinaam chaahate the?<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 18:54, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

dhanyavaad bill ji, lekin yadi aap shri devi lekh mein jaayeinge to do saaainche ek saath dikhaai dete hain jo prushth ko kaafi bhonda bana deta hai. abhi bhi poora saaaincha har prushth par dikhaai de raha hai.--somesh tripaathi ^vaarta 07:06, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

somesh ji, kshama karein parantu main aapka taatparya naheen samajh paaya. lekh mein do saaainche lagaae hue hain isliye do dikhaai de rahe hain aur saaaincha:hindi film kalaakaar to mujhe band hi dikh raha hai.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 12:14, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

namaskaar, Bill william compton ji. aapke liye vikipeediya:prushth hataane hetu charcha/lekh/khoon mein pletalets kis tarah badhaaeain ! par ek sandesh hai.
aap is soochana ko kisi bhi samay mita sakte hai, iske liye vaarta sanpaadan mein jaakar {{sandesh}} mitaaeain.

☆a★sanjeev Kumar (baatein) 10:22, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

bill ji, krupaya prabandhak pad ke liye shri siddhaarth ghai ji ka naamaankan ka sandarbh lein. is naamaankan par siddhaarth ji ne parinaam ki ghoshana se pehle tak apni sahamati naheen di thi fir bhi aapne siddhaarth ghai ji ke naamaankan ko safal ghoshit kar diya hai. meri drushti mein yeh vikiprakriya ka ghor ulanghan hai. is sandarbh mein aapke vaartaaprusht par siddhaarth ghai se jo aapki vaarta hui hai vah bhi aapattijanak hai. is vaarta ke pariprekshya mein vikiprakriya ka yeh ullanghan prabandhak ke pad ka durupyog ka pakka case hai. aapko yaad dilaana chaahata hooain ki aapko prabandhak ke pad ke durupayog ke aarop mein prabandhak pad se hataane ke liye hindi viki ke bahusankhyak sadasyon ne samarthan kiya hai. uske baad shaun kathaputali ghoshit hua tha jiske kathaputali jaaainch ka aapne virodh kiya tha.

maine uparokt link par 'siddhaarth ghai ji ka naamaankan safal kaise?' sheershak ke antargat apne vichaar likhe hain. aapse anurodh hai ki siddhaarth ji ka naamaankan ko sahamati ke abhaav ke kaaran nirast karke prakriya ke ullanghan ki galati ko samaapt karein. -- anunaad Singh^vaarta 12:44, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi, Bill!

Are you interested in writing a short stub on en:Nihari? It's a dish in the subcontinent. Thanks WhisperToMe (vaarta) 02:36, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

WTM, I'm a PETA member. Strange as it may sound, but it'd be very difficult for me to write about something I despise most. Please accept my sincere apologies for failing to complete your request.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 13:24, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

I see. Thank you for the notice! I'll look to find an editor who is willing to work on meat article WhisperToMe (vaarta) 00:10, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

hi, i want to know what sort of punctuation is prefered in hindi wikipedia for ending of sentence is it dot(.) or poornaviraam (.) or laaghav chinh (॰) because all this including dot (.) is acceptable in hindi devnagri script so you as an admin i ask you this question because today another user named sadasya:sanjeev Kumar asked me to use poornaviraam (.) or laaghav chinh (॰) so please solve this doubt and another request please ask user sadasya:sanjeev Kumar to be careful while editing because said user has added his name in middle of article named ef si Barcelona in section johan chruyff yug may be by mistake but which is equal to vandalism and since you knw how much passion club football creates such small errors might create negative impact on mind of users who support such clubs so please look into this matter on urgently.

more over if any of my article are upto standard then please nomitate those as featured article and good article status. Sushilmishra (vaarta) 09:35, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Dear Sushilmishra, People are using dot (.) in place of poornaviraam (.) and laaghav chinh (॰) in Hindi because either they doesn't have tools or they doesn't know how to type in their machine. Use of poornaviraam (.) and laaghav chinh (॰) is different. poornaviraam (.) is used as fullstop in English, I mean to say at the end of sentence we should use poornaviraam (.). In case of shorting words we use laaghav chinh (॰). For Laghava chihna you can see the page laaghav chinh.

namaste Sushilmishra ji, logon ke sanganak mein upakaranon ki kami athva tankan gyaan ke abhaav mein poornaviraam aur laaghav chinh ka upayog karte hain. ye donon bhinn-bhinn hain. poornaviraam ka upayog vaakya ke poorn hone par kiya jaata hai balki laaghav chinh ka upayog kisi shabd ke sankshipt roop ke saath kiya jaata hai. aajkal laaghav chinh ka upayog bahut nyoon ho gaya hai aur log saamaanyat: iska upayog bhi naheen karte. pandit ko sankshipt roop mein likhne ke liye pan॰ likhte hain. jaise yadi aap apne naam ka sankshipt roop angreji mein yadi SM ya S.M. likhte ho vaise hi hindi mein ise su॰ami॰ athva keval "su mi" likh sakte ho. (yadi aapke naam ke chhote roop kuchh bhinn arth dete hon athva kisi prakaar bhi aap naheen chaahate to main kshama praarthi hooain.) aapke ek lekh mein kam mainne yeh parivartan karne ki asafal koshish ki jismein trutivsh ek jagah mera naam bhi likha gaya jiske liye main kshamaapraarthi hooain.

Bill will explain more about it to you.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (baatein) 11:16, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

sanjeev Kumar well you can use dot (.) = full stop in place of poornaviraam (.), it is valid and it is used widely in many hindi textbooks and rule is tht if u are using full stop = dot (.) in any article then you shouldnt use poornaviraam (.) similarly vice versa. more over in my earlier articles which i wrote u can find a message from me in disussion section that every editor is welcomed to correct the grammar carefully, so if you are free and care for this details then you are welcome to correct the grammar of articles carefully please....and bill i would really like to know what should be used dot = full stop = (.) or poornaviraam (.) because according to my knowledge both are valid in devnagri script used to write hindi language... please clear this doubt Sushilmishra (vaarta) 11:43, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

sanjeev Kumar more over i would like to bring to your notice an article Manchester United ef.si. lot of english is used and the punctuation which you are saying we should use is no where to be seen and there is no updates of the player list. tht article was created in 2007 after that it was edited on 09:37, 22 January 2010‎ and remaining all edits are bots adding links, so i ask you to please form a team to 1st look into matter of usage of english language in articles and 2nd look into updating articles which require updates, if you are free then please take this matter in your hand do the good work and contribute for betterment of hindi wikipedia. Sushilmishra (vaarta) 12:13, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Dear Sushilmishra, You are right. I should do that. But there are two problems in this case. First as you said "time". I don't get much time to do so. Another I don't have knowledge about football et al. So this is like a black box for me and I am feared to look into it. You can see other than last 2-3 days, I didn't try to mess-up with articles crated by you that is because I am zero in those topics. About grammatical mistake I would like to play but can't play with those big pages. As you saw in your page I wrote my name by mistake, these type of things are happening if I am playing with big pages. And I don't want that I will make a page worst then it was.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (baatein) 13:41, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Any way, there is already many big discussions has been done on this matter. You can see at vikipeediya:chaupaal/puraalekh 28#devanaagari ankon ke s‍aathaan par antarraash‍aatreeya ankon va aasaan bhaasha ka prayog va poornaviraam ka savaal. This is a huge talk.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (baatein) 13:58, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Sushil, I won't deny that the period (or full-stop or dot, whatever you would like to call it) is becoming more common than the poorna viraam, but this is only because people are becoming indolent to make some extra efforts. And, this is primarily limited to the Internet sources. Poorna viraam is still the first choice of writers (at least those who choose to publish in well renowned newspapers, periodicals, etc). Text books and majority of the printed media use poorna viraam, including vast majority of the scholarly work. Due to certain constraints, including, but not limited to, absence of poorna viraam in standard keyboards, period is preferred over poorn viraam. But on Wikipedia we have Universal Language Selector, which provides a flexible way to configure and deliver language settings like interface language, fonts, and input methods (keyboard mappings). This allows users to insert poorn viraam and other glyphs not directly supported by their keyboard. This is the reason why on Wikipedia we use poorn viraam only. I can't vouch for the veracity, but the laghava cihna is only used to show the ellipsis of letters in acronyms. Regards.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 15:38, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

bill ji, namaskaar. aapse nivedan hai ki krupaya {{discussion top}} {{discussion bottom}} {{hat}} jaise saaainchon ko hindi vikipeediya ka bhaag banaane ka prayaas keejiye. in dinon mein bahas-takaraar kuchh itni badh rahi hai in saanchon ke maadhyam se bhavishya mein vartamaan ko jaaainchane bahut madad milegi. Hindustanilanguage (vaarta) 14:34, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Y poorn hua. aapne sahi sujhaav diya ऍchaऍl ji.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 17:00, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

namaskaar, Bill william compton ji. aapke liye Hindustanilanguage ke vaarta prushth par ek sandesh hai.
aap is soochana ko kisi bhi samay mita sakte hai, iske liye vaarta sanpaadan mein jaakar {{sandesh}} mitaaeain.

should always be substituted, unlike what you mistakenly did here. Since the template substitutes the username of the person making the edit, only you can actually fix this.

Also, after you've substed it, you'll probably have to make another edit to fix the timestamp to state the actual promotion date/time.--siddhaarth ghai (vaarta) 13:26, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

I don't know how I forgot to substitute it. Je suis stupide. Merci beaucoup!<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 16:58, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

tippani: Merci beaucoup (fraanseesi) = thank you very much (angreji) = bahut bahut dhanyavaad (hindi).☆a★sanjeev Kumar (baatein) 17:02, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

namaste bill ji, apne banner mein likhe vaakya mein ashuddhi hai. usamein likha hai - "2013 mein apni dasveen varshagaaainth bana raha hai." jabki shuddh - "2013 mein apni dasveen varshagaaainth mana raha hai." at: krupaya ise theek karein. chooainki laug in karne ke baad yeh dikhaai naheen deta at: kisi sadasya ki ispar nazar naheen padi. jitna jaldi ho sake ismein sudhaar karein.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (baatein) 08:06, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Y poorn hua. dhyaan dilaane ke liye dhanyavaad sanjeev ji.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 17:19, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

mainne ek sahaayata prushth ka draaft sadasya:Siddhartha Ghai/prabandhan kaarya par banaaya hai jismein prabandhan kaaryon ki ek soochi di hai. ise keval sadasyon ko jaankaari dene ke uddeshya se banaaya hai, neeti ya dishaanirdesh ke najriye se naheen. samay milne par dekh lein aur koi sudhaar sambhav hon to kar dein. yadi anya prabandhakon ko bhi yeh upayukt laga to ise vikipeediya naamasthaan mein sthaanaantarit kar deinge.

not: (unrelated) krupaya vikipeediya:prushth hataane hetu charcha/saaainche/upaparamaanvik kan/Template:Documentation dekh lein.--siddhaarth ghai (vaarta) 19:31, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

bill ji, yadi vikipeediya:prushth hataane hetu charcha/saaainche/upaparamaanvik kan/Template:Documentation par jaldi kaaryavaahi ho jaaye to achha hoga.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (baatein) 16:04, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

sanjeev ji, niyamon ke anusaar charcha kam se kam ek saptaah tak chalni chaahiye, naheen to mujhe jaldi kaaryavaahi karne mein koi parahej naheen hai.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 16:32, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

siddhaarth maine ismein kuchh badlaav kiye hain unhein jaaainchalein. iske baad chaupaal par sandesh chhod kar main anya prabandhakon va sadasyon ki rai iske baare mein praapt kar looainga.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 05:27, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

mainne badlaav dekh liye hain. sudhaar ke liye dhanyavaad :)

mainne chaupaal par charcha bhaag bana diya hai. haaain ho sakta hai ki sadasyon ke vaarta prushthon par sandesh chhodne padein unhein is charcha se avagat karaane ke liye.--siddhaarth ghai (vaarta) 21:40, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

saaaincha:kya aap jaante hain? mein galati se mainne " jise hava mein khada mandir (chitrit) kah jaata hai." likha tha aur is galati ki mukh prushth par punaraavarti ho gayi hai. mujhe lagta hai yahaan "jise hava mein khada mandir (chitrit) kaha jaata hai." (kah->kaha). yadi main sahi hooain to krupaya ismein sudhaar karein.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (baatein) 04:00, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

sudhaar kar diya gaya.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 04:02, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

dhanyavaad bill ji.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (baatein) 04:09, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Kindly see above page. Some body had added english matter without any proper reference in spite of CAUTION on top of article. I have reverted the vandalised edits. Please fix the proper tag. 14.96.213.6 (vaarta) 17:51, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

The article actually wasn't semi-protected. Merely having a template on a page, like {{surakshit}}, doesn't make it protected or semi-protected.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 18:07, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Bill, are you interested in starting en:Socio-economic issues in India in Hindi?

Thank you WhisperToMe (vaarta) 00:15, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Y Done: Bhaarat ke saamaajaarthik mudde. I will try to expand the article in the near future, when I have some free time.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 14:38, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Thank you :) WhisperToMe (vaarta) 02:32, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

namaste bill ji, aapne aaj vikaas ji ke vaarta prushth par ek sandesh likha hai. unhonne shaayad ek do prushth hi banaaya hoga. chooainki unhonne ajnyaaanakosheeya prushth banaaye at: unhein hataana bhi uchit tha aur is baat se vikaas ji ko avagat karavaana bhi sahi hai. lekin yahaaain yadi aap thoda sa narami se kehte tho achha hota. aap mere angreji viki ke vaarta prushth par dekho, mujhe bhi is tarah kuchh sunana pada tha lekin usamein vinmrata kaheen adhik thi. jo bhi ho, ho gaya so ho gaya, bhavishya mein is baat ka khyaal rakhoge to mujhe khushi hogi.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (baatein) 16:33, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

sanjeev ji, jaldi-jaldi likhne mein aisa ho gaya tha, mujhe bhi ab us sandesh ko padhne par galati mahasoos ho rahi hai. parantu galati kisi bhi prakaar hui ho vo galati hi hoti hai isliye main bhavishya mein nishchit roop se is baat ka dhyaan rakhooainga. dhyaan dilvaane ke liye liye dhanyavaad.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 21:14, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi.

Although I'd like to look into the possibility of an RfC like process on hi-wp, other stuff has again rudely interrupted plans.

this translatewiki thread will explain what I'm talking about.

We need to act to fix this ASAP (and I'd like you to follow the recommendations in the thread too). Regards.--siddhaarth ghai (vaarta) 22:13, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

namaste bill ji, main do prushthon ke baare mein jaankaari chaahata hooain jinko bahut pehle aap sheegra hataane ke liye naamaankit kar chuke hain. ye do prushth vikipeediya vaarta:prabandhan adhikaar hetu nivedan sampaadan/abhilekhaagaar/00 aur vikipeediya vaarta:prabandhan adhikaar hetu nivedan sampaadan/abhilekhaagaar/0B hain. iske saath hi vaarta:harit oorja se sheeh saaaincha hataane ka anurodha bhi karna chaahuainga.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (baatein) 11:10, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

namaskaar sanjeev ji, krupaya yeh spasht karein ki aap mere dvaara naamaankit prushthon ke baare mein kis prakaar ki jaankaari chaahate hain? agar aap yeh poochh rahe hain ki maine inhein hataane ke liye kyon naamaankit kiya tha to usaka kaaran yeh hai ki vaarta prushth ka puraalekh charcha anusaar naheen apitu aakaar anusaar banta hai aur ye do prushth charcha anusaar hain. maine uchit puraalekh bana diya tha to vaise bhi inka yahaaain rahane ka koi auchitya naheen banta. s:Hahc21 ke naamaankan ke baare mein bataana chaahooainga ki Hahc21 ji ko hindi ka bilkul gyaan naheen hai ve venejuelaai hain aur Spanish unki maatrabhaasha hai. ve aaiaarasi dvaara chhoti vikipeediya pariyojanaaon par kabhi-kabhi nazar rakhate hain jis se vahaaain barbataapoorn sanpaadan roke ja sakein. harit urja vaarta ko unhonne isliye naamaankit kiya hai kyonki prushth ki saamagri is samay arthaheen hai jis se yeh pehla, doosra aur teesara maapadand poora karta hai. hataane ke pashchaat vaarta prushth {{vaartaa_sheershak}} ke saath pun: banaaya ja sakta hai.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 17:18, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

dhanyavaad, main aapki baat samajh pa raha hooain. aapka kehna theek lag raha hai. baaki baatein meri vaapasi par agale saptaah kar sakta hooain. vaarta:harit oorja ko hataakar aap iska punarnimaan kar sakte hain. main meri aapatti vaapas leta hooain.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (baatein) 20:55, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

bill ji, namaskaar. aapne is nae lekh ko aaj hata diya. kya is lekh ki 'apathaneeya saamagri' upalabdh kara sakte hain?-- anunaad Singh^vaarta 13:37, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

anunaad ji, vaise lekh ki saamagri meri tippani mein dikh rahi hai. hataai gayi saamagri us samay upalabdh karaai jaati hai jab koi doosra sadasya us saamagri ko lekh nirmaan mein istemaal kare. mujhe to saamagri "apathaneeya" hi lagi thi parantu agar aapke ye kisi kaam aae to zaroor laaeain:

mjkk,h',;gk.tfylkltfyl.kb,gu;u,hniltv68.; ghi,tf67

<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 14:16, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

kya kul saamagri itni hi thi ya kuchh aur (jaise aadha panna)? yadi aadha panna ya adhik ho to krupaya poori saamagri upalabdh karaaeain. yadi itna hi hai to kisi kaam ka naheen hai.-- anunaad Singh^vaarta 14:33, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

yahi poori saamagri hai. maine hamesha aap se kaha ki main bina vajah lekh naheen hataata, aap se mainne kaha bhi hai ki aisa koi ek lekh bataaeain jo maine niti viruddh ja kar hataaya ho? jo lekh ullekhaneeya vishay par hota hai aur agar usaki saamagri itni paryaapt ho ki kuchh sudhaar kar ke use bachaaya ja sake to main aise lekh ko kabhi naheen hataata. krupaya aage se aisa koi anurodh karne se pehle is baat ka dhyaan rakhein.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 15:02, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

aapse poochhakar koi galati ki ho to kshama chaahata hooain. maine isliye poochha kyonki pehle bhi is tarah se lekh hataate rahe hain. us par lambi-lambi charchaaeain huin hain. vaise jitni mehnat se aapne use hataaya utani hi mehnat se ek aadhaar lekh bana sakte the. -- anunaad Singh^vaarta 15:19, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

"is tarah se lekh" jo hataata raha hooain vo hataane yogya hi the. maine un "lambi-lambi" charchaaon mein aapse udahaaran dene ke liye na jaane kitni baar kaha hoga jo aapne aaj tak naheen diya hai. aap galat kah rahe hain, jitna samay lekh hataane mein lagta hai usase kaheen adhik banaane mein lagta hai. samaanyat: main agar koi lekh banaata hooain to usamein upayukt shreni, sandarbh, jnyaaanasandook, aadi daalata hooain jismein mujhe kaafi samay lagta hai. maine hamesha kaha hai ki mujhe lekhon ki sankhya badhaane ki daud mein shaamil naheen hona, main gunavatta mein vishvaas rakhata hooain. yeh avadhaarana galat hai ki aaj ka banaaya aadhaar kal vistrut ho jaaega. hindi viki par itne kam sadasya hain ki shaayad hi koi puraane lekhon ko sudhaarane mein samay vyateet karta hai. is prakaar ham keval chhote aur bahut kam jaankaari vaale lekh bana kar hindi viki ki gunavatta din-pratidin khraab karte ja rahe hain. us kisi bhi vikipeediya par jahaaain mukhaprushth par anya bhaashaaon ki vikipriyojanaaon ki kadiyaaain gunavatta ke aadhaar par di jaati hain vahaaain ve hindi viki ko shaamil naheen karte. sabse achha udahaaran angreji viki hai, vahaaain kitne hi varshon se hindi viki ki kadi hata rakhi hai. aapko shaayad na lagta ho parantu mujhe yeh apamaanajanak lagta hai ki jis viki ke vikaas mein ham sab lage hue hain use itna bhi laayak naheen samjha jaata ki usaki kadi kisi anya vikipeediya ke mukhaprushth par di jaae. aise karte-karte ek din aisa aayaga ki hindi viki bas in gunavattaaheen chhote-chhote aadhaaron ka jamaavada ban kar rah jaaega. yahi kaaran hai ki yahaaain par sadasyon ki sankhya mein izaafa naheen ho raha, tamil viki ko dekhiye vahaaain yahaaain se kam lekh hain parantu sakriya sadasya kaheen adhik.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 15:50, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

┌a─a─a─a─a─a─a─a─a─a─a─a─a─a─a─a─a┘
bill ji, yahaaain shaayad hi koi sakriya sadasya hoga jisko aapse kam gunavatta pyaari ho. lekin keval 'gunavatta-gunavatta' alaapane se gunavatta naheen aa jaaegi. sabse mool cheej hai ek lekhon ka srujan. hindi viki par sadasya sankhya naheen badh rahi hai uske liye 'aadhaar lekh' kaise jimmedaar ho gaye? angreji viki aur tamil viki ka udaaharan dena bahut aasaan hai lekin hindi par andhaadhundh lekh mitaakar use paaainch sau par pahuaincha deinge to kal kisi bhi viki par hindi viki ki kadi naheen milegi. aur haaain, gunavatta bahut saari baaton par nirbhar hai. 'seementareej' , 'kone ke makaan' aadi par lekh banaaeain aur uske kshetrafal, lambaai-chaudaai ke liye myunisipaaliti ke dastaavejon ka sandarbh de dein to bhi gunavatta naheen aa jaati. ant mein aapko yaad dila dooain ki aapne 'hindu raashtravaad' naamak lekh ko mitaaya tha aur jab sadasyon ne virodh kiya to fir use vaapas laaya gaya. -- anunaad Singh^vaarta 04:17, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

chaliye antat: aapne koi udahaaran to diya, iske liye dhanyavaad! sarvapratham aapke is udahaaran mein kitna khokhalaapan hai usi ko bataata hooain. hindu raashtravaad ko uchit kaaran ke saath viki niti ka paalan kar ke hataaya gaya tha aur mujh se pehle ye kaarya s:Mayur aur s:poornima varman bhi kramash: 2011 aur 2008 mein kar chuke the. aapne tab koi virodh naheen kiya? khair jo bhi ho. "sadasyon ne virodh kiya", kiske virodh ke baad main prushth ko vaapas laaya tha? aap apni taraf se kyon jhoothi kahaaniyaaain rach lete hain? prushth ka nirmaan 07:13, 15 March 2013,‎ ko maine pun: kiya tha, iske baad aapne 07:20, 15 March 2013, par lekh ke vaarta prushth par jis prakaar ka bhi ho apna "virodh" darj karavaaya tha, jiska maine uttar bhi diya tha aur chaupaal par lekh ki saamagri bhi upalabdh bhi karaai thi jise dekh kar koi moodh vyakti bhi bata dega ki saamagri poorn roop se ajnyaaanakosheeya thi. mujhe yahaaain yeh bataaeain ki kiske virodh ke baad main lekh ko vaapas laaya? kyonki lekh to kabhi vaapas laaya hi naheen gaya usaka to pun: nirmaan hua tha.

ab baat rahi gunavatta ki. mujhe aapke ek lekh mein gunavatta nazar naheen aati, aapke banaae sabhi prushth chaahe kitne bhi ullekhaneeya vishay par hon viki lekh-likhne ki shaili anusaar bahut bekaar hain. aapne sahi kaha "gunavatta-gunavatta" ki baate karne se gunavatta naheen aati "lekhon ke srujan" se aaegi, parantu aap to lekh hi aise banaate hain jo vikipeediya ka bojh badha rahe hain. aapke adhiktar lekh kam jaankaari vaale, bina kisi sandarbh ke, bina chitr ke, bina jnyaaanasandook ke, galat shreniyon vaale hote hain, is prakaar gunavatta naheen badhti balki isi vajah se din-pratidin ghatati chali ja rahi hai.

"paaainch sau par pahuaincha deinge", betuki baat. main din mein jyaadaatar vo lekh hataata hooain jo kisi doosare sadasya ne naamaankit kare hon aur baaki ke vo jin par meri haal hi mein hue parivartan mein najar padi ho. tab bhi bahut kam hi lekh hataae jaate hain. mainne bhala itni badi sankhya mein lekh kab hata diye? khair ab to aapki tarkaheen baate padhne ki aadat ho gayi hai.

"gunavatta bahut saari baaton par nirbhar hai", ab yeh to saaf hai ki aapko gunavatta ka arth hi naheen pata, shaayad yahi kaaran hai ki aapke lekhon ka yeh haal hai. jo "'seementareej', 'kone ke makaan' aadi par lekh banaaeain" gaye hain vo aapke lekhon se kaheen adhik gunavatta vaale hain. aap ullekhaneeyata aur gunavatta mein shaayad antar hi naheen samajhte. aur maine kitni baar kaha hai ki unhein hataane ke liye naamaankit karein fir main aapko bataata hooain ki kaise vo ullekhaneeya hain. ab to ise chunauti hi samajh leejiye.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 05:40, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

taang adaane ke liye ke liye maafi chaahata hoon.

• bill ji -praarthana hai ki Deletion keval aur keval tabhi ho, jab aur koi chaara na ho. taig laga kar chhodne ka vikalp rakhein. hindi viki mein abhi hai hi kya? yadi ham sahi mein iska vikaas chaahate hain to 10 lakh pej hone tak hamein bahut bahut sanyam rakhana hoga, bahut bahut galatiyon ko maaf karna hoga, bahut bahut training deni hogi. angreji viki ke mukaabale filhaal gunavatta mein bahut dheel deni hogi. ummeed rakhani hogi ki jab yogadaata adhik ho jaayeinke, to bhavishya mein gunavatta apne aap theek ho jaayegi. shaayad viki ki sthaapana va safalta ka yahi mool kaaran hai.
• anunaad ji - aap jitna achha yogadaan kar rahe hai use dekhkar, auron ka pata naheen, mai vihval ho utha hoon. apni urja ko sahi disha mein lagaae rakhein. paancho ungaliyaan ek si naheen hoti. harek ko hamse asahamat hone ka adhikaar hai. aap lekhan karte rahein, dhyaan usi taraf rakhein, meri vinti hai. hindi viki mein abhi hai hi kya? yadi ham sahi mein iska vikaas chaahate hain to 10 lakh pej hone tak hamein bahut bahut sanyam rakhana hoga, bahut bahut galatiyon ko maaf karna hoga.--manoj khuraana (vaarta) 08:20, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

manoj ji, main dileeshinisht naheen hooain aur koi prushth tabhi hataata hooain jab anya koi raasta hi na ho. maine sarvada hindi vikipeediya ki lekh hataane ki niti ka paalan kiya hai. niti viki ka ek prakaar ka kaanoon hai jo sabhi sadasyon par samaan roop se laagoo hota hai. main kabhi kam gunavatta vaale prushth naheen hataata apitu bekaar se bekaar svaroop wala lekh bhi agar ullekhaneeya vishay par bana hua hai tab bhi use naheen hataata, hata bhi naheen sakta kyonki aisi koi niti hi naheen hai. parantu iska yeh arth naheen ki main anunaad ji ki tarah in gunavattaaheen prushthon se prem karne lagooain. main sabhi ko achhi gunavatta vaale lekh banaane ki salaah deta hooain aur swayam bhi aise prushth banaane ka prayaas karta hooain parantu koi jor-jabaradasti naheen karta. har koi sadasya svatantr hai vah kaise lekh banaana chaahata hai. aap nae hain isliye shaayad is baat se parichit naheen hain ki hindi viki par sakriya sadasyon ki sankhya kam hoti ja rahi hai isliye yeh aasha karna ki "jab yogadaata adhik ho [jaaeainge], to bhavishya mein gunavatta apne aap theek ho jaayegi" mujh to taarkik vichaar naheen lagta. aapko ek udahaaran de kar samajhaata hooain, viki par pichhle chhah varshon se takhana naam ka lekh hai iska nirmaan sadasya:aravindan ne 26 January 2007‎ ko kiya tha. unhonne bhi anunaad ji aur aapki tarah socha hoga ki "bhavishya mein gunavatta apne aap theek ho jaayegi" aaj 31 August 2013 hai matlab chhah varsh se adhik samay beet chuka hai, jeetne sakriya sadasya aaj hain us se kaheen adhik 2007 mein the. to mujhe aap bataaeain ki vah "bhavishya" kab aaega jab is lekh ki "gunavatta apne aap theek ho jaayegi"?<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 15:29, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

bill ji, ye kya ghamaasaan macha rakha hai main samajh naheen pa raha hooain. anunaad ji ne mohan laal sukhaadiya vishvavidyaalaya naamak prushth ki jaankaari maaaingi thi jo aapke hi shabdon mein koi bhi sadasya maang sakta hai. aapse main yeh aasha naheen karta. aap ek prabandhak hote hue anunaad ji jaise varishth sadasya par vyaktigat aakshep tak utar aaye ho. aap uparokt charcha ko ek nishpaksh vyakti bankar padhne ka prayaas kareinge to aapko swayam iska aihasaas ho jaayega. aapse mera ek anurodh bhi hai, yadi bhavishya mein aisa koi prushth hataana pade jo kisi vishvavidyaalaya par bana ho athva sudhaara ja sakta ho to mujhe uske baare mein likhein. main us prushth ko sudhaarane ka kaarya karunga. chooainki yeh kaarya ek aadmi ke vash ki baat naheen hai. main sabhi aadhaar prushthon ko uthaakar naheen sudhaar sakta lekin booaind-booaind se ghada bharta hai. kai-kai baar aadhaar prushth bhi lekh banaane mein bahut sahaayata karte hain. aapko jaankaari ke liye bata dena chaahooainga ki prushthon ki kami ki vajh se 2010 ki Bollywood filmein, 2011 ki Bollywood filmein, 2012 ki Bollywood filmein evam 2013 ki Bollywood filmein naamak prushth abhi adhure pade hain. yadi inmein prayukt sabhi kalaakaaron ke naam se yadi aadhaar prushth bhi hote to main kab ka hi in prushthon ko poorn kar chuka hota. at: krupaya kisi bhi prakaar ke duraagrah ki bhaavana ko tyaagakar krupaya svachh evam sankhya mein adhik prushth nirmaan par jor dein.

manoj ji, aap abhi prushth hataane ki neeti se avagat naheen ho at: aap samasya ko theek se samajh naheen pa rahe ho.

anunaad ji, aap se mera nivedan hai ki {{hahech lekh}} se naamaankit prushthon par bhi apni pratikriya dein. vo prushth is tarah ki adharajhool mein latake hue hain jinhein kabhi bhi hataaya ja sakta hai. iske liye krupaya shreni:prushth hataane hetu vartamaan charchaaeain dekhein. August maah mein naamaankit prushthon ki soochi ke liye krupaya shreni:August 2013 ki prushth hataane hetu charchaaeain dekhein.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (baatein) 20:30, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

sanjeev ji, jaankaari maaaingana aur kisi ke kaarya par sandeh karna do alag baate hain. aapne bhi mujh se ek baar prushth ki saamagri maaaingi thi tab bhi maine yeh kaha tha ki mujhe saamagri upalabdh karaane mein koi dikkat naheen hai parantu anunaad ji ka anurodh aapke anurodh ki tarah naheen tha. maine saaf-saaf kaaran likha tha "sampoornataya arthaheen saamagri" aur saaraansh mein saamagri dikh rahi thi "mjkk,h',;gk.tfylkltfyl....", koi bhi is saaraansh ko dekh kar bata sakta hai ki prushth mein nirrthak akshar the, parantu ise dekhne ke pashchaat bhi anunaad ji ne prushth ki saamagri maaaingi. yahaaain tak bhi koi samasya naheen thi. iske baad ve poochhate hain ki "kya kul saamagri itni hi thi ya kuchh aur (jaise aadha panna)?" ab iska arth kya niklata hai? main kya prushth ki baaki saamagri chhipa raha tha? ya fir main itna murkh hooain ki mujhe pata hi naheen ki saamagri upalabdh karaane ka arth kya hota hai. keval yeh prakaran hi naheen anunaad ji ke aise vyavahaar ka main kai baar saamana kar chuka hooain, pehle ve mujh par nasleeya hamle karte the, apamaanajanak tippaniyaaain karte the, parantu bardaasht ki bhi ek had hoti hai. unhonne kai baar mere kaarya par prashnachinh lagaae hain jismein koi buraai main naheen maanata parantu bina kisi thos tathya ke balki tathyon ko apni suvidha anusaar tod-marod kar pesh kar ke aarop lagaana kaha tak nyaayasangat hai? naveenatam udahaaran hi dekhein hindu raashtravaad lekh ka jo bhi vivaad tha use anunaad ji ne kaise pesh kiya hai. maine inse na jaane kitni baar kaha hai ki niti ka paalan na karte hue agar maine koi prushth hataaya ho to bataaeain. agar inhein hindi viki ki neetiyon se hi parahej hai to charcha dvaara mataikya banaaeain aur un neetiyon ko badal dein. har prabandhak ka daayitv hota hai ki vikipeediya ki neetiyon evam dishaanirdeshon ka upayukt roop se paalan ho. agar main yeh kaarya karta hooain to ismein main kaha galat hooain?<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 21:54, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

is charcha ka ant kiya jaaye

bill ji yeh baat theek hai ki aapne kaaran likha tha aur anunaad ji ne shaayad use naheen padha. lekin shaayad aapko kaaran mein likhi poorn jaankaari dikhaai deti hogi lekin main aapko is baat se bhi avagat karavaana chaahuainga ki kai baar lamba kaaran hone par mujhe aadha kaaran dikhaai deta hai aur uske aage "..." aa jaata hai. is avastha mein anunaad ji ne aapse yeh jaankaari maaaingi thi ki prushth mein "mjkk,h',;gk.tfylkltfyl...." ke alaava aur kuchh bhi tha athva naheen. beshak aapne iska uttar diya lekin uttar ka lahaja kuchh theek naheen tha. iske baad jo hua uske liye aap dono log jimmedaar ho kyonki aap donon viki ke sher ho jismein ek adhikaaron ke bal par baat karta hai to doosra apne yogadaanon ke aadhaar par (yadi is vaakya mein kisi ko bhaavanaatmak roop se aaghaat pahuainche to main kshama chaahata hooain.). yahi kaaran hai ki mainne mere pichhle uttar mein aap donon logon ke liye kuchh kathan likhe the. aage aap logon ki marji.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (baatein) 05:36, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi, Bill!

Are you interested in starting a Hindi stub on en:Indians in Kenya?

Thanks WhisperToMe (vaarta) 14:47, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Another idea is en:Nissin Foods - I found it has a website for its Indian customers at http://www.topramen.in/ - Thanks WhisperToMe (vaarta) 06:13, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Y Done: en:Indians in Kenya ⇔ keeniyaai bhaarateeya, I've nominated it for DYK also :)<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 05:16, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Thank you! Are you interested in doing Nissin Foods or do you want me to give it to someone else to do? WhisperToMe (vaarta) 22:49, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

I'll do it, just busy with some other stuff.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 15:44, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Y Done: nissin foods.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 07:44, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

priya bill kaumpatan ji! krupaya is sootr ko dekhne ka kasht karein. chooainki mujhe angreji vikeepeediya par kuchh logon ne mere vaare mein prashaasakon ko digbhramit karke anishchit kaal ke liye block karva rakha hai. kya aap mere baare mein kuchh vishvasaneeya jaankaari dete hue apni tippani is sootr ke neeche de sakte hain jisse un logon ki samajh mein aaye ki main vikeepeediya par dil se yogadaan dena chaahata hooain ve mere maarg ke avarodh hataane mein mera samuchit maargadarshan karein. mujhe gat varsh June mein block kiya gaya tha. mainne anablauk ke liye nivedan kiya to use mana kar diya gaya. mera kasoor yeh tha ki mainne laala hanumant sahaaya par angeji mein lekh bana diya tha jiska sandarbh aapko uparokt sootr mein mil jaayega. meri computer ke baare mein bahut kam jaankaari ke kaaran mujhe in logon ne bahut jyaada tang kiya hai. ek avadhesh paandeya naam ka yuvak kabhi-kabhaar aakar meri sahaayata kar deta tha. use jabase hindi vikeepeediya se anishchit kaal ke liye block kiya gaya ab vah bhi koi sahaayata naheen kar paata. jabki ye log aapas mein ek doosare ka samarthan karke pehle vikeepeediya par prabandhakeeya adhikaar praapt kar lete hain fir jis kisi naye sadasya ko dekhte hain use tang karke bhaga dete hain. isse viki samudaaya ka bhala naheen ho paata aur inki daadaageeri chalti rahati hai. mainne aaj tak samarpan bhaav se hi kaam kiya hai. aap dekhiyega yadi kuchh ho sake. namaskaar! dau0'kraant'ema0ela0varma (vaarta) 08:06, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

bill ji, kai bhaarateet bhaasha vikipeediyaaon par vikipriyojana:leelaavati ki betiyaaain sakriya roop se chal rahi hai aur kai sadasya jor-shor se yogadaan kar rahe hain. is silsile mein hindi vikipeediya par bhi ek vikipriyojana prushth maujood hai. aapse nivedan hai ki is vikipriyojana mein aap jo bhi yogadaan kar sakte hain, keejiye taaki vigyaan ke kshetr mein prasiddh Bhaarat ki suputriyon ko hamaari jnyaaanakosh mein sahi sthaan mile. yadi aap vyast hon, to krupaya yeh sandesh is vishay mein ruchi rakhane vaale sadasya tak yeh sandesh tak pahuaincha deejiye. dhanyavaad. Hindustanilanguage (vaarta) 08:09, 31 August 2013 (UTC).

mera E-mel hai: E-mel aaidi hataai krupaya ise not kar mita dein.--aasheesh bhatanaagar^vaarta 05:44, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

aasheesh ji, mere paas aapki yeh E-mel aaidi pehle se hi hai. E-mel ke dvaara jo aakhiri charcha humne ki thi usamein mere riplaai ke baad aapko meri aaidi bhi mil gayi hogi.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 05:58, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

mainne abhi abhi saaaincha:Jammu evam Kashmir ki jalaraashiyaaain saancha banaaya hai. kisi baut ya anya tareeke se ise ismein aane vaale lagbhag sabhi lekhon mein lagaana hai. koi tareeka hai ki ye kaam automated ho jaaye. sambhav ho to bataayein ya kar hi dein.--aasheesh bhatanaagar^vaarta 06:14, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

yeh kaarya to keval koi baut hi kar sakta hai ya otoviki braaujr dvaara ise kiya ja sakta hai. maine otoviki abhi computer mein se hata rakha hai, iska mukhyat: main angreji viki par istemaal karta tha. main siddhaarth ko soochit kar deta hooain unke paas baut anumati hai.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 06:25, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

mujhe to baut ka prayog kiye jmaane ho gaye. itne samay mein takaneeki badlaav bhi bahut hue hain aur main kaafi kuchh bhool bhi gaya hooain.

jab mainne baut script daaunalod ki thi tab meediyaaviki 1.17 tha, jo ab 1.22 pahuainch gaya hai. main naheen jaanta ki in badlaavon se script ke behaviour mein kya parivartan aaega. nai script daaunalod karne mein mujhe kuchh samay lagega.

iske atirikt mainne mukhyat: shreniyon sambandhit baut kaarya kiya tha, prushthon mein paath badalne ka kaarya kabhi naheen kiya. vo bhi seekhana padega.

nishkarshat: mujhe is kaam mein andaajn ek-do hafte lag sakte hain. agar aapko usase jaldi kaarya karne ka koi tareeka mil jaae to ati-uttam, naheen to tab tak to main kar hi dooainga.--siddhaarth ghai (vaarta) 11:17, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Y poorn hua.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 05:25, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

namaskaar bill ji, chooki aap hindi vikipeediya par prabandhak hai iseeliye main aapka dhyaan is or kheech chaahata hooain. Bhaarat ke kendrashaasit pradesh paundicheri ka naam puduchcheri ho chuka hai, parantu hindi vikipeediya abhi bhi is puraane naam ko dho raha hai. at: aapse nivedan hai ki is prushth ka naam badalkar puduchcheri kar de. ummeed hai aap is baare mein jald kuchh na kuchh kareinge. dhanyavaad! --prateek maalaveeya (vaarta) 07:25, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

prateek ji, maine lekh ke vaarta prushth par prastaav rakh diya hai, krupaya vahaaain apna samarthan darj karaaeain. dhanyavaad.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 07:46, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

samarthan darj karaane ke liye dhanyavaad! mainne bhi apna samarthan darj kara diya hai. main ek naya vikipeedeeyan hooain isliye aap mujhe baataaye aage ki kaaryavaahi kya hogi?--prateek maalaveeya (vaarta) 08:00, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

aap chinta na karein prateek ji. ab naamaankan ke ek hafte baad main lekh ko puduchcheri par sthaantarit kar dooainga.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 16:58, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Y poorn hua<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 20:10, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Are you interested in starting stubs on the following?

• en:Expulsion of Asians from Uganda (on expulsion of India-Pakistan-origin Ugandans)
• en:Mahatma Gandhi District, Houston
• en:Charas (film)

Thanks WhisperToMe (vaarta) 22:50, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Y Done en:Charas (film) → charas (film).<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 04:59, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for doing Charas! Do you have plans to do the expulsion from Uganda or the Gandhi District? WhisperToMe (vaarta) 02:29, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

I have some other commitments at the moment, so it may take a little while, but they are on my "to-do" list.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 03:24, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

That's fine. Thanks in advance :) WhisperToMe (vaarta) 19:38, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Y Done both. You're welcome.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 18:26, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

namaste bill ji, mainne aaj dekha ki raajeevamaas ji ne 24 January 2008 ko karpoor chandr kulish ko hata diya. karpoor chandr kulish vo vyakti tha jisne hindi patrakaarita mein ek bada naam kiya hai. main us lekh ko pun: sthaapit karavaana chaahuainga. yadi usamein kaupeeraait jaisi koi samasya naheen hai athva arthaheen lekh na raha ho to krupaya use pun: sthaapit kar dijiye jisse puraane prushth ka hi pun: sudhaara ja sake.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (baatein) 23:22, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Y poorn hua. main vishay ke baare mein kuchh jaanta to naheen parantu agar aapko lage ki kaheen main kaam aa sakta hooain to krupaya mujhe bhi prushth ko naya roop dene ka avsar dein :)<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 13:25, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

dhanyavaad bill ji. main abhi prushth par kaam karunga.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (baatein) 13:27, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

bill kaumpatan ji! mainne uparokt lekh mein aaj hi sanjeev Kumar ke paraamarshaanusaar angreji vikeepeediya sambandhi anubhaag (sandarbh va inhein bhi dekhein) hata diye hain. parantu ek anurodh aapse hai kyonki ise aap hi theek kar sakte hain. mainne is lekh mein infobauks motorcycle angreji vikeepeediya se import karke va uske andar ke sabhi pairaameetars, jo keval jaava se hi sambandhit hain, hindi mein svat:anoodit karke daalne ka prayaas kiya jismein main kaamayaab naheen ho paaya. kya aap is saaainche ko aikteevet karne mein kuchh sahaayata kar sakeinge? dau0'kraant'ema0ela0varma (vaarta) 08:32, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Y poorn hua. kraant ji, maine upayukt jnyaaanasandook ko yahaaain aayaat kar diya hai.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 14:30, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

bill ji, hindi vikipeediya par aapne jo seva ki hai, usaki jitni prashanasa ki jaae kam hai. iske saath-saath aapne kai doosari vikipriyojanaaon par bhi yogadaan diya hai. ise dekhte hue mujhe lagta hai ki aap jaise mahaan yogadaanakarta ka intaravyoo avashya roop se liya jaana chaahiye aur use ya to kisi hindi / angreji jaalasthal par ya fir kisi samaachaarapatr mein chhaapana chaahiye taaki ye doosare yogadaanakartaaon ko prerit kare. yadi aapki anumati ho to sambhavat: ham ye kaam agale sapataah skaaip ya ji-tauk ke maadhyam se kar sakte hain.

aapki jaankaari ke liye main bataana chaahooainga ki mainne Internet par kuchh lekh likhe hain jo is tarah hain:

• moraaraji Desai
• muskura ke kehna (kavita ya ise aap jo bhi samajhein)
• turk bhaashaaon aur urdoo ki samaanataaeain

aasha karta hooain ki aapka uttar sakaaraatmak hoga aur ham yeh shubh kaam jald hi kar sakeinge. Hindustanilanguage (vaarta) 11:47, 11 September 2013 (UTC).

mujmmil ji, aapke is sandesh ke liye dhanyavaad parantu krupaya mere naam ke saath "mahaan" jaise shabd ka istemaal na karein. main vikipeediya par kisi ko mahaan ya uchch naheen maanata; meri nazar mein har sadasya baraabar hai isliye main bhi yeh apeksha rakhata hooain ki koi mujhe koi mahaan na samajhe. mera ek hi uddeshya hai: vikipeediya aandolan ko apna nisvaarth yogadaan dena hai.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 13:20, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

namaste bill ji, aasheesh ji ke liye hue prashaasak pad ke chunaaon ko ek maah ka samay vyateet ho chuka hai. kya aap us parinaam ko metaaviki par le jaana pasand karoge?☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 15:12, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

namaste sanjeev ji, aasheesh ji ne bahut pehle hi anurodh kar diya tha jo abhi stuard ki sameeksha ke antargat hai.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 16:54, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

bill ji jaankaari ke liye dhanyavaad, mujhe is baat ka gyaan naheen tha.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 17:46, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

i have found many pages specially pages related to countries, which lack updates in important sections like prime minster, president, population, GDP and in pages related to sports where squad list is not updated, over all most of the pages i have seen related to countries lack updates, one such page is United Kingdom here you can find all the above mentioned points. I hope some 1 is looking into this matter, if no 1 then this matter has to be resolved because it concerns the quality of the page. Sushilmishra (vaarta) 23:31, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

I can understand your frustration, but there is no one "looking into this matter". We don't have many editors who are keen to do this sort of work. Building Wikipedia is a collaborative process. No one editor can write the whole encyclopaedia alone, but if you find something wrong, please feel free to correct it.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 03:43, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

He can contact Wikidata about this. Perhaps Wikidata can set up a system that can be updated across *all* Wikipedias. WhisperToMe (vaarta) 19:44, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

How do you say "Demonstrations and protests against the Delhi gang rape case" and "Demonstrations and protests against the Delhi gang rape case in Delhi‎" in Hindi? I want to add Hindi to the Commons categories. Thanks WhisperToMe (vaarta) 19:40, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

"Demonstrations and protests against the Delhi gang rape case" → Delhi saamoohik balaatkaar ke virooddh pradarshan aur virodh

"Demonstrations and protests against the Delhi gang rape case in Delhi" → Delhi mein Delhi saamoohik balaatkaar ke virooddh pradarshan aur virodh.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 20:41, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Thank you! WhisperToMe (vaarta) 23:11, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

	ashok chakr
	hindi diwas ke upalakshya mein ek hindi premi ki or se- hindi vikipeediya mein ullekhaneeya yogadaan ke liye vishesh sammaan. manoj khuraana (vaarta) 05:14, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

aapko bhi hindi diwas ki haardik subhakaamanaaeain manoj ji.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 06:54, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

bill ji aap {{jaat gotr}} mein diye gaye prushthon mein sudhaar kar rahe ho iske liye aapka svaagat hai. lekin yadi yeh kaarya roboteeya paddhati se ho raha hai to theek hai anyatha yahaaain jyaada samay na dein kyon ki unamein abhi main aur bhi sudhaar karunga jaise: bijaaraniya ko kuchh log vijaaraniya bhi likhte hain. is tarah se kuchh gotr to aise hain jinke 5-6 bhinn roop prachalit hain. at: samay vyarth na jaaye!☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 14:34, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

sanjeev ji, main bas aapki thodi madad karna chaahata tha. prakriya arddh-svachaalit hai isliye mera ismein koi vishesh samay naheen lag raha. agar aapko bhavishya mein aisa koi shramasaadhya doharaavadaar kaarya karavaana ho to mujhe bataaeain. aapke kisi kaam aakar mujhe haardik prasannata hogi!<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 14:49, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

dhanyavaad bill ji.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 15:33, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

bill ji, kuchh din poorv mainne aapse chitr:Atul Gurtu.png ke sandarbh mein jaankaari maangi thi. aapne salaah di thi ki main ise kaumans par upload kar dooain. aaj mainne mere mobile camere se atul ji ka ek chitr le liya hai aur main chaahata hooain ki kaumans par ise laga dooain. at: mujhe lagta hai ki uparokt chitr ki ab koi aavashyakta naheen hai. chooainki uparokt chitr ko kaumans par lagaaunga to vahaaain saikadon nakhare karte hain at: main keval mere dvaara banaaye hue athva mere haathon se liye gaye chitr hi vahaaain lagaana pasand karunga. at: mujhe lagta hai uparokt chitr ko hataaya ja sakta hai. aapka kya vichaar hai?☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 08:30, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

sanjeev ji, charchaaon ko theek prakaar se track karne ke liye main charcha anusaar anubhaag alag-alag rakhata hooain.

mujhe itna to yaad hai ki chitr ke baare mein maine aapko yeh salaah di thi parantu mujhe poora prakaran theek se yaad naheen. aap thoda prakaash daaleinge? vaise kya yeh chitr aapne swayam liya tha? agar aisa hai to main aapko shreya dete hue swayam kaumans par ise upload kar dooainga. unke nakhare mujhe pata hain aur kisi bhi prakaar ke vaad-vivaad se nipatne ki jimmedaari main leta hooain.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 18:53, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

pura prakaran yeh hai ki kuchh maah poorv mainne atul gurtu ke do chitr upload kiye the, jinmein se ek mainne keval hindi viki par upload kiya jis par ham charcha kar rahe hain aur doosra kaumans par. ye chitr mainne unke pikaasa ailabam se liye the jahaaain par mainne imel se anumati maaaingi thi aur unhonne anumati sahit pure pikaasa ailabam ka parichay de diya. kuchh din baad kaumans par mujhe kaha gaya ki mainne yahaaain srot theek se naheen diya to mainne srot de diya. is par kuchh charcha bhi hui jo aap mere vaarta prushth par dekh sakte ho. mainne atul ji ko kehkar is chitr ka license maaainga aur unhonne dono chitron ke sambandh mein jo jaankaari maangi vo de di. unhonne ek imel mein jo mujhe bhi CC kiya tha mein likha ki in donon chitron ka poorn license jaisa main athva vikipeediya chaahe vaisa vo de rahe hain. fir chitr par imel praapt hone ka taig laga diya. lekin atul ji ke paas imel lagaataar jaati rahi. unhonne imel likhkar mujhe puchha ki yeh kya pareshaani hai? to mainne kaha aapne jitna kiya vo theek hai baaki main dekh lunga. iske baad 14 sitmbar 2013 ko mujhe JuTa ka ek sandesh mila jismein is file ke pun: hataane ke liye charcha par vichaar kiya jaana tha. aakhir mainne bhi tang aakar kaha theek hai hata do. sanyogavash kal (17 sitmbar ko) atul ji mere sansthaan mein aaye hue the aur meri unase mulaakaat ho gayi. mainne unase turant hi unka ek chitr kheenchne ka aagrah kiya. unhonne saharsh mera aagrah sveekaar kar liya. is prakaar ab mere paas mere svayn ke kaupeeraait ki tasveer aa gayi jise main vikipeediya par kaam mein le sakta hooain. yadi uparokt chitr ko kaumans par bheja jaata hai to fir vo hi laaisens ka utapataang chakr hoga jo keval chidchidaahat ke kuchh naheen deta. is prakaar main soch raha hooain ki is chitr ko apne yahaaain se bhi hata diya jaaye to achha hai aur fir mere paas jo naya chitr hai use kaumans par upload kar deta hooain jisse chitr par kisi ko koi aapati naheen hogi. yadi abhi bhi koi baat samajh na aayi ho to mujhe bataayein. main is sambandh mein aapki athva siddhaarth ji ka mat jaanana chaahata hooain. chooainki vo shaayad chhuti par hain athva kaheen aur vyast hain at: aap apni rai vyakt kareinge to vah sahaayak hogi.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 21:30, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

main aapki hataasha samajh gaya. durbhaagyavash kuchh kaaranon se angreji vikipeediya aur kaumans par naukarashaahi bahut adhik hai isliye kai sadasyon ne in pariyojanaaon se muh tak mod liya hai. galati kaumans vaalo ki bhi poori tarah naheen hai, vikimeediya ko itni baar adaalat mein chitron ke kaupeeraait ke kaaran ghaseeta gaya hai ki vo ab fooaink-fooaink kar chalte hain. is kaaranavash jab koi apna chitr daan karna chaahata hai to us se spasht laaiseins kathan maaaingate hain. achha yeh rahata hai ki jisne daan karne vaale se aagrah kiya ho vo hi daanakartta ko laaiseins ktthan E-mel kar de. yahaaain fir sabse theek rahata hai ki vah is prushth ki kadi use de taaki daanakartta swayam javaab de paae. khair abhi ke liye to aap apne dvaara li gayi tasveer hi upload kar dein. main isko yahaaain se hata deta hooain.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 04:30, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

atul ji ne bhi yeh kaarya hi kiya tha. mujhe iska isliye pata hai kyonki unhonne mujhe CC kiya tha. jo bhi ho, jab aap yeh chitr hata deinge to main kaumans par naya chitr upload kar dunga.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 04:49, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

kaarya poorn.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 15:20, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

bill ji, mainne saaaincha vaarta:mukhaprushth samaachaar par kal ek samaachaar likha tha lekin lagta hai aap use dekhna bhool gaye. isliye main aapko dhyaan dila raha hooain ki krupaya aap dekhein aur usaka adyatan kare. --prateek maalaveeya (vaarta) 10:28, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

bill ji, krupaya is pej ko ardh surakshit kar de. kaaran- atyadhik samvedansheel mudda.--prateek maalaveeya (vaarta) 11:13, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

vaise prateek ji yahaaain mudda samvedansheel hona shaayad kaaran naheen ho sakta lekin vartamaan sthiti mein bahut avaanchhit sampaadan hone ki sambhaavana aise prushthon par rahati hai at: inhein aaipi se surakshit karna thoda achha rahata hai.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 11:18, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

to theek hai ise aaipi dvaara hi surakshit kar diya jaaya aur keval Auto confirmed users hi iska sanpaadan kar sake.--prateek maalaveeya (vaarta) 11:28, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

prateek ji, yeh galat avadhaarana hai ki aaipi hamesha barbata karte hain. dhyaan rakhein un aaipi paton ke peechhe aap aur mere jaise sampaadak ya fir ham se bhi jyaada anubhavi baithe hain. vikipeediya par aapko yeh maanana chaahiye ki doosra sampaadak viki ke vikaas ke liye kaarya karna chaahata hai. jab tak koi barbata hui hi naheen to prushth surakshit karne ka auchitya naheen banta. pehle se hi surakshit saamaanyat: ati mahatvapoorn saaaincho ya anya prushthon ko kiya jaata hai jinka prabhaav kai prushthon par dikhta hai aur aam sadasya ya aaipi un prushthon ka sanpaadan naheen kareinge. aap is lekh ko apni dhyaanasoochi mein daalein, maine bhi daal liya hai, agar koi barbata hoti hai to use poorvavat kiya ja sakta hai va agar do-teen baar se adhik koi ismein galat saamagri daalata hai to fir ise main swayam surakshit kar dooainga. parantu bhavishya mein hone waali ghatnaaon ki aashankaaon se ham nae sadasyon ko vikipeediya par sanpaadan karne se naheen rok sakte. vikipeediya ka mool mantra to aapko pata hi hoga: vikipeediya, ek mukt jnyaaanakosh jiska koi bhi sanpaadan kar sakta hai. ham bhi pehle aaipi ban kar yahaaain sanpaadan karne aae the (kam se kam main to aaya tha) sochiye agar jin prushthon ko main ya aap aaipi ke roop mein sanpaadan karte aur vo surakshit hote to kya ham yahaaain khaata banaate? aise nae sadasya hatotsaahit hote hain. aapko prushth ki chinta karne ki koi aavashyakta naheen hai main iski jimmedaari leta hooain.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 04:55, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

bill ji, mainne yeh prastaav isliye rakha tha kyoki iska angreji prushth bhi semi-protected hai. aap ki tarah mainne bhi pehla sanpaadan aaipi se hi kiya tha. yadi aap yeh kah rahe hai to theek hai. jimmedaari lene ke liye dhanyavaad! --prateek maalaveeya (vaarta) 09:59, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

prateek ji, angreji viki par ise barbata hone ke pashchaat ardh-surakshit kiya gaya tha. aap prushth ka itihaas dekheinge to paaeainge ki 9 sitmbar 2013 ko chaar-paaainch baar avaanchhit saamagri prushth mein daali gayi thi, in sanpaadanon ko kai baar poorvavat bhi kiya gaya parantu ant mein majabooran ise sadasya Ged UK dvaara surakshit karavaaya gaya. hamaare yahaaain bhi aisi koi paristithi banti hai to mera bhi yahi kadam hoga. meri baat samajhne ke liye dhanyavaad.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 16:59, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Dear Bill ji, please help in transferring this image to commons or hindi wiki. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bhai_Mati_Das.jpg Thanks. --manoj khuraana (vaarta) 13:55, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Y poorn hua.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 17:19, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

haardik dhanyavaad. --manoj khuraana (vaarta) 05:13, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

kuchh din pehle pandit shri Ram sharma aachaarya ke naam se ek pej mitaaya gaya tha (naya va khaali pej tha). ve ek ullekhaneeya vyakti hain jinhonne kai praacheen granthon ke hindi anuvaad kiye hain aur darjanon pustakein likhi hain. at: krupaya is pej ko vaapas laane ka kasht karein. dhanyavaad. --manoj khuraana (vaarta) 07:13, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

manoj ji, krupaya lekh ki laal kadi muhaiya karaaeain jismein hataae jaane ka laug bhi drushyamaan ho chooainki pandit shri Ram sharma aachaarya hataae gaye lekh ka naam naheen hai isliye bina theek naam ke vaapas bhi naheen laaya ja sakta.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 17:05, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

07:33, 18 September 2013 Bill william compton (charcha | yogadaan) ne prushth -pan. shreeraam sharma aachaarya hata diya (poornatay: ajnyaaanakosheeya saamagri)

manoj ji, main lekh to vaapas la deta hooain parantu jab maine spasht kaaran diya hai ki lekh ki "ajnyaaanakosheeya saamagri" hai to aap isse kya apeksha rakhate hain?<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 06:57, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

bill ji, jahaan tak mujhe yaad hai, shaayad is pej par lekhak ne apna naam likh kar chhod diya tha. sambhav hai ki vah is par bhavishya mein kaam karna chaahate hon. abhi jo thodi bahut jaankaari mere paas hai, vah main is pej par daal doonga. --manoj khuraana (vaarta) 07:34, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

manoj ji, is avastha mein mujhe lagta hai aapko prushth ka shoonya se kaarya karna hai aur puraane prushth ko pun: sthaapit karne ki aavashyakta naheen hai. vaise bhi kisi prushth ke itihaas mein dekhein aur usaki shuruaat mein mile ki vah keval sadasya ne apna naam likhkar aarambh kiya tha to ek achha sanket naheen hoga. aage aapki aur bill ji ki marji.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 10:52, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

vyavadhaan ke liye kshama chaahooainga. shreeraam sharma prushth pehle se maujood hai. sarokaar rakhane vaale sadasya krupaya vaheen yogadaan dein. dhanyavaad. -- ajeet Kumar tivaari ^vaarta 11:55, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

OK. --210.56.121.111 (vaarta) 13:28, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Could you test the shortUrl UI gadget (its the last gadget in the list)? Its for testing a gerrit patch which is stuck due to the developer being busy and unable to properly test it. Any suggestions for it are welcome. Regards--siddhaarth ghai (vaarta) 13:21, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Assuming every Internet user knows that you can get copy link address option by a right-click, it works fine. But the link in upakaran is not visible in cologne blue skin.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 12:22, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Uh, the sidebar thingy is not from the gadget, but from the extension. All the gadget does is to change the visible shorturl under the title into a tooltip. So what needs to be tested is whether the tooltip works the same across browsers, and whether any changes can be made to the tooltip UI to improve it. Thanks for the help. :) --siddhaarth ghai (vaarta) 19:26, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

namaste bill ji, main Oxford naamak prushth ko dekh raha tha aur yeh dekhkar aashcharya hua ki prushth mein kuchh bhi naheen likha hua. lekin jab sampaadan karne laga to pata chala ki prushth mein bahut kuchh likha hai jo Comment-out bhi naheen kiya hua. fir prushth mein dikhaai kyon naheen de raha? yeh keval mere computer par hi ho raha hai ya sabke saath yahi haal hai?☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 11:21, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

namaskaar sanjeev ji, samasya keval aapke computer tak seemit naheen thi apitu {{convert}} saaainche mein truti ke kaaran saamagri sabhi ko prushth se adrushya prateet ho rahi thi. maine prushth mein uchit badlaav kar diya hai tatha {{convert}} ko main baad mein theek kar dooainga. soochit karne ke liye aapka dhanyavaad.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 12:31, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

dhanyavaad.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 13:02, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Bill, regarding the convert template (and ank parivartan template), you should have a look at sadasya:Johnuniq/number (and the associated pages linked there). This (english wikipedia) user has been very kindly helping me over the past month or so to Lua'fy the numeral conversion template, and he's also willing to help fix the convert template. I think you could help him out from the hi-wp end whenever I'm not around. Regards--siddhaarth ghai (vaarta) 19:30, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

krupaya nimnalikhit photo kaamans par transfer karne ka kasht karein- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hemant_Karkare.jpg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:VijaySalaskar.jpg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Sandeep_Unnikrishnan.jpg yadi tareeka samjha dein to koshish karoonga ki main swayam hi kar loon.--manoj khuraana (vaarta) 11:26, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

namaste manoj ji, deri se uttar dene ke liye kshama maaaingata hooain. aisa koi shaurtakat naheen hai, aapko swayam yeh kaarya karna hota hai. ismein is baat ka bhi dhyaan rakhana hota hai ki laug, laaisains, mool srot, aadi bhi kaumans par jaane chaahiye.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 05:04, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

namaskaar, Bill william compton ji. aapke liye vikipeediya:prushth aayaat ke liye anurodh#en:Chandra_taal ka chandrataal par aayaat par ek sandesh hai.
aap is soochana ko kisi bhi samay mita sakte hai, iske liye vaarta sanpaadan mein jaakar {{sandesh}} mitaaeain.

--manoj khuraana (vaarta) 10:58, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Bill,

Are you interested in starting:

• en:Air India Flight 101
• en:Air India Flight 245

Both are Air India flights which crashed in France.

If you are interested in additional articles:

• en:Air India Flight 855
• en:1947 Korangi Creek crash
• en:Kashmir Princess

Thank you WhisperToMe (vaarta) 18:25, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

namaskaar, Bill william compton ji. aapke liye sanjeev Kumar ke vaarta prushth par ek sandesh hai.
aap is soochana ko kisi bhi samay mita sakte hai, iske liye vaarta sanpaadan mein jaakar {{sandesh}} mitaaeain.

☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 09:10, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

bill kaumpatan ji! mainne aaj hi uparokt prushth ka nirmaan kiya. iske peechhe kaaran tha George Washington naam ka ek lekh jismein Amreeki kraanti shabd laal rang mein dikhaayi de raha tha. angreji vikeepeediya se khoja to timeline of amareekan rivolooshan lekh mil gaya. usi ke aadhaar par mainne ise bana diya. baad mein hindi vikeepeediya par ise pun: sampaadan karne ke liye sarch kiya to ameriki kraanti ke naam se ek doosra prushth mila. vaise to mainne us par vilay karne ki chippi laga di hai aur main yeh kaarya swayam bhi kar sakta hooain parantu aapse charcha karni aavashyak thi so yahaaain par nivedan kar diya hai. kya aap is disha mein kuchh maargadarshan kareinge? dau0'kraant'ema0ela0varma (vaarta) 14:55, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

kraant ji, bajaae vilay karne ke ek raasta yeh ho sakta hai ki angreji viki ki tarj par ameriki kraanti ki samayarekha lekh banaaya jaae va usaki bhoomika mein Amreeki kraanti lekh ki saamagri jod di jaae. iske pashchaat Amreeki kraanti ko ameriki kraanti par anupreshit kar diya jaae kyonki baad wala puraana aur vartani anusaar bhi theek hai (Amreeki se jyaada ameriki dhvanyaatmak roop se theek hai). agar aapki aajnyaa ho to main yeh saara kaarya kar deta hooain.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 15:24, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

bill ji! yeh raasta theek hai. kintu mere vichaar se naye lekh ka sheershak ameriki kraanti ka itihaas dena jyaada upayukt rahega. baad mein Amreeki kraanti ki saamagri ko is lekh mein vilay karna adhik tark sangat rahega. isse anya bhaasha ki vikiyon se iska sambandh bhi jyon ka tyon bana rahega aur puraane vaale lekh ameriki kraanti ko bhi yathaavat rahane mein koi haani naheen hogi. anyatha hindi mein ek lekh kam ho jaayega. aapka kya khyaal hai? dau0'kraant'ema0ela0varma (vaarta) 06:38, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

parantu kraant ji mere vichaar se kisi viki par "ameriki kraanti ka itihaas" jaisa koi lekh hai hi naheen. haaain kuchh vikiyo par 'ameriki kraanti ki samayarekha' jaise lekh to hain, udahaaran en:Timeline of the American Revolution. lekh kam na ho isliye maine 'Amreeki kraanti' ki saamagri ko nae lekh mein istemaal karne ka sujhaav diya. shaayad ham donon ek hi baat kah rahe hain bas masala yeh hai ki nae prushth ka naam kya ho.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 08:04, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Take a look. Suggested changes there. Not sure if this needs a discussion on the village pump.--siddhaarth ghai (vaarta) 01:29, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Almost an year old now, I started it and I've made a keep comment on it. Close it ASAP please :) (Not closing this myself since the procedure doesn't say anything about what happens if the nominator decides to withdraw the nomination. That should probably be clarified somewhere.)--siddhaarth ghai (vaarta) 16:46, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

aapke dvaara likhe gaye ya kaafi sudhaare gaye lekh harshavardhan (raajaneta) ke tathya ko kya aap jaante hain? me 4 October, 2013 ko pradarshit kiya gaya. agar aapko haal me badle gaye kisi lekh se koi rochak tathya pata hai to krupaya use "kya aap jaante hain?" samvaad prushth par sujhaae.

--siddhaarth ghai (vaarta) 08:00, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

dhanyavaad siddhaarth.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 08:04, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

I just read m:Wikidata/Deployment_Questions#Phase_2_.28infoboxes.29 and came to know that wikidata properties can now be accessed directly on wikipedia. This is huge! Thie solves many potential infobox problems here, like the data on a lot of pages getting outdated. This also means that a lot of infobox templates now need to be updated to automatically call the properties from wikidata, instead of users having to write those here. Since you're an admin at wikidata, I was hoping you could come up with ideas for executing this. We don't need a full-fledged essay, a bullet point list of what can be improved would be sufficient to start with.

Also, have you implemented any of this here yet?--siddhaarth ghai (vaarta) 10:09, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Sid, I couldn't agree more that it would solve many problems. However, there are some challenges in using Wikidata properties. First, item should be present (or at least it should have title in Hindi), for example, if you use {{#property:P69}} in the infobox of harshavardhan (raajaneta) you don't get desirable results. Second, as there are not many articles here, some fields would look like Q1955232. Third, not all the labels of an item represent real-world realities, e.g. Mr. X has three children but only his daughter Foo is notable and has her Wikipedia biography (and thus Wikidata item), in this case {{#property:child}} would be useless.

Most of the countries have several Wikidata properties that can be useful in the infobox settlement, so I think we should change it to adopt Wikidata. I have only used properties on English Wikipedia.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 18:03, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

I see your point regarding the difficulties. And considering that there's not enough users to fix hi stuff at wikidata, this may indeed be a problem. However, workarounds are possible using parsers or lua. We could implement code in infoboxes to:

1. Use wikidata only if the parameter is not specified locally (for compatibility with existing usage)
2. Check if the property value exists (and is not broken as the example you point out) before showing the infobox entry (i.e not show a blank entry)
3. In certain cases where values are present both locally and on wikidata, check which one is updated and show that one, unless forced to show the local one explicitly. (Example: GDP/population locally given is qualified as being from 2001, and on wikidata it is qualified as being from 2011; then prefer and show the wikidata entry, unless explicitly forced to show the local entry via an infobox parameter here.)

Infobox settlement is just much unused here (200 odd transclusions) and there's no code on en-wp (it appears they haven't changed this yet) so changing it will take plain old hard work.

I was thinking of testing out these ideas with sa:jnyaaanasandook desh. But seeing the state it is in, I'll probably first try to base it on [sa:jnyaaanasandook]] before anything else. Regards--siddhaarth ghai (vaarta) 12:29, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

bill ji aapne mrugashira prushth ko ulta anupreshit kar diya. aapko mॄgashira prushth ko "mrugashira" par anupreshit karna hai. chooainki "mॄgashira" prushth puraana hai jabki anya prushth ka nirmaan ek I pi ne pratilipi lekh ke roop mein kiya tha. at: mॄgashira prushth ko sthaanaantarit karke vartani theek karne ki aavashyakta hai. chooainki hindi mein "ri" akshar hota hai lekin "ri" (deergh) sanskrut ka akshar hai at: usaki maatra ko theek karna hai.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 18:18, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Y poorn hua. avagat karaane ke liye dhanyavaad sanjeev ji.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 03:24, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

svachal ek naya naam hai, jo mainne bot ke liye socha hai. aapke nivedan ka anumodan mainne kar diya hai. main siddhaarth ji se baat kar raha tha ki Bhaarat ke shahar pariyojana ke liye ek svachal ki aavashyakta hai. iska moort roop aapke fiji hindi ke udaaharan mein mila. krupaya siddhaarth ji ke prushth par hamaari vaarta "sadasya vaarta:Siddhartha Ghai#war,_ceb_aura_9_laakh dekhein aur is baare mein mera bhi maargadarshan karein ki svachal ka upayog main kis prakaar kar sakta hoon. --manoj khuraana (vaarta) 07:46, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

manoj ji, aapke samarthan ke liye dhanyavaad. "baut" naam robot se bana hai isliye isko aadhikaarik taur par kya kaha jaae is par to charcha ki aavashyakta hai. vaise vyaktigat roop se mera maanana hai ki hamein hindi ko saral hi rahane dena chaahiye, isliye agar hindi mein "baut" shabd ka istemaal hota hai to hamein keval is kaaran ki yeh angreji se aaya hai naam naheen badalna chaahiye. maine oopar ullikhit charcha dekhi aur mera vichaar to yahi hai ki kuchh naheen se kuchh to behtar hai, udahaaran ke taur par hif:Kozan (Adana) lekh se paathak ko pata chalta hai ki kojaan Turkey ke adaana praant ka ek jila hai, 2012 ke anumaan ke anusaar vahaaain ki aabaadi 127,926 hai jismein 64,239 purush aur 63,687 mahila hain; iske saath hi lekh mein jnyaaanasandook hai jismein adaana ka maanachitr (jismein kojaan darshaaya gaya hai) aur kuchh anya jaankaari hai. ab agar yeh lekh naheen hota to kisi fiji hindi ke paathak ko niraash hona padta. parantu iska arth yeh naheen ki ham ek-ek line ke bina sandarbh vaale lekhon ko badhaava dein. agar ham svachaalit tareeke se lekh banaate hain to hamein vikipeediya ki lekh likhne ki shaili ka paalan karna chaahiye, jiske anusaar lekh mein uchit shreniyon aur sandarbhon ko bhi shaamil kiya jaana chaahiye. bhaarateeya shaharon ya kasbo ke lekh ke liye janaganana report agar hindi mein mil jaae to bada faayda hoga kyonki masheeni anuvaad bahut bekaar hota hai. aisi report mein kam se kam sthaan ki aabaadi ki jaankaari avashya honi chaahiye. agar aap yeh jaankaari kahi se juta dein to main baut flaig milte hi sabse pehla kaarya yahi karooainga.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 21:40, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

bill ji, main aapse sahamat hoon. ukt vaarta mein aapne dekha hi hoga ki mainein data aur srot donon ka jikr kiya hai. is prakaar se jo prushth baneinge to naichurali usamein vo srot ham sandarbh mein likheinge, yatha - sensas data, paarliyaament ki saait se data aadi. is prakaar se vikipeediya ki lekh likhne ki shaili ka paalan to svat: hoga hi. main bhi "maatr otomeshan" ke paksh mein naheen hoon aur maanaveeya supervision ko aavashyak maanata hoon.

baat karein 2011 sensas data ki to censusindia.gov.in par link upalabdh hai. abhi main jyaada gaharaai mein naheen gaya hoon ki kitna data hai. lekin aavashyakta padi to seedi khareedi ja sakti hai, aap saait dekh lein aur mujhe soochit kar dein ki iski aavashyakta hai ki naheen.

aapke zikr karne par mainne auto viki braaoosar ke baare mein padha, seekhane ke liye daaoon lod bhi kar liya. en wiki par rajistreshan prakriya bhi dekhi lekin hindi viki par sarch karne par kuchh naheen mila. mera aapse nivedan hai ki krupaya iske baare mein samajhaaen taaki main bhi kuchh yogadaan kar sakoon ya aapka haath banta sakoon kyonki yeh kaam bahut bada hai, aur yahi naheen aur bhi bahut kuchh karne ko hai. bhavishya mein main bhi bot ka prayog karna chaahoonga, kintu abhi ke liye mujhe lagta hai ki AWB se shuru kiya jaae, kyonki yeh ardh svachaalit hai aur meri abhi shuruaat hi hai, at: main risk naheen lena chaahata. mainne 1998 mein BASIC, Dbase3 seekhi thi, baad mein visual basic par bhi kitaab padhi, lekin yeh sab puraani baatein ho chuki hain. haan, main itna avashya kehna chaahoonga ki prograaming aae na aae, mujhe prograaming ke basics (process analysis, flow charting etc) bahut achhi tarah aate hain, I am very very clear about Where to stop, when to take risk and when not, When to go ahead and when to ask. at: main is baat ka aashvaasan de sakta hoon apni experimenting ki vajah se viki ka koi nuksaan naheen hone doonga. krupaya AWB ke baare mein vistaar se samajhaaen. --☍ manoj khuraana ^{( sadasyaprushth)} 07:12, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Please have a look at vaarta:guroo amar das,☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 16:21, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

adaraneeya bill ji, hindi vikipeediya par raveendr prabhaat ki ullekhaneeyata par aapki sahamati tatha us lekh ko rakhe jaane ki disha mein aapke dvaara kiye gaye mahatvapoorn kaarya hetu meri krutajnyaata sveekaar karein . aasha hai bhavishya mein bhi aapka sneh-sahayog praapt hota rahega. aapka pun: aabhaar.

Mala chaubey (vaarta) 05:23, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

namaste bill ji, vyavasaayik va anya niji kaaranon se aane vaale 1-2 saalon mein mera yogadaan pehle se kam rahega. isliye meri soch hai ki main prabandhak pad ka tyaag karooain aur mere sthaan par ek naya prabandhak chunane ki suvyavasthit prakriya ho. jald hi main is se sambandhit sandesh chaupaal par daalne ki soch raha hooain lekin is se pehle prabandhak hone ki haisiyat se aapko samaachaar dena chaahata tha. yadi aapki koi rai ho, to krupya mere vaarta prushth par chhodein. theek yahi sandesh main siddhaarth ji va aasheesh ji ke vaarta pannon par chhod raha hooain. dhanyavaad! --Hunnjazal (vaarta) 17:00, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

priya bill ji, vikipeediya:chaupaal#dasaveen varshagaanth ka panna vishay par krupaya kaarya ko disha dein.--sumit sinha^vaarta 19:10, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

uttar prateekshit--sumit sinha^vaarta 06:46, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

priya kaumpatan ji! mainne uparokt lekh mein nirdisht sandarbh dete hue use apdet kar diya hai dekh levein. tatpashchaat krupaya mere is prastaav ko bhi dekhne ka kasht karein aur yadi aapko sameecheen lage to avashya hi adyatan karein. dhanyavaad! dau0'kraant'ema0ela0varma (vaarta) 06:42, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

bill ji, samay mile to krupaya ek drushti chitr:Nobel Prize.png par daalein. mainne ise adyatan karne ka prayaas kiya lekin shaayad kar naheen paaya. ismein mainne angreji prushth ka ullekh kar diya hai at: krupaya sambhav ho to ismein sudhaar karein.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 18:42, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

sanjeev ji, yeh koi gair-mukt logo naheen hai balki America mein yeh saarvajanik domen mein hai. ise kaumans par isliye upload naheen kiya gaya kyonki kaumans ki niti ke tahat faail srot raashtra aur America donon mein saarvajanik domen mein honi chaahiye. yeh chitr 2037 mein poorn roop se saarvajanik domen mein aa jaaega.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 15:39, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

dhanyavaad bill ji. mere bhramit hone ka kaaran ek saaainche ka hindi viki par na paaya jaana bhi tha. ab aapne chitr ko theek kar diya, iske liye bahut-bahut dhanyavaad.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 16:12, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

namaste bill ji. aaj mainne the lunch box ka poster upload kiya. jo pehla file upload kiya, usaka resolution mere khyaal mein thoda adhik rah gaya. mainne turant hi kam resolution ka naya avataran upload kar diya. lekin chitr ke prusht par file itihaas mein ab bhi puraani file dekhi ja sakti hai. krupaya kar ise hata dein. ➟ shubham kaanodiya (vaarta) 17:33, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Y poorn hua.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 17:53, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

dhanyavaad. ➟ shubham kaanodiya (vaarta) 17:59, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

namaste bill ji, mujhe lagta hai Nisheeth84 ji aaj http://www.hindisahityadarpan.in naamak website ke lekhon ko viki par "baahari kadiyaaain" naamak anubhaag mein daal rahe hain. chooainki Nisheeth84 (yogadaan) ji naye sadasya hain aur unhein viki neetiyon ka gyaan naheen hai. unhein ek do din taka aaraam se apna kaarya karne dein. jab main punarikshit karuainga to in sabko vaapas kar duainga. chooainki do-chaar din vo baahya sootron mein pade raheinge to bhi hamaara koi nuksaan naheen ho raha. at: sadasya bhi khush hoga. ho sakta hai vo kal niymaavali ka paalan karne vaale achhe sadasya banein. lekin yadi aaj hi vo kadiyaaain lagaate jaayein aur ham vaapas karte jaayein to unke tikne ki sambhaavana bahut kam rahegi aur hamaara bhi vyarth mein hi samay barbaad hoga.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 20:50, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

sanjeev ji, achha hoga ki unhein is baat se avagat kara diya jaae kyonki isse unki mahanat bhi bach jaaegi. baad mein agar unhein bataaya jaaega to unhein lagega ki mujhe pehle hi bata diya hota.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 21:26, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

16 October 2013 ko mukhaprushth samaachaar ka adyatan hua jismein aapke dvaara likhe gaye ya kaafi sudhaare gaye lekh lekh se tathya liya gaya tha. agar aapko kisi aur rochak khabar ka gyaan ho to use vikipeediya:samaachaar/ummeedavaara‎ par sujhaaeain.

☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 18:42, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

dhanyavaad sanjeev ji.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 18:46, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

namaste bill ji, kuchh samay pehle mainne {{Infobox event}} saaaincha angreji viki se aayaat karne ka prayaas kiya. yeh saaaincha to aayaat ho gaya lekin iske saath hi 9 anya saaainche bhi aayaat ho gaye. chooainki main naheen chaahata is vajah se anya sthaanon par gadbad ho. at: kya unhein vaapas liya ja sakta hai. mere kehne ka taatparya yeh hai ki kya unhein main poorvavat karna chaahata hooain kya yeh sambhav hai?☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 10:21, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

sanjeev ji, kshama karein, vyast hone ke kaaran mein samay par uttar naheen de pa raha hooain. sarvapratham, main aapko sujhaav dooainga ki aayaat karte samay kabhi bhi 'sabhi saaainche shaamil karein' vikalp ko na chunein. yeh vikalp nai viki pariyojanaaon par upayogi hota hai na ki hindi viki jaisi das varsh puraani pariyojana par. doosra, jab aap pehle se maujood saaainche ko aayaat dvaara ovararaaid karte hain to puraana saaaincha bilkul hi khatm ho jaata hai (meri jaankaari ke anusaar) isliye poorvavat karna asambhav hai. agar pehle se hi koi prushth maujood hai to use seedha aayaat naheen karna chaahiye kyonki anya samasyaaon ke alaava isse aap sthaaneeya sadasyon ke yogadaan ko bhi akaaran hata rahe hain. pehle se maujood prushth ke avataranon mein aayaat hue avataran jodna bahut jatil prakriya hai. kya samasya ka hal nikal gaya hai?<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 06:30, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

salaah ke liye dhanyavaad. siddhaarth ji ne bhi mujhe yeh baat hi samajhaai thi aur unhonne samasya ko theek bhi kar diya hai. vaise main aage is tarah ke prayog karne se pehle charcha karunga jisse samasya na ho. pehle se upalabddh prushthon ko main aayaat naheen karta.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 06:37, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

bill, jab sanjeev ji ne saaainchon wala vikalp chuna to pehle se maujood saaainche overwrite ho gaye, aur apne-aap histmerge bhi ho gaya. haaain, shaayad pehle se maujood prushth ko aayaat karne mein sthaaneeya prushth hat jaata hai, parantu jo saaainche saath mein aayaat hue the unamein aisa naheen hua. (sauftaveyar ka ye barataav ajeeb hai, par samasya ko theek karte samay mainne yahi paaya. udaaharan ke taur pe sa:Infobox ka itihaas dekho. ye abhi punarnirdesh hai, lekin sanjeev ji ke aayaat ke dauraan is pehle se maujood punarnirdesh mein hi angreji vikipeediya se histmerge ho gaya tha.)--siddhaarth ghai (vaarta) 12:09, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

aapke dvaara likhe gaye ya kaafi sudhaare gaye lekh keeniyaai bhaarateeya ke tathya ko kya aap jaante hain? me 19 October, 2013 ko pradarshit kiya gaya. agar aapko haal me badle gaye kisi lekh se koi rochak tathya pata hai to krupaya use "kya aap jaante hain?" samvaad prushth par sujhaae.

☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 11:59, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

dhanyavaad sanjeev ji.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 16:57, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

bill ji, kya aapko football se sambandhit Elo Ranking ka hindi arth pata hai? yadi aapko pata hai to {{saaaincha:jnyaaanasandook raashtreeya football team}} par iska hindi arth likhe. yahaaain par filhaal "Elo ranking" likha hai.--prateek maalaveeya^vaarta 11:10, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

prateek ji, main yeh to naheen jaanta kahaaain tak theek hooain lekin yeh naamakaran orpaad elo (Arpad Elo) ke naam par kiya gaya hai at: iske liye upayukt hindi shabd "elo shreneekram" hona chaahiye. iske alaava iske liye kya upayukt shabd hai main naheen jaanta.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 11:24, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

prateek ji, yeh naam vyaktivaachak sanjnyaa hai isliye iska hindi mein bhi naam 'world futabaul elo retings' hi hoga. main ise jnyaaanasandook mein 'elo ranking' kar deta hooain.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 17:23, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

kaumpatan ji! uparokt lekh mein koi bhi vishvasaneeya srot na hone ke kaaran 31 August 2013 ko sanjeev dvaara hataane ke liye naamaankit kiya gaya tha aur shaayad 12 sitmbar 2013 ko siddhaarth ghai ne bhi ise uchit sroton ke abhaav mein sheegra hataane ke liye kaha. yadyapi yeh lekh mainne naheen banaaya tha parantu main praaya: lekhon ko bachaaye rakhane ki koshish karta hooain at: haal mein hue parivrtanon ki taraf jaise hi mera dhyaan gaya mainne is lekh ko sudhaarane ke kaafi prayaas kiye aur vikipeediya:prushth hataane hetu charcha/lekh/gayaasuddeen gaaji mein bhi hissa liya. mujhe jahaaain tak smaran hai siddhaarth ji bhi charcha mein naye aayaamon se prabhaavit hue aur unhonne is maamale ko nirnaayak sthiti tak le jaane ki dabi jubaan se charcha bhi ki. ab jabki naamaankan karta (sanjeev ji) swayam bhi prabandhak ho gaye hain aur siddhaarth ji pehle se hi prabandhak hain at: meri samajh se yeh nirnaya ab aapko lene ki prakriya praarambh kar hi deni chaahiye. tatasth bane rahane se aam sadasyon ko galat sandesh jaata hai. dau0'kraant'ema0ela0varma (vaarta) 08:26, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

krupaya vi:chaupaal#inaput pranaali prashn par tippani dein. dhanyavaad--siddhaarth ghai (vaarta) 09:18, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

shobhan sarkaar naam ke lekh mein krupaya galat dhng se badlaav na karein. chaahein to kuchh charcha kar lein.jaankaaron se nivedan hai ki kuchh sahaayata va sahayog karein.--rishi 07:04, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

krupaya lekh ka vaarta prushth padhein.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 07:19, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

shobhan sarkaar naam ke lekh mein badlaav ke sambandh mein uchit soochana hetu dhanyavaad! yadyapi aap ka sandesh mai sahi tarah se samajh na saka. ajnyaaanakosheeya bhaasha kya hai?vaise aap jaisa behtar samajhe, vaisa kare. mai to sirf, vikeepeediya par kuchh saarthak yogadaan karna chaahata hoo.ummeed hai ki aap mere prayaaso ko anyatha nahi lege. krupaya bataaiye ki is lekh ko banaane hetu mai kya yogadan kar sakta hoo?--rishi 11:26, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

krupaya ek hi vishay ki charcha ke liye alag-alag anubhaag na banaaeain.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 14:12, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

namaste bill ji, aap saaaincha:upaparamaanvik kan mein kuchh badlaav karne vaale the jo mainne siddhaarth ji ko kaarya poorn karne ka aagrah kiya tha. unhonne kuchh sudhaar karne ke baad kaha tha ki aap kaarya poorn karoge. uske baad aapne us kaarya ko poorn karne ke liye baut khaata banaaya tha. yadi aapne isse sambandhit code likh liya hai to krupaya kaarya poorn karein. vivran mere vaarta prushth par dekh sakte ho.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 14:37, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

sanjeev ji, mujhe iska gyaan hai. abhi main Bhaarat ke gaaainv ki shreniyaaain theek kar raha hooain, iske pashchaat main saaaincha:upaparamaanvik kan wala kaarya kar dooainga. agar jaldi hai to main pehle saaainche wala kaam kar deta hooain, mujhe to bas yeh laga tha ki aisi koi jaldi naheen hai. main ise baut ki "vartamaan pariyojana" mein jod deta hooain.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 15:26, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

jaldi to koi naheen hai. lekin ho jaaye to achha hai. vaise main jaankaari chaahata tha ki kab tak ho jaayega.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 16:37, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

sanjeev ji, main jitna jaldi sambhav ho sakega utana jaldi karne ki koshish karooainga. aapko dvaara smaran karaane ki aavashyakta naheen padegi.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 14:15, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

dhanyavaad bill ji.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 14:32, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Y poorn hua. sanjeev ji, agar koi kami rah gayi ho to krupaya bataaeain.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 17:35, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

dhanyavaad bill ji, is saptaah main kaarya naheen kar paauainga. at: agale saptaahaant tak jaaainch karke bata duainga aur yadi koi chhoti-moti galati rahi to swayam sudhaar kar luainga.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 19:38, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

namaskaar, Bill william compton ji. aapke liye vaarta:shobhan sarkaar par ek sandesh hai.
aap is soochana ko kisi bhi samay mita sakte hai, iske liye vaarta sanpaadan mein jaakar {{sandesh}} mitaaeain.

krupaya kar apni rai dein. ░a▒a▓► shubham kanodiya ^vaarta 12:02, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

bill ji agar kisi pej me praarambh se madat chaahiye to mughe jarur bataaye (Rahul kaushik )

Can I use AutoWiki Browser on hi wiki? --Kolega2357 (vaarta) 19:38, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

What work do you intend to do?<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 15:24, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Re-categorizing category. --Kolega2357 (vaarta) 16:55, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Please see vikipeediyaa_vaarta:AutoWikiBrowser/CheckPage#Kolega2357, can you give me rights to use AutoWiki browser? --Kolega2357 (vaarta) 14:15, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

please offer you views on RWC i have given my views on chaupaal. Sushilmishra (vaarta) 03:46, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Dear Bill Ji, Regarding sadasya samooh adhikaar soochi, I noted that there is quite a repetition which is leading to confusion, or hardwork in understanding it. There's a scope for simplification there. At present "autoconfirmed" is repeated at 5 places, skipcaptcha-4, autoreview-6 etc.

In my view, the list may be arranged on following lines : Level-1 or A : right no. 1,2,3,4 (or a,b,c,d) Level-2 or B : All right of Level-A + right e,f,g Level-3 or C : All rights of Level B + right h, i

One more query : Why roll-backer is a different category than reviewer? one separate category for only one task ! There must be an important reason which I would like to know.

Also, can you please guide what is the difference between reviewing and patrolling? After change in rights, I can see the note - "Dekha Hua Chinhit karen." I noted on one page that there was no vandalism, but many improvements were required like wikification, aadhar tag etc. Can I mark it as "reviewed" without adding recommenadtions for improvement or without carrying corrections( i'm unable to do it currently, as my javascript is not working.)?

Regards. --☍ manoj khuraana ^{( sadasyaprushth)} 12:35, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

manoj ji, svat: sthaapit sadasya ya otokanfarmd software dvaara diye jaana wala adhikaar hai aur kisi bhi sadasya adhikaar ke hone se pehle yeh adhikaar hona aavashyak hai. har kisi sakriya sadasya ke paas yeh adhikaar hota hai, vishesh:vareeyataaeain mein dekhiye aapke paas bhi hai aur mere paas bhi.

rolabaikar kisi prushth par kisi ek sadasya dvaara kiye gaye sabhi sanpaadanon ko ek hi baar mein poorvavat kar sakte hain jabki punareekshak lambit sanpaadanon ko jaaainchate hain. rolabaik us sadasya ko diya jaata hai jo haal mein hue parivartan mein barbata vaale sanpaadan hataata hai jabki punareekshan us sadasya ko jo vishesh:nae prushth mein nae prushthon ko jaaainchata hai.

paitrol aap nae prushthon ko karte hain jabki riviyu un prushthon ko jinhein lambit sanpaadan ke liye surakshit kiya gaya hai jaise Bhaarat lekh. [jaaaincha hua chinhit karein] aapko un sadasyon ke sanpaadan ke saath dikhega jo svat: sthaapit to hai parantu svat: pareekshit sadasya naheen hain. aise sadasyon ke sanpaadanon ke saath aapko prushth itihaas ya haal mein hue parivartan mein ! dikhega jisse aapko pata chal jaaega ki is sanpaadan ko ek baar jaaainch lena chaahiye, jis sadasya ke sanpaadan mein yeh ! naheen dikhta unhein viki ka vishvasaneeya sadasya maana jaata hai isliye unke sanpaadan jaaainchane ki koi aavashyakta naheen.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 12:58, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

namaskaar, Bill william compton ji. aapke liye Shubhamkanodia ke vaarta prushth par ek sandesh hai.
aap is soochana ko kisi bhi samay mita sakte hai, iske liye vaarta sanpaadan mein jaakar {{sandesh}} mitaaeain.

░a▒a▓► shubham kanodiya ^vaarta 15:13, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Bill i would like to invite you to please give you suggestion of chaupaal regarding Rugby Union World Cup as i find Ajit kumar Tiwari and Anirudh repeatedly reverting those edits with out giving valid reason and even after my repeated explainion of the term they are persistant with their antics and i find then working in tandem on most of the pages like a sockpuppet one such example if page related to Vivian Richards which was renamed as Viv Richards and Rugby Union World cup i find their subbornness to understand the logic very strange please help in sorting this matter. Sushilmishra (vaarta) 20:10, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

namaste bill ji, mainne kya aap jaante hain? ke liye lagbhag pichhle ek maah ke sabhi naamaankanon ki sameeksha kar di hai lekin iske baavajood mere do naamaankanon ki aaj tak sameeksha naheen ho paayi hai. jismein se pratham naamaankan the ruins of holeerood chaipal prushth ke liye hai. mere dvaara sujhaavit vaakya angreji viki ke 12 July 2013 ke ank mein kya aap jaante hain mein pradarshit ho chuka hai (vahaaain naamaankan mera naheen tha) jabki hamaare yahaaain usaki sameeksha bhi naheen hui. iske alaava mera doosra naamaankan chhing ming tyauhaar se sambandhit hai jiski aapne 11 August 2013 ko adhuri sameeksha ki thi. chooainki aapke dvaara sujhaavit parivartan karne ke baad usaki pun: sameeksha naheen ho paayi. vartamaan mein aapke aur mere alaava yeh sameeksha karne wala aur koi bhi sadasya dikhaai naheen deta. at: yadi sambhav ho to sthiti spasht karein.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 22:20, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

sanjeev ji, maine sameeksha kar di hai krupaya dekhalein.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 06:37, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

priya bill ji, mere vichaar se ukt prushth par yadi koi vandalism aadi naheen tha to anuvaad taig lagaakar chhoda ja sakta hai. abhi Bhaarat mein devanaagari taaiping ka prachalan na ke baraabar hai, yadi koi aise bhi likhta hai toh hamein unke prayaason (prayaas naheen to bhaavanaaon) ka svaagat karna chaahiye. mera vichaar hai ki kam sadasyata ki avastha mein "anya bhaasha mein likha" vaale kaaran ko abhi aap dileet karne ka kaaran na hi banaaen to achha ho, AC meri praarthana hai. dhanyavaad. --☎manoj khuraana ^vaarta 10:17, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

manoj ji, sarvapratham, yeh lekh keval laitin lipi mein likha lekh naheen tha apitu poornataya hi angreji viki ke Mugdha Chaphekar lekh se kaupi-pest kiya hua tha. agar ham aise lekhon ko naheen hataate to ham angreji viki se kaupi-pest karne ko apratyaksh roop se badhaava de rahe hain. isse na to keval hindi viki angreji bhaasha ka viki banta jaaega balki kaupeeraait ullanghan jo yahaaain pehle se hi itna hai usamein bhi vruddhi hoti jaaegi. vaise "anya bhaasha mein likha" sheegra hataane ka kaaran naheen hai apitu "poornataya anya bhaasha mein likhe lekh" kaaran hai jiske tahat amooman un lekhon ko hataaya jaata hai jinmein hindi mein kuchh ho hi naheen aur itihaas mein bhi hindi paath ka avataran na ho. agar aapko lagta hai ki aise lekhon ko naheen hataana chaahiye to aap vikipeediya vaarta:prushth hataane ki neeti par prastaav rakh sakte hain. main ajeet ji, sanjeev ji, aadi sadasyon se anurodh karooainga ki apne vichaar rakhein.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 12:14, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

yadi poornataya angreji mein likhe lekh ko ham yahaaain hindi viki par rakhein iska koi auchitya naheen hai. us prushth ko padhne koi bhi paathak hindi viki par kyon aayega? doosari baat aap angreji mein likhe prushth ke liye aisa isliye kah rahe ho kyonki aapko angreji aati hai. aap ye socho ki yadi koi sadasya cheeni athva Japani bhaasha se koi lekh jyon ka tyon kaupi kar deta hai to kya use yahaaain rakhane ka koi auchitya hai? fir aap kahoge ki lekhak ko anuvaad karne ka moka diya jaana chaahiye. lekin is tarah se kaupi karne vaale log kabhi bhi anuvaad naheen karte. chooainki yadi vo anuvaad karna chaahate hain to kam se kam ek pankti ka to anuvaad karna chaahiye. at: main to yeh hi kahuainga ki aise prushthon ko turant hata dena chaahiye. yadi aisa koi viki sadasya kar raha hai to uske vaarta prushth par sandesh chhodkar use kuchh ghanton athva ek-do din ka samay diya ja sakta hai.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 19:00, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

sanjeev ji, aapki baat se main sahamat hoon ki is tarah se kaupi karne vaale log kabhi bhi anuvaad naheen karte. lekin aam janta mein se to koi bhi kar sakta hai. jab main naya aaya tha to main anuvaad yogya prushth shreni mein gaya tha aur apni pasand ke ek lekh ka anuvaad kar diya tha. yadi vah lekh vahaan hota hi naheen to koi sambhaavana naheen thi ki us avastha mein (naya sadasya) main esa prushth bana paata, balki usane mere liye training ka hi kaam kiya. jab hamaare paas ek vibhaag alag se rakha hi hua hai to usaka upayog karne mein buraai hi kya hai. ab bill ji shaayad thoda gussa ho jaaenge aur deta le aaenge ki 100 varshon mein 10 lekh hi anuvaad hue hain to kya laabh? lekin mera savaal hai, kya nuksaan ? ejyoom gud feth ki neeti bhi to yahi kehti hai : aashaanvit rahein.

manoj ji, aapko pata naheen kab aur kaha aisa laga ki mujhe charchaaon mein krodh aa jaata hai. iske theek vipreet mera vyaktitv hai, mujhe asal jeevan mein bhi "gussa" bamushkil hi kabhi aata hai. vikipeediya par main svaichhik roop se kaarya kar raha hooain aur agar kabhi asal jeevan mein meri manodasha iske dvaara nakaraatmak hui to main avakaash bhi le sakta hooain aur le bhi leta hooain. agar aap yeh soch rahe ho ki maine sanjeev ji aur ajeet ji ki tippani krodh mein aa kar maaaingi thi to aisa bilkul bhi naheen hai. maine unki tippani isliye maaaingi thi kyonki donon hi sadasya nae lekhon ki sameeksha karte hain aur sheegra hataane ke liye uchit kaaran ke saath lekhon ko naamaankit karte hain. isliye mujhe laga ki jo sadasya sheegra hataane ke kaaranon ka istemaal karte hain unki rai jaanana achha rahega. rahi baat vikipeediya:anuvaad anurodh ki to aap shaayad usaka prayojan theek se samajh naheen paae. us prushth par gair-hindeebhaashi apne viki par upalabdh lekhon ya kisi vishesh roochi ke saath lekhon ko hindi mein anuvaad karne ka anurodh karte hain. main to bahut samay se aise anurodhon ko poora karta aaya hooain, aur yeh maanata hooain ki 100 varshon ki prateeksha karne ke bajaae aaj hi yeh kaam karooain. parantu samay ke aabhaav mein hamesha aisa naheen kar paata, isi prushth par oopar ek angreji viki ke mitr ne kuchh lekh anuvaad ke liye diye the parantu abhi tak naheen kar paaya hooain. ve meri kaarya soochi mein hain parantu praathamikta unki kam hai. aapse bhi anurodh karooainga ki "anuvaad anurodh" prushth par maheenon se pade anurodhon par kaarya karein. parantu yeh prushth un lekhon ke liye naheen hai jahaaain sadasya doosari viki pariyojanaaon se kaupi-pest kar dete hain. shaayad aapne oopar dhyaan na diya ho to aapko fir se bata dooain ki bina ऍtreebyooshan ke kaupi-pest karna kaupeeraait ullanghan bhi hai isliye aisa karna sheegra hataane ke kaupeeraait ullanghan ke tahat bhi aata hai.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 19:06, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

I opened a discussion about its reliability here, but I did not got much response. I am also a little uncertain about its reliability so I think we should open a discussion at the Village Pump on Hindi Wiki. (Sorry for writing in English but I have less time right now) :) vaibhav jain ^{vaarta imel} 09:48, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

I believe there is no need to discuss this matter on the Hindi Wikipedia Village Pump as most of the local editors are not familiar with the Wikipedia's standards of a reliable source.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 01:38, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

bill ji, mainne paaya ki graameenabaut ke prayokta ab sakriya naheen hain, kya koi esa tareeka hai, jisse ki iska prayog ham kar paaen? mainne kai shaharon ke prushth banaae hain, jo saancha mainne apne liye mainuali banaaya tha, lagbhag vaisa hi saancha is baut dvaara banaae prushthon bhi dekhne ko mila. jo yojana mainne siddhaarth ji ke saath banaai thi aur unhone aapse bhi diskas kiya tha, mainne paaya ki vahi yojana is baut dvaara banaae prushthon main bhi prayog hui hai. at: yadi kisi prakaar ham ise chaaloo kar paaen to maja aa jaaega. --☎manoj khuraana ^vaarta 12:37, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

namaste bill ji, Rotlink ji lambe samay se baut ka kaarya bina fleg ke kar rahe hain. unhein vibhinn viki pariyojanaaon par vibhinn adhikaar bhi praapt hain. bina fleg ke baut kaarya karne ki saja kya hai iske baare mein mujhe jaankaari naheen hai krupaya yeh jaankaari dein. yadi yeh galat naheen hai to hame bhi is sadasya ko svat:parikshit kar dena chaahiye. chooainki vo keval pehle se nirmit mrut kadi vaale sandarbhon ke archive lagaane ka kaarya karte hain jo hamaare liye nukasaanadaayak naheen hai.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 03:55, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

sanjeev ji, agyaat sadasyon ko baut flaig isliye naheen diya jaata kyonki baut dvaara kuchh hi samay mein kai prushthon mein barbata karna bhi sambhav hai. agar aisa hota hai to poorvavat karne mein bahut adhik samay aur parishram lag jaata hai. main yeh naheen kah raha ki rautalink ji aisa kuchh kareinge parantu baut ke vidhvansakaari roop ko dekhte hue vikipeediya samaaj ne aise niyam banaae hue hain jismein bina baut flaig ke chetaavani ke pashchaat bhi baut chalaane par sadasyon ko block kar diya jaata hai. parantu is prakaran mein mujhe naheen lagta ki aisa kuchh hone ki sambhaavana hai. vibhinn viki pariyojanaaon par rautalink ji ko jo vibhnn adhikaar diye gaye hain asal mein vo svat:parikshit va punareekshak adhikaaron ke sthaaneeya svaroop hain. mujhe bhi lagta hai ki unhein 'autopatrol' aur 'autoreview' adhikaar dena kuchh galat naheen hoga kyonki ve keval kadiyon ko hi theek karte hain. agar aapko bhi lagta hai ki unhein 'autopatrol' ke saath-saath 'autoreview' bhi kar dena chaahiye to krupaya bataaeain, main uske pashchaat unhein ek baar soochit kar ke ye bits (adhikaar) de dooainga.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 01:54, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

i wrote my views about usage of latin numerics on Hindi Wikipedia(in English). please do the need full.

namaskaar, Bill william compton ji. aapke liye vi:chaupaal par ek sandesh hai.
aap is soochana ko kisi bhi samay mita sakte hai, iske liye vaarta sanpaadan mein jaakar {{sandesh}} mitaaeain.

Sushilmishra (vaarta) 20:24, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

namaste bill ji, kya aap jaante hain? par rainkoji mandir (Japan) se sambandhit kraant ji ne ek naamaankan kiya hai. mainne pichhle kai dinon se iski sameeksha ki lekin shaayad hamesha meri sameeksha adhuri rahi. mujhe lagta hai ise adyatan kar dena chaahiye. aapka kya vichaar hai? yadi aapko lage ki adyatan karna theek hai to jarur adyatan kar dena.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 20:36, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

sanjeev ji, atyaadhik vyast hone ke kaaran jyaada samay viki par naheen pa raha hooain isliye aapse thoda samay maaaingata hooain. din ke ant tak main sabhi apoorn kaarya kar dooainga va charchaaon ke uttar de dooainga. vilamb ke liye khed hai.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 04:48, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

namaste bill ji,

main se.ra.yaatri lekh ko sudhaar chuki hooain aur sandarbh sootr jodte huye vikifaai bhi kar chuki hooain . meri samajh se is prushth ko hataane ka vichaar tyaag diya jaana chaahiye aur rakhane par vichaar kiya jaana chaahiye. krupaya lekh ka avlokan kar lein aur sheegra nirnaya lein . --maala chaube^vaarta 05:12, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Bill, are you interested in starting en:Indian Australian?

Thanks, WhisperToMe (vaarta) 05:29, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

namaskaar kaumpatan ji! mainne uparokt prushth ki bhoomika mein jo jaankaari di thi vah Hindustan live ke hindi vebaprushth ke havaale se thi usaka sandarbh bhi mainne de diya tha. aapne mool angreji time maigajeen ka sandarbh dekar use aur bhi adhik praamaanik bana diya. etadarth mainne aapko dhanyavaad bhi de diya hai. dau0'kraant'ema0ela0varma (vaarta) 14:40, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

	sooraj ko kisi pareekshan ki zaroorat naheen.
	usaki kirnein aur usase jeevan ko raha laabh apni gavaahi khud dete hain. aapka yogadaan bahumoolya hai! --mujmmil (vaarta) 17:33, 27 November 2013 (UTC).

dhanyavaad mujmmil ji, aap jaise mitr hi yahaaain yogadaan dene ke liye protsaahit karte hain. dinesh ji prabandhak na banane ke kaaran hataash hain aur unka prastaav pratikaar bhaavana ke saath rakha gaya hai, jo mere mat ko aur adhik prabal banaata hai. kuchh sadasyon ko bas fir mauka chaahiye aakarman karne ka. kuchh din pehle aapko hunnajajl ji ka kathaputali khaata bata rahe the, aaj mujhe siddhaarth ka kah rahe hain aur kal shaayad sanjeev ji ko kisi aur ka kaheinge. main aise aaropon ko ratti bhar bhi tavajjo naheen deta. aap agar kuchh achha karna chaahate hain to durbhaagyavash iska arth yeh naheen hai ki sabhi ko usamein achhaai dikhe.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 06:10, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

bill ji! main shreeyut mujmmil ji se do varsh poorv mumbai conference mein mil chuka hooain. ye sajjan vyakti hain. parantu main bhi inke chhadm naam hindustaaneelaingvaij se pehle dhokha kha gaya tha. ham koi chor naheen jo apna asli naam chhupaayein. mainne isaliye apne sadasya pej par apni photo bhi laga rakhi hai. aisa hi aap bhi karein to hamein bahut achha lagega. dhanyavaad dau0'kraant'ema0ela0varma (vaarta) 08:28, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

dau0'kraant'ema0ela0varma ji, vaise aap mere sadasyaprushth par bhi meri tasveer dekh sakte hain. ye aur baat hai ki main photogenic naheen hooain. mujmmil (vaarta) 03:11, 30 November 2013 (UTC).

namaste bill ji, en:File:Mr. Ashok Gehlot, Chief Minister, Rajasthan. India.JPG jaisi bahut saare aise chitr hain jo angreji vikipeediya par "This is a candidate to be copied to Wikimedia Commons" {{Copy to Wikimedia Commons}} flaig ke saath hain aur main kai maah se iska intajaar kar raha hooain. inki kya neeti hai? kya mere jaisa saamaanya sadasya isko sthaanaantarit kar sakta hai? kya inki koi samayaavadhi hai jiske pashchaat ye chitr kaumans par sthaanaantarit kar diye jaayeinge?☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 18:19, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

sanjeev ji, koi bhi sadasya yeh kaarya kar sakta hai. aamtaur par ek drive aayojit ki jaati hai jismein aise chitr sthaanaantarit kiye jaate hain. sthaanaantarit karte samay mool rachayita ko ऍtreebyooshan milna chaahiye aur upload laug bhi jaana chaahiye. aap bata dein to main aise chitr sthaanaantarit kar dooainga.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 18:58, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

dhanyavaad bill ji, main aapko aise chitr bataaunga.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 19:28, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

27 November 2013 ko mukhaprushth samaachaar ka adyatan hua jismein aapke dvaara likhe gaye ya kaafi sudhaare gaye lekh maaya devi mandir, lunbini se tathya liya gaya tha. agar aapko kisi aur rochak khabar ka gyaan ho to use vikipeediya:samaachaar/ummeedavaara‎ par sujhaaeain.

☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 19:14, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

dhanyavaad sanjeev ji.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 19:35, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

krupaya vikipeediya:prushth hataane hetu charcha/lekh/sanjaya manjarekar par ho rahi charcha ko samaapt karein.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 19:19, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

mujhe is charcha ke baare mein pata hi naheen tha. gyaat karavaane ke liye dhanyavaad sanjeev ji.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 02:01, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

2 December 2013 ko mukhaprushth samaachaar ka adyatan hua jismein aapke dvaara likhe gaye ya kaafi sudhaare gaye lekh paul vaukar se tathya liya gaya tha. agar aapko kisi aur rochak khabar ka gyaan ho to use vikipeediya:samaachaar/ummeedavaara‎ par sujhaaeain.

☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 05:21, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

dhanyavaad sanjeev ji. aap lekh ka naam dena bhool gaye the.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 18:08, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

oh! kshama chaahata hooain. aaj main jaldi mein adyatan karte hue yeh galati "kya aap jaante hain" mein bhi kar chuka tha. vahaaain to baad mein dekh liya aur theek kar diya. yahaaain mera dhyaan naheen gaya tha.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 20:02, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

dhanyavaad kaumpatanaji! albart aainsteen lekh ka sheershak badalne sambandhi rai dene ke liye. mainne iseeliye charcha mein likha tha ki iske liye kisi visheshagya ki rai le li jaaye. ab meri bhi vahaaain sahamati hai. haaain yadi aap mere banaaye hue lekh maaujr pistaul ke baare mein bhi apni rai de sakein to aur adhik behtar rahega. dau0'kraant'ema0ela0varma (vaarta) 08:04, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

kraant ji, main jald hi tippani karooainga. tippani karne se pehle mujhe poora lekh padhna padta hai aur vishay ki alag-alag sroton se jaankaari ekatrit karni padti hai jisse mein yeh nirdhaarit kar sakooain ki kuchh jyaada ya kam to naheen hai. is prakiya mein kaafi samay lagta hai jiska mere paas abhi abhaav hai, parantu aap nishchit rahein main bina kahe hi jitna jald sambhav ho sakega yeh kaarya karooainga.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 18:26, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

bill kaumpatan ji! krupaya ise dekhein. yeh lekh abhi tak bina kisi nirnaya ke trishanku ki maanind adhar mein lataka hua hai. koi to nirnaya lein. dau॰'kraant'ema॰aaela॰aavarma (vaarta) 08:54, 12 fravari 2014 (UTC)

namaste bill ji, humne pichhle maah chaupaal par charcha ki thi jiska sabhi sadasyon ne samarthan kiya tha (abhi yeh charcha puraalekh mein hai). usaki aage kya kaaryavaahi chal rahi hai. use kahaaain le jaana hai aur vartamaan sthiti kya hai?☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 13:25, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

ise puraalekh mein kisne daal diya? meta par alag-alag jagah anurodh va vikimeediya foundation ko soochit karna hai. main adhik se adhik bhaageedaari ka soch raha tha jisse prastaav ko thukara na diya jaae.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 18:20, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

puraalekh mein mujmmil ji ne daal diya. aap kaho to pun: puraana sanskaran sthaapit kar dete hain.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 18:49, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

ji haaain, aisa uchit rahega kyonki fir koi yeh naheen kah sakega ki charcha to puraalekh mein chali gayi thi.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 04:07, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

abhi mainne pun: puraalekh se uthaakar chaupaal par daala hai. kya yeh tarika sahi hai?☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 04:25, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

aisa karne mein kuchh galat naheen hai. pun: charcha shuroo karne ka matlab sadasyon par faalatoo ka bojh daalna hota.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 04:34, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

mujhe lagta hai ki bill ji badlaav kar chuke hain. mujmmil (vaarta) 10:17, 3 December 2013 (UTC).

aapke dvaara likhe gaye ya kaafi sudhaare gaye lekh air India udaan 101 ke tathya ko kya aap jaante hain? me 2 December, 2013 ko pradarshit kiya gaya. agar aapko haal me badle gaye kisi lekh se koi rochak tathya pata hai to krupaya use "kya aap jaante hain?" samvaad prushth par sujhaae.

☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 17:05, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

dhanyavaad sanjeev ji.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 18:20, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

namaste bill ji. aapne jo hindi viki ka naya logo upload kiya hai, usame shaayad aap transparency add karna bhool gaye hai. isliye shaayad .png faurmet mein hone ke baavajood transperancy nazar naheen aa rahi. agar aap top-left par logo dekheinge to viki ka logo ek safed bakse ke andar nazar aata hai, jabaki logo ke pehle sanskaran mein aisa koi dibba naheen tha. krupaya safed background hataakar ek transperent sanskaran upload karein, kyoonki mere khyaal mein yeh abhi thoda bhadda nazar aa raha hai. agar aapko isse sambandhit koi madad chaahiye to aap mere vaarta prusht par ya imel kar sakte ho. ░a▒a▓► shubham kanodiya ^vaarta 12:43, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Y poorn hua dhyaan dilvaane ke liye dhanyavaad shubham ji. asal mein imej editor mein difault traansapireinsi hoti hai, maine jab faail sev ki to yaad naheen kahaaain dhyaan kho baitha ki background safed rah gaya. logo badalne mein badi mushkil hui thi kyonki faunt kuchh alag hi istemaal kiya gaya tha, 'sh' likhne ke liye pehle mujhe upayukt faunt khojana pada.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 13:52, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

kaumpatan ji! krupaya uparokt prushth dekhein. ismein lagta hai sanjeev ji ne bhoolavash 1 December ko infobauks aur shreni mein shahar ki jagah nagar kar diya jisse iske infobauks ki jagah pata naheen kuchh ajeeb si lambi-lambi laainein dikh rahi hain. mainne unke sampaadan ko poorvavat karna chaaha parantu na ho saka. unke vaarta prushth par dekha to pata chala ve ek saptaah ke liye avakaash par hain. aap is prushth ko check kar lein. dhanyavaad dau0'kraant'ema0ela0varma (vaarta) 17:39, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

punashch vaise mainne ismein infobauks angreji vikeepeediya se lekar daal diya hai isse yeh samasya to door ho gayi hai. rah gayi infobauks ke andar naam aadi hindi mein karne ki, to vah main mainuali kar dooainga. dau0'kraant'ema0ela0varma (vaarta) 18:17, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

6 December 2013 ko mukhaprushth samaachaar ka adyatan hua jismein aapke dvaara likhe gaye ya kaafi sudhaare gaye lekh nelsan mandela se tathya liya gaya tha. agar aapko kisi aur rochak khabar ka gyaan ho to use vikipeediya:samaachaar/ummeedavaara‎ par sujhaaeain.

☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 14:05, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

dhanyavaad sanjeev ji.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 03:38, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

namaste bill ji, krupaya vikipeediya:samaachaar/ummeedavaar dekhein. do din pehle naamaankit samaachaar. thode samay baad baasi ho jaayega jabki angreji vikipeediya par yeh pehle hi prakaashit ho chuka hai. aap chaaho to usaka roop badalkar angreji vikipeediya ki tarah "vishv vyaapaar ko saral banaane ke uddeshya se taiyaar baali samjhaute ko sarvasammati se vishv vyaapaar sangathan mein sveekruti." bhi prakaashit kar sakte ho.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 02:34, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

yeh meri nazar mein tha sanjeev ji, main bas uchit samay ki prateeksha kar raha tha.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 06:37, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

bill ji angreji vikipeediya par baain or waali patti mein en:Current events naam ki kadi hai jismein haal mein hui ghatnaaon kya byaura milta hai. hamaari viki par bhi praveshadvaar:haal ki ghatanaaeain prushth ka kai samay se niyamit roop se adyatan kiya ja raha hai, aur sadasyon dvaara taaji saamagri daali ja rahi hai. kya angreji viki ki tarah hindi viki ki baanyeen patti par bhi mein "haal ki ghatanaaeain" link daala ja sakta hai? mere khyaal se ye bahut mahatvapoorn hai ki logon tak yeh prusht aur aasaani se pahunche, jisse ke hamaari vikipeediya pragatisheel prateet ho. haaain, mukhaprusht par mukhya samaachaar zaroor nazar aate hain, par dainik ghatnaaon ka byaura naheen milta. vartamaan mein agar koi is praveshadvaar par jaana chaahe to mukhaprushth par "samaachaar" link klik karne ke alaava aur koi saadhan naheen.░a▒a▓► shubham kanodiya ^vaarta 14:08, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

aapne achha sujhaav diya shubham ji. chooainki ab is prushth ka paryaapt roop se adyatan hota hai to ise saaidabaar mein avashya hona chaahiye. maine vi:samaaj mukhaprushth ko hata diya hai kyonki usaka bahut samay se adyatan hi naheen hua tha, agar aapko lagta hai ki usaki kadi ko vaapas laga diya jaana chaahiye to krupaya bataaeain.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 04:31, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

dhanyavaad. aaainkade dekhe jaaeain, to logon ke beech samaaj mukhaprushth bhi lok-priya hai (ya shaayad sidebar mein link hone ke kaaran ise zyaada hits milti hain?). jo bhi hai, is prusht ko sudhaarane ki zaroorat to hai hi. ░a▒a▓► shubham kanodiya ^vaarta 08:42, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Yes bill i agree some of the image uploaded by me were lacking leicensing part because initially i dint knew about which leicense applies were, i request you to if required please attach proper leicensing to images uploaded by me, i have provided source of image for every upload, and most of the images are taken from either english wikipedia or uefa.com or from related football club website.

I ll not be available on wikipedia as i use to be earlier, i ll be involved only in minor edit works, but no major page creation work or uploading work will be on from my end for some time now. So i request you to please correct the images uploaded by me. Thank you Sushilmishra (vaarta) 17:02, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

namaskaar, Bill william compton ji. aapke liye vikipeediya:nirvaachit soochi ummeedavaar/bhaarateeya janta party ke mukhyamantriyon ki soochi par ek sandesh hai.
aap is soochana ko kisi bhi samay mita sakte hai, iske liye vaarta sanpaadan mein jaakar {{sandesh}} mitaaeain.

prateek maalaveeya^vaarta 10:35, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

krupaya en:File:Map rajasthan dist Barmer.png ko vikikaumans par sthaanaantarit karein.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 08:05, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Y poorn hua.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 12:19, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

dhanyavaad bill ji.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 16:25, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

aapne mere dvaara likhit lekh "ishvar ke prati aaj ki maanasikta" ko hata diya hai iska mujhe bilkul bhi khed naheen hai aur isse mujhe bahut hi uttam seekh mili hai iske liye praarthi aapka sadaiv rini rahega kyonki likhne se pehle mujhe iske baare mein theek se samajh lena chaahiye tha parantu mera aapse vinaya sahit aagrah hai ki jab koi mera naam Google par khojata hai to sabse oopar ye hi lekh dikhaata hai aur jab koi ise padhne ke liye usapar klik karta hai to usapar likhkar aata hai ki ye lekh hataaya ja chuka hai, meri aapse pun: binti hai ki ya to aap mera lekh mere page se hata deejiye ya fir ise hataane ka uttam tareeka mujhe bata deejiye aur haaain bahut jald hi mein apne lekh post bhi karoonga jise aap jaroor padhiyega aur mujhe ummed hai ki vo lekh aap avashya hi shaamil kareinge ...aapka bahut bahut aabhaar

namaste bill ji, main vaarta:vikipeediya saaaincha soochi par aapki tippani chaahata hooain.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 18:47, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

maine tippani kar di hai sanjeev ji. smaran karaane ke liye dhanyavaad. aasha hai aniruddh ji mera auchitya samajh paaeainge.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 14:44, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

namaste bill ji, prushth praarambh (shaikshanik traimaasik patra) par hataane ke liye chal rahi charcha ka parinaam dhyaan se dekhein to prateet hota hai ki lekh ko naalanda (gair-sarkaari sangathan)#praaranbh shaikshik samvaad par anupreshit kiya jaana chaahiye vaheen lekh ka itihaas dekhne par gyaat hoga ki ajeet ji bhi lekh ko hataane ke liye sahamat hain. aapka is par kya nirnaya hai? mujhe lagta hai isko anupreshit karke charcha ko samaapt kiya jaaye.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 09:36, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

mera bhi yahi vichaar hai. main ise anupreshit karne ke pashchaat charcha samaapt kar deta hooain.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 14:49, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

uparokt donon parinaamon ke liye dhanyavaad.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 15:18, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

namaste bill ji, shreni:kaupi pest kiye hue lekh jinka srot maaloom hai mein aane vaale lekhon ke saath kya kiya jaaye?☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 15:13, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

sanjeev ji, jinke itihaas mein koi bhi avataran agar bina kaupeeraait ullanghan wala naheen hai unhein to sheegra dvaara hataana chaahiye, aur jinke itihaas mein bina ullanghan wala avataran upalabdh ho use poorvavat kar ke ullanghan vaale avataran chhipa dene chaahiye. agar kisi ko lekh ka nirmaan karna hai to vah pun: aisa karne ke liye svatantr hai.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 04:37, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

namaste bill ji, main suneel Gavaskar ke antararaashtreeya cricket shatakon ki soochi ko nirvaachit soochi ke liye naamaankit karna chaahata hooain. at: krupaya niymaavali aur nirvaachan paddhati ki jaankaari dein. yadi yeh abhi tak ban naheen paayi hai to banaane ke liye kuchh praarambhik charcha aarambh ki jaaye.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 20:36, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

main jald hi upayukt prastaav rakhata hooain.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 04:39, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

I have a doubt regarding templates. Are the templates named in English case sensitive? There are many templates with the same name (saaaincha:Infobox royalty & saaaincha:Infobox Royalty) (notice the capital R in the latter) but with different capitalization. These are infact two completely different templates, with their own hindi translations for parameters, although they look same. If I use one in place of the other, the parameters and fields change. It becomes very misleading.

This is infact the case with not one, but many such poorly imported templates from our English counterpart. What can we do about this?░a▒a▓► shubham kanodiya ^vaarta 16:53, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Yes, template names are case-sensitive, similar to article (or any other namespace for that matter). They can be merged to a single template with most appropriate fields and translation.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 18:56, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

krupaya vikipeediya:prushth hataane hetu charcha/lekh/jasabeer Chawla dekhein.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 11:10, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi.

The following XFDs need admin attention:

• vikipeediya:prushth hataane hetu charcha/lekh/hariraam paandeya
• vikipeediya:prushth hataane hetu charcha/lekh/hindi dalit saahit‍aaya
• vikipeediya:prushth hataane hetu charcha/lekh/hindi shabdaarth
• vikipeediya:prushth hataane hetu charcha/saaainche/Featured article

Best regards--siddhaarth ghai (vaarta) 05:48, 1 fravari 2014 (UTC)

These too:

• vikipeediya:prushth hataane hetu charcha/lekh/sanjaya mohhala
• vikipeediya:prushth hataane hetu charcha/lekh/krishna agnihotri

--siddhaarth ghai (vaarta) 05:53, 1 fravari 2014 (UTC)

And these three please:

• vikipeediya:prushth hataane hetu charcha/lekh/ashok manavaani
• vikipeediya:prushth hataane hetu charcha/lekh/aarakshit van
• vikipeediya:prushth hataane hetu charcha/lekh/rakshit van

--siddhaarth ghai (vaarta) 08:36, 12 fravari 2014 (UTC)

And the following:

• vikipeediya:prushth hataane hetu charcha/lekh/fruts khane k bhi hote hai ruls
• vikipeediya:prushth hataane hetu charcha/lekh/agrahari vaishya bandhoo (patrika)
• vikipeediya:prushth hataane hetu charcha/lekh/ishvari prasaad sharma
• vikipeediya:prushth hataane hetu charcha/lekh/association football

Thanks--siddhaarth ghai (vaarta) 12:46, 19 fravari 2014 (UTC)

And:

• vikipeediya:prushth hataane hetu charcha/lekh/raip gaayak
• vikipeediya:prushth hataane hetu charcha/lekh/vangaari maathe
• vikipeediya:prushth hataane hetu charcha/lekh/sarvodaya mahila vikaas pariyojana
• vikipeediya:prushth hataane hetu charcha/lekh/roodhivaadiyon ko aidvartaaijmant parivrtit karte hain
• vikipeediya:prushth hataane hetu charcha/lekh/vedaarthapaarijaat
• vikipeediya:prushth hataane hetu charcha/lekh/raameshvar kaamboj 'himaanshu'
• vikipeediya:prushth hataane hetu charcha/lekh/milind keshav

Thanks again :) --siddhaarth ghai (vaarta) 19:24, 28 fravari 2014 (UTC)

And:

• vikipeediya:prushth hataane hetu charcha/lekh/bhaamada parivaar
• vikipeediya:prushth hataane hetu charcha/lekh/Ahmad raja Khan kaadari
• vikipeediya:prushth hataane hetu charcha/faailein/Ram Sutar.jpg
• vikipeediya:prushth hataane hetu charcha/lekh/andaaj (1995 film)

--siddhaarth ghai (vaarta) 13:34, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

namaskaar.

jaadui shabdon ka anuvaad karna ab traansaletaviki par sambhav hai, parantu chooainki in anuvaadon ka asar sabhi sadasyon par padta hai, at: in badlaavon se pehle sarvasammati ki aavashyakta hai. jaadui shabdon ke anuvaad vikipeediya:chaupaal/jaadui shabd anuvaad par prastaavit hain. samay milne par krupaya in anuvaadon ko dekh lein aur charcha bhaag mein apni tippani dein, aur yadi anuvaad uchit lage to apna samarthan avashya dein. dhanyavaad--MediaWiki message delivery (vaarta) 17:32, 16 fravari 2014 (UTC)

bill ji namaskaar, haal hi mein mainne not kiya ki kisi prushth hataane ke kaaranon mein ek tha - kaupeeraait ullanghan, english viki se kaupi. poora poora yaad naheen ki exact statement kya thi aur kaun sa lekh tha. lekin isse mere man mein ek jijnyaaasa uthi hai jiska spashteekaran yadi aap kar dein to achha ho kyonki bahut jagah mainne bhi angreji viki se saamagri uthaakar anuvaad ki hai (udaaharan ke liye- seeepeeem). yadi vikipeediya svatantr kosh hai, jiska uddeshya hi hai ki kaupeeraait rahit gyaan upalabdh karaaya jaae, taaki koi bhi, kaheen bhi ise prayog kar sake, to fir kaupeeraait ullanghan kaise hai? kyonki aap bahut puraane aur neeti ke visheshagya sadasya hain at: mainne aapse salaah lena uchit samjha. krupaya maargadarshan karein ki kaheen main bhi koi galati to naheen kar raha? angreji viki se saamagri uthaakar anuvaad karna kya hamesha galat hai ya kisi vishesh paristhiti mein hi? --☎manoj khuraana ^vaarta 13:15, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Talk page stalker

@Manojkhurana:

namaskaar manoj ji,

angreji vikipeediya, athva anya vikimeediya pariyojanaaon se saamagri lene ke sandarbh mein hindi vikipeediya par yeh dishaanirdesh hai. vikipeediya ek mukt jnyaaanakosh avashya hai, parantu iski saamagri ka punarprayog karne ki bhi kuchh shartein hain. angreji vikipeediya ke liye ye shartein aap en:WP:REUSE par pa sakte hain.

sankshipt mein kahein to saamagri li to ja sakti hai, parantu srot you.aar.L athva lekhakon ke naam bataakar unhein attribution (shreya) diye bina naheen. yeh shreya ki shart vikipeediya ke CC-BY-SA license ka "BY" hai. yeh shreya dena ek kaanooni license (vikipeediya ke creative commons license) ka ek bhaag hai. yadi is license ki shartein maane bina ham saamagri ka prayog karte hain to vah license ki kaanooni sharton ka ullanghan, aur isliye kaupeeraait ullanghan hua.

aage bill shaayad aapko aur jaankaari de sakein.--siddhaarth ghai (vaarta) 13:58, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

manoj ji, vaise siddhaarth ke vivran ke pashchaat bataane ke liye jyaada kuchh bachata naheen hai, bas kuchh aur jodna chaahooainga. vikipeediya pariyojana par nirbhar karta hai (de facto taur par) ki vo bina shreya vaale anoodit prushthon (jinmein maulikta naheen hai) ko kaise sambhaalati hai. aadarsh roop se bina shreya ke prushth ko anoodit naheen karna chaahiye va aise kisi prushth ko ekdam hata dena chaahiye parantu jaisa maine kaha alag-alag viki aise prushthon ko vibhinn tareeko se sambhaalati hain. masalan simpal angreji viki par aise prushthon ko ekdam hata diya jaata hai parantu angreji viki par thodi dheel hai. yahaaain hindi viki par aise prushth jo keval masheeni roop se anoodit kiye gaye hain va unamein maanav sahayog bahut kam ya bilkul naheen hai unhein sheegra hata diya jaata hai parantu agar prushth ki saamagri padhne va samajhne yogya hai to unhein amooman naheen hataaya jaata. vikimeediya foundation ne bhi bina shreya antaraviki anuvaad karne par koi thos rukh naheen banaaya hai.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 14:25, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

aaj antararaashtreeya mahila diwas hai. vishv ke vibhinn kshetron mein mahilaaon ke prati sammaan, prashansa aur pyaar prakat karte hue is din ko mahilaaon ke aarthik, raajaneetik aur saamaajik upalabdhiyon ke upalakshya mein utsav ke taur par manaaya jaata hai. noor inaayat Khan dviteeya vishv yuddh ke dauraan bhaarateeya mool ki mitr deshon ki jaasoos thi, jinke balidaan aur saahas ki gaatha Britain aur France mein khoob gaai jaati hain. isliye aaj ke din ko vishesh din maanate huye is prushth ko nirvaachit lekh hetu naamaankit kiya gaya hai. is prushth ki banaavat, rachanaatmakata aur vishyavastu sandarbh sahit va bharpoor hai. ek vishv prasiddh saahasi mahila ka sammaan karte huye ise nirvaachit lekh hetu apna yahaaain samarthan devein.--maala chaube^vaarta 07:02, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

8 March 2014 ko mukhaprushth samaachaar ka adyatan hua jismein aapke dvaara likhe gaye ya kaafi sudhaare gaye lekh Malaysia airlines udaan 370 se tathya liya gaya tha. agar aapko kisi aur rochak khabar ka gyaan ho to use vikipeediya:samaachaar/ummeedavaara‎ par sujhaaeain.

☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 17:03, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

dhanyavaad sanjeev ji.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 18:25, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

aap ko kyon lag raha hai ki yeh prachaar pej hai sirf panna hataane se to baat nahi banti bataaye taaki ham jaan sake sake-Ajey gupta (vaarta) 07:59, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Are you interested in adding Hindi translations for the text at Commons:Commons:WikiProject India? It is good to have the page be bilingual in English and Hindi.

Thank you WhisperToMe (vaarta) 15:37, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Where do you want the translations?<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 15:42, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Please put the Hindi on the same page, with each Hindi line after the English line. For section headings, please use the format English name/Hindi name, such as what I did at Commons:Commons:WikiProject Argentina. Thank you so much! WhisperToMe (vaarta) 03:51, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

namaskaar, aapse nivedan hai ki aap krupaya hindi viki-sammelan ke baare mein apne vichaar yahaaain prakat karein. --mujmmil (vaarta) 16:12, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello,

Just a heads-up that I had to temporarily disable abusefilter 20 to perform a rename requested on meta. I have re-enabled it now.

Regards, Ajraddatz (vaarta) 17:10, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi.

User:Enrevseluj recently left a message at vikipeediyaa_vaarta:prabandhana_adhikaara_hetu_nivedan#Wikipedia_France asking for help regarding a deletion discussion on fr.wp (fr:Discussion:Vala (Inde)/Suppression).

Could you please inform him that the article on hi.wp is about a city and not the kingdom?

Also, the english wikipedia page and the hindi wikipedia page on the city were in two different wikidata items which I've merged into [1]. But I'm not sure whether all the items refer to the city, or if some refer to the kingdom.

Also, the dynasty which ruled the city is en:Maitraka.

This information might be helpful for them. Thanks--siddhaarth ghai (vaarta) 15:19, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Sid, Vala was a principality state, for which I've created a separate item, and Vallabhi is a city. I have tried to resolve Enrevseluj's doubts.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 20:32, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Btw, I transferred the post to the embassy page and informed the same to the French admin on his/her talk page. I've seen an IP-signed thank you message on the talk page which I guess is that of the admin's. mujmmil (vaarta) 12:24, 23 March 2014 (UTC).

bill, do samaan lekhon mein se hataane ke liye lekh chunate samay main lekh ki vartamaan sthiti par par dhyaan rakhata hooain. jis samay maine lekh ka sthaanaantaran kiya tha vartamaan lekh par naatak ke paatron ki soochi (mere dvaara hi sahi) banaayi ja chuki thi. doosare lekh se yeh behtar ho gaya tha. yeh lekh bhi mere dvaara shuru naheen kiya gaya tha. donon lekhon ke yogadaan kartaaon ke itihaas ko marj karne ki suvidha abhi hamaare paas naheen hai. fir bhi aap chaahein to mere dvaara shreya se vanchit kiye jaane ke bhool ka parimaarjan kar sakte hain. bas itna dhyaan rakhiyega ki nae parivartan lekh ki saamagri ko badhaaen ya utana hi rahane dein na ki kam karein. viki lekh saamagri ke kaupi ko kaupeeraait bataane waali koi neeti bani ho to krupaya avagat karein. aniruddh vaarta 12:02, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

@aniruddh: aniruddh ji, prushthon ke itihaas ko vilay karne ki suvidha upalabdh hai. ise itihaas vilay kehte hain. iske liye jis naam par lekh maujood hona chaahiye, uske alaava dusare lekh ko us naam par sthaanaantarit karna hota hai. isse mool prushth hat jaaega. fir prushth itihaas mein ja kar hataae gaye avataranon ko punarsthaapit karna hota hai. isse donon prushthon ka itihaas vilay ho jaata hai aur lekhakon ka shreya maujood rahata hai.

jahaaain tak viki ke lekhon ke kaupeeraait ki baat hai, to vikipeediya ka license kisi ko bhi paath ka prayog karne ki anumati is shart par deta hai ki mool lekhakon ko shreya diya jaae. ismein khud vikipeediya bhi shaamil hai, kyonki saamagri ke kaupeeraait holder lekhak swayam hain, vikipeediya ya vikimeediya naheen. iska arth hai ki vilay karte samay mool lekhakon ko shreya dena aavashyak hai. shreya mool lekh ke liye ek haaiparalink ke taur par bhi diya ja sakta hai, par aise mein mool lekh ko hataaya naheen ja sakta (arthaat chaahe punarnirdesh ke roop mein hi sahi, par prushth ko rakhana aavashyak ho jaata hai).--siddhaarth ghai (vaarta) 13:44, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

bill ji namaskaar. aapka sadasya prushth dek raha tha. bahut achhi hai. doosra paira me "main hindi vikipeediya par prabandhakon hooain." likha gaya hai.mujhe laga ki shaayad taiping galati hai. meri hindi itni achhi nahi hai. agar mai galatahu to, maaf kare. Visdaviva (vaarta) 11:28, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

vardan ji namaskaar, aapne bilkul theek galati par dhyaan dilaaya. uske liye aapka dhanyavaad.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 02:28, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

janaab maine khaङaini naam ka prushth banaaya tha. khaङaini, uttarapradesh raajya ke kannauj jile ka charchit kasba hai. yahaaain pracheen samay ke mandir aur imaaratein hain. jinke baare mein logon ko jaankaari pradaan karne ke liye prushth ko nirmaan kiya gaya. jise aapne arthaheen bataate huye mita diya. aashutosh Singh bais (vaarta) 09:24, 1 April 2014 (UTC) aashutosh Singh bais

bais ji, krupaya prushth ki laal kadi muhaiya karaaen.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 02:28, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

bais ji shaayad khaङaini prushth ki baat kar rahe hain. lekin mujhe na hi to Google khoj mein iska koi parinaam mila aur na hi prushth mein koi sandarbh tha. iske atirikt mainne socha ki kuchh log "d" ke sthaan par galati se "ङ" likh dete hain lekin mujhe to "khadini" ka bhi koi sandarbh naheen mila.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 13:32, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

• I have observed here that in most of the recent edits(which can be termed as major addition of data) made by few editors, the edits lack any references tag attached to it as we observe in English Wikipedia, as matter of fact these articles lack references completely. Because once in 2007 I was said on English Wikipedia that an article lacking references is like body with out soul, it is like a long story written by some 1. (I have just now found few discussions about that user induging in such activity before also [2]) i request you too please check all the contributions of user anunad this guy is creating mess here look at this anunaad Singh ne saadhyavaad prushth uddeshyavaad par sthaanaantarit kiya: yahi maanak shabdaavali hai. how can this guy term it as manak or amanak shabd? there is not discussion nothing on this and he simple term it as manak just because he thinks so. guys is on creating mess, is this an essay writing stuff? tackle it now !!

• Second thing that i have observed recently is that most of the Hindi Wikipedia articles lack any attachment in interwiki. Which means neither no page exist in other languages or the creator of that page is not interested in adding this to interwiki, i am point this because if page is not attached in interwiki then there is a possibility that multiple pages with same name can be created with little spelling difference example of which was spicejet which had two different pages in hindi with different spellings, recently i merged both.

• Thirdly, edits made by anoynomus users(users without wikipedia id; users on whose edits we see ip-address instead if an user name), most of this edits are vandalism, are admins paying any attention to such edits and such anoynomus users. Because recently I came across many such edits and removed it.

• Fourthly, I find some editors creating pages here which contain only 1 line or max 3 to 4 lines with no details, no references nothing.

I wrote this 4 points because this are related to making Hindi Wikipedia trustworthy. Sushilmishra (vaarta) 00:00, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi Bill :)

Mediawiki developers have an update scheduled for 18:00–20:00 UTC on 3 April 2014 (11:30pm on 3 April to 1:30am on 4 April in IST). This scheduled update includes disabling the typography refresh beta feature and making some of those changes default. Since this changes the site css, changes will need to be made to fix the main page. And these changes can be made only after the mediawiki change takes effect. So we need an admin online during that time window today. Will you be able to do this?

Further info: vikipeediya:chaupaal#Changes_to_the_default_site_typography_coming_soon, vikipeediya:prabandhaka_soochanaapat#mukhaprushtha_mein_prastaavit_takaneekee_badalaav, mw:Typography_refresh, labsconsole:Deployments#Week_of_March_31st.

Best regards--siddhaarth ghai (vaarta) 09:36, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi Sid. I'm available, and will do all the changes you have proposed at vikipeediya:prabandhak soochanaapat#mukhaprushth mein prastaavit takaneeki badlaav. Do you want me to replace <h2> with <h3>, as suggested by Kanodia? I guess, I'll have to repeatedly check the main page at that time slot.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 12:30, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Thanks! :)

Yes, the h2s need to be changed to h3s. Content of sadasya:Siddhartha Ghai/sandbox3 goes at mukhaprushth, sadasya:Siddhartha Ghai/vector.css goes in Mediawiki:Vector.css and sadasya:Siddhartha_Ghai/common.css goes into Mediawiki:Common.css.

And yes, you'll have to keep a watch during that time. You could either keep checking Special:Version to see if the mediawiki version has changed, or keep checking the beta features section of the preferences, from which typography refresh should dissappear following the update.

Best regards--siddhaarth ghai (vaarta) 13:06, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Got it! Looks like I will have to miss some TV time :(<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 17:53, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Y poorn hua<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 19:39, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Thanks :)

Sorry about your TV time. IIRC, you had access to some form of screenreader. I just remembered that the headings were changed from divs to h2s by me to make them accessible in screenreaders. Not sure how much that is affected by the change to h3s. Could you check?

Best regards--siddhaarth ghai (vaarta) 10:30, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Sid, currently, I don't have any direct access to screenreader. I have a friend, and I can ask for favor. But unfortunately, he doesn't read Hindi.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 06:41, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

No problem. Shouldn't be necessary anymore. Aniruddha has tested it and it seems we're safe with the h3s. Thanks again for the help--siddhaarth ghai (vaarta) 13:32, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

namaste bill ji, krupaya en:File:Old Jammu railway station.jpg ko kaumans par sthaanaantarit karein.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 14:39, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Y poorn hua.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 14:56, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

dhanyavaad bill ji.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 15:12, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

ek file en:File:Karpal Singh.jpg bhi chaahiye.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 13:14, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Y poorn hua.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 15:14, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

bill kaumpatan ji! mainne kuchh vikipeediya sambandhit sandeshon ka anuvaad kiya tha par abhi tak kisi ne unako review naheen kiya hai, isi kaaran vo bekaar hi pade hai to kya aap unako review kar deinge? agar koi galati rah gayi ho to mujhe soochit kar deejiyega. yeh hai vo do [[3]] aur [[4]] dhanyavaad. peeyoosh^vaarta 09:18, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

piyoosh ji, daan sanchaya sandesh mein kaafi kamiyaaain theen, jinhein maine sudhaar diya hai va sameeksha bhi kar di hai. doosare sandesh ki bhi jald sameeksha karne ka prayaas karooainga.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 12:20, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

bahut-bahut dhanyavaad bill kaumpatan ji! peeyoosh^vaarta 07:18, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

bill kaumpatan ji aapne doosare sandesh ki abhi tak sameeksha naheen ki, kya aap doosare kisi kaam mein vyast hai? agar aisa hai to jab aap ko samay mile to jab kar dijeeyega, mujhe koi jaldi naheen hai. peeyoosh^vaarta 14:44, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

Will you please convert en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:New_R._S._J._Public_School to Hindi Also tell me how to convert a page to hindi.

bill ji, yadi samay mile to nirvaachit soochi ke liye kaise naamaankit karein iska bhi vivran vikipeediya:nirvaachit soochi ummeedavaar par dein.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 15:58, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

vikipeediya:nirvaachit soochi ummeedavaar se kaupi-pest:

"soochi ko naamaankit karne ke liye soochi ke vaarta prushth par {{nirvaachit soochi ummeedavaar}} laga kar prushth sahej dein. saheje hue prushth par aapko "naamaankan aarambh karein" par klik karna hai. jo prushth khul kar aae usamein {{subst:naya nirvaachit soochi prastaav|soochi ka naam jise aap naamaankit kar rahe hain|~~~~|aapki tippaniyaaain}} jod dein. naamaankan prushth ke nirmaan ke pashchaat {{vikipeediya:nirvaachit soochi ummeedavaar/naamaankit lekh ka naam}} ko is prushth ke "naamaankan" anubhaag mein sabse oopar jod dein."

sanjeev ji, kya aapko yeh nirdesh samajhne mein samasya ho rahi hai? agar aisa kuchh hai to spasht na hone ke liye kshama maangata hooain. aap kaheinge to sambandhit prushth par ise aur saral tareeke se samajhaane ka prayaas karooainga.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 13:17, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

likha hua to sab dhng se hi hai. shaayad mainne hi dhng se naheen padha. meri galati ke liye kshama chaahata hooain.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 10:07, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

please have a look at this article samaajashaastreeya siddhaant you will find a line in here anubhavajanya vivechan[1][2] aur vivechanaatmak vishleshan[3] ki vibhinn paddhatiyon ka upayog karta hai, aksar jiska dhyeya saamaajik kalyaan ke anusaran mein aise gyaan ko laagoo karna hota hai. in this line you ll find 1, 2, 3 number which are as it is and which will appear in case if some 1 is copying matter from other sites or other articles over here and there you wont find purnaviram being used but instead fullstop, this is another proof of copyright violation taking place. I dont know the original source of those line but you can find them on that article samaajashaastreeya siddhaant.

similar activity has been observed on another page named nafrteeti if you go thru this pages then you will find those numbers again which again prove that some copy paste activity from other articles or sources is taking place which is copy right violation. Sushilmishra (vaarta) 22:54, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

shreemaan aapne mera lekh musahafe faatema vikeepeediya se hata diya hai aur aapne usaka jo kaaran bataaya hai main usase sahamat naheen hooain aur mujhe lagta hai ki aap islaami aur shiya itihaas ki jaankaari naheen rakhate hain, agar aapko lagta hai ki yeh lekh prakaashit kiye jaane ke yogya naheen tha ko main uske kaaran avshya jaanana chaahooainga, kyonki mainne ise likhne mein bahut mehnat ki thi, kya aapko is lekh se koi aapatti thi ya aap yeh pasand naheen karte hain ki musalmaanon se sambandhit koi lek logon ke saamane aae aur logon ko musalmaanon aur islaam ke baare mein jaankaari ho sake? ````tajzaidi

shreemaan aapka jo lekh hataaya gaya hai usaka kaaran "ajnyaaanakosheeya va aspasht lekh" diya gaya hai. sarvapratham, yeh hindi vikipeediya hai isliye lekh mein hindi ka istemaal karein. aapne devanaagari mein urdoo likhi hui thi. doosra, urdoo mein bhi lekh aspasht tha, kuchh arth nikaalna bahut mushkil tha. doosare sadasya bhi lekh ko hataane ke paksh mein the. main anunaad ji va prateek ji se tippani karne ka anurodh karooainga. anunaad ji ne vaarta prushth par lekh ki avastha ke baare mein apne vichaar rakhe the va prateek ji ne use sheegra hataane ke liye naamaankit kiya tha, jiske pashchaat maine ise hataaya.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 14:25, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

tajzaidi ji, krupaya lekh ko hindi bhaasha mein likhe. urdoo bhaasha mein likha ajnyaaanakosheeya lekh vikipeediya par sveekaar naheen kiya ja sakta. main aapko bataana chaahata hooain ki vikipeediya kisi dharm ke khilaaf naheen hai.--prateek maalaveeya^vaarta 04:09, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

mera vichaar hai ki tajzaidi ji ka maargadarshan kiya jaana chaahiye tatha lekh punarsthaapit kar dena chaahiye. unhein lekh mein sudhaar ke liye thoda samay diya jaana chaahiye. baad mein punarvichaar kiya ja sakta hai. main maanata hooain ki ajnyaaanakosheeya lekh vikipeediya par sveekaar naheen kiya ja sakta, lekin devanaagari mein urdoo likhna koi jyaada galat baat naheen hai, kuchh paathakon ko padhne mein takaleef jaroor ho sakti hai, lekin fir bhi urdoo aur hindi mein vibhaajan na kiya jaae to behtar hai. rojmarra ki jubaan mein urdoo ke hajaaron lafj hindi mein istemaal hote hain aur kisi ko pata bhi naheen chalta ki hindi kya hai aur urdoo kya hai - jaise ameer-gareeb urdoo ke shabd hain. jyaada mushkil urdoo likhi ho to anuvaad ka taig to hai hi. tajzaidi ji se nivedan hai ki jitna ho sake hindi ke shabd prayog karein. koi dikkat ho to sahaayata ke liye vi:chaupaal par sandesh chhod dein.--☎manoj khuraana ^vaarta 04:55, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

manoj ji, aapne shaayad mera uttar theek se padha naheen. urdoo mein bhi lekh ka kuchh arth naheen ban raha tha (main urdoo jubaan kaafi had tak samajhta hooain). anunaad ji ka bhi yahi mat tha. agar aapko lagta hai ki vishay ke oopar lekh hona chaahiye va yeh ek jnyaaanakosheeya vishay hai to main aapke ya tajzaidi ji ke saindabauks mein lekh ki prati punarsthaapit kar doonga. uske baad paryaapt sampaadan ke saath ise mukhya naamasthaan par sthaapit kiya ja sakta hai.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 10:13, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Namskar,

Why not write Hindi in India's simplest Nukta and Shirorekha free Gujanagari(Gujarati) Script? If Hindi can be written in Urdu or in Roman script then why it can't be done in Gujanagari script?

All languages derived from Brahmi are equal in the eyes of Indian people.However as per Google transliteration, a Gujanagari script is India's simplest script next to Roman script resembling old Brahmi Script.

In order to maintain two languages script per state, People may learn Hindi in their state language script through script converter or in Roman script.

Most who try to promote Rajbhasha Hindi in other states know English very well but try to deprive others from learning English and don't provide general knowledge through wiki projects via translation /transliteration in Hindi. These are the same Sanskrit pundits who deprived common people from learning holy Devanagari script.

Why not attach a Indian languages script converter to Wiki Web pages?

Most Hindi states students get their education in two scripts while regional states students are given education in three scripts.Why?

Why can't regional states students learn Hindi in India's simplest Nuktaa and Shirorekhaa free Gujarati script or in their state scripts ?

Since Hamaari Boli /Hindustani doesn't have it's own script , it can be written in any easy script? See how easy it is to learn/write Gujanagari letters via English letters

ડ/ટa…a…a…a…a….ક (k),ફ(F), ડ (d) , ઠ (th), હ (h), ટ (T), ઢ(dh), થ(th) પ(P), ય(Y) , ખ(kh), ષ(sh)

R/2…a…a… ….. ર(R), ચ (ch),સ(S), શ(sh), અ(A)

C/4…a…a…a…a….ગ (g), ભ (bh),ઝ (Z), જ (J) ણ(N), બ(bh) લ(L), વ(V)

દ …a…a…a…..દ(D),ઘ(dh),ઘ(gh),ઈ(ee,ii), ઈ(I,i), છ (chh)

m…aa…aa…aa…aa…aa…aaમ(M)

n…a…a…a…a…a….ન (n,N),ત(T,t)

U…aa…aa…aa…aa…aa…aaળ(r,l

India needs simple script but Let the people of India decide what's good for them.

Are there nuktaa in Sanskrit Script?

http://www.omniglot.com/writing/sanskrit.htm

See the Loan words in Hindi from Persian and Arabic.

http://www.omniglot.com/writing/hindi.htm

India's simplest script.

http://www.omniglot.com/writing/gujarati.htm

Thanks,

Ken

namaste bill ji, mere dvaara naalaapat baalamani amma ko nirvaachit lekh parakh hetu naamaankit kiya gaya hai. yeh lekh Bhaarat ki kshetreeya bhaasha malayalam ki kaalajayi lekhika jinhein "grand madar of malayalam litrechar" kaha jaata hai, par hai. iski sabse badi visheshata yeh hai, ki itne sundar tareeke se na to malayalam viki par aur na aaingreji viki par yeh lekh bana hai. is lekh ko vikipeediya:is saptaah ka sudhaar hetu lekh pariyojana ke antargat 23 April 2014 se 3 May 2014 tak sadasyon dvaara sudhaar kiya gaya hai aur iski sthiti gunavatta ke anuroop hui hai. sadasyon ki sahamati se is lekh ko nirvaachit lekh parakh hetu prastut kiya gaya hai. nirvaachit hone ke pashchaat hindi viki par yeh kisi bhaarateeya bhaasha ke kaalajayi saahityakaar par pehla nirvaachit lekh ya shreshth lekh hoga. is kaalajayi mahila saahityakaar ka sammaan karte huye ise nirvaachit lekh hetu apna yahaaain samarthan dene ki krupa karein .--maala chaube^vaarta 05:51, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

I have created a new hindi wiki page -- nyoo_aar._es._je._pablik_skool. I want you to convert the texts into Hindi please. Also i want to make a redirect from -- New R. S. J. Public School to nyoo_aar._es._je._pablik_skool.--Prathamprakash29 (vaarta) 11:57, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

bill mate why there is no news about indian election on hindi wikipedia main page news section?? Hindi language is spoken most in india and hindi wikipedia isnt show casing important and major news related to india, is there any sort of bias going on? English wikipedia is showing this event on home page news. please update news section with latest and important news. Sushilmishra (vaarta) 14:50, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

der aye par durust aye!!! shaabaash!! bill dost Sushilmishra (vaarta) 15:22, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

susheel ji, sadasyon ke vaarta prushth par sandesh chhodne ke bajaay naamaankan prakriya mein agar aap bhi bhaageedaari kareinge to jaada faladaayi hoga. maine adyatan kar diya hai kyonki kai sadasya (shubham ji, prateek ji, sanjeev ji, aadi) khabar ko post karne ke paksh mein the. agar aap bhi bhavishya mein jaldi apna mat sambandhit prushth par prakat kareinge to samaachaar jaldi post honge.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 15:25, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Bill i have said about it many times if there is any vote going on then please post about it on chupal, (well few are doing it) i cant see any notice about this event on chupal. More over as you and sanjeev are admins on this site so i can question you guys about it, like i always say i am just an user of this site and its the responsibility of admins like you to keep it up to date and user's responsibility is to remind admins of the flaws. Next time remember to inform users about any vote via chupal. And once again good job mate... Sushilmishra (vaarta) 15:36, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

More over I would like to point out delay on your part irrespective of my vote as you yourself has said kyonki kai sadasya (shubham ji, prateek ji, sanjeev ji, aadi) khabar ko post karne ke paksh mein the. it took you about 2 days after results were announced and about 9 hours since your 1st post on that topic, if you admins work with little more urgency then we can make a big difference. Sushilmishra (vaarta) 15:48, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

@Sushilmishra: mukhaprushth samaachaaron ke liye naamaankan prushth par pratyek naamaankan ke baad matadaan hota hai. aap is panne ko bukamaark karke rakh sakte ho jisse hamesha iski jaaainch ki ja sake. aapse anurodh hai ki vahaaain par samay par mat dein. yeh ek lagaataar hone waali prakriya hai at: ismein hamesha chaupaal par charcha karne ki aavashyakta naheen hai.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 16:09, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

susheel ji, maine aapke sandesh ke pashchaat isliye adyatan kiya kyonki yeh svabhaavik tha ki aap bhi vahaaain samarthan hi karte, is tarah maine ise apavaad ki tarah liya. parantu har samay apavaad naheen ho sakta. har cheej ka ek tantr hota hai, aapko yeh lagta hoga ki aakhir kyon prabandhak swayam sab kuchh kyon naheen kar dete. parantu agar aisa hone laga to araajakata aaegi. prabandhak sadasyon dvaara banaae gaye mataikya ke anusaar kaarya karte hain. aise kai prakaran alag-alag viki (hindi sahit) par ghatit ho chuke hain jahaaain prabandhako ke kaaran pariyojana ko nuksaan pahuaincha hai. niyam isliye hi bante hain jisse aage galatiyaaain na hon ya kam hon.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 17:15, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

fine mate i agree with you but some topics specially in news section need not go for a community vote example general election results of world's largest democracy or say some natural disaster or losing a plane, as this will cause un-necessary delay in publishing an important news, i request you to please follow your instinct while putting something for a community vote related to important news item. Sushilmishra (vaarta) 18:43, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

namaste bill ji, kya chitr:Anandipatelimg.jpg mukt chitr hai athva iska pareekshan abhi naheen ho paaya?☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 14:22, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

namaste sanjeev ji, maine aapke sandesh ke turant pashchaat chitr ko hataane ke liye naamaankit kar diya tha, jise hata bhi diya gaya hai.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 18:27, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

dhanyavaad bill ji.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 20:15, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

abhi ek aur chitr File:Anandiben Patel - 15th Gujarat CM.jpg viki-kaumans par lagaaya gaya hai. kya yeh license ki drushti se theek hai? upload karne vaale ne ise apna kaarya bataaya hai lekin pratham drushtaya dekhne se mujhe to lag raha hai ki chitr kaheen se krop karke lagaaya hua hai.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 08:17, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

sanjeev ji, chitr moolat: vishay ke Youtube prushth se liya gaya hai, arthaat kaupeeraait ullanghan. maine sheegra hataane ke liye naamaankit kar diya hai.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 13:09, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

kya File:Anandiben Patel.jpg ko kaam mein lena theek hai? kyonki iske bhi kaumans ke prushth par yahi likha hai ki "A normal copyright tag is still required".☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 13:18, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

sajeev ji, is chitr ko bina kisi samasya ke istemaal kiya ja sakta hai. maine laaiseins spasht kar diya hai.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 13:29, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

dhanyavaad bill ji.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 14:13, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

namaste bill ji, krupaya vikipeediya:samaachaar/ummeedavaar par taaja naamaankan dekhein aur yadi sab theek-thaak ho to krupaya ise post kar dein.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 14:43, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

aap mere sadasya naam badal praapt karne mein meri madad kar sakta hai is parivartan ke anusaar? -- saami ^vaarta 17:53, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

krupaya yahaaain apna anurodh rakhein.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 07:18, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Bill mate i would like to bring to your notice a thing which irritated me since day 1,

pages lacking references, specially those created by a particular author who claims to be highly skilled in Hindi and all blah blah blah blah blah

small example just look at here i made a page denish Bhaarat i know its pathetic,language wise lol but look at it it have a info box, pictures attached, many in-line references and it is attached even in inter-wiki and compare this with shukraneeti lacks basic info box, no pics, no references and not attached in inter-wiki looks like another shabby work of essay writing.

you defend such author by saying they are contributing since time immemorial, hell i ask you what sort of contribution? i always found such shabby work from such authors, even you look the work of such authors its like shabby essay, lacking references, basic info boxes and if you try to reform such authors they go on personal attacks. Pathetic work here is being lauded really pathetic work.

look at here denish Bhaarat contains 27,450 bytes of data and it contain 15 in-line references and on other hand shukraneeti contains 156,617 bytes of data and it have no not a single reference, only it contains some talk about 3 books under the heading of sandarbh granth soochi which in English Wikipedia would be under heading of Further reading.

Bill i don't wish to know what has happened in the past, who contributed more or other crap but I expect some reforms on par with English Wikipedia. You have been silent on many topics which i raised but now i expect you to answer. Sushilmishra (vaarta) 19:03, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

@Sushilmishra: krupaya ek to ek hi vishay se sambandhit alag-alag jagah charchaaeain na kiya karein aur doosra thoda shaanti se kaam lein. agar hamaara uddeshya ek hai to har samasya ka hal nikaala ja sakta parantu uske liye thoda dhairya aavashyak hai. aur chinta na karein aapko koi block naheen kar raha. main jald hi aapko uttar deta hooain.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 17:51, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

@Bill william compton: mate i have never started the conversation at multiple location i was pinged to comment on those and matter of discussion was same so how come its my mistake? Bill mate, is it a mistake to demand for references? Is it a mistake to demand a bit more content in a page? Is it a mistake to demand admins to ask such authors to not indulge in such activities?

I agree nothing is perfect but atleast we can work on it. I am not asking you to throw some 1 out but at least ask them to not repeat it, you got authors here who are creating such content on mass scale. You got authors here who are banned on English Wikipedia for such activity but are being encouraged here on the name of "they are contributing".

If you try to ask for some reforms then people say hey you are not good writer yourself how dare you ask others or like I am here for so many years, I am largest contributor.

Sushilmishra (vaarta) 18:08, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

namaste bill ji, main pichhle kuchh dinon se dekh raha hooain ki jab bhi kisi prushth ko angreji vikipeediya se aayaat karta hooain to saamaanyat: gaharaai kam ho jaati hai. iska kya kaaran hai?☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 16:15, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

sanjeev ji, aisa hona to svabhaavik hai. gaharaai ek sootr dvaara nikaali jaati hai, jo hai: gaharaai = (kul sampaadan/sabhi prushth) x (gair-lekh prushth/lekh prushth)². jaisa ki aap dekh hi rahe hain ki 'lekh prushth' sootr mein bhaajak hai, matlab gaharaai lekho ke varg ke vyutkramaanupaati hai. iska seedha arth yeh hai ki jab aap lekho ko aayaat karte hain to gaharaai kam ho jaati hai aur jab saaainche aadi ko aayaat karte hain to gaharaai badh jaati hai. vaise gaharaai ka itni gaharaai se dhyaan rakhane ki jaroorat naheen :) viki ke vikaas ke saath-saath gaharaai swayam badhti chali jaaegi.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 16:58, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

yahaaain jab ham ek prushth aayaat karte hain to uske saath lagbhag 10-12 kul sampaadan bhi to aayaat karte hain. chooainki (kul sampaadan) upar hai at: gaharaai badhni chaahiye. iske atirikt jab main ek prushth ko aayaat karta hooain aur ek bina aayaat kiye seedha nirmit karta hooain tab sootr ke anusaar gaharaai doosare vaale mein adhik ghatani chaahiye lekin hota isale ulat hai.

aaj mainne ek aur baat par dhyaan diya. mainne nisha Desai bisvaal ke 25 avataran aayaat kiye to kul prushthon ki sankhya 1,11,788 se badhkar 1,11,813 ho gayi. arthaat mere dvaara aayaat kiye hue pratyek avataran ki ganana ek prushth ki bhaaainti hui hai aur is tarah ki ganana avashya hi gaharaai ko kam karti hai. lekin is tarah ki prushth sankhya mein badhotri bhi ek alag parinaam ki or le jaati hai. iska arth ye bhi hota hai ki ham vishesh aaainkade prushth par galat sankhya dekh rahe hain. yadi vo sankhya galat hai to use kaise sudhaara ja sakta hai?☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 20:38, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

sanjeev ji, jab prushth aayaat hota hai to saath ke sampaadan to aate hain parantu software unhein kul sampaadan mein naheen ginta. aap khud hi dekhiye agar aisa hone laga to detaabes mein ek hi taaimastaimp par do alag-alag pariyojanaaon mein ek sadasya dvaara ek saath pravishti ho jaaeaingi, jo takaneeki roop se sambhav naheen hai. aayaat dvaara detaabes ki pravishtiyaan dupleeket ki jaati hain isliye aapke dvaara kiye sampaadan do baar naheen gine jaate.

aisa to naheen hona chaahiye. main kisi prushth ko aayaat kar ke iski jaaainch karooainga aur fir aapko uttar doonga.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 17:58, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

theek hai, main pratiksha karunga. iske alaava abhilaash sharma ji file kaupeeraait ke sambandh mein jaankaari chaahate hain. yadi sambhav ho to unke vaartaaprushth par unhein upayukt sthaan ka pata de do jisse vo praarambhik jaankaari praapt kar sakein.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 18:36, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

samay mile to krupaya svat: pareekshit adhikaar ke liye naamaankan ki sameeksha karein.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 12:43, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

sanjeev ji, naamaankan ke pashchaat kam se kam teen-chaar din ka samay dena uchit rahata hai. ati sakriya pariyojanaaon par bhi do-teen din ki avadhi ke pashchaat naamaankan safl ghoshit kiya jaata hai. main kal iski sameeksha kar looainga kyonki pehle mujhe inke sampaadan dekhne honge.<>< bill William kaumpatan^vaarta 14:53, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

dhanyavaad. vaise mujhe bhi itni jaldi naheen hai. chooainki mujhe ye adhikaar bina kisi naamaankan ke hi diya tha at: meri is sambandh mein jaankaari poorn naheen ho paayi.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 16:54, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

namaste bill ji, chitr PicsArt 1401341004384.jpg ko hataane ke liye chal rahi charcha mein apalodakarta ka kehna hai ki unhonne yeh chitr apne camere se liya hai. chooainki camere se liye gaye chitr mein neeche vivran mein camere ka vivran bhi hona chaahiye lekin usamein aisa kuchh naheen hai. iske atirikt kya kisi pustak ke mukhaprushth ka chitr lena mudraadhikaar ullanghan hai? mujhe is baare mein adhik jaankaari naheen hai at: aap hi upayukt tippani karein to kaarya sugam rahega.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 05:31, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Hello Bill, I am a Hindi speaking editor active on the English Wikipedia. I can't type in Hindi. Is there any way in which I can help the Hindi Wikipedia.--Skr15081997 (vaarta) 13:31, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

@Skr15081997: iske liye aap naaraayam aur devanaagari mein kaise tankan karein? prushthon ko dekho. yahaaain yadi kuchh samajhne mein samasya ho to bataayein.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 14:00, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi Bill! vikipeediya] par ek adbhut antarraashtreeya chunauti hai. maja mein shaamil hone ke liye dhanyavaad! main tum vahaaain dekheinge. mujhe lagta hai main tum ab tak pata naheen jaane diya maafi chaahata hooain; shaayad yeh 20 lekh likhne ke liye bahut der ho chuki hai? mera raashtra, vels, sanskruti se samruddh ek chhote se abhi tak puraane raashtra hai. kaavya football se jyaada mahatvapoorn hai, sangeet se bada aur adhik mahatvapoorn hai. hamaare agale darvaaje padosi ke liye bahut alag! mein shaamil hone ke liye dhanyavaad!

International Challenge - 20-20 Vision of Wales

There's a wonderful International Challenge on Wikipedia. Please join in the fun! I will see you there. I'm sorry I didn't let you know until now; maybe it is too late to write 20 articles? My nation, Wales, is a small yet old nation, rich in culture. Poetry is more important than football, music is more more important than larger. Very different to our next door neighbour! Please join in!

bill ji! uparokt lekh ka avlokan karein ismein aaj hi kisi vyakti ne apratyaashit roop se kaat-chhaaaint kar di hai. mainne ise poorvavat karna chaaha to likha aaya ki chhanani dvaara ise roka hua hai. aap chooainki ek saksham prabandhak hain at: is or tatkaal dhyaan dein. dhanyavaad! dau॰'kraant'ema॰aaela॰aavarma (vaarta) 13:32, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

namaste bill ji, krupaya apni vyastata se samay nikaalkar chaupaal par mere dvaara aarambh ki gayi charcha ka uttar dein. aapka uttar hi us samasya ka poorn samaadhaan de sakti hai. main mere prayaas karke haar chuka hooain.☆a★sanjeev Kumar (✉a✉) 01:11, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

billy mate i request you to please indulge in this now (you have kept quite for long) because this is serious....sanjeev has been asking me to prove that there is policy violation here by some users which i did again and again now i question you mate why turning a blind eye to all this mess.....once ok...twice forgiven....but this users are masters in doing this.......Sushilmishra (vaarta) 07:52, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

namaste bill ji, main jaanti hooain ki aap atyant vyaktigat vyastata ke daur se gujar rahe hain, kintu aapse vinmr nivedan hai ki krupaya apni vyastata se samay nikaalkar naalaapat baalamani amma aur noor inaayat Khan ke nirvaachit lekh parakh par apni tippani dein. aabhaari rahooaingi.--maala chaube^vaarta 13:37, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

namaskaar bill ji, mera naam abhilaash sharma hai tatha main vikeepediya ka nav aagantuk hooain. mujhe aapki sahaayata ki aavashyakta hai. mainein kuchh dinon pehle ek shri narasinh puraan naamak prushth ka nirmaan kiya tha, jiske liye main ek chitr ki talaash mein hooain tatha vah mujhako naheen mil rahi hai, at: aapse mera vinmr nivedan hai ki krupaya aap hi iske liye uchit chitr dhoondh kar ismein rakshit kar dein tatha mujhe soochit karein. aapka dhanyavaad. ~sharma ji ^vaartaalaap